Ugly divides revealed in budget negotiations even as leaders express optimism
Legislative leaders expressed optimism Tuesday that a budget deal could be finalized by the end of this week and a special session would start next week.
An explosive taxes meeting -- one of the few working groups meeting publicly -- revealed some deep divisions on the road to finalizing agreements.
Layoff notices will likely need to go out to state employees next week because July 1 is when a government shutdown would happen without a deal.
ST. PAUL, Minn. (FOX 9) - An explosive day at the Capitol has revealed some deep divisions as legislators try to work out a state budget before a special session.
Explosive day
They're on the clock to avoid a government shutdown and we saw the good, the bad and the ugly Tuesday.
Walking into the governor's office, Speaker of the House Lisa Demuth, (R-Cold Spring), Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy, (DFL-St. Paul), and House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman, (DFL-Brooklyn Park), were all smiles — Hortman even expressing optimism that the finish line is near.
"We're hoping to wrap things up this week and that the revisor will finish drafting soon thereafter," she said, acknowledging a special session would likely follow next week if everything goes right.
Missing pieces
But reasons for pessimism are also abundant.
Senate Minority Leader Mark Johnson was absent Tuesday and hasn't been invited to meet with the other leaders in five days.
And most of the negotiations are happening behind closed doors, but two working groups are meeting in public.
Tensions escalated in the taxes group Tuesday when Sen. Ann Rest pushed House members to dry the ink on a couple compromises proposed by the House members.
"To move forward, the Senate is accepting your offer," said Sen. Rest, (DFL-New Hope). "One would think that the House would vote for their own offer. All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed, say no. The motion fails. Let it be known to our leaders that the House cannot even accept their own proposal."
MN Care's till Tuesday
The issue of healthcare coverage for undocumented immigrants is also still a powder keg.
A few dozen protesters rallied in front of the governor's office, hoping to convince negotiators to back down from the change cutting undocumented adults out of MN Care.
They argue the coverage saves money in the long run and it's the right thing to do with the budget.
"Always it has to be a moral document, but people tend to make a political document," said Pablo Tapia, an organizer from Blaine.
Deadlines approaching
They're working under a couple deadlines at the Capitol now.
The state government would shut down without a deal before July 1.
And because of that, layoff notices have to go out to state employees if there's no deal before next Monday -- 30 days notice.
That seems like a foregone conclusion now, even in the best-case scenario.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Rep. Ilhan Omar condemns party's decision to throw out Fateh endorsement
Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar sharply condemned her party's move to overturn its endorsement in the Minneapolis mayoral race on Thursday, calling the reversal a "stain on our party" that will damage Democrats' ability to organize and win "this year, next year, and beyond." Why it matters: The statement, co-signed by over a dozen other local DFL elected officials, captures how the hotly debated decision is already deepening divisions between centrist DFLers and the democratic socialist-allied factions. Context: The statement was released just hours after a state Democratic party committee revoked the Minneapolis DFL Party's endorsement of Omar Fateh, a state senator who identifies as a democratic socialist, over incumbent Mayor Jacob Frey. Committee members cited major concerns with local party organizers' handling of the endorsing convention. What they're saying: The four-term congresswoman and other signers condemned thedecision as an " extremely dangerous precedent" that "will undermine the DFL endorsing process going forward and fails to center the will of delegates." "Right now, there is a clear tension between the progressive Democrats who are challenging the status quo and moderate Democrats," the statement reads, calling it "extremely disheartening" that the first Black mayoral candidate to be DFL-endorsed in Minneapolis in the last three decades had the endorsement revoked. Zoom in: The statement, first reported by Axios, was signed by Omar and seven members of Minneapolis' state legislative delegation, three Hennepin County commissioners, one school board member and five Minneapolis City Council members, most of whom have formally endorsed Fateh. Omar has clashed with Frey in the past but has not endorsed in this year's mayoral race. The intrigue: The statement also criticizes newly elected Minnesota DFL chair Richard Carlbom, saying the decision "runs counter to" his campaign promise to unite the DFL. "The DFL Party is a big-tent party and all factions should be fairly represented, not silenced," it reads. "...Undoubtedly, this appalling decision will leave many voters feeling discouraged and unwelcome from participating in our party." Reality check: Minneapolis DFL organizers admitted as part of the challenge process that their electronic voting system failed to capture all delegate votes during July's citywide convention. Between the lines: Omar is a prolific fundraiser who has transferred hundreds of thousands of dollars to the state party in recent years.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Cox says he's ‘grateful' he didn't know about new law's impact on Senate president's relative
Gov. Spencer Cox speaks with members of the media during the governor's news conference broadcast by PBS Utah at the Eccles Broadcast Center in Salt Lake City on Thursday, August 21, 2025. (Pool photo by Rick Egan/The Salt Lake Tribune) An at times heated Utah Gov. Cox sparred with reporters Thursday over the fallout from reports that Utah Senate President Stuart Adams initiated passage of a law that later helped his 18-year-old granddaughter reach a plea deal in a criminal case involving sex with a 13-year-old. Cox said he didn't think an ethics investigation or a third-party review is warranted, saying 'there's nothing to investigate.' 'The facts are abundantly clear. It's been reported. I don't think anybody's denied that what happened, happened,' Cox said, adding he learned about the situation when The Salt Lake Tribune first reported it earlier this month. Cox argued the most pertinent question is whether Adams 'should have told me about it' or 'should he have leaned on me.' 'I can only imagine how people would have reacted if he had done that,' the governor said. 'Look, there have been times in my term as governor, when I've been so mad at Stuart Adams that I couldn't see straight on certain bills,' Cox said, without naming those instances. 