logo
EXCLUSIVE The man who ordered the kidnap and murder of his niece in Britain's most notorious honour killing now claims HE is the victim. Here, her family have their say

EXCLUSIVE The man who ordered the kidnap and murder of his niece in Britain's most notorious honour killing now claims HE is the victim. Here, her family have their say

Daily Mail​06-06-2025
The harrowing kidnap, rape and murder of Banaz Mahmod made for one of Britain's most infamous so-called 'honour killings'.
And loved ones grieving her loss are now suffering fresh trauma after an uncle who was among those plotting her death launched a sick new court battle.
Family members and campaigners honouring tragic Banaz have hit back at the convict's latest claims, describing the case as 'appalling' - while also calling for changes to sentencing on 'honour killings'.
Banaz, 20, was killed on the orders of her father Mahmod Mahmod and her uncle Ari Mahmod after she left an abusive arranged marriage and fell in love with another man.
Other family members and friends were recruited to carry out the murder and she was raped by three of her cousins before being strangled.
Now her uncle Ali Mahmod, 69, is suing ITV in London 's High Court over a 2020 drama called Honour, starring Keeley Hawes, and a 2012 documentary on the killing.
Representing himself in court, Mahmod insisted that in his Iraqi Muslim culture such supposed 'honour' murders were acceptable - and he complained it was the accusation of rape that would damage his reputation.
Ali Mahmod, speaking via videolink from HMP Whitemoor in Cambridgeshire, told the High Court he had been attacked in prison and his family were victims of reprisals.
While representing himself in the court hearing last month, Ali Mahmod told judges he been attacked in jail and that his family were victims of reprisals.
Speaking through an interpreter, he said: 'In my country murder is normal - after served time you have a new opportunity.
'In my culture the main things they react against me was the rape allegation.'
Talking about himself in the third person, he added: 'Almost all statements left no doubts the allegation of rape was with Ari's blessing. In the Islamic community rape is taboo - it is the highest level of crime.'
But now campaigners who have been backing Banaz's surviving family members and other victims of violence and abuse have condemned his latest pleas.
A family member, who did not want to be identified, told MailOnline: 'The fact he's bringing this case is quite unbelievable.
'We knew but didn't realise it was actually happening. It's appalling, the whole thing.'
Dr Hannana Siddiqui, head of policy for campaign group Southall Black Sisters, told MailOnline of disbelief at the tragedy being brought back to court by Ali Mahmod.
She said: 'I find it strange. Rape is used as a tool of abuse of women. I don't understand his logic.
'Whoever gives permission for murder must understand all the implications.
'We know he was justifying the killing – it was justified in his community and he therefore he didn't see it as wrong.
'Now he's trying to retain his honour by saying he's being accused of rape – why he'd have a problem with that, with what he's done, I don't know.
'Generally, the community feel rape is acceptable with someone who's exiled from the community and family.
'Maybe he's trying to get money. I find it baffling that there wasn't a prosecution for rape as well as the murder – that may be why he claims it's libel.
'But he ordered the killing – and all the implications of the rape could be involved. I don't think his case is very strong.'
The organisation is calling for what they suggest be named 'Banaz's Law', which would recognised 'honour'-based abuse as a statutory aggravating factor in sentencing.
The campaign has previously been backed by one of Banaz's sisters, Bektal Mahmod, who has been living in hiding under witness protection after giving evidence during the 2007 criminal trial.
Dr Siddiqui, who co-authored Bekhal's 2022 book No Safe Place: Murdered By Our Father, added: 'Honour killings are using as a triggering factor but instead the issue should be treated as an aggravating factor in sentencing guidelines.'
Banaz had fled an abusive arranged marriage that began when was 17 after being continuously raped and beaten by her husband, who was ten years older.
She returned to live in the family home in south London and then fell in love with a Kurdish man, Rahmat Suleimani, who later took his own life in 2016.
In the months leading up to her disappearance, Banaz reported to police five times that her family wanted her dead, but no action was taken.
She was deemed to have brought 'shame' on the family with her father and uncle hatching a plan to have her killed in the most savage way possible to restore their 'honour' and 'reputation' within the community.
Banaz suffered horrific sexual violence prior to being strangled to death at the family home in January 2006.
Her body was then stuffed into a suitcase and taken to Birmingham, where it was buried in the garden of an abandoned home.
Following the discovery of her body, Banaz's father, uncle and other relatives and family associates were charged with her murder or for conspiring in it.
In 2007, following a three-month trial at the Old Bailey, her father Mahmod Mahmod was found guilty of murder and sentenced to life with a minimum of 20 years in prison.
Her uncle Ari Mahmod was also found guilty of murder and sentenced to life in jail with at least 23 years behind bars.
Her cousin Mohamad Hama also admitted murder and was ordered to serve at least 17 years in prison.
Three years later, Banaz's cousins Omar Hussain and Mohamad Saleh Ali, who were the ones carrying out the killing, were extradited from Iraq and handed life sentences of 22 years and 21 years respectively after being found guilty of murder.
The acclaimed ITV docudrama Honour tells the story of lead investigator DCI Caroline Goode's efforts to bring Banaz's killers to justice, after the victim was reported missing from her home by Mr Suleimani.
Award-winning actress Hawes portrayed DCI Goode, who worked for 33 years in the Metropolitan Police and wrote a book published in 2020 called Honour: Achieving Justice for Banaz Mahmod.
