logo
A New IRS-ICE Agreement Could Reduce Tax Revenue by $300 Billion Over the Next Decade

A New IRS-ICE Agreement Could Reduce Tax Revenue by $300 Billion Over the Next Decade

Yahoo15-04-2025

Earlier this month, the IRS and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) forged an agreement to share taxpayer data with federal immigration officials. According to a partially redacted memorandum of understanding, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) "will come to the IRS with the names and address[es] of taxpayers that they believe have violated federal immigration laws," reported CNN.
The government has long encouraged undocumented immigrants who work in the United States to file their taxes. But the new agreement means that someone who pays his taxes in good faith could attract unwanted scrutiny and be at greater risk of deportation.
Between 50 percent and 75 percent of undocumented immigrants pay taxes via federal income and/or payroll taxes, the Congressional Budget Office found in 2007. Undocumented immigrants are required to pay taxes, and doing so can help in their immigration cases down the line. The IRS has long "sought to keep information submitted by undocumented immigrants confidential," so the IRS-ICE agreement marks "a fundamental departure from decades of practice at the tax collector," reported The New York Times.
If the agreement between ICE and the IRS discourages undocumented immigrants from paying their taxes, the U.S. could lose billions in tax revenue. In 2022, undocumented immigrants paid $96.7 billion in federal, state, and local taxes, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), a left-leaning economic think tank. Over one-third of those tax dollars "go toward payroll taxes dedicated to funding programs that these workers are barred from accessing," including Social Security and Medicare, reported ITEP.
The Budget Lab, a nonpartisan policy research center at Yale University, estimates that the IRS-ICE agreement could cause federal revenues to "come in roughly $300 billion lower" over the next decade. In addition to becoming more hesitant to file their individual income taxes, undocumented immigrants might increasingly take under-the-table jobs.
Undocumented immigrants now have to weigh the risks of filing their taxes against the risks of not filing them. On one hand, the IRS could transmit their personal information to federal immigration authorities, potentially leading to their arrest and deportation. On the other hand, "failing to file taxes can have serious consequences, from penalties for tax evasion to negative impacts on immigration cases—including naturalization applications," wrote Steven Hubbard and Micaela McConnell for the American Immigration Council, a pro-immigration research organization.
"This will be a targeted agreement that will go specifically after individuals who do perpetuate violence and enact crimes in this country," said DHS Secretary Kristi Noem last week. (That undersells how broadly the agreement may be applied.) Noem also stressed that "the American people need to be confident in the fact that their personal privacy will be protected."
But increased data sharing between federal agencies always carries privacy risks. "If you are a U.S. citizen, your sensitive tax data could also be compromised by this short-sighted policy," argued immigration attorney Maurice Goldman. There's another major potential cost that native-born Americans could face: Immigrants, including undocumented ones, play an important role in reducing federal budget deficits and propping up programs like Social Security.
With over $28 trillion in publicly held debt, the last thing the country needs is a policy that scares undocumented immigrants out of paying taxes—and punishes them for doing something the government has encouraged them to do for decades.
The post A New IRS-ICE Agreement Could Reduce Tax Revenue by $300 Billion Over the Next Decade appeared first on Reason.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kamala Harris slammed by California sheriff for 'embarrassing' statement on LA riots
Kamala Harris slammed by California sheriff for 'embarrassing' statement on LA riots

New York Post

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Kamala Harris slammed by California sheriff for 'embarrassing' statement on LA riots

A California sheriff has ripped Kamala Harris after the former vice president blamed President Trump for starting the anti-ICE protests that are wreaking havoc in Los Angeles. 'President Trump didn't start these riots. He's not out there lighting cars on fire, hurling projectiles at law enforcement or blocking freeways,' Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco said in a post on X as he shared Harris' remarks. 3 Kamala Harris blamed Donald Trump for the anti-ICE riots taking over Los Angeles. Connor Terry/ZUMA / 'This statement is an embarrassment and does nothing to diffuse the violent riots taking place across the city.' 'The Democrats and their 'leaders' own this,' he added. 3 Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco took aim at Harris on X Monday. Chad Bianco / Facebook Bianco, who is running for governor in 2026, lashed out Harris after she accused the Trump administration of 'stoking fear' by opting to deploy the National Guard to quell the violence. 'Los Angeles is my home. And like so many Americans, I am appalled at what we are witnessing on the streets of our city,' Harris said. 3 Bianco called Harris' statement an 'embarassment.' Fox News 'Deploying the National Guard is a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos.'

