How much would a 100% 'Made in the USA' vehicle cost? It's complicated
A 2025 Ford Expedition with bronze trim at the automaker's Kentucky Truck Plant, April 30, 2025.
Michael Wayland | CNBC
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A white 2025 Ford Expedition SUV with bronze exterior trim rolled off the assembly line at Ford Motor 's Kentucky Truck Plant. It was assembled — from its frame to completion — by American workers at the factory. But it's far from being completely 'Made in the USA.'
A majority of its main parts — at least 58% as stated on a window sticker — were made outside the country, including 22% from Mexico. That includes its Ford-engineered, 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V-6 Ecoboost engine, the heart of the vehicle.
The popular large SUV is a prime example of how complicated the global automotive supply chain is, and underscores the reality that even vehicles rolling off U.S. assembly lines from quintessentially American companies such as Ford can rely heavily on nondomestic content.
The massive Kentucky assembly plant, which has more than 9,000 people building the Expedition, F-Series pickup trucks and Lincoln Navigator SUV, is exactly the kind of facility President Donald Trump is pressuring automakers to build in the U.S. through his use of aggressive tariffs.
After Trump put 25% tariffs on imported vehicles and many automotive parts, automakers started scrambling to tout U.S. investments and localize supply chains as much as possible. But while the country would benefit from jobs and economic output if all auto parts were sourced and manufactured in the U.S., experts say it's just not feasible.
'Some parts that have been offshored will still be cheaper to manufacture in those locations rather than the USA at scale even with some of the imposed tariffs,' said Martin French, a longtime supplier executive and partner at Berylls Strategy Advisors USA.
Processing and production plants for things such as steel, aluminum and semiconductor chips, especially older ones used for autos, as well as raw materials such as platinum and palladium, aren't prevalent enough in the U.S. without establishing new plants or mines. Those are processes experts say would take a decade or more to create at scale.
On top of that, the increased costs of a 100% U.S.-made vehicle could price many consumers out of the new vehicle market. That could in turn lead to less demand and likely lower production.
'We can move everything to the U.S., but if every Ford is $50,000, we're not going to win as a company,' Ford CEO Jim Farley said last week on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'That's a balancing act that every [automaker] will have to do, even the most American company.'
Farley said 15% to 20% of commoditized vehicle parts are difficult, if not impossible, to source currently in the U.S. That includes things such as small fasteners, labor-intensive wiring harnesses and almost $5,000 in semiconductors per vehicle, which are currently sourced largely from Asia.
S&P Global Mobility reports there are on average 20,000 parts in a vehicle when it's torn down to its nuts and bolts. Parts may originate in anywhere from 50 to 120 countries.
For example, the Ford F-150, which shares a platform and some parts with the Expedition, is exclusively assembled in the U.S. but has roughly 2,700 main billable parts, which exclude many small pieces, according to Caresoft, an engineering benchmarking and consulting firm.
The Trump administration could ease higher prices for an American-made vehicle by offering tax breaks or consumer incentives, much like the electric vehicle credit of up to $7,500 that Trump previously promised to eliminate.
But the costs of a 100% American-made vehicle are far greater and more complex than they might seem at first blush. It's even hard to track what comes from the U.S., as automakers are required to report a combined percentage of Canadian and U.S. content in a vehicle, not just U.S. content.
The material costs alone, excluding manufacturing investments, would add thousands of dollars to a vehicle's price point, which would wipe out profits for automakers and force price increases for consumers, several automotive analysts and executives told CNBC.
The people, who were given anonymity so they could speak freely, estimated it would add thousands of dollars with each step you took to get closer to 100% U.S. and Canadian parts. 100% U.S.-made vehicle
Mark Wakefield, a partner and global automotive market lead at consulting firm AlixPartners, said nothing's impossible with time, but the investment needed for U.S. and Canadian sourcing and added costs would increase exponentially the closer a company came to a 100% 'Made in the USA' vehicle.
