Nigel Farage says he ‘can't apologise' for lack of MP vetting in UK general election
On Monday morning, Mr Farage arrived to overcast drizzle at Kent County Council (KCC) in Maidstone, to be greeted by expectant councillors from the Reform-led authority.
Advertisement
The visit comes after news that Reform MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock James McMurdock has resigned the party whip amid allegations that he took out government loans during the Covid pandemic for businesses with no employees.
Mr Farage was keen to distance himself from the absence of Reform candidate vetting processes for the 2024 UK general election, and said he 'can't apologise' for it.
He said: 'I came in, I inherited this situation where hundreds of candidates who stood in the last general election had not gone through a vetting process.
'I said on July 5, the day after the election last year, that we would now professionalise.
Advertisement
'We put 1,630 candidates into the field on May 1, more than any other party with very, very few rows or arguments – so the vetting process worked for this year, I can't apologise for what happened before.'
(PA Graphics)
The Reform leader did not answer when asked whether the allegations faced by Mr McMurdock were an embarrassment for his party.
'Let's find out the truth, I know as much about this right now as you do,' said Mr Farage.
He added that he would be heading to Westminster later on Monday to find out more about the situation.
Advertisement
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage during his visit to Kent County Council (Gareth Fuller/PA)
Addressing KCC Reform councillors on the steps inside County Hall, he outlined his expectations for them.
Mr Farage said: 'Behaving with integrity is a responsibility upon all of you, although that doesn't mean you all have to become stuffed shirts or anything like that.
'You are holders of public office you are responsible and how we behave matters.'
Later, he told the PA news agency: 'Yes I think, I think that when you become elected at any level you have a responsibility,
Advertisement
'I'm not asking for stuffed shirts, I'm not asking for boring people. I'm just saying think, think to all of these people here who were basically in 'civvy street' in political terms before May 1, just think before you act.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Newcastle Great Park 'fractured' after Q3 bus cut, residents say
A controversial bus service cut that "fractured" a community should be put under review, residents have chiefs have been urged to look again at the changes that removed a popular service from Great Park, in September, much of the estate has no longer been served by Go North East's Q3 bus in a move that sparked hundreds of complaints about problems accessing local services in nearby councillor Juna Sathian said the previous Q3 route was "too expensive to run with falling passenger numbers" and that the city council wanted to find "best value" by providing a service that could become self-sustaining rather than reliant on public funding. A petition signed by more than 3,600 people was presented to Newcastle City Council on Wednesday, where Great Park resident Sharon Pitkethly said stopping the service was "not just inconvenient" but "damaging and discriminatory"."There was no meaningful consultation. Residents were excluded. With no commitment to future provision, we now face isolation," Ms Pitkethly told the Local Democracy Reporting Service."This has increased traffic, harmed the environment and fractured our community. "We demand immediate action through a fair, inclusive and transparent review." New services The estate's bus services are funded through section 106 funding payments made by its developers and commissioned by the estate's transport advisory board, made up of representatives of the Newcastle Great Park Consortium, the city council and bus operator year a new Stagecoach 49 service was set up, though residents complained it was less frequent than the said: "Ideally we would have consulted more widely with residents and that is something we are committed to improving in future."Since the new services were introduced, several parts of Great Park now have a better bus connection with more frequent services, new links to Kingston Park and similar journey times into the city."She also said the council was "actively exploring ways" to improve bus services in Great Park. Follow BBC Newcastle on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
A decade of small boat migrants - how did it begin?
