James Gunn Doesn't Want You to Trust Anything About ‘The Batman Part II' Until It Comes From Him
Gunn put his foot down regarding the speculation surrounding the inclusion of Robin in the script for director Matt Reeves and co-writer Mattson Tomlin's highly anticipated sequel, The Batman Part II, starring Robert Pattinson. This clarification came today in a reply on Threads to a post from a verified DC fan account. Gunn explicitly addressed the rumors, writing the following:
'Guys please stop believing this nonsense. I think six of us have read the script. No one knows anything about the Batman 2.'
Gunn's proactive approach to shutting down rumors before they are mistaken for professional wrestling-style behind-the-scenes truths is one of his more unique qualities since becoming head of DC back in 2022. Divorced from his numerous media tour interviews for projects like Peacemaker, Creature Commandos, and Superman, DC fans will routinely find Gunn in the replies of seemingly random posts to either give more color to a behind-the-scenes detail about a project or to shut down a rumor with his titular preface, 'Nope.' Other times, he's cheekily not provided enough information on his posts, as was the case with the Easter egg-filled Hall of Justice Mural from Superman seen a couple of weeks ago.
While certainly not on the same level, Gunn's social media presence during media tours makes him someone worth following, much like Geoff Keighley, the creator of the Game Awards. In addition to hosting Summer Game Fest and providing commentary on topics related to gaming—such as explaining to Fox News why the sexual themes in Mass Effect aren't worth Satanic panic—Keighley has significantly increased his social media activity on both his personal and Game Awards accounts. While Keighley has indeed fallen short on addressing industry facing issues with his platform, his accounts doubling as a newswire are close to what Gunn is doing with his social media (only trade Muppets and Hideo Kojima oomfie posts with behind the scene set videos and clips of Gunn's dog, Ozu).
Keighley's posts help disseminate information quickly, but they also position him as a central hub for updates on significant developments in the industry. Gunn's approach to social media reflects this same strategy. Given that he has creative input and authority over all matters related to DC, his becoming a de facto source for breaking news (some of which is ostensibly aggregated from his social media posts) is a no-brainer.
The significant aspect of this whole first-world phenomenon is that Gunn's position as an accessible mouthpiece for all things DC is unique compared to how other studio heads operate. Fans don't see studio heads like Kathleen Kennedy or Kevin Feige jumping on an Instagram story or BlueSky post to tell fans to 'stop listening to these rumors' about Star Wars or Marvel. Similarly, studio heads don't expect fans to attend quarterly earnings meetings to gain insight into the status or studio backing of a new project.
Gunn's constant online presence as a source for most things DC—filtering out truth from fiction—is something uniquely his. As annoying as it may be for him to take breaks from writing scripts to reassure fans, it's a distinctive approach that sets him apart from others in the industry. However, any alternative would be preferable to David Zaslav attempting to explain all the changes and shake-ups at Warner Bros. and why shows are no longer on HBO Max in a tweet for all affected parties.
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
🔴 MLS LIVE: Three games underway as Miami travel to Orlando later
A reminder of tonight's fixtures:2025-08-10T22:07:22Z Who do you have coming out on top tonight? Let us know in the comments below. 2025-08-10T21:47:14Z Saturday night's action saw LAFC welcome new signing Son Heung-Min to the pitch. Check out every moment of his debut. 2025-08-10T21:45:19Z A reminder of tonight's fixtures:2025-08-10T21:41:53Z We're back with more Major League Soccer action this Sunday with a nice five matches on the schedule. Follow all the action here with us.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liam Neeson Goes Viral for His Unexpected Answer to ‘What Is a Labubu?'