'The cost gets quantumly more … the closer you get to 100%,' Wakefield said. 'Getting above 90% gets expensive, and getting about 95% would get really expensive, and you just start getting into things that you'd have to take a long time [to do].'
A worker at Ford's Kentucky Truck Plant on April 30, 2025.
Michael Wayland | CNBC
To get that last 5% to 10%, if, or when, you could, Wakefield said, would start 'getting really expensive' and likely take a decade or more to set up raw material sourcing and reshore production of some parts.
'I don't think you could do it more than about 95% on average, at any cost, at the moment, just because you need to build a lot of stuff that's going to take a long time,' he said. 'The processing and the raw material stuff, it takes a really long time, because those are multibillion-dollar facilities that process it.'
Two executives at auto suppliers told CNBC it would be 'unrealistic,' if not impossible, for a company to profitably build a 100% U.S.-made vehicle at this time. Another executive at an automaker estimated the average cost increase for an American-assembled U.S. full-size pickup would jump at least $7,000 to source as many components as currently possible from the U.S. and Canada.
One expert, generalizing the costs, said it could cost $5,000 more to get a vehicle that's currently under 70% U.S./Canadian parts to 75% or 80%; another $5,000 to $10,000 to hit 90%; and thousands more to a higher percentage than that.
The average transaction price of a new vehicle in the U.S. is currently around $48,000, according to Cox Automotive. Say that vehicle is made of $30,000 in materials and parts. Adding the above costs, it would come out to roughly $10,000 to $20,000 more for companies.
Cars.com reports the U.S. is by far the most expensive country to manufacture a vehicle in. The average new-car price of a U.S.-assembled vehicle is more than $53,200, according to its data. That compares with roughly $40,700 in Mexico, $46,148 in Canada and roughly $51,000 in China.
Excluding raw materials, someone could theoretically start a new car company — let's call it U.S. Motors — from scratch. U.S. Motors could spend billions of dollars to build new factories and establish an exclusively American supply chain, but the vehicle it would produce would likely be low-volume and excessively expensive, experts say.
Think of Ferrari : Every car from the iconic automaker comes from Italy, with as many components as possible sourced from the company's homeland.
But even Ferrari's multimillion-dollar sports cars have parts or raw materials for things such as airbags, brakes, tires, batteries and more that come from non-Italian suppliers and facilities.
'If you did it at really low volume and you're extremely innovative and different with the vehicle, you could make $300,000-$400,000 vehicles that are all-American,' Wakefield said. 'To do it at scale, it would be 10-15 [years] and $100 billion to do that.' What's more realistic?
Getting vehicles to 75% U.S. and Canadian parts and final assembly in the U.S. is a far more achievable target that 'doesn't really force you to do uneconomic things,' Wakefield said, noting that a few vehicles meet that standard today.
But even reaching that threshold on a larger scale would likely take billions of dollars in new investments from automakers and suppliers to localize production. Some automakers could make the move more easily, while others would require massive shifts in sourcing and production.
Vehicles that meet the 75% U.S./Canada parts standard for the 2025 model year include the Kia EV6, two versions of the Tesla Model 3 and the Honda Ridgeline AWD Trail Sport, according to the latest vehicle content data required by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Nearly 20 others are at 70% or higher, while some vehicles still need to be added to the data. Read More Nothing Redeems Crypto
That compares with 2007 model-year NHTSA data, where the top 16 vehicles — all from GM and Ford — had 90% or more U.S. and Canadian content. Ford's Expedition at that time was among the highest at 95%, but that was before the expanded globalization of the auto industry supply chain after the Great Recession — and before several major technological advances in cars made new parts and materials more important.
For decades, there has been a trend for less U.S./Canadian content because of the globalization of supply chains and the increase in the use of Mexico as a source of parts and components, according to American University's Kogod School of Business.
The top 10 vehicles with the most U.S. and Canadian parts on average have 63.6% to 69.2% parts content from those countries from the 2019 through 2024 model years, according to Cars.com.
