Authorities to take action for demolition of painter Abanindranath Tagore's heritage house
Bolpur Municipality Chairperson Parna Ghosh on Tuesday said that despite a notice served by the civic body on the present owner of the property named 'Awas' not to tinker with the construction in any way, the person engaged a real estate developer and razed down major parts of the building.
Santiniketan in West Benganl's Birbhum district comes under the Bolpur Municipality.
"We will protect whatever remains of 'Awas' are still there. We will take action against those who went ahead with the demolition ignoring the notice served by the municipality," Ghosh said.
Only the gate of the house, with the name 'Awas' inscribed on the still intact boundary wall, remains, according to a video clip of the demolished property, which went viral on social media.
Abanindranath, a nephew of Nobel laureate poet Rabindranath Tagore, used to stay in 'Awas' during his stay in Santiniketan.
The house was built at Santiniketan's Aban Pally, named after the painter who was appointed the second 'Acharya' of Visva Bharati university in 1942 after the death of Tagore in 1941. Visva-Bharati, set up by Tagore in 1921, was declared a central university and an institution of national importance by an Act of Parliament in 1951.
'Awas' changed hands afterwards.
Former acting vice-chancellor of Visva Bharati and ashramite Sabujkali Sen expressed dismay over the incident.
"We are saddened that a house associated with the memory of Abanindranath Tagore - and retaining certain unique features reflecting his works - has been mostly razed down. A part of history and heritage is thereby gone," she said.
Education Minister Bratya Basu, when told about the demolition of 'Awas', said he did not have much knowledge about the development.
"Abanindranath Tagore is our national pride. I am happy several of the houses - associated with his memory - are being preserved and maintained elsewhere. This includes a property in Konnagar, in Hooghly district which is being preserved by the local municipality,' said Basu who is also a theatre personality.
Abanindranath is also known for "Bharat Mata" , a painting he created in 1905, representing the nation as a four-armed goddess.
He also had a number of books on art to his credit. Besides, the stories he wrote for children were told so picturesquely that it was said, Abanindranath 'writes pictures'.
He died in 1951 at the age of 80 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
13 hours ago
- The Hindu
The ceding of academic freedom in universities
Everyone engaged in higher education recognises that academic freedom is primary because universities are the places for raising doubts and asking questions about everything. Exploring ideas, debating issues and thinking independently are essential in the quest for excellence. After all, knowledge develops only if we question existing knowledge. This means that students must have the freedom to ask questions just as faculty must have the freedom to question received wisdom in their respective disciplines. Indeed, universities, as institutions, must have the freedom to raise questions, express opinions or articulate criticisms in the wider context of economic, social and political spheres. In fact, the development of knowledge is central to university education. Students enter the world of higher education to learn. Understanding existing knowledge is a first step. The ability to ask relevant questions, a capacity to critique conventional wisdoms, and the confidence to resist the authority of the spoken — even printed — word are the next successive steps. Of course, learning is a continuous process that never stops. Thus, it is for universities to decide what is taught to students, which must not be controlled from elsewhere. There should be no restrictions on who is invited to address a student audience. Circumscribing this space, in any way, can only stifle learning, which, in turn, can hurt economic and social progress. The world of research needs similar freedoms. It is for universities to decide their research priorities. It is for faculty members to decide their research agenda. Of course, financial support for research must be based on peer review without preference or prejudice. Dissenting opinions or unorthodox thinking, irrespective of disciplines, should be encouraged for that is how knowledge develops. In fact, fundamental research needs far more in terms of not only freedoms but also resources and time. Such an environment is essential for brilliant scholars or thinkers to surface, blossom and flourish. The disturbing reality in India The unfolding reality in India is disturbing. Curricula are regulated and straitjacketed. Readings are prescribed. Indeed, what is excluded or what is included in prescribed reading lists is decided elsewhere, not necessarily by the teachers. Some readings are explicitly excluded. Promising research, which departs from the mainstream, particularly in social sciences or humanities, is stifled. Research funding is controlled, directly or indirectly, by the central government through its research councils and departments. In this milieu, fundamental research in universities in India is rare if not impossible. It is no accident that our universities have not produced any Nobel laureates. Even the freedom for students and teachers to organise