logo
EXCLUSIVE The man who ordered the kidnap and murder of his niece in Britain's most notorious honour killing now claims HE is the victim. Here, her family have their say

EXCLUSIVE The man who ordered the kidnap and murder of his niece in Britain's most notorious honour killing now claims HE is the victim. Here, her family have their say

Daily Mail​a day ago

The harrowing kidnap, rape and murder of Banaz Mahmod made for one of Britain's most infamous so-called 'honour killings'.
And loved ones grieving her loss are now suffering fresh trauma after an uncle who was among those plotting her death launched a sick new court battle.
Family members and campaigners honouring tragic Banaz have hit back at the convict's latest claims, describing the case as 'appalling' - while also calling for changes to sentencing on 'honour killings'.
Banaz, 20, was killed on the orders of her father Mahmod Mahmod and her uncle Ari Mahmod after she left an abusive arranged marriage and fell in love with another man.
Other family members and friends were recruited to carry out the murder and she was raped by three of her cousins before being strangled.
Now her uncle Ali Mahmod, 69, is suing ITV in London 's High Court over a 2020 drama called Honour, starring Keeley Hawes, and a 2012 documentary on the killing.
Representing himself in court, Mahmod insisted that in his Iraqi Muslim culture such supposed 'honour' murders were acceptable - and he complained it was the accusation of rape that would damage his reputation.
Ali Mahmod, speaking via videolink from HMP Whitemoor in Cambridgeshire, told the High Court he had been attacked in prison and his family were victims of reprisals.
While representing himself in the court hearing last month, Ali Mahmod told judges he been attacked in jail and that his family were victims of reprisals.
Speaking through an interpreter, he said: 'In my country murder is normal - after served time you have a new opportunity.
'In my culture the main things they react against me was the rape allegation.'
Talking about himself in the third person, he added: 'Almost all statements left no doubts the allegation of rape was with Ari's blessing. In the Islamic community rape is taboo - it is the highest level of crime.'
But now campaigners who have been backing Banaz's surviving family members and other victims of violence and abuse have condemned his latest pleas.
A family member, who did not want to be identified, told MailOnline: 'The fact he's bringing this case is quite unbelievable.
'We knew but didn't realise it was actually happening. It's appalling, the whole thing.'
Dr Hannana Siddiqui, head of policy for campaign group Southall Black Sisters, told MailOnline of disbelief at the tragedy being brought back to court by Ali Mahmod.
She said: 'I find it strange. Rape is used as a tool of abuse of women. I don't understand his logic.
'Whoever gives permission for murder must understand all the implications.
'We know he was justifying the killing – it was justified in his community and he therefore he didn't see it as wrong.
'Now he's trying to retain his honour by saying he's being accused of rape – why he'd have a problem with that, with what he's done, I don't know.
'Generally, the community feel rape is acceptable with someone who's exiled from the community and family.
'Maybe he's trying to get money. I find it baffling that there wasn't a prosecution for rape as well as the murder – that may be why he claims it's libel.
'But he ordered the killing – and all the implications of the rape could be involved. I don't think his case is very strong.'
The organisation is calling for what they suggest be named 'Banaz's Law', which would recognised 'honour'-based abuse as a statutory aggravating factor in sentencing.
The campaign has previously been backed by one of Banaz's sisters, Bektal Mahmod, who has been living in hiding under witness protection after giving evidence during the 2007 criminal trial.
Dr Siddiqui, who co-authored Bekhal's 2022 book No Safe Place: Murdered By Our Father, added: 'Honour killings are using as a triggering factor but instead the issue should be treated as an aggravating factor in sentencing guidelines.'