Imported vehicles from many luxury brands, specifically German manufacturers as well as Toyota's Lexus, feature little U.S.-sourced content. Many have none or 1%, according to the federal data.
The U.S./Canada percentages, under the American Automobile Labeling Act of 1992, are calculated on a 'carline' basis rather than for each individual vehicle and may be rounded to the nearest 5%. They are calculated by automakers and reported to the government.
However, a high threshold of North American parts doesn't mean the vehicles are produced in the U.S. The 2024 Toyota RAV4, for example, was reported to have 70% U.S./Canadian parts and is built in Canada.
'You could have a vehicle, theoretically, that is made in the U.S., but only has 1% parts, content,' said Patrick Masterson, lead researcher for Cars.com's 'American-Made Index.'
Cars.com's annual index of the top U.S. vehicles takes vehicle assembly, parts and other factors into account. No vehicles from Ford or General Motors made the top 10, while two Teslas, two Hondas and a Volkswagen took the top five spots.
The study ranks 100 vehicles judged through the same five criteria it's used since the 2020 edition: assembly location, parts content, engine origin, transmission origin and U.S. manufacturing workforce. More than 400 vehicles of model-year 2024 vintage were analyzed to qualify the 100 vehicles on the list.
The white 2025 Ford Expedition that recently rolled off the assembly line in Kentucky is expected to score higher than the prior model year, which ranked 78th, because of an increase in domestic content.
Masterson said there's been increased interest and popularity for the 'American-Made Index' this year amid Trump's tariff policies and nationalism.
'Traffic on the 'American-Made Index' this year is way, way up. … People are concerned about this, perhaps more than ever,' Masterson said, later adding 'it would be extremely difficult to make a 100% U.S.-made [vehicle].'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
6 minutes ago
- CNBC
The latest CPI report showed some softening in inflation. What investors are saying
Wall Street got a favorable inflation report on Wednesday, giving equities a boost. The consumer price index rose 0.1% in May , slightly less than the 0.2% increase economists polled by Dow Jones anticipated. So-called core CPI, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, increased by 0.1% — also less than expected. Stocks reacted positively, with S & P 500 futures erasing an earlier decline to trade about 0.2% higher. Some investors noted continued uncertainty around the Federal Reserve's interest rate outlook, despite the latest price report. Here's how some investors, economists and strategists reacted to the news: Chris Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBonds: "Net, net, the inflation shock wave from more costly imported goods has yet to arrive on American shores. Today's consumer inflation report is a real head-scratcher for economists as they ponder why the trade war hasn't set off another inflation outbreak yet with core goods prices sitting on store shelves seeing no change in May." Alexandra Wilson-Elizondo, global co-CIO of multi-asset Solutions at Goldman Sachs Asset Management: "Inflation in May was lower than anticipated, suggesting the tariffs aren't having a large immediate impact because companies have been using existing inventories or slowly adjusting prices due to uncertain demand. While we might see some price increases on goods later, service prices are expected to remain stable, suggesting any rise in inflation is likely to be temporary." Ian Lyngen, head of U.S. rates at BMO Capital Markets: "CPI surprised on the downside across the board. … The yield curve is bull steepening as the slower trajectory of inflation has firmed rate cut expectations for later this year. On the margin, it is also supportive of next week's [Federal Reserve Summary of Economic Projections] signaling 50 bp of cuts in 2025." Ryan Weldon, investor director and portfolio manager at IFM Investments: "The softer services inflation lends itself to a slowing economy in the face of continued tariff anxiety and will support the Fed to come out of their wait-and-hold approach sooner. However, the Fed will still want to see several months of consistent inflation and jobs data and have more clarity on the Trump administration's tariff policy before resuming cuts." Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer at Northlight Asset Management: "With lower-than-expected numbers across the board (with the exception of headline YoY, which stayed constant), and a trade deal with China that was agreed to in London, the narrative around tariff-induced inflation should subside. However, CPI remains above 2% and even though the tariff rates are going to be less than originally feared, after they are implemented they will further increase the cost of goods." Skyler Weinand, chief investment officer at Regan Capital: "Wednesday's weaker-than-expected CPI opens the door to a Fed rate cut in September, since it's clear that the inflation data continues to move in the right direction even as we deal with tariff uncertainty. While employment is strong and the economic effects from tariffs are yet to be determined, the Fed would like to start easing again in the not too distant future to get in front of a possible recession in 2026" Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Financial Group: "Bottom line, a sigh of relief on the lower than expected inflation stats just as we search for where tariffs will work its way through the supply chain and end customer."