'That has happened a couple of times. I can tell you this is not one of those times.' Cox said he believed Adams acted appropriately by not publicly weighing in on the bill or disclosing his relatives' involvement to other legislators other than his right-hand man, Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy. 'I think it was appropriate for the top person in the Senate not to weigh in on this bill, which is exactly what happened,' Cox said. In fact, Cox — who signed the bill after it passed last year — said he's 'very grateful that I had no idea that this was impacting someone in his family, in his granddaughter's family, because it may have changed the way I reacted to the bill.' Instead, he said he was able to focus only on the policy. The governor added that there's 'no controversy about whether people knew this was in the bill or not.' 'The only question I have is this is the right policy? And this is a really tough one, guys,' Cox said. 'This is a hard one. You have kids in high school being treated differently, depending on where their birthday falls during the year. And if their birthday falls in May instead of June, then they get treated the same as a 50-year-old who had a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old. And that's the question. Is that fair?' The Tribune reported that Adams, 'surprised by the severity of the charges' that were first filed against his relative, confided with Cullimore and asked him to look into the issue. The original charges included two counts of child rape and two counts of child sodomy, all first-degree felonies, with the possibility of 25 years to life in prison and requirements to register as a sex offender, the Tribune reported. Cullimore also said he consulted Cara Tangaro, the defense attorney representing Adams' granddaughter, for more information on the case and to help draft language that was later put into a sweeping criminal justice bill, SB213, during the Utah Legislature's 2024 session. That provision allowed lower-level charges to be filed against 18-year-olds still enrolled in high school, allowing them to be treated the same as 17-year-olds in similar cases. The bill was not retroactive, and Adams' relative was not charged with the lower penalties it created, but the new law was referenced in court hearings before the case was resolved with a plea deal. 'You saw the legislative change,' Tangaro told Judge Rita Cornish at sentencing, the Tribune reported. 'We all agree that's not retroactive, but the government did change their offer based on that.' Ultimately, Adams' 18-year-old relative took a plea deal that meant she would not serve additional time in jail, would serve four years on probation, and would not register as a sex offender, the Tribune reported. In the interview with and Deseret News, Adams said his granddaughter made a mistake, but he also argued she received appropriate penalties, saying she was arrested at her high school, spent eight days in jail, and spent more than 500 days under house arrest with an ankle monitor. 'What a humiliating event,' Adams told the outlets. 'Now we're heaping on her a scarlet letter on her forehead. It's wrong. The stories are wrong. … She's been convicted and tried, and now we're doing it again in the media and it's wrong.' The 13-year-old victim's mother, however, told the Tribune she felt like she was 'punched in the gut' after she learned about the law change, and she felt as though her child was an afterthought both in the policy debate and the criminal case. 'I feel like a law is the law, regardless of who you are, but that wasn't what was going on here,' the mother told the Tribune. 'I feel like [the 18-year-old] just got special treatment …and nobody was going to say anything about it.' In wake of the Tribune story, calls for Adams' resignation have come from some Democrats, including Sen. Nate Blouin, D-Millcreek, and Utah Democratic Party Chair Brian King. They've also come from some corners of the right, with roughly 100 mostly conservative people rallying at the Utah Capitol in Salt Lake City over the weekend to call for Adams to resign. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Adams has rejected those calls and has denied any wrongdoing, telling and Deseret News that he didn't tell legislators about the case involving his granddaughter in an effort to keep the process fair. In an interview with the outlets, Adams and Cullimore also argued that the bill's process was proper and not unusual. 'There's nothing unusual about how this bill came about,' Adams told the outlets. 'Every bill that we run has some type of connection to a constituent, to a lobbyist, to an industry leader, to a personal experience a legislator has.' Other Republican lawmakers, including Sen. Todd Weiler, R-Woods Cross, have defended Adams and the process that led to the bill's passage. He told and Deseret News that he didn't know about the connection to Adams' granddaughter when the bill was debated, and that's how it should be. At least one Republican legislator, however — the House sponsor of the bill, then-House Majority Whip Karianne Lisonbee, R-Syracuse — has expressed concerns that that section of the omnibus criminal justice bill didn't go through the same vetting process as the rest of the bill. In a statement issued last week, House Speaker Mike Schultz, R-Hooper, said due to 'heightened attention on SB213, I believe it's important to reconvene stakeholders for further discussion to ensure we have arrived at the right policy.' 'I have spoken with President Adams, and he agrees,' Schultz said. 'We will convene a working group to conduct a comprehensive review of state policy in this area to ensure our laws protect public safety, uphold accountability, and serve the best interests of all Utahns.' Cox on Thursday left the door open to changes to the law, saying when he signed the bill it was a 'close call.' 'Maybe it's not the right policy. Maybe now that we have an opportunity to reflect on it, maybe it doesn't go far enough or it goes too far, and that's what we do. That's the process,' Cox said. The governor again defended Adams' role in the bill. While he brought it to Cullimore to address, he didn't publicly debate it or tell legislators about his connection to the issue. 'Every single legislator has experiences in their life where they see something that they feel may be unjust, and that influences the way they bring legislation to the table,' Cox said. 'Again, I have lots of reasons to get upset with Stuart Adams. This was not one of them. I'm really grateful he never talked to me about it.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Play Farm Merge Valley
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
India dogged by Trump spotlight on Russian oil
Good morning. There is no dearth of drama in this country. The monsoon session of parliament closed yesterday with the house in uproar over Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