Banaz had fled an abusive arranged marriage that began when was 17 after being continuously raped and beaten by her husband, who was ten years older.
She returned to live in the family home in south London and then fell in love with a Kurdish man, Rahmat Suleimani, who later took his own life in 2016.
In the months leading up to her disappearance, Banaz reported to police five times that her family wanted her dead, but no action was taken.
She was deemed to have brought 'shame' on the family with her father and uncle hatching a plan to have her killed in the most savage way possible to restore their 'honour' and 'reputation' within the community.
Banaz suffered horrific sexual violence prior to being strangled to death at the family home in January 2006.
Her body was then stuffed into a suitcase and taken to Birmingham, where it was buried in the garden of an abandoned home.
Following the discovery of her body, Banaz's father, uncle and other relatives and family associates were charged with her murder or for conspiring in it.
In 2007, following a three-month trial at the Old Bailey, her father Mahmod Mahmod was found guilty of murder and sentenced to life with a minimum of 20 years in prison.
Her uncle Ari Mahmod was also found guilty of murder and sentenced to life in jail with at least 23 years behind bars.
Her cousin Mohamad Hama also admitted murder and was ordered to serve at least 17 years in prison.
Three years later, Banaz's cousins Omar Hussain and Mohamad Saleh Ali, who were the ones carrying out the killing, were extradited from Iraq and handed life sentences of 22 years and 21 years respectively after being found guilty of murder.
The acclaimed ITV docudrama Honour tells the story of lead investigator DCI Caroline Goode's efforts to bring Banaz's killers to justice, after the victim was reported missing from her home by Mr Suleimani.
Award-winning actress Hawes portrayed DCI Goode, who worked for 33 years in the Metropolitan Police and wrote a book published in 2020 called Honour: Achieving Justice for Banaz Mahmod.
Speaking to MailOnline last August, DCI Goode recalled: 'This was the most complex and difficult investigation I have ever been involved in.
'From the outset we were met by a conspiracy of silence from the Iraqi-Kurdish community in the UK and had very little evidence to go on.
'The case was unusual because normally when you investigate a murder you are trying to get justice for the family.
'But in this instance, the family weren't interested in getting justice as they were the ones who ordered her killing.'
It remains unclear why Ari Mahmod has been allowed to sue ITV as convicted murderers usually have no reputation to defend.
Representing ITV, barrister Ben Gallop told the High Court last month: 'The claimant is a convicted murderer.
'This is rare for a claim of libel as the possibility of any damage to his reputation is limited due to his pre-existing bad reputation.'
A judgment in the case is expected later in June.
Banaz, an Iraqi Kurd living in Mitcham, south London, was murdered in January 2006 after she fell in love with a man of whom some of her family disapproved.
She was raped, tortured and strangled to death with the bootlace after she walked out of a marriage she had been forced to enter just three years earlier at 17.
Between December 2005 and January 2006, Banaz had told police four times that relatives wanted her dead and described the litany of sexual violence she had been forced to endure at the hands of her abusive husband.
In a recorded interview with police prior to her death, she told of being followed by members of the Iraqi-Kurdish community.
Banaz said: 'People following me - still now they follow me.
'That's the main reason that I came to the police station. In the future at any time if anything happens to me, it's them.'
The terrified young woman left her husband after two and a half years, a decision that angered her family who had arrived in the UK when Banaz was 12.
After returning to her family home, she met and fell in love with Rahmat Sulemani, a family friend.
He would later give evidence at the trial, revealing that he and Banaz had been threatened with death if they carried on seeing each other.