discussions or debates on campus, which are perceived as critical of the Bharatiya Janata Party or its governments at the Centre and in States where it rules, is circumscribed everywhere, often by administrative fiat or penal action. Freedoms are curbed further, as social media posts sometimes lead to disciplinary action by universities or legal action by governments. At many central Universities, if a faculty member applies for duty leave to participate in a conference abroad, he/she has to provide a written undertaking which says: 'I will not participate in any anti-Government activities…while I am abroad whether on official duty or a personal visit, I shall be subject to all the provisions of Government Servants Conduct Rules including those relating to connection with the press and criticism of Government…Further I understand that… any breach of these provisions whether committed in India or abroad shall render me equally liable to disciplinary action.' Such intrusion, in different forms, is now being extended to private universities. Dissenting or critical voices of students or faculty members are silenced with disciplinary action. In some cases, it goes much further, essentially because risk averse promoters fall in line, since they do not wish to displease or antagonise the central government, or the State governments where their universities are located. Autonomy and accountability Just as important, the autonomy of university spaces is also sacrosanct in the wider context of political democracy, where universities perform an important role in addition to imparting higher education. In the economy, they are a source of ideas for science, technology, research and development, innovation, and economic or social policies. In society, they are the conscience-keepers as public intellectuals, from among the faculty, who engage with the public domain, informing citizens in their columns or lectures. In the polity, their evaluation or assessment of the performance of governments fosters accountability. Of course, this autonomy must have a corresponding accountability. But it is essential for governments to recognise that the provision of resources to universities does not endow them with a right to exercise control. The resources are public money for public universities, which are accountable to students and society through institutional mechanisms that exist or can be created. For this purpose, it is imperative that structures of governance in universities are appropriate for, and conducive to, accountability. Good governance is necessary but not sufficient. There must also be checks and balances in the public domain. Rankings of universities perform an important role in this context. Such rankings, despite their limitations, provide students, their parents and society at large, such an institutional mechanism for accountability. It is absolutely essential that regulatory structures provide complete autonomy — administrative, financial and academic — to universities. Liberation from the shackles of the University Grants Commission is a necessary condition. The existing parliamentary or legislative acts that created our universities also have many constraints and fetters. Thus, as an approach, it would be far better to reform regulatory structures, provide autonomy to universities and ensure accountability through systems — rather than interventions or controls — to create an environment that encourages freedom of thought and is conducive to learning. The quest for uniformity is the worst enemy of thinking, creativity, understanding and knowledge, which can thrive only in open societies. One-size-fits-all is a flawed presumption. Indeed, diversity and differentiation are an integral part of the quest for excellence in higher education. Governments and their quest to control Academic freedom in universities is circumscribed not only in India but also in countries such as Argentina, Hungary and Türkiye which have democratically elected governments. Of course, academic freedom is highly restricted in countries that are ruled by dictators in Africa and Asia. It is also curbed in countries that have one-party rule, for example, China, Russia and Vietnam. China is somewhat different. Even if the freedom for academics — especially in the social sciences and humanities — to write or to speak in the public domain is highly restricted, there is no compromise, driven by preference or prejudice, in the quality of academic appointments at leading universities and research institutions. The real surprise is the United States, where academic freedom in universities has been sacrosanct for more than a century. The federal government of U.S. President Donald Trump is slashing research grants and imposing curbs on its leading public universities. If this continues, the leading edge of American universities in education, research, science, technology and innovation is bound to erode. Governments seek to control universities essentially because they are worried about criticism or dissent. Just as important, there is a sense of discomfiture, if not insecurity, since universities, empowered by academic freedom, ask questions that are perceived as difficult. Of course, in some countries, governments just want ideological conformity. Most universities cede their autonomous space because they are largely dependent on government grants to support their teaching and research. The reasons why academics, as individuals, are often silenced are because of fear or compromise, while a few are willing to trade their beliefs for rewards. The moral of the story is simple. The absence of academic freedom in universities will inevitably harm the teaching-learning process just as it will stifle thinking and creativity in research. Students and teachers will obviously be the worse-off. Ultimately, however, the economy, society and polity will be the losers. Deepak Nayyar is an economist, Professor Emeritus at the Jawaharlal Nehru University, and former Vice-Chancellor, University of Delhi
