logo
Inside deputy prime minister David Seymour's celebration brunch

Inside deputy prime minister David Seymour's celebration brunch

The Spinoff2 days ago

On Sunday the newly minted deputy prime minister had brunch with Act Party faithfuls. Gabi Lardies was there.
The stairs were completely jammed up with Epsom's finest. The dress code was unclear – alongside Kathmandu rain jackets were stiletto heels and magenta ties. It seemed that the majority of the mostly older crowd, who were imprinting red lipstick on their takeaway coffee cups about 10 steps away from their brunch reservations, were completely unfazed by the hordes of people outside, who were waving Palestine flags and chanting,'you're supporting genocide'. Once upstairs the chanting was inaudible, instead giving way to a new sensory experience, the smell of baby powder. Tickets were carefully checked and people were sequestered to their assigned tables, all 20 or so of them, round, covered in black polyester tablecloths and seating 10.
So began the Act Party's special celebration brunch on Sunday morning at the Hyundai Marine Sports Centre on Auckland's Tāmaki Drive. The occasion? A milestone. A huge ascension. A shiny new role for their leader. Little more than a decade after being the sole Act MP in parliament thanks only to the Epsom electorate, David Seymour was sworn in as deputy prime minister barely 24 hours earlier.
That part was no surprise, it was all as laid out by the coalition agreements signed in November 2023. Each of the coalition party leaders is to serve half a term as deputy. Winston Peters' 18 months are up, and now it's Seymour's turn. The title is largely just that – a title. Being deputy does not come with any specific portfolios and the biggest responsibility is acting as prime minister when Christopher Luxon is away. Even Seymour has confessed that ' to be honest, it doesn't make a massive practical difference '. But still, party members, supporters and hardcore loyalists turned up to give him not one, but two standing ovations.
But first, brunch.
I confess there was one journalist in the room who had assumed a celebratory brunch would mean bubbles, or at least mimosas, but the chilled glass bottles on the tables were merely water, and nary a drop of juice was to be seen. Glasses of muesli and yogurt were distributed around the room by waitstaff and then prodded unenthusiastically. One by one, tables were invited to make their selections from the buffet tables on either side of the room, not unlike a wedding reception.
The buffet tables were a dietary requirements nightmare. It was mostly half-sized pastries that were erupting flakes within a 5km radius. If you didn't want a pastry, you could opt for an english muffin, not that they were gluten free. All eggs were scrambled, mixed up with who knows what and extremely close to the bacon.
The drinks table was similarly non-woke. There was a box of teabags, a cauldron of coffee and one jug of cow's milk, with an undisclosed amount of skim. None of the attendees requested plant-based milk.
At about 10.20am, David Seymour stepped into the room, wearing what he always wears – a dark toned suit with a coloured tie, this time blue. In the sea of retirees, he looked like a fresh foal, long legged and eager to please. 'Thanks for coming,' he said quietly to a table of adoring fans. 'Do you live nearby?' Before he got to life's big questions, he was whisked away to the front of the room, where pop-up Act branded banners and a lectern sliced up the perfect view of Rangitoto. Behind the logos, the volcano stood proudly in the shimmering waters, flanked by Northhead and Motutapu. Little sailboats wobbled on the shimmery sea and seagulls circled. But nobody was looking out there.
Seymour chatted to Act president John Windsor near tables scattered with his MPs: Karen Chhour wore a breast cancer ribbon on each of her magenta lapels, Parmjeet Parmar quietly looked on, and Todd Stephenson and Simon Court entertained John Banks. Laura McClure seemed restless, pacing in and out and across the room. When Brooke Van Velden arrived she joined her leader at the front of the room. Neither of them ate, though Seymour sipped from a takeaway coffee cup he'd bought in with him, and Van Velden made herself a steaming cup of tea.
At 10.45am, Act staffers checked the TV cameras were ready to roll before giving Seymour the go ahead. President Windsor took the lectern and a hush quickly descended over the room. He introduced Van Velden, who then introduced the deputy prime minister of the moment, Seymour. Before he had got a word in, the clapping (but not cheering) crowd popped up out of their seats. They stood and clapped for what felt like a feature length movie. Then finally, the Sunday speech they'd been anticipating for 18 months began.
'It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men and women.' Seymour began with a quote from Samuel Adams, one of the United States founding fathers. He left no doubt in anyone's minds that it was people in this room who were that irate, tireless minority, and the fire they were lighting was one of classical liberalism.
For 23 minutes Seymour spoke without once glancing at notes or fumbling. Every head on every table was turned his way. There was no chatter, no one scrolling on a phone, not even a cough. Eating and drinking were paused. The laughs came on all the right cues, at comments like 'some people probably think that books are a symbol of colonisation' and 'it was written by Brooke, but like Helen Clark, I just signed it' and all the references to Dancing with the Stars.
Most of all the laughing came when Seymour roasted his opponents. 'I get so much free accommodation living in Willie Jackson's head,' he said. 'You know nearly every single press release from Labour, every fundraising email, every talking point, is about how dangerous David Seymour is… I'm going to have to declare to Labor, yes, I am dangerous, but only to you and your batty outriders.'
Seymour painted a narrative of triumphing against the odds. The Act Party once on the brink of getting evicted from their offices, now at the centre of government. The many trials and tribulations along the way, like not breaking 1% support for five years. Then a roll call of gratitude to supporters, both big, small, financial and otherwise. The bulk of the speech though was ideological. The word freedom came up again and again, as did liberal. There were some notable omissions. Seymour never mentioned the Treaty principles bill. Not once. Nor did he mention his coalition partners or their parties.
Seymour finished with a look to the future. 'Buckle yourselves in because, in Hillary terms, this, today, is only basecamp.' The crowd popped up like meerkats again, determinedly clapping, and yet strangely silent. But it was all over quickly. Seymour's presence had been promised to a handful of media and their cameras, who followed him and his team into a small room near the entrance of the building. The brunchers were told they were welcome to stay around for more tea and coffee, but the wordless muzak was turned up and the waitstaff started clearing the tables.
In the small media room, the Act MPs stood in a triangular formation much like the pins in ten pin bowling, with Seymour as the head pin. 'This is not any kind of end,' he said, 'it's just another rest before we keep climbing.' His team smiled and nodded along. So what would the peak be? 'A multiple term government with Act at the centre of it.'
Outside a cold wind lifted the sole remaining Palestine flag. The Act Party supporters had mostly melted into the walkers along the waterfront or the line of traffic winding its way to Epsom. When the fundraising efforts begin for the election campaign, they will be called on first, to support the rest of the climb.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More Kiwis Oppose Than Support Government's Pay Equity Changes, New Poll Shows
More Kiwis Oppose Than Support Government's Pay Equity Changes, New Poll Shows

