
How Emotional Intelligence Can Solve The Matrix Management Problem
The conventional wisdom? Throw soft-skills workshops at the problem. But Beth Hoban, Vice President of Talent Management at LMI, a 2,700-person digital solutions provider for the government, had a different approach. When she systematically built 'power skills' (i.e., emotional intelligence across relationships) into daily operations—not through formal training events, but through embedded systems—everything got better.
At LMI, Hoban is responsible for developing talent in one of the most complex organizational structures imaginable: a matrix organization where employees report to both project managers and capability leaders, deploy across multiple government markets, and navigate constant change in federal contracting. I recently had the opportunity to ask Hoban about several of the ways LMI enables leaders to develop their 'power skills.'
Frequent PM Touchpoints
Most organizations approach skills development through intensive multi-day workshops. Hoban takes a different approach: embedded learning that happens within daily work.
"We, at this point in time, are not doing the classic, let me take you out for three days to go teach you how to talk to each other,'" she explains. "We want multiple checkpoints throughout the year to really embed and reinforce it."
The approach includes weekly forums where program managers can ask questions, learn new technical skills, and practice difficult conversations. When teams face challenges like contract losses, Hoban provides individual coaching to the PMs, too.
Three-Question Performance Management
When it comes to performance management, Hoban eschews the traditional, complex annual review ritual. Instead, LMI built their entire performance culture around three simple questions that Hoban says they use in "all of our career conversations":
"It's a really simple methodology that we repeat over and over and talk about in the flow of work. It's changed the way we're having conversations," Hoban says. Her philosophy is straightforward: "People can't meet expectations for their leaders if they don't know what they are."
The approach recognizes a fundamental truth about human nature. "I always ask people, 'Raise your hand if you came to work today to be totally mediocre,'" Hoban notes. "And no one raises their hands—we're here because we want to be of service and we want to do great work."
The Systems Approach That Scales
What makes LMI's approach work isn't any single program—its systems thinking. Hoban describes herself as "a systems thinker" who focuses on creating what she calls multiple options in critical subject areas.
"It's more about creating options in certain buckets and having toolkits. For lack of a better analogy, it's almost a menu," she explains. "Here are some tools and resources that we have at different phases of your career and to counter different problems."
These include everything from EQ assessments for specific situations to leadership development for senior teams. The tool is determined by the question: What problem are we trying to solve for? What's the insight we need to get to?
The Mission Connection
Perhaps most importantly, LMI grounds all of this in mission. As a company serving government clients, every employee can connect their daily work to national security, veteran healthcare, or other critical objectives.
Hoban emphasizes the importance of embedding LMI's vision throughout the organization: "How does every single person working here see themselves in the mission? One of my favorite things to ask our leaders is, 'Tuesday afternoon at 2 o' clock in your staff meeting, how are you role-modeling this?"
This mission orientation provides what she calls a "bearing point" during times of constant change—a fixed reference when everything else is shifting.
The Bottom Line
Matrix organizations are becoming the norm in tech and consulting, but they're also where traditional management breaks down. As AI automates more knowledge work, the organizations that thrive will be those that master human relationships.
But this isn't about sending people to communication workshops or posting values on the wall. It's about building systems that embed power skills into daily work, create multiple touchpoints for feedback and development, and connect individual growth to organizational mission.
Hoban's system approach yields impressive results. While most organizations struggle with AI-driven transformation, LMI actually saw attrition decrease during their 2020 transition from not-for-profit to for-profit status—precisely when employee turnover typically spikes.
Hoban references a quote from futurist Alvin Toffler that captures the challenge: "The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn."
In an AI-powered world, that learning agility—combined with the uniquely human ability to connect, collaborate, and build trust—becomes your only sustainable competitive advantage.