The colorful, collectible monster toys are one of the biggest pop culture crazes of the momentNEED TO KNOW Liam Neeson was asked what a Labubu is in a new interview, and his hilarious response has gone viral 'Can you eat it?' a puzzled Neeson wondered The collectible monster toys have been popping up everywhere, and boast a number of celebrity fans, including Kim Kardashian, Rihanna and David BeckhamLiam Neeson is nothing but puzzled by one of the biggest pop culture crazes of the moment. During a recent interview with Fox News, the 73-year-old actor was shown a photo of a Labubu toy and was asked what it was. 'I have no clue. No,' a baffled Neeson quickly replied, shaking his head. 'Seriously, I don't know.' When he was told that the photo featured a Labubu, the Naked Gun star continued to appear completely bewildered. 'Okay,' he then said. 'It's a fluffy doll. Or, can you eat it?' While Neeson may not be part of the Labubu fan club, the toys are a viral phenomenon around the world. A number of celebrities have even gotten in on the craze, including BLACKPINK's Lisa, Kim Kardashian, Rihanna, Dua Lipa and David Beckham. Created by Hong Kong artist Kasing Lung, Labubus are sold by Pop Mart, which describes the toys as being "a devilish but cute monster with pointed ears, a charmingly mischievous smile, and very sharp teeth." The colorful, collectible dolls, which are often sold in blind bags, can be hooked to purses and bags as quirky accessories and charms. Aside from his hilarious response to his first encounter with Labubus, Neeson has been making headlines recently for his romance with his Naked Gun costar, Pamela Anderson. PEOPLE first confirmed that the two were dating in July, with a source revealing that their relationship was "in the early stages." "It's sincere, and it's clear they're smitten with each other," the insider said. Since going public with their romance, the pair have been showered with support from family and friends. Neeson's 28-year-old son, Daniel, gave his stamp of approval when his dad and Anderson, 58, made a joint appearance on Watch What Happens Live with Andy Cohen on Aug. 3. After host Andy Cohen told the two stars, "I do just want to say, as a very old friend of yours, all of your friends are very much stanning this relationship, as the kids say," he shouted out Daniel, who was sitting in the studio audience. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "Right, Danny?" Cohen asked, to which Daniel replied, "Yes!" with a big smile. Jamie Lee Curtis got choked up in an interview with VT earlier this month as she shared her hope that Anderson, her costar in The Last Showgirl, has found love with Neeson. "If love has found [its] way into that relationship, God bless them both," she said. "Because both of them have had hardship, and they're both beautiful human beings. And if they actually have found an intimate love with each other, we should all go to bed tonight feeling better." Doug Mand, who co-wrote The Naked Gun reboot, told The Hollywood Reporter he's "pulling for the two of them in a big way," as he recalled how Neeson and Anderson had "immediate chemistry" on the movie's set. 'They liked each other. You only dream that your two costars are connecting on that level,' he told the outlet in an interview published on Aug. 5. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CEO Bob Iger Announces Joint Hulu and Disney+ Streaming Service. What Does It Mean for Investors?
Key Points Hulu is to be absorbed into Disney+ by the end of this year. Also, Disney will no longer be updating subscriber counts for any of its streaming services. Wednesday's resulting setback in Disney stock provides a buying opportunity. 10 stocks we like better than Walt Disney › It's official. The Walt Disney Company's (NYSE: DIS) stand-alone streaming service Hulu is going of. The company announced on Wednesday that Hulu will soon be fully integrated into Disney+, although it will still be its own category within the Disney+ menu. Hulu will also replace Star in the international version of Disney+. That's not the detail that interested investors will care the most about, however. Even more noteworthy is the fact that Disney will no longer be reporting the number of streaming subscribers for either service, or how much revenue these accounts generate every month. The decision removes two of the most closely watched metrics that investors are currently using to gauge the health of the company's increasingly important streaming business. Here's what you need to know about all of it. Another (mostly) solid quarter As a recap, The Walt Disney Company turned $23.7 billion worth of revenue into an adjusted per-share profit of $1.61 for its fiscal third quarter of 2025, which ended in June. The bottom line was up from the year-ago comparison of $1.39, and handily topped expectations for earnings of $1.47 per share. The top line, though -- while 2% better than sales in fiscal Q3 2024 -- fell just a bit short of analysts' estimates, sending shares lower as a result. Blame the company's cable television arm, mostly. Linear network revenue slipped 15% (with most of the setback stemming from Disney's international TV business), dragging cable TV's operating income down 28% year over year. Theme parks, films, and sports ventures, in contrast, did pretty well given the challenging economic environment. And Disney's streaming division? It's doing pretty well too. Its revenue grew 6% year over year to nearly $6.2 billion, leading to an operating profit of $346 million versus the slight loss reported for the same quarter of 2024. This extends a healthy streak of slow but persistent progress: The company's direct-to-consumer arm added another 1.4 million Disney+ subscribers to the fold last quarter as well, with 1 million of them signing up for the U.S.