logo
Federal money is essential to North Country airports; Trump wants to cut it in half

Federal money is essential to North Country airports; Trump wants to cut it in half

Yahoo30-05-2025
If you live in the North Country, you know flights can be expensive. Air travel often involves hours of driving, expensive airport parking, and even pricier tickets.
But if you're looking to travel to a few cities around the eastern U.S. and your schedule is flexible, you might be able to find far cheaper tickets for direct flights from one of five North Country airports.
That's because of the Essential Air Service, a federally funded program aimed at providing affordable air travel to rural regions.
Now, President Donald Trump is proposing to cut EAS funding by $308 million or more than 50%, as outlined in the discretionary funding requests the White House published in early May, which argued, 'The EAS program funnels taxpayer dollars to airlines to subsidize half-empty flights from airports that are within easy commuting distance from each other, while also failing to effectively provide assistance to most rural air travelers.'
Empty seats and idle airports
There are five EAS airports in the North Country: Plattsburgh, Lake Clear, Massena, Ogdensburg, and Watertown.
In mid-May, a direct flight from Plattsburgh to Dulles near Washington DC. had just 12 passengers on the 30-seater plane operated by Contour Airlines. The round-trip flight cost $158.
The availability and affordability of direct flights from rural regions like the North Country to larger cities dates back to the 1970s when the federal government was deregulating the airline industry. Some lawmakers worried that rural populations would be left without any service at all.
So Congress created what would later become the Essential Air Service. The goal was to serve places like the North Country, where people regularly drive hours to larger hubs like Syracuse, Albany or Burlington.
'Anytime I travel, it saves me four hours, at least- two hours one direction, two hours another direction,' explained Andre Dauphin, who lives in Ausable and spends about 50% of his time traveling for work.
'Rather than doing the commute and the traveling and dropping off a car at a rental place, I don't have to do all that,' said Dauphin. 'It saves me a lot of time and money, and it saves my company a lot of time and money.'
Trump's budget says EAS spending is 'out of control'
When President Donald Trump proposed a 50% cut to EAS funding, some lawmakers including Senator Chuck Schumer raised the alarm.
'That would devastate North Country airports and hurt places or smaller airports- Watertown, Ogdensburg, Plattsburgh, Massena, Adirondack Regional airport,' said Schumer.
Those five North Country airports got more than $31 million in 2024, more than double what they received five years ago. EAS funding nationwide has more than doubled since then, as well. Trump's proposed budget points that out, saying 'spending on programs is out of control.'
Ray Mundy agrees. He's a retired college professor who taught about transportation issues and published a cost-benefit analysis of the Essential Air Service in 2015.
'Even though the intentions of the program were good, the politicians that arranged for them are good, the local people that want an airport are good, it's just a waste of money,' said Mundy.
The subsidized price per passenger
Last year, Plattsburgh got $6.8 million in EAS funding. According to federal data, it served about 93,000 passengers, equating to a $74 subsidy per person.
For even smaller North Country airports, the subsidy is much higher. About 6,100 people boarded flights out of Ogdensburg airport in 2024 and the airport received $8.8 million in EAS funding, resulting in an average subsidy of $1,400 per passenger.
Last fall, NCPR intern Zach Jaworski was one of just 13 passengers on an Airbus that can seat nearly 140. He spoke with flight attendant Li'i Issacs.
'The smallest flight that I've had was when we did this first trip two days ago. We only had two people on our plane,' said Issacs. 'I've never had a crew that outnumbered the passengers.'
Ticket sales have gone up from Ogdensburg in recent months, but flights are still only about 30% full. Airport manager Charlie Garrelts says despite that fact, he believes EAS airports are vital to the North Country's economy.
'Residents in rural areas, a lot of them are depending on air service to travel for specialized medical care or higher education opportunities.'
Garrelts says another big percentage of passengers are Canadian. While the Ottawa airport is just about an hour north, flights from Ogdensburg are cheap, and parking is free. Canadian travelers have their choice of airports near the border that are subsidized by American taxpayers, from Watertown, Ogdensburg, Massena, and Plattsburgh.
Burlington resident David Rovinsky was flying from DC back to Plattsburgh due to air traffic control issues in Newark upending his travel plans to fly to Burlington.
Rovinsky said it's difficult to weigh the costs and benefits of EAS funding, since some things are just hard to quantify.
'There's an element of public good here,' said Rovinsky. 'This is important to maintain communities and even if the airport doesn't completely pay for itself, it provides other social benefits that, in turn, justify making up that difference with government money.'
Just how much government money will keep flowing is now up to Congress.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Photos: Donald Trump Gives Vladimir Putin Warm Welcome to Alaska
Photos: Donald Trump Gives Vladimir Putin Warm Welcome to Alaska