Scoop

time11 hours ago

  • Scoop

More Kiwis Oppose Than Support Government's Pay Equity Changes, New Poll Shows

Article – RNZ Nearly two thirds of the public believe the government should have first sought feedback on the controversial change, the latest RNZ Reid Research poll shows., Deputy Political Editor More New Zealanders oppose than support the government's shake-up of the pay equity regime, and a clear majority think the public should have been consulted first, a new poll shows. The latest RNZ Reid Research survey found 43.2 percent of respondents were against the overhaul, compared to just 25.5 percent in favour. Nearly a third – 31.3 percent – remained unsure. On the question of consultation, 68 percent said the government should have first sought feedback, with only 18.6 percent saying no. The remainder – 13.4 percent – were undecided. That opinion carried through to voters' party preferences, with even a slim majority of ACT voters agreeing that there should have been consultation, despite the changes being championed by Workplace Relations Minister and ACT deputy leader Brooke van Velden. The poll also indicated limited public comprehension: just 49.7 percent said they understood the changes, 38.2 percent admitted they did not, and a further 12.1 percent were unsure. More than half of those who claimed a lacked of understanding still expressed an opinion about the policy: 38 percent said they opposed it and 13 percent said they supported it. Respondents were surveyed from 23 May through to 30 May, capturing the immediate reaction to last month's Budget and the $12.8 billion of savings made from the coalition's pay equity pivot. Van Velden had announced the overhaul several weeks earlier, before passing legislation through all stages under urgency. Among the key changes: a new merit test was introduced, as well as a greater focus on whether employers could afford higher wages. The threshold to lodge a claim was lifted, and job comparisons across different industries were restricted. Along with the changes, the coalition also extinguished the 33 claims already being considered under the previous scheme. The government argues the regime had expanded beyond its remit, becoming too costly and confusing. The opposition parties and unions says the changes will make it harder for those in female-dominated sectors to achieve fair pay. The RNZ Reid Research result follows a similar question asked in the latest 1News Verian Poll, released on Tuesday. It found 45 percent opposed the pay equity changes, compared to 39 percent in support, and 16 percent who did not know or wouldn't say. Speaking to RNZ, van Velden said she had received mixed feedback but believed the community now recognised that the changes were necessary. 'It's always going to be a difficult conversation,' she said. 'We have fixed resources, we have to make those difficult decisions on behalf of New Zealanders.' And Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told RNZ he would not do anything differently if given the chance again. 'We made some pretty tough decisions to go through under urgency. But we had to fix a very unworkable and unaffordable law. It had got completely out of whack.' Finance Minister Nicola Willis suggested some of the public opposition or lack of understanding could have been driven by Labour promoting 'misinformation'. 'Labour have had a very confused position, and their hyperbole in claiming that we were ending equal pay has ultimately done a disservice to them and the people they're seeking to represent, because it's basically untrue.' But Labour leader Chris Hipkins said that was sheer desperation. 'Women up and down the country have a right to feel angry,' Hipkins said. 'The government cut billions of dollars that was otherwise going to be going into low paid women's pay packets, and now they're just desperately trying to deflect attention away from that.' The latest RNZ Reid Research poll showed National and ACT losing support, and without the numbers – even with NZ First – to form a government. ACT leader David Seymour said he did not put much stock in any one poll but acknowledged the recent pay equity changes could be on some voters' minds. 'Doing what is right is what is politically popular in the long term, and even if I'm wrong about that, good policy is worth it anyway. 'We have left New Zealand with a more sensible pay equity regime focused on actual gender-based discrimination, and I think that's worth it.' This poll of 1008 people was conducted by Reid Research, using quota sampling and weighting to ensure representative cross section by age, gender and geography. The poll was conducted through online interviews between 23-30 May 2025 and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent at a 95 percent confidence level. The report is available here.

