South Dakota behavioral health loses federal COVID funds
Jury chosen in DSS embezzlement trial
According to the South Dakota Department of Social Services (DSS), the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) terminated $2,982,719 in DSS' supplemental block grant awards from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA).
The money supported a range of behavioral health treatment and prevention activities through DSS, said Matt Althoff, DSS Cabinet Secretary, in a statement to KELOLAND News.
Although contracts are being terminated or amended, said Althoff, DSS does not anticipate any staff layoffs as a result of these cancellations.
According to Althoff, DSS notified vendors and contractors of the immediate end of work and contracts related to these funding streams.
The grants would've ended by September 30, 2025, according to the DSS website,
Signed by former President Joe Biden in 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act is designed to fiscally aid Americans impacted by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
This is a developing story.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
The Memo: Trump ignites new culture war battle over the Smithsonian — and slavery
President Trump has plunged once more into the nation's cultural wars — this time with Washington's famous Smithsonian Institution in his sights. As is often the case, the manner of Trump's attack risks significant blowback, even as it delights his fans. Specifically, in a social media blast about how 'OUT OF CONTROL' the Smithsonian allegedly is, Trump contended that its exhibits were excessively focused on 'how bad Slavery was.' Whether that sentiment was clumsily phrased or fully intentional, it ignited a storm because of the implication that slavery was somehow not quite as bad as commonly portrayed. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) — a potential 2028 presidential candidate who has adopted an ever more combative social media stance against Trump in recent weeks — contended that the president was 'trying to ERASE slavery from U.S. history.' Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) blasted Trump's comment as 'outrageous and un-American' and further argued, 'If Trump thinks slavery wasn't bad, he clearly needs to spend more time in a museum.' Media commentators expressed their own criticisms. CNN 'Newsnight' anchor Abby Phillip began her show on Tuesday with a monologue in which she noted, 'It's important to say, objectively, slavery was indeed bad. It was evil — the nation's original sin. And it is impossible to understand the true history of this country without fully grappling with slavery's impact.' It would be naive to imagine that one more Trump controversy will do anything to fundamentally change his political fortunes. Trump has peppered the national discourse with inflammatory remarks since he descended the Trump Tower escalator to launch his first campaign a decade ago, accusing Mexico of sending 'rapists' across the southern border. Still, his propensity to ignite new fights, often on some of the most sensitive issues of American life, surely contributes to popularity ratings that are, overall, mediocre — despite the ferocious loyalty of his base. Even as his supporters laud the changes he has wrought in the first seven months of his second term, recent polls have shown most Americans disapproving of his job performance. A recent Ipsos/Reuters poll put Trump 14 points underwater, with 54 percent of survey respondents disapproving and 40 percent approving. An Economist/YouGov poll indicated his net rating was even worse, 16 points in the negative. Trump's ratings when it comes to personal attributes also reflect broad distaste for his approach. A second Economist poll earlier this month asked Americans if they liked Trump as a person, regardless of whether or not they agree with his policies. Just 33 percent of respondents said they liked him. Forty-eight percent said they disliked him — including almost 1 in 5 self-described conservatives. That being said, there is obviously a political market for what Trump is selling, especially among culturally conservative Americans who feel alienated by society's liberal shifts in recent decades. He notably placed his attack on the Smithsonian within the framework of the institution allegedly being excessively 'woke'— and insufficiently patriotic. Despite the nebulousness over what 'wokeness' actually is, Trump has used similar charges against leading universities. Those attacks have drawn much media comment, but it's unclear they have sparked commensurate public outrage. A number of elite institutions have sought some form of accommodation with him. In Trump's case, it's also often hard to distinguish between 'culture war' rhetoric and substantive policy. The former seems to drive the latter in his case, to an unusual extent. There are subjects on which this plays to his political advantage — the most obvious being immigration, where he has spoken frequently about an 'invasion' that can only be repelled by his hawkish policies. During last year's election campaign, immigration was consistently Trump's strongest issue — a finding that suggests his language on the issue resonates widely, even as it appalls critics. He has, more recently, used similarly emotive language as he seeks to justify his deployment of the National Guard and other federal law enforcement agencies in Washington, D.C., as well as his takeover of the city's police department. In that instance, Trump has contended that 'the Democrat Government of D.C. has largely stopped investigating, arresting, and prosecuting most crime,' and has spoken of a crime emergency, despite declining violent crime rates. He has also promised that his law enforcement takeover will result in the District of Columbia being 'LIBERATED' from 'Crime, Savagery, Filth and Scum.' In this case, however, his words have rung hollow for the vast majority of residents of the District. A Washington Post-Schar School poll of D.C. residents published on Wednesday found 79 percent of those surveyed oppose his federal takeover of the police and his deployment of the guard and FBI. It is, of course, arguable whether Trump's language and actions in relation to Washington are really aimed at meeting the needs of the strongly Democratic city — or about playing to his base in the heartlands by casting the capital in a negative and quasi-subversive light. In the end, there is no plausible possibility that Trump will back off the culture war fights that he has embraced for so long. He can argue that approach has brought him this far — even as it has also fueled the intensity of the opposition to him.
USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
Millions for ballroom while healthcare, food aid, federal services are cut
Congress, by abdicating their duties for oversight and the power of the purse, has expanded the prerogatives of presidential authority to every facet of the federal government's operations. Two Aug. 7 headlines sum up this administration's priorities: 'MCW opens $150M cancer research center: But hiring limited by federal cuts to research' and 'Trump ($200M) ballroom a lasting legacy: President making big changes to White House.' The ballroom chandeliers and gold filigree could pay for medical research to help everyone — but our president enjoys dancing. Peggy Creer, Whitefish Bay Letters: ICE cruelty, rioter pardons, unjust tariffs and more in Trump's first six months GOP Congressional majority gives away 250-year-old Democracy In just seven months, the Republican majority in Congress gave away the Democracy that has served Americans for nearly 250 years. They willingly relinquished their constitutional powers as an equal branch of government so that President Donald Trump could run the country as he pleased. We were left with a president intent upon rounding up and deporting millions of immigrants, pardoning the Jan. 6 insurrectionists, prosecuting his persecutors, imposing tariffs on all imports and abandoning climate protections for fossil fuel profit for energy corporations. Gone is the America that feeds the hungry, houses the homeless, cares for the sick and disadvantaged, unburdens the debtor, loves the neighbor, welcomes the stranger, tolerates the different and exalts the lowly. Congress, by abdicating their duties for law making, oversight and the power of the purse has expanded the prerogatives of presidential authority to every facet of the federal government's operations. ICE has become a nationalized police force that operates with impunity, sweeping up and detaining people without probable cause nor due process. Healthcare is been stripped from 10 million people, food security cut for 40 million Americans. Tax breaks in the billions for the wealthy, but significant additional financial burdens for working-class Americans. Our nation has lost respect for the rule of law. We have lost civility and decency. Verbal abuse and bullying are normalized. Americans no longer have a voice in their government because Republicans in Congress have ceded that voice to Donald Trump. Jerry Hanson, Elkhorn Letters: Sen. Ron Johnson's suggestion to bypass primaries is great, except for his motive | Letters I demand answers on impact of federal workforce cuts I am writing to shed light on the disservices being committed against the public servants who tirelessly ensure the continued operation of our country. Under the Trump administration, the federal workforce has sustained numerous attacks, including the elimination of jobs, undermining of democratically directed government operations and removing merit-based civil service protections. The administration has advanced large-scale reductions-in-force that threaten to undermine the effectiveness of government operations, eliminate government functions without the approval of Congress or privatize government work to the detriment of the public and taxpayer. In a time where the American people depend on the services provided by the federal community, we cannot stand idly by. I demand greater transparency regarding the impact on government operations, adherence to the law and better treatment for our public servants, and for our country. Mary Karfonta, Muskego Letters: Slash and burn approach to federal agencies antithesis of smart management Tips for getting your letter to the editor published Here are some tips to get your views shared with your friends, family, neighbors and across our state: Write: Letters to the editor, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 330 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI, 53202. Fax: (414)-223-5444. E-mail: jsedit@ or submit using the form that can be found on the on the bottom of this page.
