logo
How much would a 100% 'Made in the USA' vehicle cost? It's complicated

How much would a 100% 'Made in the USA' vehicle cost? It's complicated

Business Mayor16-05-2025
A 2025 Ford Expedition with bronze trim at the automaker's Kentucky Truck Plant, April 30, 2025.
Michael Wayland | CNBC
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A white 2025 Ford Expedition SUV with bronze exterior trim rolled off the assembly line at Ford Motor 's Kentucky Truck Plant. It was assembled — from its frame to completion — by American workers at the factory. But it's far from being completely 'Made in the USA.'
A majority of its main parts — at least 58% as stated on a window sticker — were made outside the country, including 22% from Mexico. That includes its Ford-engineered, 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V-6 Ecoboost engine, the heart of the vehicle.
The popular large SUV is a prime example of how complicated the global automotive supply chain is, and underscores the reality that even vehicles rolling off U.S. assembly lines from quintessentially American companies such as Ford can rely heavily on nondomestic content.
The massive Kentucky assembly plant, which has more than 9,000 people building the Expedition, F-Series pickup trucks and Lincoln Navigator SUV, is exactly the kind of facility President Donald Trump is pressuring automakers to build in the U.S. through his use of aggressive tariffs.
After Trump put 25% tariffs on imported vehicles and many automotive parts, automakers started scrambling to tout U.S. investments and localize supply chains as much as possible. But while the country would benefit from jobs and economic output if all auto parts were sourced and manufactured in the U.S., experts say it's just not feasible.
'Some parts that have been offshored will still be cheaper to manufacture in those locations rather than the USA at scale even with some of the imposed tariffs,' said Martin French, a longtime supplier executive and partner at Berylls Strategy Advisors USA.
Processing and production plants for things such as steel, aluminum and semiconductor chips, especially older ones used for autos, as well as raw materials such as platinum and palladium, aren't prevalent enough in the U.S. without establishing new plants or mines. Those are processes experts say would take a decade or more to create at scale.
On top of that, the increased costs of a 100% U.S.-made vehicle could price many consumers out of the new vehicle market. That could in turn lead to less demand and likely lower production.
'We can move everything to the U.S., but if every Ford is $50,000, we're not going to win as a company,' Ford CEO Jim Farley said last week on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'That's a balancing act that every [automaker] will have to do, even the most American company.'
Farley said 15% to 20% of commoditized vehicle parts are difficult, if not impossible, to source currently in the U.S. That includes things such as small fasteners, labor-intensive wiring harnesses and almost $5,000 in semiconductors per vehicle, which are currently sourced largely from Asia.
S&P Global Mobility reports there are on average 20,000 parts in a vehicle when it's torn down to its nuts and bolts. Parts may originate in anywhere from 50 to 120 countries.
For example, the Ford F-150, which shares a platform and some parts with the Expedition, is exclusively assembled in the U.S. but has roughly 2,700 main billable parts, which exclude many small pieces, according to Caresoft, an engineering benchmarking and consulting firm.
The Trump administration could ease higher prices for an American-made vehicle by offering tax breaks or consumer incentives, much like the electric vehicle credit of up to $7,500 that Trump previously promised to eliminate.
But the costs of a 100% American-made vehicle are far greater and more complex than they might seem at first blush. It's even hard to track what comes from the U.S., as automakers are required to report a combined percentage of Canadian and U.S. content in a vehicle, not just U.S. content.
The material costs alone, excluding manufacturing investments, would add thousands of dollars to a vehicle's price point, which would wipe out profits for automakers and force price increases for consumers, several automotive analysts and executives told CNBC.
The people, who were given anonymity so they could speak freely, estimated it would add thousands of dollars with each step you took to get closer to 100% U.S. and Canadian parts. 100% U.S.-made vehicle
Mark Wakefield, a partner and global automotive market lead at consulting firm AlixPartners, said nothing's impossible with time, but the investment needed for U.S. and Canadian sourcing and added costs would increase exponentially the closer a company came to a 100% 'Made in the USA' vehicle.
'The cost gets quantumly more … the closer you get to 100%,' Wakefield said. 'Getting above 90% gets expensive, and getting about 95% would get really expensive, and you just start getting into things that you'd have to take a long time [to do].'
A worker at Ford's Kentucky Truck Plant on April 30, 2025.
Michael Wayland | CNBC
To get that last 5% to 10%, if, or when, you could, Wakefield said, would start 'getting really expensive' and likely take a decade or more to set up raw material sourcing and reshore production of some parts.
'I don't think you could do it more than about 95% on average, at any cost, at the moment, just because you need to build a lot of stuff that's going to take a long time,' he said. 'The processing and the raw material stuff, it takes a really long time, because those are multibillion-dollar facilities that process it.'