While the lovers continued to meet in secret they were spotted together outside Morden tube station in south London in December 2005.
Banaz's father was informed and arranged the horrific killing of his own daughter.
During an Old Bailey trial it later emerged that on New Year's Eve 2005 a bleeding and terrified Banaz had told PC Angela Cornes that her father had just tried to kill her.
The police officer dismissed her as 'dramatic and calculating' and instead considered charging her with criminal damage for breaking a window during her escape.
Banaz was murdered three weeks later.
Sentencing her father and uncle to life in prison at the Old Bailey in 2007, Judge Brian Barker said: 'This offence was designed to carry a wider message to the community to discourage legal behaviour of girls and women in this country.
'Having endured a short and unhappy marriage, she made the mistake of falling in love with a Kurdish man that you and your community thought was unsuitable.
'So, to restore your so-called family honour you decided she should die and her memory be erased. This was a barbaric and a callous crime.'
The ITV docudrama about the case, Honour, was first broadcast in 2020 before winning a new audience when put on Netflix last year - reducing viewers to tears.
Banaz's boyfriend Rahmet, who gave evidence at the trial of her father and uncle, went into witness protection before taking his own life in 2016.
One of her sisters, Bekhal, also gave evidence and is currently in witness protection and has little contact with anyone that could potentially put her at risk of reprisals.
In an extract from her book about Banaz, published in the Mail On Sunday in 2022, Bekhal recalled how they referred to their abusive father as 'the Evil Punisher'.
She wrote: 'Before I testified against the Evil Punisher and Ari, in a private witness room at the Old Bailey, I worked myself up into a panic.'
She told of 'pacing nervous circles as I said to myself, "Oh my God, they're going to kill me, they're going to kill me, they're going to kill me…"
Bekhal added: 'Giving evidence for the prosecution would mean testifying against my family - and, by extension, the entire Kurdish community.
'My head was a tumble dryer. What if Dad and Ari get off? What if one of them leaps from the dock while I'm giving my evidence?
'What if there's a Kurdish man in the public gallery, armed with a knife, ready to storm the witness stand and slit my throat? Will the jury believe me?
'The risks involved were insurmountable. By now, I had a baby daughter and the police had moved us to a secret location amid death threats.
'The thought of facing Dad and Ari in court terrified me to the core. But securing justice for Banaz outweighed all the risks.'
She gave evidence at the Old Bailey trial behind a screen, and remembered: 'There was no way I could let Dad or Ari see my face, so I decided to wear a hijab, niqab and abaya.
'A hijab is a head covering, a niqab is the traditional Muslim face veil, while the abaya is a square of fabric that drapes from your shoulders to your feet.
As I advanced with two security guards into the courtroom, the first people I noticed were the defendants, both in grey suits and, as always, watching my every step.
'Ari gave me one of his smug smiles. I'll never forget that look.
'It said: "I'm going to win this case – then kill you." Dad crossed his brows, his hatred for me palpable in his menacing stare.
'I quickly averted my gaze to the blue screen around the witness stand ahead, aware that every pair of eyes in that packed courtroom was on me.
'I wanted to do this for Banaz. I swallowed hard, looked at the jury, and said: "I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.'
She also told how Banaz was given the fond nickname of Nazca, meaning 'beautiful' and 'delicate' in Kurdish.
And she shared the message: 'Oh, Nazca, if you were here, the whole world would be orange and yellow. I love you, my darling sister. Sleep tight, my angel.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colston statue toppling shows 'history isn't static'
Colston statue toppling shows 'history isn't static'