-Canada platform. Hulu added 1.3 million streaming subscribers of its own, although it also lost a couple of hundred thousand subscribers to Hulu's live-TV service. And again, this extends tepid but long-established growth trends: This is the next-to-last time, however, the chart immediately above will be able to be updated. No more subscriber metrics It's true. As CEO Bob Iger noted in his executive commentary published along with Wednesday's earnings report, "We believe quarterly updates on the number of paid subscribers and ARPU [average revenue per user] have become less meaningful to evaluating the performance of our businesses, and we will no longer report these metrics starting with the first quarter of fiscal 2026 [beginning in October] for Disney+ and Hulu." The company will, however, continue to share information about its streaming business's overall profitability. Iger explains: "We believe our reporting going forward will better align with changes in the media landscape, the unique nature of our integrated assets, [and] how we operate our businesses, and will reflect how management evaluates the progress and success of our strategic initiatives." If it sounds like CEO prattle, though, that's because it arguably is. Don't misunderstand. At least in some ways the decision does "align with changes in the media landscape." Early last year streaming rival Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) made the same decision to stop disclosing its subscriber counts and ARPU (as of the beginning of this year), aiming -- as Disney is now -- to put the focus on more meaningful metrics like revenue and profitability. Like Netflix's then, the timing of Disney's decision suspiciously coincides with a measurable slowing of its streaming business's subscriber growth, removing two of the more-watched measures of the entertainment giant's progress when investors need them the most. Perhaps at least some of Wednesday's setback was the result of waning transparency, and wasn't just in response to the company's revenue shortfall. Opportunity knocks So what does this mean for investors? The market was largely prepared for the fold-in of Hulu into Disney+ already. The possibility was first floated several quarters ago, and making Hulu's content available to its subscribers from within the Disney+ app early last year was an obvious step in this direction. Combining the two services into a single one now -- with a single payment -- isn't exactly a big leap, technological or otherwise. As for its impact on marketability, although the combo isn't any more marketable, it isn't less marketable either; the cost of subscribing to both is only between $1 and $4 more per month, depending on your plan. Indeed, in light of the media company's relatively new focus on monetizing both streaming services' content by injecting advertisements into its programming, anything that makes it easier to watch any of Disney's streaming content is a win for this fast-growing business. Adding Hulu to Disney+ at least does that. It will also just be cheaper to manage one content stack rather than two different ones, which is another modest win for The Walt Disney Company. But the decision to not share a couple of key customer metrics that investors had grown accustomed to seeing? Sure, that's a sticking point for some current and would-be maybe not as much of one as you might think. Netflix's shares also initially stumbled in response to word that it would no longer be reporting subscriber numbers, but its stock has more than doubled since that April 2024 low, reaching record highs in June. Investors mostly just want to see strong top and bottom lines, which Hulu and Disney+ can certainly team up to deliver. Data from streaming-market research outfit JustWatch indicates that, when combined, Hulu and Disney+ are collectively just as watched within the U.S. as Netflix, as well as Amazon's Prime. They were also two of only three streaming platforms to gain U.S. viewing time during the second quarter of this year (with the third being Max). So, this pairing should hit the ground running. Let's also not forget that the entirety of Disney's direct-to-consumer business still only makes up about one-fourth of its total revenue. Whether its streaming arm thrives, flops, or something in between, almost all of its other ventures are doing just fine anyway. More to the point, there's nothing about the Hulu-Disney+ decision, or last quarter's results, that's a reason to steer clear of the stock. In fact, since it's already down from its early-July peak, Wednesday's setback is arguably a great opportunity to step into very ownable Disney shares. The analyst community thinks so, anyway. The vast majority of them currently rate Disney stock as a strong buy, with a consensus price target of $135.12 that's 17% above the ticker's present price. Should you invest $1,000 in Walt Disney right now? Before you buy stock in Walt Disney, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Walt Disney wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Netflix, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. CEO Bob Iger Announces Joint Hulu and Disney+ Streaming Service. What Does It Mean for Investors? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
