Report into domestic violence helpline DVConnect finds almost 4,000 calls unanswered in October 2024
A review into DVConnect, launched in December, has laid bare the pressure on the service amid a sharp rise in calls for help.
More than 6,500 calls were made to its Womensline in October, and almost 4,000 of those went unanswered.
Those who abandoned their call for help waited on average almost 13 minutes before hanging up, while those who waited for a responder were in the queue for more than 20 minutes.
From July 2023 to March 2025, the total number of abandoned calls increased by 388 per cent, which equates to more than 2,500 calls.
"The number of calls abandoned has grown steadily and has remained at a relatively high proportion of all calls," the report from BDO noted.
Minister for the Prevention of Domestic and Family Violence Amanda Camm said the figures were "astounding and frightening".
"Every victim deserves their call to be answered when they are seeking help, and in some of these circumstances, it could have been a life-threatening situation. It's not good enough.
"It's why we have taken action. What I would say to victim-survivors is I want people to be calling DVConnect, whether it's the Womensline, the Mensline, or those service providers, we want a 24/7 crisis service to be operating to the highest standard."
The report noted staffing issues, with actual hours worked well below employee rostered hours, from July 2023 through to October 2024.
"The lowest point in total hours worked was in December 2023, when DVConnect staff only worked 57 per cent of the hours they had been rostered or expected to work."
The review was launched following concerns from advocates around underfunding.
But Ms Camm said there was a "more than adequate amount of funding to meet demand".
"There is a failing, I believe, in the way in which those resources were allocated to meet that demand.
"Over time, what we saw is that it continued to decline and the organisation did nothing different.
"There has been a trust broken between my department and this government and that service."
She noted that since a new triaging system had been introduced, there had been an increase in the call response rate to 73 per cent in April and June.
"That's still not good enough for me. We have a long way to go," Ms Camm said.
"But I want people to have confidence that this government will put victims first and that we will do everything we can to increase the standard of that service."
DVConnect partnered with 1800Respect, a 24/7 confidential service for people affected by domestic and family violence service administered by Telstra Health, in 2017.
The partnership was designed to deliver connections to a team of specialist practitioners for those accessing the helpline.
Fronting budget estimate hearings in parliament on Thursday night, Ms Camm claimed there had been a lack of transparency by DVConnect last year.
"The review also uncovered that during the contract renewal negotiations in 2024 with the former Labor government, the service and the former CEO failed to inform the department that they had lost the multimillion-dollar contract to deliver the 1800RESPECT service," she told the committee.
The report found the relationship between DVConnect and Telstra Health, the helpline provider, was "fraught" in February 2023.
In May 2024, Telstra Health advised DVConnect that it had terminated the contract.
In July 2024, DVConnect renewed and signed after several negotiations with the state government.
"The report also notes when reviewing the 1800Respect contract that this risk could have been disclosed by DVConnect to the department as part of its funding negotiations at the relevant time. This did not occur," Ms Camm told the estimates hearing.
"Those contracts signed in July 2024 saw a significant investment by the former government, which effectively covered the lost millions of dollars when funding was pulled for the 1800Respect contract.
"The negotiations led by the former CEO of DVConnect have caused significant damage to the relationship and trust between the service and our government, relationships that are crucial to helping victim-survivors of domestic and family violence," Ms Camm told the committee.
The chief executive of DVConnect at that time was Beck O'Connor, who resigned from the role in June to become Queensland's Victims' Commissioner.
DVConnect chief executive Joanne Jessop said the organisation would continue to work with the government.
"We have already made changes as part of the review and note that every part of our DFV response system across Queensland needs to be better," she said.
She said was proud of the skilled staff, who support people in times of "extreme crisis and risk".
"Their actions keep people safe and save lives every day," Ms Jessop said.
Ms O'Connor has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
7 hours ago
- News.com.au
Former AFL player reportedly tested positive to performance enhancing substance
A former AFL player reportedly tested positive for a performance-enhancing substance while playing in a lower-level competition following the end of his professional career. The player, who finished his AFL career in 2023, has this year been placed under provisional suspension, per Code Sports. It's understood the player tested positive while playing in a lower-level league last year, and despite having put an end to his professional career by that stage, could still be tested under the AFL's Anti-Doping Code within 12 months of his AFL exit. FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every match of every round in the 2025 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE in 4K, with no ad-breaks during play. New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited-time offer. The report elected not to name the player in question. The player's test was undertaken by Sport Integrity Australia; the governing body, formerly known as ASADA, which aims to preserve fairness at all levels of Australian sport. Under the AFL Anti-Doping Code, if a player intentionally takes a prohibited substance to gain an advantage, they are subject to a maximum ban of four years. Local leagues, including the state competitions, are held to the same rules. In late 2024, ex-Melbourne player Joel Smith was suspended four years by SIA for cocaine use and trafficking after turning up a positive result on a matchday test in August 2023. But unlike Smith's circumstances, Niall reports the unnamed player in question's alleged breach was 'for a substance that is banned both in and outside the competition'. He noted also that positive results for performance-enhancing drugs were 'extremely rare' in the AFL, as cases of positive tests for illicit substances are more common. Then-Collingwood players Josh Thomas and Lachie Keeffe copped two-year bans in 2015 after testing positive for performance-enhancing drugs. The 'Essendon 34' that were banned for the 2016 season after four years' worth of investigation did not return positive tests for a banned substance but rather were suspended on circumstantial evidence they were administered with a banned substance.

