Meet the Asian American woman breaking barriers in Las Vegas politics
[Source]
Francis Allen-Palenske, who made history as the first Asian American woman elected to both the Nevada state legislature and Las Vegas City Council, is working to ensure AAPI voices help shape the city's future.
Historic firsts: Allen-Palenske, who represents Ward 4, began her political journey at age 25 when she was first elected to the Nevada Assembly in 2004, becoming the first Asian American woman — and second Asian American, after Robert Wong — to serve in the position.
The lifelong Nevadan, born to a U.S. Army vet and a South Korean mother, served two terms in the Assembly before running for and being elected to the Las Vegas City Council in November 2022, again becoming the first Asian American woman for the role. Outside politics, she is a successful small business owner with more than 15 years of experience in the Capriotti's Sandwich Shop system.
Uplifting others: In a recent interview, Allen-Palenske reflected on her historic role with a focus on future leadership diversity. 'I'm tired of being first. I want to make sure there's an entire team of folks behind me to help lift the mantle,' she told KTNV. Last month, she acknowledged the diverse makeup of the current council, telling KLAS it includes 'three Latinas, an African American, a Jewish female and one Caucasian guy, and now a Korean.'
Trending on NextShark:
In terms of policy, the Republican official prioritizes public safety initiatives, supports locally owned businesses and encourages the next generation of AAPI leaders to pursue higher learning. 'Asian Americans, we love to focus on education — go to university, get that degree,' she said.
This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices.
Trending on NextShark:
Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community.
Subscribe here now!
Trending on NextShark:
Download the NextShark App:
Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Want to go behind the scenes of the Chronicle Opinion section? Check out our new newsletter
Wait, don't hit delete! Yes, this is still the Opinion Central newsletter. We're just rolling out a new format to offer readers more than a collection of links. I'm Harry Mok, and starting this week on Thursdays, I'll be your guide for content from the Chronicle's Opinion section. First, a little about me. I'm the Opinion section's assistant editor and a columnist. I help edit all the stories that appear in the section, and I'm the editor who receives all of the Letters to the Editor submissions from readers. I grew up in the Sacramento area on a farm that my parents, immigrants from China, started as the family business. I didn't appreciate much of my family's history until I got off the farm and went to college at San Jose State, where I majored in journalism. I knew that having a family farm that grew Chinese vegetables was unusual. At San Jose State, I took classes in Asian American history and literature, which gave me a better understanding of how my family fit, or didn't fit, into the American story. I'm glad I've been able to document and honor that history by writing about it. My career has taken me from California to New York and back, and to the Chronicle twice. I was a copy editor at the Chronicle from 1997 to 2002, and I returned in 2016. I've been with the Opinion section as assistant editor since 2021. I've lived in San Francisco since 1996 and in the Sunset District since 2004. Some readers might be familiar with my columns about the Sunset, including the recent debate over the closure of the Upper Great Highway to cars. With the new Thursday newsletter format, I want to give you insights into what you're reading and how it came to be. Sometimes, that could be going behind-the-scenes with staff columnists or contributors to talk about their pieces or an analysis of issues of the day. Other times, I might give newsletter readers the space to weigh in. The goal is to have a deeper discourse that gets people thinking. Then, maybe you'll want to send a letter to the editor. Or you'll be motivated to research a subject to bolster an opinion or offer your personal experience for an Open Forum submission. The Chronicle's Opinion section welcomes viewpoints from all perspectives about the challenges we face and the triumphs we celebrate, hit me up. Our submissions inbox is open, and I can be reached at hmok@
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
What My Six Decades in America Taught Me
I immigrated to America on June 6, 1965, from Taiwan, carrying with me big dreams and expectations, mingled with fears of the unknown. I was 17, and it was at the height of the Vietnam War. A year later, I enlisted in the Air Force and instead of being sent to the frontlines, I was deployed to England for three years to do aircraft maintenance. Coming home from military service, I saw an America that was full of opportunities. I spent a year working on Wall Street but was drawn to public service, which landed me in the New York City Department of City Planning as an economic development researcher. While in that job, I also moonlighted as a writer for a Chinese-language newspaper, where I noticed that many Asian American small businesses were confined to small ethnic enclaves, competing among themselves. Asian American professionals working for major corporations were trapped in their jobs and regarded as good workers but not managers. U.S. flags flying in the wind are pictured. U.S. flags flying in the wind are pictured. Getty Images The small businesses lacked political clout and unity, making it difficult to get the attention of the government for resources and support. Many of the professionals were short on social skills and further hampered by cultural barriers that prevented them from rising to leadership positions. And yet, it was a time of profound societal change. During the 1970s and 1980s, I witnessed America's convulsions: civil rights marches, Vietnam War protests, and the rise of technology. These influenced me to be involved in community, social and civic affairs, and to take actions to affect changes in my community. I wanted to expand Asian enterprises into broader markets and create opportunities with other communities. I wanted to raise the representation of Asian American professionals in corporate leadership. This became the catalyst for the work of the Asian American Business Development Center (AABDC), which I founded in 1994 to be a bridge between Asian American corporate professionals and entrepreneurs to the larger society and to foster better integration of Asian Americans into mainstream society by deepening mutual understanding and collaboration. For decades, I believed in the alchemy of participation—I showed up at city council meetings, lobbied for fair lending policies, drafted proposals for minority business grants, and sat on boards where I was the only Asian American. Together with like-minded allies across the color spectrum, we worked for better representation in corporate boardrooms, pushed for equitable access to capital, and created programs to help Asian-owned businesses expand beyond ethnic niches. For decades, we worked with the belief that America was slowly, painfully, but inevitably moving toward inclusion. And then—the backlash. Just as we began to see the fruits of our labor—more Asian American executives, more cross-cultural business partnerships, more recognition of our community's contributions—the political winds shifted. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), once framed as moral imperatives, were suddenly branded as divisive. Policies we championed were dismantled under the guise of "colorblindness," as if decades of exclusion could be erased by pretending race didn't matter. Politicians who once paid lip service to multiculturalism now stoked fears of Asian Americans as "perpetual foreigners" or threats to "American values" and even to national security. This is more than disappointment. But disappointment does not mean defeat. The AABDC's work continues, not because the path is easy, but because it is necessary. I have spent 60 years in this country—40 of them fighting for a seat at the table. I will not now, at this stage of my life, let that table be overturned. I know there are others from all corners of society who feel the same, but perhaps are being silenced by the winds of change. I'm far from my 17-year-old self. But I still have big dreams and expectations, and a belief that this is still a land of opportunity for everyone. We belonged then. We belong now. John Wang is the founder and president of the Asian American Business Development Center (AABDC), which promotes recognition of Asian American professionals, entrepreneurs, and business leaders. AABDC bridges cultures, drives economic opportunity, and connects U.S. and Asian businesses. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
As a Florida teacher, I must navigate education restrictions with integrity
As I prepare to teach a new literature course at Palm Beach State College (PBSC) this term, I find myself hesitating over something that, until recently, would have been routine: selecting the works I assign to my students. The anthology adopted by our department includes powerful selections from African American, Latino, Asian American and LGBTQ writers — voices that capture the richness, contradiction and struggle of the American experience. These are voices I have taught for decades. But now I ask myself: Am I allowed to? Florida's 2023 legislation — most notably, Senate Bill 266 — prohibits instruction that espouses theories suggesting systemic racism, sexism, or privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States and that they were created to maintain social or economic inequities. The language is broad, and the intent seems clear: to restrict the way educators discuss identity, history and power. But what is less clear is what this means in practice for teachers like me, particularly in college classrooms. I am a lifelong educator. I spent 36 years in the New York City Board of Education as a teacher, department chair and supervisor. For the last 12 years, I have taught English literature at PBSC. My passion has always been to encourage students to read deeply, think critically and reflect honestly — especially about the kind of country we live in and the lives we each bring to the table. That requires a broad and inclusive literary canon. It requires teaching James Baldwin and Langston Hughes not only for their artistry, but for the searing truths they offer about race and belonging in America. It means examining the cultural double-consciousness in Sandra Cisneros, the generational trauma in Ocean Vuong, the gender defiance in Audre Lorde. Literature becomes real when it speaks both to and through the student reading it. That is the essence of education. Opinion: Bipartisan support suggests better sex ed in FL schools. It's the opposite. But now, when I consider assigning those same texts, I worry: will presenting such works — even neutrally, even for discussion — be seen as violating this law? If I ask students to consider the historical roots of injustice in a work by August Wilson or Toni Cade Bambara, could that be construed as 'promoting a theory' rather than simply exposing students to a reality reflected in literature? Worse, the chilling effect has begun to erode the classroom itself. Faculty colleagues increasingly wonder whether they should self-censor — not out of agreement with the law, but out of a desire to avoid trouble. This is the real damage: when fear begins to replace curiosity, and when silence replaces speech. I do not seek to indoctrinate my students. I never have. I seek to challenge them, to open doors through literature that lead into the complicated, layered, and sometimes uncomfortable questions that make up life in a pluralistic democracy. That is not political. That is educational. Opinion: As a professor, I see how universities are failing. We need a new approach. Let us be clear: removing or discouraging the inclusion of marginalized voices in the classroom does not eliminate discomfort. It only eliminates understanding. If our students cannot engage with difficult truths in college classrooms, where are they to encounter them? If we cannot safely present a range of American experiences through our literary heritage, what remains of our intellectual freedom? I do not write this out of defiance, but out of love — for teaching, for literature and for the role education plays in shaping thoughtful citizens. The danger of this legislation is not only in its enforcement, but in its ambiguity. It turns teachers into second-guessers. It turns students into cautious bystanders. And it risks turning Florida's classrooms into places where only the most neutral, safest voices are heard. But the world is not neutral. Literature is not safe. And education, at its best, is a form of illumination, not erasure. Carmine Giordano is an adjunct lecturer in English at Palm Beach State College. He lives in Lake Worth Beach, and wrote this for The Palm Beach Post. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: FL law could silence Black, LGBTQ voices in the classroom | Opinion