Two executives at auto suppliers told CNBC it would be 'unrealistic,' if not impossible, for a company to profitably build a 100% U.S.-made vehicle at this time. Another executive at an automaker estimated the average cost increase for an American-assembled U.S. full-size pickup would jump at least $7,000 to source as many components as currently possible from the U.S. and Canada.
One expert, generalizing the costs, said it could cost $5,000 more to get a vehicle that's currently under 70% U.S./Canadian parts to 75% or 80%; another $5,000 to $10,000 to hit 90%; and thousands more to a higher percentage than that.
The average transaction price of a new vehicle in the U.S. is currently around $48,000, according to Cox Automotive. Say that vehicle is made of $30,000 in materials and parts. Adding the above costs, it would come out to roughly $10,000 to $20,000 more for companies.
Cars.com reports the U.S. is by far the most expensive country to manufacture a vehicle in. The average new-car price of a U.S.-assembled vehicle is more than $53,200, according to its data. That compares with roughly $40,700 in Mexico, $46,148 in Canada and roughly $51,000 in China.
Excluding raw materials, someone could theoretically start a new car company — let's call it U.S. Motors — from scratch. U.S. Motors could spend billions of dollars to build new factories and establish an exclusively American supply chain, but the vehicle it would produce would likely be low-volume and excessively expensive, experts say.
Think of Ferrari : Every car from the iconic automaker comes from Italy, with as many components as possible sourced from the company's homeland.
But even Ferrari's multimillion-dollar sports cars have parts or raw materials for things such as airbags, brakes, tires, batteries and more that come from non-Italian suppliers and facilities.
'If you did it at really low volume and you're extremely innovative and different with the vehicle, you could make $300,000-$400,000 vehicles that are all-American,' Wakefield said. 'To do it at scale, it would be 10-15 [years] and $100 billion to do that.' What's more realistic?
Getting vehicles to 75% U.S. and Canadian parts and final assembly in the U.S. is a far more achievable target that 'doesn't really force you to do uneconomic things,' Wakefield said, noting that a few vehicles meet that standard today.
But even reaching that threshold on a larger scale would likely take billions of dollars in new investments from automakers and suppliers to localize production. Some automakers could make the move more easily, while others would require massive shifts in sourcing and production.
Vehicles that meet the 75% U.S./Canada parts standard for the 2025 model year include the Kia EV6, two versions of the Tesla Model 3 and the Honda Ridgeline AWD Trail Sport, according to the latest vehicle content data required by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Nearly 20 others are at 70% or higher, while some vehicles still need to be added to the data. Read More Nothing Redeems Crypto
That compares with 2007 model-year NHTSA data, where the top 16 vehicles — all from GM and Ford — had 90% or more U.S. and Canadian content. Ford's Expedition at that time was among the highest at 95%, but that was before the expanded globalization of the auto industry supply chain after the Great Recession — and before several major technological advances in cars made new parts and materials more important.
For decades, there has been a trend for less U.S./Canadian content because of the globalization of supply chains and the increase in the use of Mexico as a source of parts and components, according to American University's Kogod School of Business.
The top 10 vehicles with the most U.S. and Canadian parts on average have 63.6% to 69.2% parts content from those countries from the 2019 through 2024 model years, according to Cars.com.
Imported vehicles from many luxury brands, specifically German manufacturers as well as Toyota's Lexus, feature little U.S.-sourced content. Many have none or 1%, according to the federal data.
The U.S./Canada percentages, under the American Automobile Labeling Act of 1992, are calculated on a 'carline' basis rather than for each individual vehicle and may be rounded to the nearest 5%. They are calculated by automakers and reported to the government.
However, a high threshold of North American parts doesn't mean the vehicles are produced in the U.S. The 2024 Toyota RAV4, for example, was reported to have 70% U.S./Canadian parts and is built in Canada.
'You could have a vehicle, theoretically, that is made in the U.S., but only has 1% parts, content,' said Patrick Masterson, lead researcher for Cars.com's 'American-Made Index.'
Cars.com's annual index of the top U.S. vehicles takes vehicle assembly, parts and other factors into account. No vehicles from Ford or General Motors made the top 10, while two Teslas, two Hondas and a Volkswagen took the top five spots.
The study ranks 100 vehicles judged through the same five criteria it's used since the 2020 edition: assembly location, parts content, engine origin, transmission origin and U.S. manufacturing workforce. More than 400 vehicles of model-year 2024 vintage were analyzed to qualify the 100 vehicles on the list.
The white 2025 Ford Expedition that recently rolled off the assembly line in Kentucky is expected to score higher than the prior model year, which ranked 78th, because of an increase in domestic content.
Masterson said there's been increased interest and popularity for the 'American-Made Index' this year amid Trump's tariff policies and nationalism.
'Traffic on the 'American-Made Index' this year is way, way up. … People are concerned about this, perhaps more than ever,' Masterson said, later adding 'it would be extremely difficult to make a 100% U.S.-made [vehicle].'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Morning Bid: Tech wrecks the party
Morning Bid: Tech wrecks the party