BBC News

time20 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Colston statue toppling shows 'history isn't static'

For hundreds of years, Edward Colston was celebrated and honoured by many in his home city of Bristol, but an anti-racism protest held in the city on 7 June 2020 changed that in the most dramatic way. The toppling of his statue five years ago today made headlines around the world, forcing Bristolians to examine the legacy of the 17th Century slave years, his prominence in Bristol in the form of the city-centre statue and multiple locations bearing his name sparked controversy. Born into a merchant's family, Colston went on to build his own business in London trading in slaves, cloth, wine and found wealth through his work and later became an official of the Royal African Company, which held the monopoly in Britain on slave is believed to have transported about 80,000 men, women and children from Africa to the Americas between 1672 and 1689. When Colston died in 1721, he left his wealth to churches and hospitals in Bristol. A portion of it was also used in founding two almshouses and a legacy continued to live on, with his name and face appearing on various city streets, buildings and memorials. The beginning of the end for Colston's close relationship with Bristol began thousands of miles away in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 25 May, were called to a grocery store to reports of a 46-year-old man allegedly paying for a pack of cigarettes with a counterfeit $20 bill. That man was George police officer Derek Chauvin knelt on Mr Floyd's neck for more than nine minutes during his arrest. Mr Floyd's pleas of "I can't breathe" as he died sent shock waves around the world - including towards Lives Matter protests sprung up across the world, calling for an end to racism and police Floyd: What happened in the final moments of his lifeChauvin was convicted of Mr Floyd's murder along with three other officers - Tou Thao, Thomas Lane and J Alexander Kueng - who were convicted of aiding and abetting second-degree manslaughter. The Black Lives Matter protest in Bristol attracted an estimated 15,000 people who gathered on College Green before heading down to Colston Avenue, where the bronze statue was erected in honour of the slave trader in 1895. On the day of the protest, the figure was covered up with a canvas material. It had already been targeted by egg-throwers, but the canvas was later torn off by protesters saying they wanted to look Colston in the eyes. Shortly after the cloth was removed, three protesters climbed up to the statue and attached ropes to its head. To roars of celebration from the crowd, they pulled on the ropes and 30 seconds later the statue was on the ground. Many ran towards the fallen figure, jumping on it and kicking it. One protester placed his knee on the statue's neck, mirroring the actions of Chauvin during Mr Floyd's arrest. Other protesters climbed the empty plinth, chanting and holding anti-racism statue was later dragged the short distance over to the harbour, where it was dumped into the water. For many that was symbolic, as Bristol's waterways had plenty of links with the slave people - dubbed the Colston Four - were charged for their involvement in the toppling, but were later acquitted of criminal damage. The toppling of the statue was dramatic. Other change has been slower, but over the last five years, Colston's name has gradually started disappearing from the city. In fact three years before his statue was toppled, the city's largest music venue, Bristol Beacon - known formerly as Colston Hall - announced that it was considering dropping the link to Colston. Massive Attack, perhaps the most famous band from Bristol, had always refused to play the venue due to its name change proposal led to a debate, with bosses maintaining that the venue was named after the street it is located on, rather than the slave trader. There was no investment from Colston in building the of Bristolians were against the change, it should be noted, but on 23 September 2020, the Bristol Music Trust, which runs the venue, decided to go ahead with the schools in Bristol also implemented changes after the statue came School in Stapleton became known as Collegiate School, Colston's Girls' School became Montpelier High School and The Dolphin Primary School changed its logo from the Colston family crest. Karen Macdonald, head of public engagement on Bristol City Council's culture team, said the toppling was "symbolic".The statue was temporarily displayed at the M Shed museum in the city in 2021 after it was retrieved from the harbour. The council launched a public survey which more than 14,000 Bristolians responded to with "very clear wishes" of what they wanted for the statue's future. The majority of the responses called for the statue to be displayed in its damaged state, alongside balanced historical information and context about Colston's that is where you will find the Colston statue now, lying on its back in a glass case, surrounded by the real placards left behind by the protestors. Ms Macdonald said: "There is value in listening to different viewpoints and coming to an understanding, even if you can't agree with each other. "This isn't erasing history, this is recording history. History isn't something that can remain static and preserved - that moment was history in action. "It wasn't about lumps of cast metal," she added. Nothing has replaced the toppled statue, the plinth is still it does now feature an updated plaque reflecting Colston's involvement in slavery and telling the story of that dramatic day in June.

Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'
Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'

BBC News

time20 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Danes Moss: Campaigners say peatland plan withdrawal 'step to victory'