News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
Court's stunning apology to South Australian MP over blackmail charges
A South Australian court has apologised for a system error which logged a guilty finding against an ex-MP who was accused of blackmailing Premier Peter Malinauskas. Annabel Digance is suing Mr Malinauskas for damages, claiming he orchestrated a 'malicious prosecution' against her to further his own political ambitions and crush a parliamentary inquiry into alleged bullying in the Labor Party. During a hearing in the South Australian Supreme Court in late July, Justice Graham Dart told the court that Ms Digance and her husband Greg had been found guilty of blackmailing Mr Malinauskas. The court was told their charges were later dropped, according to court records. Ms Digance and her husband Greg were charged with blackmailing Mr Malinauskas in 2021. The SA Courts Administration Authority (CAA) said in a statement on Tuesday that neither Ms or Mr Digance had been found guilty. The court said that in April 2023 a nolle prosequi order was made, meaning the prosecution was abandoned. 'There were no orders made which involved a finding of guilt against either of the defendants,' the court said in a statement. The court said that a document which stated that a finding of guilt had been made was 'generated in error and is incorrect'. 'The CAA unreservedly apologises to the parties for this error,' the court said in a statement. 'The CAA will review all court matters with orders made in the same circumstances to ensure that court records are accurate. 'The CAA will also commission an external assurance review into this matter.' In Ms Digance's statement of claim in her civil lawsuit, she argued that her arrest and prosecution caused 'injury, loss, damage and harm' and that Mr Malinauskas conspired with the SA Police to pursue her. She is suing both the premier and the State of South Australia and is seeking $2.3m in damages. The matter is scheduled to return to court in September.

News.com.au
9 hours ago
- News.com.au
Cop's courtroom grope dismissed as ‘joke'
EXCLUSIVE A police prosecutor who was found to have harassed a female court officer while working inside a courtroom has been cleared of all charges, on the basis that the act could have been 'a joke'. SA Police officer Greg Hill, 62, was charged with aggravated indecent assault after he was reported for 'tickling' the left buttock of the court officer after she called him into a courtroom in 2022. The woman was working as a court officer, which ensures the smooth running of the court and includes letting lawyers know when they are required in the courtroom. The woman told police she was holding the door open for Mr Hill when he 'touched her left buttock'. She described the touch as 'feeling his fingers move in a tickling movement'. 'It made her angry as he had no permission to touch her,' the court heard. She told police she said to him: 'I wouldn't be doing anything like that to me if I were you' to which Mr Hill 'stepped back and laughed'. She then said: 'I'm serious, I'll have you for sexual harassment' before Mr Hill replied: 'I don't know whether to take you seriously or not'. The incident was captured on CCTV and showed that Mr Hill had his fingers 'curled' and that 'movement of his fingers was consistent with a tickling motion'. The magistrate was 'satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt' that Mr Hill 'deliberately tickled [the woman's] left buttock, it could not be proven that he did so for 'sexual gratification or [to] cause sexual humiliation.' The magistrate said that while the 'harassing, unacceptable and disrespectful' act amounted to 'unwanted touching' - the element of indecency could not be proven. 'It was just as likely the action was a joke or ill-conceived gesture,' the magistrate said. 'There was no suggestion of any flirting behaviour by the defendant. The touch was not accompanied by any comment or other behaviour.' He was found not guilty and acquitted of the charge. The matter was put before the SA Supreme Court last week after the Commissioner of Police appealed against the acquittal. Supreme Court Justice Laura Stein dismissed the appeal on Thursday, finding the magistrate did not err in finding a 'failure to establish sexual intention'. 'Regardless of that conclusion, I reiterate the Magistrate's comments that the behaviour was harassing, unacceptable, inappropriate and should not have occurred,' Justice Stein said in her decision.