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Morning Bid: Tech wrecks the party

A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Rae Wee Markets in Europe were set for a dour opening on Wednesday, after a slump on Wall Street pushed Asian shares into the red, with technology stocks leading the decline. While there was no immediate trigger, analysts pointed to a confluence of factors, such as doubts over the lofty valuations of tech heavyweights and President Donald Trump's growing influence over the sector. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the government taking equity stakes in Intel as well as other chip companies in exchange for grants under the CHIPS Act that was meant to spur factory-building around the country, sources told Reuters. The move comes on the back of other unusual deals Washington has recently struck with U.S. companies, including allowing AI chip giant Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China in exchange for the U.S. government receiving 15% of those sales. The government's intervention in corporate matters has worried critics who say Trump's actions create new categories of corporate risk and that a bad bet could mean a hit to taxpayer funds. "This U.S. state/Presidential creep into tech, and the wider private sector, is unhealthy as it threatens to erode margins and dent demand/topline," said Mizuho's head of macro research for Asia ex-Japan Vishnu Varathan. Asia's tech-heavy indexes in Taiwan and South Korea slid 2.6% and 1.7%, respectively, while EUROSTOXX 50 futures shed 0.7%. Nasdaq futures were down 0.5%. Apart from the tech gloom, traders in London will be waking up to UK inflation figures, where expectations are for headline consumer prices to have picked up slightly in July on an annual basis. Inflation in Britain remains the highest of any major advanced economy and is around one percentage point more than in the United States or the euro zone. Any upside surprise would prove a headache for the Bank of England, with economists polled by Reuters expecting the central bank to cut interest rates by a quarter-point once more this year and then again in early 2026. Elsewhere in markets, the New Zealand dollar tumbled on Wednesday after the central bank cut rates and flagged further reductions in coming months as policymakers warned of domestic and global headwinds. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand said the economy had stalled in the second quarter, and lowered its projected floor for the cash rate to 2.55%, from 2.85% forecast in May. Key developments that could influence markets on Wednesday: - UK inflation (July) - FOMC July meeting minutes - Fed's Waller, Bostic speak Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

European markets head for negative open as sentiment shifts; UK inflation data ahead
European markets head for negative open as sentiment shifts; UK inflation data ahead

CNBC

time44 minutes ago

  • CNBC

European markets head for negative open as sentiment shifts; UK inflation data ahead

LONDON — European stocks are expected to open lower on Wednesday as global market sentiment wavered. The U.K.'s FTSE index is seen opening 0.18% lower, Germany's DAX 0.6% lower, France's CAC 40 down 0.56% and Italy's FTSE MIB 0.56% lower. Regional bourses traded higher on Tuesday as global markets reacted broadly positively to the outcome of talks between U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders at the White House on Monday. Defense stocks were among the worst performers in the index, however. On the data front, the U.K. inflation print for July will be published at 7 a.m. London time. Economists polled by Reuters had anticipated inflation would reach 3.7% in the twelve months to July, after it picked up to a hotter than expected 3.6% in June. Earnings come from Alcon and Geberit and Sweden's Riksbank publishes its latest monetary policy decision. Globally, Asia-Pacific markets fell overnight, tracking Wall Street declines in Tuesday's trading session. S&P 500 futures were near flat overnight ahead of the release of the Federal Reserve's July meeting minutes. At the time, policymakers once more held steady on interest rates, but Fed Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman dissented, marking the first time two voting Fed officials have done so since 1993. Traders are also focusing on key speeches from Fed officials when they convene in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, for the Fed's annual economic symposium on Thursday. Investors are awaiting clues from Fed Chair Jerome Powell as to what will happen at the central bank's remaining policy meetings this year. The Fed funds futures market is indicating an 84.9% chance for a quarter-point rate cut at the Fed's next policy meeting in September, according to CME's FedWatch tool.

Ford Issues Recall Notice for 1 — Yes, Just 1 — Example of the 2024 Mustang
Ford Issues Recall Notice for 1 — Yes, Just 1 — Example of the 2024 Mustang

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ford Issues Recall Notice for 1 — Yes, Just 1 — Example of the 2024 Mustang

The Ford Mustang remains an utter force in the auto industry, one that looks likely this year to once again repeat its title as the best-selling sports car in the world. Yet while there are substantial numbers of 'Stangs out there, the Blue Oval's latest recall affects as small a group of them as is physically possible. FoMoCo is recalling a single Mustang from model year 2024 over improperly installed software tied to a previous recall notice. Here's what we know based on the automaker's filings with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. According to the automaker's report, the impacted pony car was previously brought in for repair under recall 24C35 / 24V-802, related to the instrument cluster and a potential loss of side marker lamp and daytime running light functionality. Technicians were required to install a remedy via the automaker's software tools. The impacted vehicle in question did not receive the proper software, however, despite the dealer tool logging the repair as completed. As a result, the Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) may not illuminate at startup or while driving. This is a violation of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard numbers 101, "Control and Displays" and 102, "Transmission shift lever sequence, starter interlock, and transmission braking effect." Any failure to display critical safety information comes with an increased risk of crash or injury. That said, Ford is not aware of any accident or injuries related to the fault. Ford will task a dealer to reinspect and repair the impacted Mustang as needed with no charge to the owner. The automaker does plan on sending a notification letter on September 15, but there's a good chance the owner already knows something is amiss. That said, if you are concerned that it may be your particular 2024 Mustang that's been affected, you can contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332 and request info on recall number 25C35. You Might Also Like You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners The Man Who Signs Every Car

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store