Kevin Kruse is the Founder + CEO of LEADx, an emotional intelligence training company. Kevin is also a New York Times bestselling author. His latest book is Emotional Intelligence: 52 Strategies to Build Strong Relationships, Increase Resilience, and Achieve Your Goals.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Circle's Q2 Pop Fizzles as Price Target Gets Cut
Circle Internet Group (NYSE:CRCL) had its big earnings debut since going public in June, and on paper, the numbers looked impressive. Revenue for the second quarter jumped 53%, fueled by a 90% year-over-year surge in USDC circulation to $61.3 billion. But despite that strong top-line growth, the stock fell almost 6% after-hours on August 12. The drop came after Circle revealed it plans to sell 10 million new shares, which raised concerns about dilution. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with CRCL. US Tiger Securities analyst Bo Pei isn't ready to turn bullish just yet. He trimmed his price target from $200 to $180, pointing out that while Circle is in a strong position in the regulated stablecoin market and has its new Arc blockchain product on the way, several red flags remain. Profit margins are under pressure and may tighten further in the second half of the year. Operating costs are climbing faster than expected. And with 96% of revenue still coming from interest-sensitive reserves, a cut in Federal Reserve rates could take a bite out of income. On top of that, the valuation is steep, trading at more than 60 times projected 2026 EBITDA. Investors are betting heavily on Circle's growth story, but without a crypto market rebound or better industry conditions, that bet might feel expensive. For now, the stock's future seems to hinge on whether the momentum in digital assets can keep up with the lofty expectations. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Recent IPO Stock Gains Suggest a 'Spillover' Effect Could Boost Upcoming Debuts
Key Takeaways This year's cohort of new issues are popping on their first trading day, with some closing at more than double their IPO prices. Well-received IPOs tend to spawn other pops, University of Florida business professor Jay Ritter says. The median first-day performance of U.S. IPOs that raised $100 million or more was about 19% so far this year, the highest since 2020, according to Renaissance demand for initial public offerings is putting the shine in 2025's newest stocks. The median first-day performance of US IPOs—those that raised at least $100 million—was about 19% so far this year, the highest since 2020's median of 33%, according to Renaissance Capital, a provider of pre-IPO research and related ETFs. The firm's index of larger new listings that have been public for less than three years, tracked by the US IPO ETF (IPO), was up 12% through the Friday's close, ahead of the S&P 500's 8.6% gain. Firefly Aerospace (FLY), WhiteFiber (WYFI), and HeartFlow (HTFL), which priced last week, were included in those figures. Hot first-day performance can effect subsequent deals in what University of Florida business professor Jay Ritter calls a "spillover" effect. Companies waiting in the wings to go public could bask in the afterglow of NewsMax (NMAX), FatPipe (FATN), Circle Internet Group (CRCL), AIRO Group Holdings (AIRO) and Figma (FIG), all of which doubled their IPO prices, or better, over their respective trading debuts. More IPOs are on the way. Crypto exchange and CoinDesk owner Bullish is set to debut today under the ticker "BLSH." Tickets provider StubHub, which delayed its IPO plans following Liberation Day stock volatility, is reportedly kicking off its roadshow after Labor Day and will make its public debut in late September. There is no crystal ball for how well a new stock will do, but the ones that tend to outperform have things in common. "The vast majority of those with big run-ups are venture-capital backed. Lots are tech stocks. They're hard to value," Ritter told Investopedia, citing examples like Netscape in 1995 or Airbnb (ABNB) in 2020. Of the top 10 VC exits via US IPOs in value terms, which include Figma (FIG), Chime Financial (CHYM), and Circle (CRCL), according to PitchBook data, only one didn't pop on Day 1: CoreWeave (CRWV), which priced its IPO also under its marketed range. Its shares have subsequently risen almost 250% since its March debut. Figma, which went on a blistering rally as soon as it listed on July 31, has since declined about 25%. New stocks generally experience mean reversion. "Those that double or more on the first day have average long-term returns below IPOs that had less-than-enthusiastic first-day receptions," according to Ritter, who defines "long-term" as three years. The issue with the companies that tend to rocket up on their trading day, is that they then have a very high price-to-sales ratio. "It's difficult for a company to meet expectations when there's so much optimism built into the price," he said. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ravens' Lamar Jackson ends No. 8 trademark battle with Troy Aikman
Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson has ended his challenge to Troy Aikman's trademark use of the No. 8, according to the Baltimore Sun. Jackson originally filed the challenge in July 2024, and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office said this week that the Ravens quarterback filed to withdraw his challenge on Monday. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] At issue was Aikman owning and applying for several trademarks featuring the word "EIGHT" on apparel and bags, which Jackson's legal team reportedly argued would be "likely to cause confusion, or cause mistake, or to deceive" the public when it comes to figuring out if they're buying a Troy Aikman T-shirt or Lamar Jackson T-shirt. FL101, the company behind the Aikman products, has several products featuring "EIGHT," including a light beer brand, but Jackson was only disputing the bags and apparel. Aikman responded jokingly on social media following the July 2024 news by telling Jackson, 'Hey Lamar, looks like a worthy conversation over a couple cold EIGHT beers! Maybe Steve Young can arbitrate??' Jackson has been making his own apparel for years under his Era 8 Apparel brand, with products including T-shirts that just have the numeral 8 on them. Jackson has reportedly applied for a number of trademarks around the number, most of them featuring the "Era 8" name. This isn't the first time Jackson has gone to battle over his apparel company, as he filed a lawsuit against Amazon in 2020 over selling unlicensed merchandise featuring his registered trademarks. He also resolved a trademark dispute with Dale Earnhardt Jr. in April after the NASCAR Hall of Famer secured the right to a different No. 8.