Campaigners have welcomed a council's decision to scrap its plans for close to 1,000 homes on a peatland site in Cheshire as the "first step to victory".Cheshire East Council has rowed back on the proposal and asked officers to look at alternative uses for Danes Moss in Macclesfield, which could include restoring the Eccles, the chair of the Danes Moss Trust, said he felt pressure from the campaign group had led to the decision and there was "no justification to build there". Cheshire East opposition councillor, Conservative Chris O'Leary, told a meeting of the authority it was right to "reset the council's plan". The original proposals for the site, known as the South Macclesfield Development Area, included 950 homes, a supermarket and a link East Council owns 55% of the site, while Barratt Homes owns approximately 41%.Campaigners had been calling for no building there because of the amount of peatland, although it has been earmarked for development since 1997.A report ahead of the council meeting said the proposals to build on the land "cannot be fully reconciled" with the council's peat and carbon on Cheshire East Council's economy and growth committee voted on Tuesday to withdraw the homes application and approved plans to review include selling the land rethinking the development plans, or allowing for a "nature-led" recovery, an option added after a cross-party amendment. During the debate, O'Leary said: "Anyone who's visited Dane's Moss will know what an incredibly special place it is and it's quite right we reset the council's plans".The withdrawal was needed to "consider all the available options and make the right decisions for the right reasons for the future of this incredible site," he Labour's Anna Burton said that doing nothing was "not an option"."The wetland peat is drying out, so whatever decisions are made long term doing nothing is not an option," she councillors voted in favour of the withdrawing the application, with two Eccles told BBC Politics North West that he hoped councillors had "seen sense that there's no justification on earth to damage or build on peatlands".He said: "It's good news that the original plans are not going to go ahead but we still feel there should be zero development on this site because of the huge global importance of peatlands."James Melling of the Cheshire Wildlife Trust, which has a nature reserve on the border of the site, said he was "delighted" with the said: "I think it's testament to the hard work of all the campaigners involved and Save Danes Moss have been fantastic." See more Cheshire stories from the BBC and follow BBC North West on X. For more local politics coverage, BBC Politics North West is on BBC One on Sunday at 10:00am and on BBC iPlayer.

I've been branded a cheat and a prostitute by evil trolls online & my boyfriend is starting to believe them
I've been branded a cheat and a prostitute by evil trolls online & my boyfriend is starting to believe them

The Sun

time22 minutes ago

  • The Sun

I've been branded a cheat and a prostitute by evil trolls online & my boyfriend is starting to believe them