Newsweek

timea minute ago

  • Newsweek

Photos: Donald Trump Gives Vladimir Putin Warm Welcome to Alaska

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin opened their Alaska summit Friday with a warm handshake, greeting each other like longtime acquaintances before beginning hours of talks that could reshape the war in Ukraine and the broader U.S.-Russia relationship. After stepping off Air Force One at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Trump applauded as Putin approached along a red carpet laid out for each leader. The two clasped hands for an extended moment, smiling as cameras clicked. Putin eventually pointed skyward while their hands were still joined. President Donald Trump greets Russia's President Vladimir Putin Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. President Donald Trump greets Russia's President Vladimir Putin Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson Uniformed service members stood at attention nearby as B-2 bombers and F-22 fighter jets — aircraft designed to counter Russia during the Cold War — roared overhead in a symbolic flyover. US President Donald Trump greets Russian President Vladimir Putin on the tarmac after they arrived at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15, 2025. US President Donald Trump greets Russian President Vladimir Putin on the tarmac after they arrived at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15, 2025. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Getty Images When reporters shouted, "President Putin, will you stop killing civilians?" Putin cupped his hand to his ear but did not respond. Moments later, both leaders climbed into the U.S. presidential limousine, with Putin grinning as it pulled away. President Donald Trump talks with Russia's President Vladimir Putin Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. President Donald Trump talks with Russia's President Vladimir Putin Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the meeting format had shifted from a one-on-one to a "three-on-three" session. Trump will be joined by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, while Putin will be accompanied by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov. The move reflects a more cautious approach than the 2018 Helsinki summit, when the two met privately with only their interpreters for two hours. US President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin pose on a podium on the tarmac after they arrived at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15, 2025. US President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin pose on a podium on the tarmac after they arrived at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15, 2025. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Getty Images The leaders are scheduled to hold a joint press conference at the conclusion of the summit. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio arrive before President Donald Trump greets Russia's President Vladimir Putin Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio arrive before President Donald Trump greets Russia's President Vladimir Putin Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. Associated Press This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.

Fears Over Fulbright's Future as Trump Admin Cuts Exchange Programs
Fears Over Fulbright's Future as Trump Admin Cuts Exchange Programs

Newsweek

timea minute ago

  • Newsweek

Fears Over Fulbright's Future as Trump Admin Cuts Exchange Programs

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration is moving to cut over 20 cultural exchange programs under the Department of State, it was reported Friday, raising concerns that flagship programs like Fulbright could be next. The Alliance for International Exchange told Newsweek that it had learned that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) had decided to cut at least 22 offerings from the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) totaling around $100 million in annual funding. "While this does not impact flagship programs like Fulbright, Gilman, and IVLP at the moment, it sets a dangerous precedent," Mark Overmann, executive director of the Alliance, told Newsweek. "If OMB is allowed to act with impunity and unilaterally and cancel already appropriated ECA funding, it opens the door for them to do it again and again in the future." A State Department spokesperson told Newsweek that selected educational and cultural program grants were not being awarded in 2025, following a "careful review" of the current fiscal environment. Why It Matters The U.S. offers a variety of cultural exchange programs, where foreign nationals can come to the country on a temporary basis for a variety of work experience opportunities. Under the Trump administration, there have been moves to tighten the rules around temporary immigration, with several visa programs put at risk. What To Know President Donald Trump's OMB was said to be making the cuts to already-allocated funding for fiscal year 2025, following a delay in the process to secure the cash for late September. The following programs are reported to be affected, according to the Alliance for International Exchange: Community College Administrator Program (CCAP) Community College Initiative Program (CCI) Community Engagement Exchange (CEE, Leahy Initiative on Civil Society) Council of American Overseas Research Centers English Access Scholarship Program English Language Fellow Program Global Undergraduate Exchange Program IDEAS Program International Center for Middle Eastern-Western Dialogue (Hollings Center) Kennedy-Lugar Youth Exchange and Study (YES) and YES Abroad Program Leaders Lead On-Demand Mandela Washington Fellowship for Young African Leaders Mike Mansfield Fellowship Program National Clearinghouse for Disability and Exchange (NCDE) Professional Fellows Program Survey of International Educational Exchange Activity (IEEA) in the United States TechWomen The J. Christopher Stevens Virtual Exchange Initiative U.S. Congress-Korea National Assembly Exchange Program U.S.-South Pacific Scholarship Program (USSP) Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative (YSEALI) Academic Fellowship Young Southeast Asian Leaders Initiative (YSEALI) Professional Fellowship Program (PFP) Many of these programs fall under the J visa issued by the State Department. It is a temporary visa which allows immigrants to work in a variety of roles, from camp counselors to teaching positions to au pairs. The first on the list, the CCAP, was seen as widely successful in a 2024 State Department report, with officials finding that alumni were provided with "theoretical and practical knowledge that directly contributes to participants' ability to influence change within their home institutions and to change education policy as well." Several of these programs are viewed as ways for U.S. culture and practices to be shared around the world by those who return to their home countries once their visa term ends. The U.S.' cultural exchange programs stem from the Fulbright scholarship, which is seen as one of the most prestigious programs of its kind in the world, with American students traveling elsewhere and foreign nationals headed to the U.S. While Fulbright was not seen as at-risk under the planned cuts, Overmann stressed that the flagship cultural exchange scholarship started by Senator J. William Fulbright in the 1940s could be next. The Alliance also warned that thousands of American students currently abroad on ECA funding could be left stranded if programs were suddenly cut. Office lights are illuminated in the U.S. Department of State headquarters building at dusk on July 11 in Washington, D.C. Office lights are illuminated in the U.S. Department of State headquarters building at dusk on July 11 in Washington, D.C. People Are Saying Executive Director of the Alliance for International Exchange Mark Overmann, in his statement to Newsweek: "This endangers the future of Fulbright, Gilman, and all international exchange programs and the effectiveness of U.S. public diplomacy." A State Department spokesperson referred Newsweek to previous comments by Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Every dollar we spend, every program we fund, every policy we pursue must be justified by the answer to one of three questions: Does it make America safer? Does it make America stronger? Or does it make America more prosperous?" What Happens Next? The State Department is yet to formally announce the change, with uncertainty remaining for the hundreds of participants likely caught up in the cuts.