It has been a decade since the BBC first reported on a small, sporadic number of boats with migrants on board arriving off the Kent coast from France. At the time, the focus was mainly on the thousands of attempts by migrants in northern France, who were attempting to stowaway on lorries and ferries to the the nearby "Calais Jungle" thousands of men, women and children were living under canvass in a sprawling camp that was later cleared by the French as security was tightened around the ports and Eurotunnel, within three years, significant numbers were using small boats instead to make the dangerous crossing. How many people cross the Channel in small boats?With the Prime Minister claiming the UK will begin returning some migrants arriving in small boats to France under a new pilot scheme, BBC South East looks back on the emergence of smugglers using maritime routes into Britain 10 years ago.A former head of Border Force, an ex Dover coastguard and a retired customs chief investigator recall how they were first made aware of small boat crossings - and offer suggestions on how they could be stopped. Tony Smith is the former director general of Border Force. He served for 40 years, retiring in 2013. He said he was never aware of any arrivals by boat during his time in the service and says at that time he was advised that it wasn't a threat."The problem was people penetrating via ferries and lorries and I think the reason people shifted to the boats was because we'd done quite well in stopping them coming in by other routes," he said."I was advised during my time as gold commander for the London 2012 Olympics and as head of Border Force that this was not a threat."The currents were too difficult, these were busy shipping lanes, nobody would be able to make it across, so I was very surprised when I saw that boats started arriving, particularly small boats and dinghies."As soon as the migrants and smugglers realised this was a viable route, they were getting ashore, they weren't being sent back and more started to come." BBC South East first reported on a handful of boat arrivals in 2014 and 2015, with around 100 people arriving in 2016 - but at that stage the incidents weren't published by the Home numbers started to climb in 2018, when people from Iran started to make the crossing. By December that year, the then Home Secretary Sajid Javid declared a "major incident" after an increase in Smith added: "Apart from a reduction in 2023, when we had the Albanian campaign and were able to send people back there, we haven't really been able to return anybody from France to the the new agreement with France, Mr Smith said "It probably is ground breaking if we are actually going to put asylum seekers in France back on flights to France.""I'm hopeful the French tactics in the water might have some impact.""We still need other options, we could clampdown a lot on illegal working, which I think this government to be fair says it's going to do, but I would be looking at a Rwanda type deal, or some other deal with other countries, so we don't have to rely on 6% returns to France." Former coastguard Andy Roberts remembers in 2015 first hearing news about a small inflatable boat arriving with a few people on board - without life jackets - at Kingsdown beach, near said: "There was, understandably, some confusion as to what was the reason for the landing, even comments about the fact they must have got lost when going on a jaunt off the French coast."Mr Roberts says he never thought it would have become a regular smuggling route."The Dover strait is the busiest thoroughfare for shipping in the world, with in excess of 500 commercial shipping movements a day," he said."I know there has been in excess of 100 drownings in the past 10 years by people attempting this crossing. I cannot believe that there has been only one incident with in excess of 20 people drowning."These small rubber inflatable dinghy's are rarely picked up on ship's radars and in the first few years of these crossings there was no aerial surveillance." David Raynes, a former assistant chief investigator for HM Customs and Excise, warned several years ago that the small number of migrants could start to grow if the smugglers saw this as a viable route."As I recall, the first boats in 2014/15 were making it across and hitting the beaches," he said."There was a gradual transition from hiding in lorries, as that was made more difficult."Why do Channel migrants want to come to the UK? Speaking in 2016, Mr Raynes warned smuggling gangs could eventually use so-called "mother ships" further out to sea, to offload migrants on to small boats in the years on, he told BBC South East how frustrated he is by successive governments vowing to "stop the boats" or "smash the gangs"."If the French managed to slash every dinghy, the traffic would not stop," he said."It would move, some back to containers and lorries, some to larger boats, more remote coast line. Even to much larger boats, as occurred with drugs."What is attractive to migrants is the near certainty they can make it to the UK. The near certainty that they will get to stay."That certainty needs to be removed. Quick fixes on party lines go nowhere near the problem."
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Welcome to the Little Chagos Islands! Single London council forced to spend £18million to house hundreds people from the Indian isles on top of their asylum seekers quota
A single London council has seen its housing bill for new migrants soar to £18 million after hundreds of Chagos Islanders arrived on top of the asylum seekers it was already paying for. The two groups combined have put a huge strain on Hillingdon Council which is the first port of call for those arriving at Heathrow to set up home in the UK but with no home to go to. Ian Edwards, Conservative leader of Hillingdon Council, claimed that the huge cost is impacting its ability to provide services and that they have been forced to make a series of crippling cuts that have affected life for residents. Hillingdon, which is close to Heathrow, has at any time an average of 2,700 asylum seekers housed in hotels surrounding the airport, one of the highest rates in the country. Once they are given leave to remain by the Government, they are effectively 'evicted' from the hotels, leaving the council legally responsible for looking after them as homeless. At the same time, around 400 Chagos Islanders have landed in Hillingdon over the past two years creating an even greater unsustainable demand on local services as the council also has a statutory duty to house and provide for them. Sir Keir Starmer handed control of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius in May after 161 years of British rule, in a deal that was heavily criticised for compromising the security of a military base that will remain on the islands. Mr Edwards revealed that the council is demanding that the Labour government refund the near £18 million it has already spent over the last five years and provide extra funding for the future because supporting asylum seekers and Chagos Islanders is a 'national responsibility,' and the issue 'shows no signs of going away.' He told MailOnline: '£18 million is a lot of money and it's not right that the residents of Hillingdon are expected to pick up this tab. 