FBI announces $50K bounty on masked protester who assaulted officer during LA anti-ICE riots
FBI announces $50K bounty on masked protester who assaulted officer during LA anti-ICE riots

New York Post

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Post

FBI announces $50K bounty on masked protester who assaulted officer during LA anti-ICE riots

The FBI has put a $50,000 bounty on a violent masked rioter who assaulted a federal officer during this weekend's anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles. The unidentified suspect injured an officer when he hurled rocks at law enforcement vehicles on Saturday afternoon on Alondra Boulevard in Paramount, according to the FBI. He also damaged an FBI vehicle. Advertisement The agency is offering a reward of $50,000 for information leading to his arrest and conviction. 3 Federal authorities are searching for a man who threw rocks at police in LA County on Saturday. FBI Los Angeles 3 The unidentified man also damaged a law enforcement vehicle. FBI Los Angeles Advertisement 3 Rioters took the to streets in Los Angeles and San Francisco over the weekend. AFP via Getty Images Photos released by the FBI show the suspect wearing a motorcycle helmet and sunglasses at the demonstration. Another photo shows him wearing a cap and face mask to obscure his identity. Chaos erupted in the country's second-largest city over the weekend over President Trump's immigration policies. Advertisement On Saturday, Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to respond to protests around federal buildings in downtown LA, where ICE officials were detaining immigrants to be deported. The president demanded the arrest of all rioters wearing face masks as tensions escalated and even spread to San Francisco. LAPD's Chief of Police Jim McDonnell had said his force was 'overwhelmed' by the protests, as rioters armed with hammers and cinder blocks threw concrete at officers. Riots in San Francisco also turned violent as protesters tore through buildings and clashed with police in riot gear, shooting fire works at officers. Advertisement Police said two officers were injured in San Francisco's financial district. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie said that about 60 people were arrested. 'Everyone in this country has a right to make their voice heard peacefully, and local law enforcement will always protect that right and the rights of everyone in our city to be safe,' he posted on X. 'But we will never tolerate violent and destructive behavior, and as crowds dwindled, a group that remained caused injuries to police officers, vandalized Muni vehicles, and broke windows of local businesses.'

New DOT rule could mean you spend $600 more on gas each year
New DOT rule could mean you spend $600 more on gas each year

Miami Herald

time31 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

New DOT rule could mean you spend $600 more on gas each year

The United States is a pretty car-dependent country, and we are also a country with a lot of cars that are not the most fuel-efficient in the world, including a substantial number of pickup trucks and large SUVs that guzzle gas. Since we do use a lot of gasoline, it's probably not surprising that the U.S. Energy Information Administration says that gas is consistently the type of energy that we devote the largest portion of our household energy spending to. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter In fact, the Consumer Expenditure survey shows that the average annual household spending on gas came in at around $2,148 per year in recent years. This is more than the amount that we're spending on natural gas, electricity, and fuel oil combined. There's no getting around the fact that you're going to have to keep putting gas in your car if you live the typical American lifestyle and aren't ready to abandon it for a walkable city and public transportation. Unfortunately, for those of us who are frequent drivers, it is entirely possible that fuel costs are going to rise. In fact, a new final rule issued by the Department of Transportation recently could mean that Americans end up spending around $600 more on gas each year than original projections suggested they would. Here's why gas spending may be higher than anticipated. The DOT action that is going to have an impact on your gas consumption came last Friday. On June 6, 2025, the DOT officially declared that Joe Biden had exceeded his authority as president when establishing fuel economy rules while in office. Specifically, under the Biden Administration, the DOT had put a rule in place that was finalized in 2024 that required manufacturers to improve fuel economy by 2% per year for passenger cars made between 2027 and 2031 and by 2% annually for SUVs and other light trucks made from 2029 to 2031. Related: New DOT rule could worsen trucker shortage, cause delivery delays Now, the DOT claims the Biden Administration did not properly exercise its authority when setting those fuel economy rules because it set them based on the assumption that there would be increased usage of electric vehicles regardless of what the emissions standards required. A statement accompanying the DOT's rule publication explained that the problem with the Biden administration's actions was that current statutory requirements prohibit the consideration of electric cars when the government establishes fuel efficiency requirements. The DOT says that the Biden Administration ignored that limitation and assumed a high number of consumers would switch to EVs. This new declaration has opened up the door for the Trump Administration to rescind the Biden standards and put in their own looser limits. When the Biden Administration established the stricter fuel efficiency standards, that rule was expected to save consumers more than $600 in gas costs each year, as well as help to fight climate change. Without those new standards going into effect, though, the $600 in savings promised by Biden's plan is not likely to materialize. Consumers will have to spend that extra money instead, since car makers are no longer going to be required to make such drastic cuts to the fuel that common vehicles use. Related: Major trucking company files Chapter 11 bankruptcy While spending $600 more per year on fuel costs doesn't sound very appealing, those who support the Trump Administration's actions believe that the order will give consumers more choice. Many car makers had their hands severely tied in trying to meet the Biden administration's standards, which would likely either force them to increase costs or to change the kinds of vehicles they were producing. They won't be subject to these rules anymore and can continue making cars that consume more gasoline, which, frankly, appear to be the cars many Americans want. "We are making vehicles more affordable and easier to manufacture in the United States. The previous administration illegally used CAFE standards as an electric vehicle mandate," Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement regarding the rule change. More Economic News: Tesla, Elon Musk make drastic decision amid U.S.-China trade warMajor U.S. automaker makes harsh decision in the wake of tariff tussleTariffs will devastate this entire industry Still, those hoping car makers would have been inspired to find new ways to improve fuel efficiency may be disappointed in the fact that some key incentives that could have prompted those changes are now disappearing. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store