logo
Fostering a lifelong love of reading in children

Fostering a lifelong love of reading in children

The Guardian06-05-2025
You report that an increasing proportion of young parents say children's reading is 'more a subject to learn than a fun thing to do' (Most parents don't enjoy reading to their children, survey suggests, 30 April). This is hardly surprising, as the early reading strategy required by the Department for Education and Ofsted places an exclusive emphasis on learning phonics rules. Required reading schemes must focus on decoding words at the expense of context, a lively story or anything that looks a bit like fun.
Next month, in primary schools, five- and six-year-olds will undertake the statutory 'phonics check', which asks them to decode single words and nonsense words according to the rules they have been taught. Those who do not meet the standard must repeat the test next year. Intensive drills will be the order of the day. No, it is not 'a fun thing to do'.
It is claimed that standards in early reading are rising. In fact, scores on the phonics check are improving as schools teach to the test, but this is valueless if children do not enjoy reading. The ability to 'sound out words' is one skill to support reading, but there are many others, including whole-word recognition, appreciation of sentence structure and use of context. Children become fluent readers by being drawn into the enjoyment of books.
The exclusive emphasis on synthetic phonics teaching was ramped up under the Cameron government and became progressively more strictly imposed through the years of Tory government. It is disappointing that the curriculum review set up by Labour under Prof Becky Francis does not recognise the need for change. Her interim report, published in March, recommended retaining the phonics check. Children deserve better.
Ruth Allen
Kinoulton, Nottinghamshire
I am delighted that Julia Donaldson is working on another of her wonderful books (The Guardian view on the Gruffalo: a well-timed comeback, wart and all, 1 May). Her stories are a joy to read aloud and share with children because adults enjoy them too. There is nothing that will encourage young children to read more than sharing excitement and delight in a story with a grownup who clearly enjoys reading. As public libraries close nationwide and school libraries are sidelined, the joy of reading is lost and it simply becomes another subject in the curriculum.
This leads to a lack of fluent literacy that affects children's ability to understand words and to evaluate what they see written in whatever format or media. Story time with teachers and librarians, cuddling up with a parent and a good book, time to read just for fun – these are some of the best things we can give children, so that reading for pleasure becomes a lifelong joy.
Carol Elliott
Morpeth, Northumberland
Your article underlines the need for school libraries. The decline in the 'happy reading culture' that comes from being read to, and the growing perception of reading as schoolwork, is a challenge. We need to maximise access to reading for pleasure, and offer choice, encouragement and guidance. Every school needs a library, and someone responsible for curating and promoting a diverse and current collection, relevant to children's lives. This is particularly important where home circumstances limit opportunities.
We owe it to children to be relentlessly positive about books and reading, and to press those in power for a library in every school.
Henrietta Englefield
London
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Historian finds 17th century will which sparked Shakespeare family row
Historian finds 17th century will which sparked Shakespeare family row

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Historian finds 17th century will which sparked Shakespeare family row

A 17th century will which sparked a family row over William Shakespeare's grand Stratford-upon-Avon home has been found. The document, drawn up by Thomas Nash on August 25 1642, was discovered Dr Dan Gosling, a historian at The National Archives, who was looking through unlisted boxes containing hundreds of deeds. Dr Gosling said he is 'confident' that no one had seen the will in 150 years as it was filed away in the late 19th century. He added that it shows how the execution of Shakespeare's will 'wasn't entirely smooth sailing'. Nash was married to Shakespeare's granddaughter Elizabeth Hall and living in New Place – then The Bard's family residence and the second-largest house in the Warwickshire town. But Nash left the property to his cousin Edward – despite having no right to do so. The house had already been left by Shakespeare to his eldest daughter, Susanna, who was alive and living there with Nash and Elizabeth, who was her daughter. When Nash died in 1647, Susanna and Elizabeth obtained a legal document confirming that they still held Shakespeare's estates. Edward Nash hauled Elizabeth into court the following year, arguing she respect Nash's wishes. The case landed in the Court of Chancery – where Elizabeth argued that her late husband had no power to grant Shakespeare's home and mentioned her grandfather's bequest to her mother. Elizabeth, who later became Lady Barnard, is believed to have settled the matter out of court and lived in the residence until her death in 1670, Dr Gosling said. Dr Gosling told the PA news agency: 'My initial immediate reaction when I found it was, 'oh, this is interesting', but I got really excited when I started to read about it and how it tied into the Chancery case, how it tied into the Shakespeare family and the last of Shakespeare's direct descendants.'