'We have massive problems with regulation' - Seymour defends Regulatory Standards Bill
'We have massive problems with regulation' - Seymour defends Regulatory Standards Bill

RNZ News

time11 hours ago

  • RNZ News

'We have massive problems with regulation' - Seymour defends Regulatory Standards Bill

Deputy Prime Minister and ACT Party leader David Seymour has hit back at criticism of his flagship Regulatory Standards Bill, defending the legislation against claims it breaches Treaty of Waitangi principles and contradicts its own standards when compared with the recently passed Pay Equity Bill. In an at-times heated exchange with Guyon Espiner, Seymour stood firm on the need for regulatory reform despite New Zealand's high international rankings in governance and legal standards. Espiner pointed out that New Zealand ranks 99 out of 100 for regulatory quality in the World Bank index, placing it just behind the global benchmark. Seymour dismissed the ranking, arguing it measured whether a country is "basically a third-world country" and failed to capture the real-world frustrations faced by businesses, particularly in agriculture and construction. "You can read all the indices you like, but once you start getting down to talking to the actual people … we have massive problems with regulation," Seymour said, citing delays in approval for lower-emission agricultural chemicals as one. ACT Party leader David Seyour in studio for an interview on season 3 of 30 with Guyon Espiner. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Espiner went on to challenge Seymour on whether the government's recent Pay Equity Bill - pushed through under urgency - violated the principles laid out in the Regulatory Standards Bill itself. These principles include ensuring laws are not retrospective and that proper consultation takes place. Seymour did not deny the lack of consultation or the retrospective nature of the law change - which left 33 current pay equity claimants in the lurch - but argued it was irrelevant. "It was breached because it didn't matter," Seymour said. "All we did was dismantle a Byzantine crazy system… deciding how much the government would pay different workers it was employing anyway." He described the previous equity process as "effectively an internal government activity of arguing with each other" and derided those who had submitted pay appeals under the former system. "They said, 'We work so hard.' I said, 'Really? You think work is arguing with each other?'." The debate turned toward Māori engagement when Espiner pointed out the Waitangi Tribunal's conclusion that the Regulatory Standards Bill, due to a lack of meaningful consultation with Māori, breached the Treaty principles of partnership and active protection. Seymour insisted Māori voices were heard through public consultation. "We had 144 Iwi-based groups who submitted … If that's not enough, then I don't know what is." However, Espiner highlighted that of the 23,000 total submissions, only 76 supported the bill - a support rate of just 0.33 percent. Seymour dismissed the figure as misleading. "That quantum reflects nothing more than the fact that it's got easier and easier for people to make really, frankly, fake submissions … They've got bots, they can make a submission." Despite dismissing the opposing voices as fake, Seymour maintained that what mattered was not the opposition but the quality of the legislative framework, which is non-binding in its nature, thus not enforceable - despite the bill's $20 million price-tag. Seymour argued the Regulatory Standards Bill was about transparency, not enforcement. He compared it to the Public Finance Act and the Reserve Bank Act - also non-binding in nature, but important for government accountability. "There's nothing to stop a minister of finance writing to the governor of the Reserve Bank before an election saying, 'Run the presses, prime the pumps,'" Seymour said. "But it does allow the voters to judge them for doing it… and I want to do the same thing for regulation." Watch the full conversation with David Seymour and Guyon Espiner on 30 With Guyon Espiner . Subscribe to the podcast feed now to get every episode of 30 on your phone when it lands: On Spotify On iHeartRadio On Apple podcasts Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

