More Kiwis Oppose Than Support Government's Pay Equity Changes, New Poll Shows
Nearly two thirds of the public believe the government should have first sought feedback on the controversial change, the latest RNZ Reid Research poll shows., Deputy Political Editor
More New Zealanders oppose than support the government's shake-up of the pay equity regime, and a clear majority think the public should have been consulted first, a new poll shows.
The latest RNZ Reid Research survey found 43.2 percent of respondents were against the overhaul, compared to just 25.5 percent in favour. Nearly a third – 31.3 percent – remained unsure.
On the question of consultation, 68 percent said the government should have first sought feedback, with only 18.6 percent saying no. The remainder – 13.4 percent – were undecided.
That opinion carried through to voters' party preferences, with even a slim majority of ACT voters agreeing that there should have been consultation, despite the changes being championed by Workplace Relations Minister and ACT deputy leader Brooke van Velden.
The poll also indicated limited public comprehension: just 49.7 percent said they understood the changes, 38.2 percent admitted they did not, and a further 12.1 percent were unsure.
More than half of those who claimed a lacked of understanding still expressed an opinion about the policy: 38 percent said they opposed it and 13 percent said they supported it.
Respondents were surveyed from 23 May through to 30 May, capturing the immediate reaction to last month's Budget and the $12.8 billion of savings made from the coalition's pay equity pivot.
Van Velden had announced the overhaul several weeks earlier, before passing legislation through all stages under urgency.
Among the key changes: a new merit test was introduced, as well as a greater focus on whether employers could afford higher wages. The threshold to lodge a claim was lifted, and job comparisons across different industries were restricted.
Along with the changes, the coalition also extinguished the 33 claims already being considered under the previous scheme.
The government argues the regime had expanded beyond its remit, becoming too costly and confusing. The opposition parties and unions says the changes will make it harder for those in female-dominated sectors to achieve fair pay.
The RNZ Reid Research result follows a similar question asked in the latest 1News Verian Poll, released on Tuesday. It found 45 percent opposed the pay equity changes, compared to 39 percent in support, and 16 percent who did not know or wouldn't say.
Speaking to RNZ, van Velden said she had received mixed feedback but believed the community now recognised that the changes were necessary.
'It's always going to be a difficult conversation,' she said. 'We have fixed resources, we have to make those difficult decisions on behalf of New Zealanders.'
And Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told RNZ he would not do anything differently if given the chance again.
'We made some pretty tough decisions to go through under urgency. But we had to fix a very unworkable and unaffordable law. It had got completely out of whack.'
Finance Minister Nicola Willis suggested some of the public opposition or lack of understanding could have been driven by Labour promoting 'misinformation'.
'Labour have had a very confused position, and their hyperbole in claiming that we were ending equal pay has ultimately done a disservice to them and the people they're seeking to represent, because it's basically untrue.'
But Labour leader Chris Hipkins said that was sheer desperation.
'Women up and down the country have a right to feel angry,' Hipkins said.
'The government cut billions of dollars that was otherwise going to be going into low paid women's pay packets, and now they're just desperately trying to deflect attention away from that.'
The latest RNZ Reid Research poll showed National and ACT losing support, and without the numbers – even with NZ First – to form a government.
ACT leader David Seymour said he did not put much stock in any one poll but acknowledged the recent pay equity changes could be on some voters' minds.
'Doing what is right is what is politically popular in the long term, and even if I'm wrong about that, good policy is worth it anyway.
'We have left New Zealand with a more sensible pay equity regime focused on actual gender-based discrimination, and I think that's worth it.'
This poll of 1008 people was conducted by Reid Research, using quota sampling and weighting to ensure representative cross section by age, gender and geography. The poll was conducted through online interviews between 23-30 May 2025 and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent at a 95 percent confidence level. The report is available here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
38 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Council seeks recovery of legal fees after $2.4m lawsuit against it dismissed
He sought $2.4m for lost earnings but the claim was not permissible under the ACC Act, which barred people from suing for personal injury, and the judge dismissed the case. A recent court judgement showed the council had sought almost $43,000 from Sheeran to recover legal costs but Judge Andrew Skelton ruled the council was instead entitled to recover costs of about $20,000. Sheeran, who was appealing the dismissal of his original case, sought a stay of execution of the costs order pending the outcome of his appeal, but this was declined. In his ruling, Judge Skelton said the council and its ratepayers would be adversely affected by any stay of execution in that 'the recovery of costs will be delayed, possibly for some time'. 'The council and ratepayers have had to bear the costs of this proceeding since 2023 and are now having to bear the further costs of responding to Mr Sheeran's appeal,' Judge Skelton said. He said Sheeran had 'contributed unnecessarily' to the time and expense of the proceeding. 'In particular, Mr Sheeran was advised by the solicitors for the council and the court that his claim for compensatory damages for personal injury would likely be dismissed or struck out,' he said. 'It was explained to Mr Sheeran that his claim is barred by s 317(1) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001, but he continued to pursue the claim. 'Mr Sheeran also apparently failed to follow my direction that he should obtain legal advice on his claim, including whether his claim should be amended to seek exemplary damages. 'I also explained that he should consider carefully whether he should be pursuing any claim against the council because of the likely cost consequences.' LDR is local body journalism funded by RNZ and NZ on Air. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Kiwis Leaving Clear Vote Of No Confidence In Luxon