News18
19 hours ago
- News18
This Island Led To Sheikh Hasina's Exile From Bangladesh. Now Reports Say It Could Go To The US
Last Updated: Sheikh Hasina, ousted as Bangladesh's PM, claims US pressure for a military base on St Martin Island led to her exile. Nobel laureate Yunus' interim government may hand it over. It has been over a year since Sheikh Hasina was ousted as Prime Minister of Bangladesh and fled to India by helicopter, where she has remained in political exile. The dramatic exit followed a rebellion in Dhaka that Hasina claimed was orchestrated by the United States. According to her, the US' pressure to allow a military base on one of Bangladesh's islands, a request she said she refused, was the real reason for her removal from office. The island in question, St Martin, has long been off-limits to visitors due to its sensitive location. In the days following Hasina's flight to India, it was at the centre of heated political debate. Now, reports suggest the interim government led by Nobel laureate Mohammad Yunus could be preparing to hand over control of the island to the US, though no official confirmation has been made. Known in Bengali as 'Narikel Jinjira' or 'Daruchini Dweep', St Martin Island is a small, 3-square-kilometre coral island in the northeast Bay of Bengal, close to the Myanmar border. Its location gives it immense strategic value. Hasina has repeatedly claimed that US interest in establishing a military base there was part of a wider Indo-Pacific strategy to counter China's influence. In 2023, she said, 'I could have stayed in power if I had leased the island," but insisted she would not 'sell the country's assets". The US denied the allegations. The island's history stretches back over 5,000 years. Once part of the Teknaf Peninsula, it became separated due to rising sea levels. Arab traders settled there in the 18th century, calling it 'Jazeera'. Under British rule in 1900, it was named after a local administrator, Deputy Commissioner Martin. The territory later became part of Pakistan after the 1947 partition, and then joined Bangladesh following the 1971 Liberation War. A 1974 agreement between Bangladesh and Myanmar affirmed its Bangladeshi ownership, a stance upheld by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Today, St Martin is home to roughly 6,000 fishing families and is a hub for tourism from October to April, attracting about 10,000 visitors daily in peak season. It boasts 153 species of seaweed, 66 types of coral, 240 species of fish, 120 bird species, and 29 types of reptiles. In 2022, it was declared a marine protected area. Despite its ecological richness, the island's geopolitical weight is what fuels international interest. Its proximity to Myanmar puts it near the ongoing Rohingya crisis and along key maritime routes. Control over St Martin would allow the monitoring of the Strait of Malacca, a chokepoint through which around 80 percent of China's energy imports pass, and could influence stability in the north-eastern part of India. As of August 12, 2025, St Martin remains fully under Bangladeshi sovereignty. No American military base has been built, and no official agreement for transfer exists. However, speculation persists that Yunus' interim government may offer the US not only the island but also the Chittagong port and a corridor to Myanmar's Rakhine state in an effort to strengthen ties with Washington. The government has not confirmed these claims. Currently, civilian access to St Martin is restricted, officially due to heightened tensions with Myanmar. Some local reports allege that the restrictions are part of a 'master plan" to relocate residents ahead of potential foreign military use. Bangladesh is home to anywhere from 700 to over 1,000 islands, depending on the source, with some estimates, counting seasonal sandbars, reaching up to 7,000. The largest, Bhola, spans about 3,402 square kilometres and has a population of 17 lakh. Other inhabited islands include Nijhum, Hatiya, Sandwip, Manpura, and Maheshkhali. St Martin, despite its size, remains the most internationally watched. view comments Location : Bangladesh First Published: August 13, 2025, 18:01 IST News world This Island Led To Sheikh Hasina's Exile From Bangladesh. Now Reports Say It Could Go To The US Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
21 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's Pakistan prem decoded: From crypto, crude to ego massage, here's what's drawing him towards Asim Munir