More Kiwis Oppose Than Support Government's Pay Equity Changes, New Poll Shows
More Kiwis Oppose Than Support Government's Pay Equity Changes, New Poll Shows

Scoop

time12 hours ago

  • Scoop

More Kiwis Oppose Than Support Government's Pay Equity Changes, New Poll Shows

More New Zealanders oppose than support the government's shake-up of the pay equity regime, and a clear majority think the public should have been consulted first, a new poll shows. The latest RNZ Reid Research survey found 43.2 percent of respondents were against the overhaul, compared to just 25.5 percent in favour. Nearly a third - 31.3 percent - remained unsure. On the question of consultation, 68 percent said the government should have first sought feedback, with only 18.6 percent saying no. The remainder - 13.4 percent - were undecided. That opinion carried through to voters' party preferences, with even a slim majority of ACT voters agreeing that there should have been consultation, despite the changes being championed by Workplace Relations Minister and ACT deputy leader Brooke van Velden. The poll also indicated limited public comprehension: just 49.7 percent said they understood the changes, 38.2 percent admitted they did not, and a further 12.1 percent were unsure. More than half of those who claimed a lacked of understanding still expressed an opinion about the policy: 38 percent said they opposed it and 13 percent said they supported it. Respondents were surveyed from 23 May through to 30 May, capturing the immediate reaction to last month's Budget and the $12.8 billion of savings made from the coalition's pay equity pivot. Van Velden had announced the overhaul several weeks earlier, before passing legislation through all stages under urgency. Among the key changes: a new merit test was introduced, as well as a greater focus on whether employers could afford higher wages. The threshold to lodge a claim was lifted, and job comparisons across different industries were restricted. Along with the changes, the coalition also extinguished the 33 claims already being considered under the previous scheme. The government argues the regime had expanded beyond its remit, becoming too costly and confusing. The opposition parties and unions says the changes will make it harder for those in female-dominated sectors to achieve fair pay. The RNZ Reid Research result follows a similar question asked in the latest 1News Verian Poll, released on Tuesday. It found 45 percent opposed the pay equity changes, compared to 39 percent in support, and 16 percent who did not know or wouldn't say. Speaking to RNZ, van Velden said she had received mixed feedback but believed the community now recognised that the changes were necessary. "It's always going to be a difficult conversation," she said. "We have fixed resources, we have to make those difficult decisions on behalf of New Zealanders." And Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told RNZ he would not do anything differently if given the chance again. "We made some pretty tough decisions to go through under urgency. But we had to fix a very unworkable and unaffordable law. It had got completely out of whack." Finance Minister Nicola Willis suggested some of the public opposition or lack of understanding could have been driven by Labour promoting "misinformation". "Labour have had a very confused position, and their hyperbole in claiming that we were ending equal pay has ultimately done a disservice to them and the people they're seeking to represent, because it's basically untrue." But Labour leader Chris Hipkins said that was sheer desperation. "Women up and down the country have a right to feel angry," Hipkins said. "The government cut billions of dollars that was otherwise going to be going into low paid women's pay packets, and now they're just desperately trying to deflect attention away from that." The latest RNZ Reid Research poll showed National and ACT losing support, and without the numbers - even with NZ First - to form a government. ACT leader David Seymour said he did not put much stock in any one poll but acknowledged the recent pay equity changes could be on some voters' minds. "Doing what is right is what is politically popular in the long term, and even if I'm wrong about that, good policy is worth it anyway. "We have left New Zealand with a more sensible pay equity regime focused on actual gender-based discrimination, and I think that's worth it." This poll of 1008 people was conducted by Reid Research, using quota sampling and weighting to ensure representative cross section by age, gender and geography. The poll was conducted through online interviews between 23-30 May 2025 and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent at a 95 percent confidence level. The report is available here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store