1 DEAR DEIDRE: EVER since I started dating this great guy at work, someone has been waging a nasty campaign against me. At first it was lies all over his socials, and mine, from an anonymous account, saying I was cheating on him. I managed to convince him that none of the accusations were true but I'm worried that their latest stunt is getting to him. We've been together for six months but as soon as he posted pictures of both of us together, the lies started. Thankfully the first lie they told was easy to disprove. When we went public, I posted a lovely photo of the two of us hugging and tagged him in. Within the hour someone commented from an anonymous account 'hang on? I didn't realise you were in a relationship otherwise I would never have stayed the night with you last weekend.' What they didn't know was I spent every single minute of that weekend at my boyfriend's so the lies didn't stack up. Dear Deidre: Cheating and can you get over it My boyfriend and I decided to ignore the comments, hoping whoever it was would get bored but they just kept repeating other untruths on his socials. Eventually we blocked the account but as soon as we'd blocked them, they would start up another. At first I felt it was us against this faceless saboteur, but now I can see in his eyes that he isn't quite sure about me any more. Their latest trick is to accuse me of being a prostitute. They posted a link to an escort site saying I had a secret past and sure enough there was a profile where they had used my photo. They have clearly cropped an image from my social media but I don't feel like my boyfriend is behind me any longer. And to be honest, I'm not sure that I want to be with someone who hasn't got my back anyway. I'm devastated and feel so anxious. I used to consider myself a quietly confident person but now I feel like hiding away. I'm sure everyone at work thinks there is some truth in these lies. Whenever I walk into a room, I can't help but notice the nudges, long looks and suddenly no one seems that interested in chatting to me. I don't want to let this malicious person win but I'm getting so tired. I wish I could make them stop and go back to how we were. HOW TO REBUILD TRUST You thought you were heading off into the sunset together but then an unexpected curveball comes spinning into your relationship and shatters the once unwavering trust you had. Perhaps they have started to hold back in conversations with you and you can feel an emotional gulf looming, or maybe they have become more attached to their phone making you acutely aware there's an unknown presence threatening your status quo. Worse still, you've discovered they've cheated physically or emotionally. Whatever the cause, when the trust crumbles between a couple, it can spell the beginning of the downfall. Only if you are both dedicated to working at rebuilding that trust has the relationship got a chance. Here are my trust re-enforcing tips: You've got to be prepared to talk about your worries to your partner. They have to be prepared to listen and reassure you, taking your concerns seriously. They also have to show genuine remorse and understand how their actions damaged your confidence in them. You both need to be ready to be honest about any issues in your relationship, without being unkind. This is about wanting to improve your connection, not blame one another. You both need to have the capacity to be consistent in your actions, proving you can be relied upon and ultimately trusted. Agree to have regular check-ins spending quality time together where you put all tech away and find out what is going on for the other in their life. Be patient. Rebuilding trust isn't a quick fix, especially if someone has cheated, it can take months, years even, of regular reassurance to find the more stable ground. And this is a biggie - you both have to be ready to forgive, or be forgiven and let all that resentment go. DEIDRE SAYS: You're fighting on two fronts; firstly you're dealing with this awful unsettling harassment and secondly you're facing the diminishing trust in your relationship. It is of course disappointing that your boyfriend seems to be questioning you - and actually on a practical level makes little sense. He knew from the start these slurs were fabricated so why would he now start believing that you worked as a prostitute - even when you insist this is a lie. Does he not see that it is at the very least a coincidence? It would be worth letting him know you feel he is pulling away and that you're worried he's starting to believe the untruths. He could be distancing himself, not because he doesn't believe you but because he's getting tired of the drama and wants a return to a care-free life. While the malice is being directed at you, his life and reputation are also being scrutinised. But you're only going to find out what is going through his mind if he is willing to talk. In terms of this harassment, it's really important that you start to record every incident. Don't interact with this person at all if they make any new contact with you or your boyfriend. It would be advisable if you and your boyfriend make your social accounts private to stop this individual from accessing your private lives. It's also a good idea to let any friend, family and managers know what you are going through, they may be able to help gather more evidence of this harassment and even help protect you. And be wary of the sort of content that you post on your social platforms - it all helps build a picture of your life and can easily provide material for anyone with ill intent. Also, contact the administrators of the escort site and ask them to take down your photo, they have a legal obligation to remove fake profiles. If they don't do anything, contact the web hosting company. I'm afraid you are the victim of harassment and stalking and you would be very wise to report these incidents to the police. You can also get in touch with the Suzy Lamplugh Trust ( who can offer further advice. Dear Deidre's Harassment Files Deidre's mailbag is full of harassment and stalking problems. One reader was left stressed and worried after a former friend was sending him malicious texts; another from a different subscriber who was living in fear after being stalked by a woman he went on a date with, while one woman was afraid to leave her home after receiving chilling messages from her husband's lover. Get in touch with the Dear Deidre team Every problem gets a personal reply from one of our trained counsellors. Sally Land is the Dear Deidre Agony Aunt. She achieved a distinction in the Certificate in Humanistic Integrative Counselling, has specialised in relationships and parenting. She has over 20 years of writing and editing women's issues and general features. Passionate about helping people find a way through their challenges, Sally is also a trustee for the charity Family Lives. Her team helps up to 90 people every week. Sally took over as The Sun's Agony Aunt when Deidre Sanders retired from the The Dear Deidre column four years ago. The Dear Deidre Team Of Therapists Also Includes: Kate Taylor: a sex and dating writer who is also training to be a counsellor. Kate is an advisor for dating website OurTime and is the author of five self-help books. Jane Allton: a stalwart of the Dear Deidre for over 20 years. Jane is a trained therapist, who specialises in family issues. She has completed the Basic Counselling Skills Level 1, 2, and 3. She also achieved the Counselling and Psychotherapy (CPCAB) Level 2 Certificate in Counselling Studies. Catherine Thomas: with over two decades worth of experience Catherine has also trained as a therapist, with the same credentials as Jane. She specialises in consumer and relationship issues. Fill out and submit our easy-to-use and confidential form and the Dear Deidre team will get back to you. You can also send a private message on the DearDeidreOfficial Facebook page or email us at: deardeidre@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store