What a summit win looks like for Trump – and for Putin: From the Politics Desk
What a summit win looks like for Trump – and for Putin: From the Politics Desk

NBC News

timea minute ago

  • NBC News

What a summit win looks like for Trump – and for Putin: From the Politics Desk

Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, a newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. In today's edition, Kristen Welker outlines the stakes for the in-person meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, their first since 2019, as they arrive in Alaska. After shaking hands on the tarmac, Putin joined Trump in his car. . Plus, Rob Wile answers this week's reader question on what happens to the money the government collects from tariffs. — Adam Wollner The high stakes for Trump as he comes face to face with Putin Analysis by Kristen Welker President Donald Trump's summit today with Russian President Vladimir Putin comes with incredibly high stakes for the future of Russia's war with Ukraine — and for Trump himself. The president seemed to be lowering expectations ahead of the face-to-face meeting, telling Fox News Radio yesterday that 'there a 25% chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting.' So what does a win for Trump look like? A senior administration official also told me that Trump 'is realistic that this is likely a multistep process and he's ready and positive about this step forward.' But Western and U.S. officials say that a victory for Trump is an unconditional and immediate ceasefire, and that if there are conditions attached, that's a win for Putin. It remains to be seen if Putin will try to cloud these talks by raising other issues on his agenda, like a nuclear arms deal and easing sanctions against Russia. It's also unclear whether Trump will offer any incentives to the Russians, and keep his promise to Ukraine and European allies that he will not negotiate territory. All of this underscores the political risk for Trump as he navigates a war that has cost hundreds of thousands of lives and fueled a robust debate over how long the U.S. should provide financial and military support to Ukraine. Trump said during the 2024 campaign that he would end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours upon taking office, but he has acknowledged that doing so is far more complicated than he could have anticipated. Meanwhile, recent polling has found that more voters disapprove of his handling of the war. A recent Wall Street Journal poll found a slim majority of voters (51%) disapproving of Trump's handling of the Russia-Ukraine war, while 41% approved (the survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points). That poll also showed that 58% of voters were in favor of sending additional financial aid to Ukraine, a 10-point increase since January, while 36% were in opposition. We'll be delving into the fallout from the high-stakes summit on 'Meet the Press' this Sunday with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. ✉️ Mailbag: Where does the tariff money go? Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's question comes from Tara Vargas: 'Trump claims to be raking in trillions from tariffs. I read that the money goes into the general fund. But does it really? And if not there, where?' To answer that, we turned to business reporter Rob Wile. Here's his response: Yes, it does go into the U.S. Treasury's General Fund — something the department calls 'America's Checkbook' — and is used to finance both daily and long-term government operations, ranging from federal employee salaries to interest payments. Congress establishes how the general fund is spent in its appropriations bills. While the Treasury Department tracks where revenues come from, it generally does not individually earmark a set of funds from a given revenue source for a specific purpose. 'You can think of [tariffs revenues] as helping reduce the overall deficit, or offsetting the costs of the One Big Beautiful Bill,' said Marc Goldwein, senior vice president and senior policy director at the nonpartisan think tank Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. 'It doesn't go into any kind of dedicated trust fund.' In July, the Treasury took in about $29 billion in tariffs. Every month since April, when Trump announced 'reciprocal' tariffs, has seen record tariffs revenues come in. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget projects that the tariffs could bring in as much as $1.3 trillion of net new revenues through the end of Trump's current term, and $2.8 trillion through 2034 — though it cautions these estimates are 'very rough' and intended to reflect 'the general magnitude' of Trump's overall approach to the import taxes 'given the complexity of the tariffs and their impacts.' The U.S. Government Accountability Office, the chief auditing agency of the federal government, has found significant, long-running issues with how General Fund payments are tracked and reported, though it does not suggest any funds are actively being misappropriated. The Treasury, it said in March, 'records transactions as a group total instead of individual balances and then processes them through a variety of systems.' It continued: 'As a result, we did not have enough information to determine if the amounts reported are reliable, and therefore, the Schedules were not auditable. More recently, we've identified additional challenges that impact the ability to clearly track funds. This includes oversight of information coming from outside entities, such as banks, that collect money on behalf of the federal government.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store