Data from StatsNZ shows more people are leaving New Zealand as the cost of living keeps getting worse under National. 'The number of New Zealanders leaving is a clear vote of no confidence in Christopher Luxon and his government,' Labour finance and economy spokesperson Barbara Edmonds said. 'Christopher Luxon promised his business experience would make things better, instead he's making life worse. New Zealanders are being forced to leave to find opportunities that should be available here. 'Almost 72,000 New Zealand citizens have given up hope for a better future here in New Zealand in the year to June 2025, the highest since 2012. That's more than the population of Napier gone, all thanks to this government failing to deliver on their promises. 'No one should have to leave their country to build a future. It doesn't have to be this way. 'We can build a future where young people want to stay, put down roots, and help shape a thriving Aotearoa. 'Labour is focused on rebuilding opportunity here at home while easing the pressure households are feeling right now,' Barbara Edmonds said.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Police Blame Job Cuts For Not Following Cabinet's Orders To Improve Asset Management
Phil Pennington Police admit they ate into their ability to manage their costly assets with big back-office job cuts last year. They promised at the time no impact on frontline services from axeing the 170 jobs to save $50 million, amid the government's public sector cuts. Asked by RNZ about them scoring the worst out of 16 agencies Treasury measured, police said the "reduction in corporate roles in 2024 has impacted the resource available for strategic asset management". It came at a time that some key assets, including about 900 of their 5300 Bushmaster rifles, were too old and need replacing. Police were under a 2023 Cabinet directive to improve asset management, when they cut the corporate jobs. The Treasury report said police were five-to-seven years away from fixing the systems as Cabinet demanded, and could not do it without fresh investment. As for the rifles, Treasury said, "Police must procure a vendor to supply product and services to replace, maintain and sustain its fleet of rifles. "Some current weapons are 20+ years old and well outside their life-of-type." Life-of-type usually refers to submarines past their expected lifespan. A rifles tender went out in June that said the "semi-automatic rifle stock includes a portion of aging firearms reaching end of life and needing replacement". Police said they maintained the old rifles well - "A rifle at end of life does not mean that it is no longer functioning or safe." Out of 5300 rifles, about 800 were "beyond end-of-life", and 100 at or near it. Four thousand were current; only 500 were new, police told RNZ. They also defended their overall asset management, saying they were striving to improve it. But they scored the worst out of 16 agencies in a Treasury report in February. Told by the Cabinet in 2023 to do better, 11 agencies did so. But the police instead cut back on staff doing the work, taking out 170 back-office jobs to save $50m amid the public sector cutbacks the government ordered. At the time, they promised the cuts would have no adverse impacts on frontline policing. But they had impact elsewhere. "A reduction in corporate support staff has impacted resources with expertise in resilience, sustainability and portfolio specific asset management," the police reported back in February. They repeated this four times on one page, about five "non-compliances" with what Cabinet ordered in 2023. They estimated they would not have fixes for these till 2030 and 2032 - and even then this was "dependent on securing an uplift in investment and retaining dedicated resource". Again, this line was repeated four times. The next agency with the most number of failures to comply - four - was the Defence Force. Eleven out of the 16 agencies had complied. Police told RNZ: "NZ Police strives to continuously improve asset management towards compliance with the Cabinet circular." "The Commissioner has prioritised operational asset management this financial year." RNZ asked what assurance police could give the public that they would not cut out vital back office roles in future. The Police Association union last August quoted a police employee saying, "We think this will be a scattergun headcount-reduction exercise made in a silo by people who don't understand the work people do, who they do it for, and who also won't personally be affected by the outcome of the 'realignment' exercise." A police spokesperson said the force faces considerable pressure with its capital funding and was constantly making prioritisation decisions. "Police's reduction in corporate roles in 2024 has impacted the resource available for strategic asset management, but recent changes to leadership the Commissioner introduced through his leadership realignment have also brought a range of assets, (including our property portfolio, vehicle fleet, firearms, and other operational assets such as tasers and body armour) together under single leadership and this is enabling improvements in how those assets are managed." RNZ approached Minister Mark Mitchell for comment. Mitchell has heralded putting over a billion dollars into police in the last two Budgets. Most was for the front line, with a slice for a human resources and payroll IT upgrade. The Cabinet directive demanded police have an asset register for "critical assets" listing their condition and risks. They now expect to have set one up by 2032, but "compliance is dependent on securing business case funding". They got the nod late last year to do a business case to replace the old Bushmasters, in a project rated "medium" risk, the document showed. Police told RNZ their rifle stocks included new ones, and others "at end of life, or beyond end of life" at the other end of the spectrum. End-of-lfe was about an asset being fully depreciated. "This is typical of asset management ... This means the asset no longer has a monetary value and can be replaced," said Inspector Jason Ross, acting director of operational capability, in a statement. "Our rifle fleet is regularly and well maintained by our National Armoury and all firearms are operationally and functionally checked before every deployment. Should any issue be identified during these checks, the rifle is removed from service and repaired or replaced." As well as new rifles, they were also looking into maybe getting an outside service to manage the rifles rather than their own armoury. They also want a digital asset tracking tool. "This will enable police to have a rifle fleet that meets current and future operating capability needs," Ross said. It aligned with how they were managing their body armour. The Treasury report covered the quarter to December 2024, but was the latest available. Along with it, the Minister of Finance Nicola Willis and her Associate Chris Bishop warned colleagues that many agencies "remain well below" their expectations on giving Cabinet accurate budget advice about projects on time; fewer than 60 percent were up to scratch. Ministers had a big role in making sure project planning, delivery and asset management got better; they should "understand the state of their agency's asset management performance and ability to manage critical replacement, renewals and maintenance within existing funding". Treasury scored Police middle of the pack of 25 agencies for planning big projects, higher for delivering them on time and on budget. They have $1.2 billion of investments planned, and $2.1b being delivered - the largest project is the $1.8b Public Safety Network. Along with a nod on rifles, Police won the nod to do more planning on public order policing improvements, sparked by the 2022 occupation of Parliament grounds.