Los Angeles Times
26 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
The Big Lie is back and coming for American elections
Like most Americans, including White House reporters apparently, I've tuned out Donald Trump's incessant Big Lie that he won the 2020 presidential election — 'by a lot.' That means his nonsense about rigged voting and Democrats' cheating goes mostly unchallenged, and he continues to undermine faith in U.S. elections. After all, it's not like anyone can shut him up. Still, it's time to quit tuning out. Whether a reporter on the beat or a citizen in conversation anywhere, pay attention and push back against Trump's un-American blather. Because in recent days the power-drunk president has in various ways telegraphed that his Big Lie isn't just about a past election but a pretext for what he could do to disrupt the next one, the 2026 midterm elections for Congress. Other 2020 election liars are paying a big price, literally. Just this week, right-wing Newsmax agreed to pay $67 million to Dominion Voting Systems, on top of $40 million in March to Smartmatic, to settle defamation lawsuits based on Newsmax's false reporting (echoing Trump) that the companies rigged voting machines for Joe Biden. Newsmax's penalty is of course dwarfed by the $787 million that Fox News paid to Dominion in 2023; in a pending trial, Smartmatic seeks $2.7 billion from Fox. All the while, the president of the United States continues to spout the same slop, all but immune to legal action, as he sets the stage for 2026. On Friday, after Trump's bro-fest summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin about the war in Ukraine, Trump happily recounted to Fox's Sean Hannity in Alaska that the two presidents digressed to discuss the 2020 U.S. election and — what do you know? — Putin, the KGB-trained master manipulator and well-known arbiter of honest elections (not) supposedly assured Trump that, yes, he actually won big but the election was rigged against him. As an aside here, recall that Hannity and other Fox network stars privately trashed Trump's 2020 election lie, according to filings in the Dominion lawsuit, and that Hannity testified under oath: 'I did not believe it for one second.' Yet in Anchorage, Hannity nodded along as Trump told him that Putin said Trump won in 2020 'by so much,' but 'your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting. … It's impossible to have mail-in voting and have honest elections.' Assuming Putin said what Trump claims, the Russian was playing to Trump's longstanding, groundless gripes not only against the 2020 election but against voting by mail, which Democratic voters use much more than Republicans do. And Trump, ever the Kremlin's useful idiot, took his cue: First thing on Monday morning, he declared in a long, error-filled and much-capitalized social media diatribe that he'd 'lead a movement' to ban mail ballots and voting machines. Trump repeated Putin's falsehood that the United States is 'the only Country in the World that uses Mail-In Voting. All others gave it up because of the MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD ENCOUNTERED.' But in fact, dozens of countries use mail ballots and, as with other forms of voting, research, along with the courts, has found that fraud is vanishingly rare. The president's stance on mail ballots is like his position on a ceasefire in Ukraine: He was for it before he was against it (and he was for both things before getting ensnared in Putin's web on Friday). In 2024, bending to Republican officials' pleadings that he drop his opposition to mail ballots, Trump urged supporters to vote by mail — as he typically, and hypocritically, does — and even recorded a video promotion. Now that Trump is back to opposing mail ballots, in Monday morning's social media rant he yet again contradicted the plain words of the Constitution to claim powers he doesn't have, that he can order states to get rid of mail ballots and voting machines. 'Remember, the States are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes,' he wrote. 'They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them.' Here's the Constitution on that: 'The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.' It's just more proof that both times Trump took the oath of office to uphold the Constitution and 'see that the laws are faithfully executed,' he lied then, too. The president has since repeated that he, with Republican allies, will 'do everything possible' to end mail ballots. And he's saying the quiet part out loud: Without mail-in voting, he told reporters in the Oval Office on Monday, 'you're not gonna have many Democrats get elected. That's bigger than anything having to do with redistricting.' There you have it. Trump's 'movement' against mail ballots, along with his push for red states to redraw congressional district lines to elect more Republicans, is all part of how he's trying rig elections in 2026, in what is expected to be a bad year for his party given his unpopularity. And it's all predicated on the Big Lie about nonexistent Democratic election cheating. There are other warning signs: Trump's military takeover of the District of Columbia. (Every day brings another announcement of a Republican governor sending National Guard troops.) His occupation of Los Angeles. Repeated threats to send troops to other big, blue cities. All on specious grounds and over the objections of elected local and state leaders. It's wholly imaginable, then, that on trumped-up claims (pun absolutely intended) about potential election fraud, Trump would militarize Democratic vote-heavy cities in time for next year's elections. At a minimum, that would surely intimidate some would-be voters. At worst, well, I don't even want to speculate about the worst. When Trump entered presidential politics a decade ago, it took a while for journalists to get comfortable applying the L-word: Liar. But he earned it. Now he's all but inviting us to expand the nomenclature to include autocrat, dictator or even the F-bomb, fascist. Bluesky: @jackiecalmesThreads: @jkcalmesX: @Jackiekcalmes