'The Government should do the right thing. Our reserves are being drained and it's threatening our ability to provide services to residents. This is a national problem, and the burden needs to be carried more equitably.' He added: 'We have one of the highest rates of asylum seekers in the country and now we have the issue of the Chagos Islanders. I accept that the Government has a difficult job, but they are not recognising that it's causing harm to our borough and are not doing anything to prevent that harm.' Breaking down the figures, he said that £16 million has been spent on asylum seekers over the past five years while between July 2024 and March 2025 supporting British Chagossians cost them over £508,000. Another £1.2 million has been set aside for the remainder of this financial year as more arrivals continue to pile in. Faced with a financial crisis, the council has implemented £34 million worth of cuts this year. This has included giving up running three golf courses and a local theatre, which have been handed over to the private sector; cutting non-essential services and introducing a controversial £70 per year garden waste collection charge which has angered many locals. A popular council run garden centre has also been closed while some libraries have been relocated to make savings. The council tax has also been increased by almost 3%. Mr Edwards said: 'We are not cutting essential services, but we are having to make savings and see where we can increase income. This is a direct result of two things: the Government increasing National Insurance contributions for employers and the asylum crisis.' He revealed that last year alone, the council spent just over £5 million on asylum seekers which is more than what it spent on libraries and cultural services. It is expected to spend the same amount next year. The bulk of the £18 million the council has already spent over the past five years has been for accommodation with asylum seekers and Chagos Islanders put up in private housing. Council figures show that this year, an average of 28 asylum seekers per week requested housing from the council after being 'evicted' from their hotels. As British nationals, Chagos Islanders are placed in accommodation almost immediately after arriving in the borough, but they have also benefited from other assistance such as receiving prepaid cards, essentials as well as help to open bank accounts and apply for Universal Credit. Even though many asylum seekers and Chagos Islanders are dispersed to other parts of the country the council remains responsible for ensuring that their rent is paid in full if the benefits they receive are not enough to pay the whole amount. At the same time, the council has also had to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds to private landlords as an incentive to let their properties. Mr Edwards added: 'We place these people in private accommodation usually outside of London, but we still have to pay for part of this if their housing benefit isn't enough to cover the rent. We simply don't have the housing stock to keep them within the borough and rents are usually cheaper outside the capital.' The residents of the Chagos Islands, a British overseas territory, were evicted between 1967 and 1973 to create a joint UK-US military base. In 2022, a law was passed allowing them to become British citizens and settle in the UK. Chagos Islanders, who are legally entitled to enter the country usually do so via Heathrow and present themselves for assistance at the most convenient council, which happens to be Hillingdon. Located in the far west of the capital, Hillingdon is considered one of the city's archetypal suburban areas and is largely made up of semi-detached homes located along tree lined roads. Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson was previously MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip, which is in the borough while famous celebrities like James Corden and Ronnie Wood were born there. But residents in the borough expressed anger at the huge amount of money that the council has had to shell out for asylum seekers and Chagos Islanders, claiming that their lives are being blighted. Sue Sibley, 69 said: 'It's not just that we are being made to pay for these people because we have not created this problem. Central government should be picking up the bill, the council leader is right. 'Council services are not as good as what they used to be, and people are angry about things like the garden waste charge. I also loved going to the council run garden centre but sadly, that's closed. I've got nothing against asylum seekers or Chagos Islanders but why are we picking up the bill for them?' Penny Bailey, 63 who sufferers from Parkinson's said: 'I'm disgusted by the amount of money the council is having to spend while we suffer. Over the years, all we've seen is the council tax go up and services cut. How about looking after us first? Why is the Labour Government not helping us pay for these people?' Dan Bellini, 35 said: 'I've worked in Hillingdon for more than five years and over that time I've seen it go downhill. I think the Government have let things get out of control with the asylum issue and it's had a negative effect on our lives. 'People seem to be coming from all over the world and none of them seem to be that bothered about actually contributing. British people feel neglected, the cost of living is very expensive, council services are rubbish and life has become an uphill battle.' Brian Mulkeen, 65 who has lived in the borough all his life said: 'I'm very angry about a lot of things but especially the garden waste charge. What's it going to be next? I don't have a problem with the Chagos Islanders because at the end of the day, they are British, and we probably owe them. 'But why are we paying for all these asylum seekers? It's affected the quality of our lives and I don't understand why nobody is helping Hillingdon with the cost of looking after them.' Mr Edwards revealed that the council had not ruled out taking legal action against the Government if it does not provide extra funds and reimburse it for what has already been spent. He said: 'We want to sort this matter out amicably but if the Government rejects our demands, then we will consider our legal options.' The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been contacted for comment.
