logo
I booked basic economy flights with Delta and Alaska Airlines. One was clearly better for coach passengers.

I booked basic economy flights with Delta and Alaska Airlines. One was clearly better for coach passengers.

First, I flew with Delta from Salt Lake City to New York City.
In January 2025, I took a 4 ½-hour Delta flight from Salt Lake City to NYC. My basic economy ticket cost $175, and it included one carry-on bag. The booking didn't accrue miles or include a seat reservation, so I got my seat assignment at the gate.
It's worth noting that I switched flights just before boarding. The flight I'd booked was full, so the airline asked for volunteers at the gate to take an emptier flight that left 10 minutes later. Since that one was headed to an airport closer to my NYC apartment — John F. Kennedy International Airport — I was happy to change my reservation.
Then, I took an Alaska Airlines flight from Seattle to NYC.
In May 2025, I took a 5 ½-hour flight from Seattle to NYC with Alaska Airlines. For $240, I booked the saver fare — Alaska's basic economy ticket, which allows rewards members to earn miles, though fewer than in standard economy.
Like the Delta flight, my ticket included one carry-on bag and no seat assignment. But unlike the Delta flight I ended up on, this flight was full. And since I was in the last boarding group, all the overhead bin space was taken by the time I got to the front of the line, so I checked my carry-on luggage at the gate.
The Delta flight was on an Airbus A321neo with several empty seats.
The Alaska flight was on a full Boeing 737-900.
I made my way to the middle seat in the back row of Alaska's Boeing 737-900, which seats 178 travelers.
While Alaska retired its Airbus fleet in 2023, Delta has three Boeing 737-900 models similar to the Alaska plane I took. These models seat between 173 and 180 passengers, according to the airline.
The seats were larger on the Delta flight.
My seat on the Delta flight was larger and a bit cushier than the seat on my Alaska flight. The Delta Airbus A321neo economy seats are 18 inches wide with a 31-inch seat pitch.
Meanwhile, according to Seat Guru, Alaska's economy seats are 17 inches wide and have a seat pitch between 31 and 32 inches.
Delta had a better entertainment system.
Perhaps the biggest difference between my experiences on these two flights was the entertainment.
On the Delta flight, I had a seat-back touchscreen housing hundreds of movies and TV shows. On the Alaska flight, I had access to over 800 shows and movies from my personal device, but there was no seat-back screen.
When I fly, I prefer to have a seat-back entertainment system for viewing because it's much larger than my phone screen, and I don't have to hold it up in front of my face.
Both flights had power outlets, and at least two of Delta's similar Boeing 737-900 models also have seat-back screens.
Both flights had three bathrooms in the main cabin.
Ultimately, the Delta flight was a better ride.
The Delta flight was obviously more enjoyable since the flight had many empty seats. But if the roles were reversed, and I had to sit in the back middle seat of the Delta flight as I did on the Alaska flight, I still think I would have preferred the same airline.
With a larger, cozier seat and a 10-inch screen in front of me, I'd take any basic economy seat on a Delta flight.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hawaiian Airlines to add premium economy in A330 overhaul
Hawaiian Airlines to add premium economy in A330 overhaul

Travel Weekly

time35 minutes ago

  • Travel Weekly

Hawaiian Airlines to add premium economy in A330 overhaul

Hawaiian Airlines' fleet of two dozen Airbus A330 aircraft will be retrofitted to accommodate the carrier's first premium economy cabin. New interiors will also have updated lie-flat seats in business class and upgraded seats in the main cabin. Parent company Alaska Air Group did not provide a timeline for the retrofits, but said it will be making a substantial investment "over the next few years," and that Airbus 330 widebody planes will remain dedicated to Hawaii flying.

What Trump's immigration crackdown means for the 2028 Olympics
What Trump's immigration crackdown means for the 2028 Olympics

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

What Trump's immigration crackdown means for the 2028 Olympics

Will there be exceptions for athletes? Yes. Athletes competing in the Olympic Games and World Cup (which the United States will host in 2026) are exempt from the travel ban. The White House has said it will allow into the country 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Olympians typically use visas reserved for high-level athletes. Advertisement Trump announced a task force Tuesday to make sure there is a streamlined visa processing and credentialing process for foreign athletes, coaches, officials and members of the news media. Will there be exceptions for fans? No. Fans from the affected countries will have to abide by the restrictions. The State Department said people who want to come and watch the Olympic Games should apply for visas as soon as possible. 'We encourage prospective foreign travelers who will need U.S. visas to travel to the 2028 Olympics to apply early,' the statement said. The State Department noted that the travel and tourism sector contributes nearly 10 million jobs to the U.S. economy. Advertisement What are the latest restrictions? Beginning Aug. 20, the United States will begin a one-year pilot program in which travelers from Malawi or Zambia must post a bond ranging from $5,000 to $15,000, determined at the person's visa interview. The bond requirement applies to travelers eligible for a business or tourism visa, known as a B1 or B2 visa. As a condition of the bond, all visa holders from these two countries must arrive at and depart from the United States via Boston Logan International Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York or Washington Dulles International Airport. The State Department says the bond will help ensure the travelers do not overstay their visas. The countries were chosen based on their high visa overstay rates, according to data compiled by the Homeland Security Department. Who is affected by the travel ban? In June, Trump barred travel to the United States by citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Trump also imposed restrictions, but stopped short of a full ban, on travel from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. This article originally appeared in .

Amazon's bid to overturn B.C. labour ruling on workers' unionization rejected
Amazon's bid to overturn B.C. labour ruling on workers' unionization rejected

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon's bid to overturn B.C. labour ruling on workers' unionization rejected

VANCOUVER — British Columbia's Labour Relations Board has rejected a bid by e-commerce giant Amazon to overturn an earlier decision that awarded union certification to workers at a facility in Delta, B.C. In a new decision dated Tuesday, a Labour Relations Board panel ruled that it agrees with the board's original decision in July that ordered remedial certification due to Amazon ramping up hiring "in order to thwart the union's certification application." The panel says evidence presented by union Unifor showed "a deliberate decision by the employer" to increase its employee roster to dilute union support during its membership drive. The decision also says the move for Amazon to intentionally pad its employee list and then using it to argue that union does not meet the threshold for certification "is manipulating the employee list in order to avoid certification." Amazon had applied for the Labour Relations Board to reconsider its original July decision, and the latest decision says the company argued that the last board panel had erred in applying labour laws to the case — as well as in it awarding remedial certification to the union. The company had argued that evidence showed "there was an operational need for additional staff" while what was described as a "pervasive anti-union campaign" was protected by employer free-speech rights. The panel, however, disagreed. "In our view, the original decision adopts the correct approach which is to consider the employer's conduct as a whole," the decision says. Citing precedent, the panel wites, "We note that the kinds of activities in which the employer engaged in the present case are the 'classical hallmarks of an interference in the formation or selection of a trade union.'" The panel says that Amazon's move to "knowingly and improperly" pad the employee list is "sufficiently egregious" to justify its original decision to order union certification. "From our perspective, the intentional padding of an employee list for the purpose of undermining an organizing drive is an even more fundamental attack on its employees' associational rights," the latest decision says. Amazon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In a statement, Unifor National president Lana Payne says the decision is a "message" to B.C. employers to not interfere in unionization "or to suffer the consequences." This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 6, 2025. The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store