Government's GCSE English and maths resits policy ‘not fit for purpose'
Government's GCSE English and maths resits policy ‘not fit for purpose'

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Government's GCSE English and maths resits policy ‘not fit for purpose'

The Government's policy of making students resit maths and English GCSEs is 'not fit for purpose' and it can undermine young people's 'confidence and motivation', education leaders have warned. Politicians have been urged to 'rethink' how young people are encouraged to gain English and maths skills after the number of post-16 students taking GCSE resits in the two subjects increased this year. The rise in young people resitting their exams is partly down to a growing number of teenagers in the population, as well as the return to pre-pandemic grading standards in England in 2023, the Ofqual chief has suggested. In England, many students who do not secure at least a grade 4 – which is considered a 'standard pass' – in English and/or maths GCSE are required to retake the subjects during post-16 education. The proportion of 16-year-old entries in England securing at least a grade 4 in English language has dropped from 71.2% last year to 70.6% this year – although it is above the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when the figure was 70.5%. In maths, the proportion of 16-year-old entries in England securing at least a grade 4 has fallen from 72.0% in 2024 to 71.9% this year, though this is higher than 71.5% in 2019. Students in England are funded to retake maths and/or English until they achieve a GCSE grade 9 to 4. For students with a grade 2 or below, they can either study towards a pass in functional skills level 2 or towards a GCSE grade 9 to 4. PA news agency analysis of figures by Ofqual suggests that 183,450 16-year-olds in England did not achieve a grade 4 or above in English language this year, 1,770 more than in 2024. In maths, it is likely that 174,930 16-year-olds did not achieve a grade 4 or above, 970 fewer than last year. The Government launched a curriculum and assessment review last summer. Ahead of the review's final report, which is due in the autumn, education leaders have called on policymakers to look again at the GCSE resits policy. The Education Secretary has said the review will look at how to support young people who do not achieve the 'right level' in maths and English at GCSE. Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'Once again we see that the majority of students who retake GCSE English and maths in post-16 education under a Government policy of mandatory resits continue to fall short of a grade 4 standard pass. 'It is utterly demoralising for these young people and there has to be a better way of supporting literacy and numeracy. 'We urge the curriculum and assessment review to grasp this nettle.' Catherine Sezen, director of education policy at the Association of Colleges (AoC), said: 'Across the country, educators are working hard to improve outcomes, yet many are left asking what more can be done. 'After a decade of the condition of funding policy, it is time to rethink how we support young people to build essential English and maths skills.' She added that the AoC is calling for 'a more flexible, evidence-based approach' which empowers colleges to meet learners' needs 'without relying on repeated resits that can undermine confidence and motivation'. Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the NAHT school leaders' union, said the current GCSE resit policy was 'not fit for purpose'. He said: 'NAHT has long called for reform of the current policy that forces students into repeated resits, which is demotivating and ineffective. 'What is needed are more appropriate and engaging alternatives to GCSEs in English and maths at KS4. 'Post-16 students who need to continue the subjects must be allowed to study for qualifications that suit their needs and ambitions, rather than defaulting to GCSE resits.' Jill Duffy, chief executive of the OCR exam board, added that Thursday's figures showed a 'resit crisis. She said: 'Tinkering at the edges of policy won't fix this. We need fundamental reform to maths and English secondary education – especially at Key Stage 3 – to support those who fall behind in these crucial subjects.' UK GCSE entries for students aged 17 and over has risen by 12.1% compared with last year. On the rise in the number of post-16 students taking resits, Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at England's exams regulator Ofqual, said it was linked with the 'rising demographic trend'. He told PA: 'If you've got a larger cohort – and proportions getting a grade four are broadly stable – you're going to see more people coming through to resit. 'But the reset of normal grading standards in 2023 probably also plays into it as well.' Sir Ian said: 'My view is that the Government's policy that students continue to study English and maths post-16 if they haven't reached that critical grade four threshold is the right thing to do. 'The policy is not that students do multiple resets. The policy is that they continue to study English and maths and sit, when appropriate, either for GCSE or for a functional skills qualification.' Speaking to PA earlier this month, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'The curriculum and assessment review is looking at how best we can support 16 to 19-year-olds who don't achieve the right level in maths and English. 'Of course I do want more students – particularly from less well-off backgrounds – to get a good pass at GCSE in English and maths because that's the gateway to so much more. 'But the curriculum and assessment review is going to look at the approach we will take in the years to come.'

Tube strike: London Underground staff to walkout over pay
Tube strike: London Underground staff to walkout over pay

BBC News

time20 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Tube strike: London Underground staff to walkout over pay

There will be rolling strike action across the London Underground (LU) beginning on Friday 5 September for seven days, the RMT union has strikes come after management refused to engage with union demands on pay, fatigue management, extreme shift patterns and a reduction in the working week, as well as failing to honour previous agreements made with staff, the RMT said. RMT General Secretary Eddie Dempsey said: "Fatigue and extreme shift rotations are serious issues impacting on our members health and wellbeing- all of which have not been adequately addressed for years by LU management."Transport for London has been approached for comment. On Thursday, RMT accused management of a "dismissive approach", adding this had "fuelled widespread anger and distrust" among the workforce. Staff at different grades will be taking industrial action at different times as part of rolling strike action, it a separate dispute over pay and conditions, workers on the Docklands Light Railway will also be striking during this period in the week beginning 7 Dempsey added: "RMT will continue to engage LU management with a view to seeking a revised offer in order to reach a negotiated settlement."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store