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Inflation holds steady as data shows how prices are faring after Trump's ‘Liberation Day' tariffs
Inflation held steady last month, according to data that gives the first glimpse of how prices are faring since President Donald Trump's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs. Consumer prices rose 0.1 percent on a monthly basis in May, while annual inflation stood at 2.4 percent, according to the Department of Labor's consumer price index. The report captures the period after Trump unveiled his global reciprocal tariffs in April and provides some insight as to whether businesses are bearing the brunt of the duties themselves or passing them on to customers. Analysts predicted to see a bigger increase, but some still warn the future is uncertain because tariffs keep changing. 'So far, inflation risks from higher tariffs are subdued,' Win Thin, global head of markets strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman, told Bloomberg. 'Nonetheless, US protectionist trade policy and uncertainty about the ultimate level of tariffs are downside risks to growth and upside risk to inflation. Bottom line: the fundamental USD downtrend is intact.' Since Trump announced his global reciprocal tariffs and the stock market was spooked, many of the duties were paused. However, 10 percent tariffs for most countries remain. Inflation has been slow to respond to the tariffs as most retailers are selling merchandise accumulated before the import duties took effect. Economists said that the reduction in the scale of some trade tariffs may have 'helped to restrain cost increases thus far,' Wells Fargo's Sarah House and Nicole Cervi said. 'That said, as the higher tariff regime persists, shielding consumers from the costs is likely to become more challenging,' the economists added. 'Only a few goods prices likely rose as a result of the new tariffs in May,' Pantheon Macroeconomics economists Samuel Tombs and Oliver Allen said in a note, Bloomberg reports. 'June will be a different story — while some providers of discretionary services probably cut prices or kept them low to sustain demand.' Walmart warned customers last month that they could see price rises because of the trade tariffs. The retailer's chief financial officer John David Rainey said that the tariffs are 'still too high.' 'It's more than any supplier can absorb. And so I'm concerned that consumer is going to start seeing higher prices,' he said. 'You'll begin to see that, likely towards the tail end of this month, and then certainly much more in June.' Reuters contributed reporting


Business Upturn
8 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Donald Trump confirms US-China deal done, says rare earth deal and 55% tariffs finalised
Donald Trump touts 55% tariffs and rare earth supply in pending China deal By News Desk Published on June 11, 2025, 17:56 IST Last updated June 11, 2025, 17:57 IST Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump on Tuesday announced via social media that a new deal with China has been reached, pending final approval from both himself and Chinese President Xi Jinping. According to Trump, the agreement includes upfront Chinese supply of 'full magnets' and 'any necessary rare earths' to the U.S. In return, the U.S. will uphold previously agreed terms, which Trump said include allowing Chinese students to continue studying at American colleges and universities — a relationship he described as 'always been good with me!' Trump emphasized that under the new deal, the U.S. will receive a combined total of 55% in tariffs, while China will get 10%. 'Relationship is excellent!' Trump declared in the post, adding thanks for attention to the matter. The post, shared on June 11, 2025, at 8:04 AM, comes amid ongoing geopolitical and trade tensions between the world's two largest economies. No official confirmation has yet been released by Chinese authorities or the U.S. State Department. News desk at