US President Donald Trump's growing warmth towards Pakistan is raising eyebrows in New Delhi. From first-ever US crude shipments and crypto deals to a Nobel nomination, his moves suggest more than routine diplomacy. Analysts say it's not just about energy or tech — there's a mix of trade, rare earths, and military cooperation shaping Washington's approach, with Pakistan's army taking centre stage. Trump has repeatedly credited himself with preventing a potential war between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, praised Pakistan's military leaders, and backed trade deals that mark Islamabad's first US crude oil imports. While Pakistan welcomes his style, some in India see economic, strategic, and political motives behind the US pivot. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program First-ever US crude shipment to Pakistan Pakistan is set to receive its first US crude oil shipment later this year after Trump announced a trade deal with Islamabad. He also promised that Washington would help Pakistan develop 'massive oil reserves.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo The deal followed discussions that began in April, after Trump hinted at a 29% tariff on Pakistani imports. Pakistan's largest refinery, Cnergyico, signed a contract with Vitol to import one million barrels of American crude. Vice chairman Usama Qureshi told Reuters that oil is Pakistan's top import, valued at $11.3 billion for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, about one-fifth of total imports. Crypto tie-up with Trump-linked firm In April, just five days after the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 tourists, Pakistan signed a preliminary deal with World Liberty Financial, a decentralised finance company 60% owned by the Trump family, to boost blockchain technology. Live Events You Might Also Like: On US soil, Pakistan's Asim Munir threatens to nuke and take half the world down The Dawn reported that a World Liberty delegation met Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and army chief General Asim Munir to formalise a 'Letter of Intent… to accelerate blockchain innovation, stablecoin adoption and decentralised finance integration across Pakistan.' Trump is listed as 'Chief Crypto Advocate', Eric and Donald Jr as 'Web3 Ambassadors', and Barron Trump as 'DeFi Visionary'. Pakistan nominates Trump for Nobel Pakistan has nominated Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, praising his 'decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' in easing tensions with India. Trump said: 'I should have gotten it four or five times. They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals.' India has rejected the claim that Trump was responsible for the ceasefire after the Pahalgam attack. Trump responded: 'Well, I stopped a war… I love Pakistan. I think Modi is a fantastic man… But I stopped the war between Pakistan and India.' You Might Also Like: Tariffs, phone calls and power plays: How two lobbyists are shaping US-India-Pakistan relations Trump is also set to meet Pakistan's army chief for a White House lunch following the nomination. Strategic interest in minerals and rare earths The Washington Post reports that US officials are eyeing Pakistan's untapped rare earth minerals, vital for electronics and defence. Rising tensions with China, the main supplier, make Islamabad an attractive alternative. US officials attended the Pakistan Minerals Investment Forum in April. China is building a 2,000-mile transport network linking northern Pakistan to a southern port, but insurgent violence in Baluchistan and Taliban activity in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa threaten the projects. Baluch separatists recently attacked mining trucks, warning anyone 'involved in the looting of Baloch national resources' would be targeted. US labels Baloch insurgents as terrorists On Monday, the US designated the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and its Majeed Brigade as Foreign Terrorist Organisations. The BLA claimed several attacks, including the March 2025 hijacking of the Jaffar Express train that killed 31. The move aligns with the Trump administration's stated aim of 'countering terrorism.' It follows General Munir's June White House lunch, a rare honour for a Pakistani military chief without civilian leaders present. US military praises Pakistan's cooperation General Michael Kurilla, head of US Central Command, told Congress that Pakistan is a 'phenomenal partner' in counter-terrorism. He highlighted the extradition of terrorists who attacked US interests and praised General Munir for capturing Mohammad Sharifullah, mastermind of the 2021 Kabul airport attack. Kurilla's remarks point out Pakistan's selective cooperation — handing over terrorists to the US but rejecting India's requests. Indian MPs visiting Washington noted that major terrorists targeting the US, like Osama bin Laden and Ramzi Yousef, were captured in Pakistan. Munir's US visits spark protests General Munir visited the US twice in two months, attending Kurilla's retirement ceremony and previously meeting Trump privately at the White House, where the US president credited him with averting a 'nuclear war' with India. Protests followed his visits, with supporters of jailed former PM Imran Khan accusing the military of suppressing democracy. Demonstrators outside Washington and New York called Munir a 'dictator' and 'fraud.' Despite the criticism, the Trump administration continues to court Pakistan's military, discussing trade, rare earths, and technology, raising concerns about bypassing civilian leaders in Islamabad.