Speaking to MailOnline last August, DCI Goode recalled: 'This was the most complex and difficult investigation I have ever been involved in.
'From the outset we were met by a conspiracy of silence from the Iraqi-Kurdish community in the UK and had very little evidence to go on.
'The case was unusual because normally when you investigate a murder you are trying to get justice for the family.
'But in this instance, the family weren't interested in getting justice as they were the ones who ordered her killing.'
It remains unclear why Ari Mahmod has been allowed to sue ITV as convicted murderers usually have no reputation to defend.
Representing ITV, barrister Ben Gallop told the High Court last month: 'The claimant is a convicted murderer.
'This is rare for a claim of libel as the possibility of any damage to his reputation is limited due to his pre-existing bad reputation.'
A judgment in the case is expected later in June.
Banaz, an Iraqi Kurd living in Mitcham, south London, was murdered in January 2006 after she fell in love with a man of whom some of her family disapproved.
She was raped, tortured and strangled to death with the bootlace after she walked out of a marriage she had been forced to enter just three years earlier at 17.
Between December 2005 and January 2006, Banaz had told police four times that relatives wanted her dead and described the litany of sexual violence she had been forced to endure at the hands of her abusive husband.
In a recorded interview with police prior to her death, she told of being followed by members of the Iraqi-Kurdish community.
Banaz said: 'People following me - still now they follow me.
'That's the main reason that I came to the police station. In the future at any time if anything happens to me, it's them.'
The terrified young woman left her husband after two and a half years, a decision that angered her family who had arrived in the UK when Banaz was 12.
After returning to her family home, she met and fell in love with Rahmat Sulemani, a family friend.
He would later give evidence at the trial, revealing that he and Banaz had been threatened with death if they carried on seeing each other.
While the lovers continued to meet in secret they were spotted together outside Morden tube station in south London in December 2005.
Banaz's father was informed and arranged the horrific killing of his own daughter.
During an Old Bailey trial it later emerged that on New Year's Eve 2005 a bleeding and terrified Banaz had told PC Angela Cornes that her father had just tried to kill her.
The police officer dismissed her as 'dramatic and calculating' and instead considered charging her with criminal damage for breaking a window during her escape.
Banaz was murdered three weeks later.
Sentencing her father and uncle to life in prison at the Old Bailey in 2007, Judge Brian Barker said: 'This offence was designed to carry a wider message to the community to discourage legal behaviour of girls and women in this country.
'Having endured a short and unhappy marriage, she made the mistake of falling in love with a Kurdish man that you and your community thought was unsuitable.
'So, to restore your so-called family honour you decided she should die and her memory be erased. This was a barbaric and a callous crime.'
The ITV docudrama about the case, Honour, was first broadcast in 2020 before winning a new audience when put on Netflix last year - reducing viewers to tears.
Banaz's boyfriend Rahmet, who gave evidence at the trial of her father and uncle, went into witness protection before taking his own life in 2016.
One of her sisters, Bekhal, also gave evidence and is currently in witness protection and has little contact with anyone that could potentially put her at risk of reprisals.
In an extract from her book about Banaz, published in the Mail On Sunday in 2022, Bekhal recalled how they referred to their abusive father as 'the Evil Punisher'.
She wrote: 'Before I testified against the Evil Punisher and Ari, in a private witness room at the Old Bailey, I worked myself up into a panic.'
She told of 'pacing nervous circles as I said to myself, "Oh my God, they're going to kill me, they're going to kill me, they're going to kill me…"
Bekhal added: 'Giving evidence for the prosecution would mean testifying against my family - and, by extension, the entire Kurdish community.
'My head was a tumble dryer. What if Dad and Ari get off? What if one of them leaps from the dock while I'm giving my evidence?
'What if there's a Kurdish man in the public gallery, armed with a knife, ready to storm the witness stand and slit my throat? Will the jury believe me?
'The risks involved were insurmountable. By now, I had a baby daughter and the police had moved us to a secret location amid death threats.
'The thought of facing Dad and Ari in court terrified me to the core. But securing justice for Banaz outweighed all the risks.'
She gave evidence at the Old Bailey trial behind a screen, and remembered: 'There was no way I could let Dad or Ari see my face, so I decided to wear a hijab, niqab and abaya.
'A hijab is a head covering, a niqab is the traditional Muslim face veil, while the abaya is a square of fabric that drapes from your shoulders to your feet.
As I advanced with two security guards into the courtroom, the first people I noticed were the defendants, both in grey suits and, as always, watching my every step.
'Ari gave me one of his smug smiles. I'll never forget that look.
'It said: "I'm going to win this case – then kill you." Dad crossed his brows, his hatred for me palpable in his menacing stare.
'I quickly averted my gaze to the blue screen around the witness stand ahead, aware that every pair of eyes in that packed courtroom was on me.
'I wanted to do this for Banaz. I swallowed hard, looked at the jury, and said: "I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.'
She also told how Banaz was given the fond nickname of Nazca, meaning 'beautiful' and 'delicate' in Kurdish.
And she shared the message: 'Oh, Nazca, if you were here, the whole world would be orange and yellow. I love you, my darling sister. Sleep tight, my angel.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel

Locals in Epping have welcomed an injunction to block asylum seekers from being housed at a nearby hotel, but raised concerns the decision would only 'kick the can down the road'. Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'

Gang of six schoolgirls aged 12 and 13 are arrested after 'park assault' on a 13-year-old girl
Gang of six schoolgirls aged 12 and 13 are arrested after 'park assault' on a 13-year-old girl

Daily Mail​

time7 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Gang of six schoolgirls aged 12 and 13 are arrested after 'park assault' on a 13-year-old girl

A gang of schoolgirls aged 12 and 13 have been arrested after an alleged assault on a 13-year-old girl in a park. Police rushed to Wish Park in Hove, Sussex on Friday at around 5.55pm after reports of the attack. The victim was taken to hospital for assessment of her injuries and has since been discharged. Enquiries are ongoing following the arrest of two 12-year-old and four 13-year-old girls, all from Brighton. Chief Inspector Simon Marchant, of the Neighbourhood Policing Team in Brighton, said: 'This was a deeply troubling incident which has understandably caused concern within the local community. 'Our officers have now arrested all of the young people we wanted to speak with in connection with the report, and wider enquiries remain underway. 'We are aware that footage relating to this incident is circulating online, and we continue to urge the public not to share or speculate, as this could affect any future legal proceedings. 'This case is being fully and robustly investigated, and if you have information to report, we ask you come forward and speak with police.'

Government ‘does not have a plan' to accommodate asylum seekers
Government ‘does not have a plan' to accommodate asylum seekers

The Independent

time36 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Government ‘does not have a plan' to accommodate asylum seekers

The Government does not have a plan to accommodate asylum seekers and did not listen to concerns that they should not be housed at the Bell Hotel, the leader of Epping Forest District Council has said. Chris Whitbread, who also leads the Conservative group at the Essex authority, said that failures to improve the system for processing asylum applications were also causing distress 'up and down the country'. His comments came after the council was granted a temporary injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the hotel, which has been at the centre of a series of protests and counter-protests in recent weeks. The interim injunction granted by Mr Justice Eyre means the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site by September 12, but the company could seek to challenge the ruling at the Court of Appeal. Speaking to the PA news agency after the judgment, Mr Whitbread said the injunction marked an 'opportunity for my community to start to return to normal'. A hearing on Friday was told by barristers representing Somani Hotels that the venue previously housed asylum seekers from May 2020 to March 2021, and from October 2022 to April 2024, and that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'. Asylum seekers were then placed in the Bell Hotel again from April 2025. When asked on Tuesday why the council did not previously take legal action, Mr Whitbread said: 'It goes back to 2020 when we were in the pandemic originally, and at that time, it was used for young families, women and children, which is completely different to having it used for single males. 'Obviously, we have always raised our concerns with the Home Office, whether it be the previous government or this government, we raised our concerns. 'This government decided to start using the hotel again without consultation and purely by instruction; they didn't listen to our concerns. 'Five schools are in close proximity, a residential care home, lots of residential homes nearby, they didn't listen to us at all, that is the fundamental difference.' When asked what message he believed this sent from the Government, he said: 'If I am honest with you, I don't think they have actually got a plan. I think that is my real concern. 'We talk about one in, one out, well, that is a gimmick. If you talk about smashing the gangs, that was a gimmick. 'What we really need to see is a government with a serious plan to deal with this problem, and that obviously comes down to processing, where they stay while they are being processed, and actually speeding up the system. 'We are not seeing that at the moment, and that is causing a lot of distress to people up and down the country.' The hotel became the focal point of a series of protests after an asylum seeker housed at the site was charged with sexually assaulting a teenage girl. Mr Whitbread said that while later protests had been 'more peaceful, more bearable but still disruptive' to the community, he had 'never seen anything like what we have seen in recent times'. He said: 'I think what we have done as a council and what my brilliant team of council officers have done is actually take forward what the desire of residents is, to see the Bell closed, but do it in a sensible and proper way, and that is what we're doing.' Mr Whitbread also said that there had been 'no conversations' about the next steps for removing those currently housed at the hotel. Reacting to the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said: 'This government inherited a broken asylum system, at the peak there were over 400 hotels open. 'We will continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns. Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. 'We will carefully consider this judgment. As this matter remains subject to ongoing legal proceedings it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store