Bluff Gorse Stoush: Ex-Councillor Hasn't Paid Council Bill
A former Invercargill councillor says she has not cleared her bill with the council after they removed gorse from her land more than two years ago.
Karen Arnold has been embroiled in a battle with the organisation since 2022 when her section at Theodore St, Bluff, began failing inspections due to overgrowth.
A report prepared for a March hearing showed it had drawn three 'request for service' complaints and failed eight of 10 inspections.
But Arnold disputes the issue, saying compliance notices from council were unlawful and breached the New Zealand Bill of Rights.
Arnold said she won't pay her share of a $5320 bill for council contractors clearing the section following an October 2022 bylaw notice, despite receiving monthly reminders.
'They keep sending it out, I've ignored it.'
Invercargill City Council group manager consenting and environment Jonathan Shaw said a decision was made to split the cost 50/50 with Arnold when she met with council in January 2024.
The section was also the subject of a council hearing in March where Arnold unsuccessfully appealed a bylaw notice from December 2024.
Although the panel accepted it was unhelpful that gorse existed on co-owned council land at the boundary of the property, removal still rested with the owner.
'They say that it's got to be cleared again, and I'm not going to do it and so it's going to be the same thing,' Arnold said.
'They'll go and clear it and then they'll charge me.'
The section backs onto Bluff Hill/Motupōhue, which is co-owned by the council and Department of Conservation.
Arnold claims the council conceded it had failed on a range of issues at a January 2024 meeting where the council's chief executive and lawyer were present.
That included that two compliance notices in 2022 and one from 2023 were unlawful and breached the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, that the council did not manage its gorse under the regional pest management plan until prompted, and that they had a conflict of interest in dealing with her concerns.
In response to questions, Shaw said the council did not accept that gorse wasn't being managed on its land at Bluff Hill prior to Arnold's complaint.
The cancellation of a December 2023 notice for procedural reasons did not mean the compliance problems raised in the original notice were invalid, Shaw said.
Two councillors on the hearing panel declared conflicts of interest but felt it did not warrant them stepping aside, he added.
"The council staff involved in the decision considered the issues raised by Ms Arnold on each occasion in a fair and balanced manner.
"This included preparing for and attending the hearing, which Arnold chose to leave partway through."
Arnold was elected to council in 2013 and 2016, but stood down near the end of her second term.
She was declared bankrupt in 2018 after losing a defamation suit against Stuff and then-mayor Sir Tim Shadbolt, RNZ reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Farmer fed up with council ‘dragging' out investigation
Nigel Hewitson says a housing development has affected his poultry farm. PHOTO: NINA TAPU Tisbury poultry farmer Nigel Hewitson is calling for faster action on a council investigation into the impact of a nearby housing development, which he says has caused significant distress to his 5000 hens and harmed his farm's income. Mr Hewitson, who first raised his concerns in November, expressed frustration the issue had not been resolved, and suggested the delay might be a tactic to avoid action. The hens lost their appetite and their condition, egg production dropped and his income was down. When he talked to a council staff member in November he was told the project complied with the Resource Management Act (RMA). "It is quite ratshit how they're just dragging it all out," Mr Hewitson said. He was disappointed the construction was not suspended immediately after he reported the problem. If human remains or buried petrol tanks were found, the work would have stopped immediately, he said. His situation should be a warning to other farmers about what could happen if changes proposed to the RMA that were fast-tracked went through. "There are going to be other people who have the same issues." The Invercargill City Council is investigating the matter. Council consenting and environment group manager Jonathan Shaw is leading the investigation but has said it was too early to comment on the findings. He promised to report back to Mr Hewitson in two weeks and prepare an update for the next community wellbeing and regulatory committee meeting. At a meeting on Tuesday, committee chairman Darren Ludlow confirmed councillors received a verbal update on the investigation's progress. However, he did not provide specifics, saying only that a full report would be made public at next month's meeting. In his presentation to the council last month, Mr Hewitson said the noise from the development had disturbed his hens since September, and he was perplexed about how the consent could have been approved without considering the impact on his farm.
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
30 With Guyon Espiner: Netflix ‘Doesn't Need Us' Or Our ‘Silly' Levy
Global streaming giant Netflix 'doesn't need us' and a proposal to force them in to funding local shows is 'silly,' says TV production pioneer Dame Julie Christie. Dame Julie, a founding force in reality TV and an internationally successful format producer, is the latest guest on RNZ's multimedia talk show 30 with Guyon Espiner. She is critical of proposals suggested by industry groups and the government that would compel global streamers to invest more in local productions or face bans. More focus needs go on funding ideas and formats that will garner international success, she says. People should not 'stand around and whine, or do silly things like threatening Netflix – 'If you don't make more local productions, we'll turn you off in this country.' You can imagine the public reaction to that.' Christie, whose production company Touchdown helped define and export iconic shows like Treasure Island and Game of Two Halves, said New Zealand needs to be more realistic about its size and global influence. 'Netflix doesn't need us,' she says, dismissing suggestions that a levy on streaming giants would fix the problem. 'And who's going to decide what's made with that revenue? Netflix. I just don't think it will work.' Instead, the country should focus on producing globally appealing content in genres where New Zealand can compete – particularly in unscripted formats and documentaries. 'True crime is the biggest genre in the world … and we're not making it, because you usually can't get it publicly funded,' she says. 'As a result, we're not making what the world wants.' NZ On Air has become too narrowly focused on funding projects that meet too specific cultural criteria, often at the expense of international interest. 'The number one thing you have to have to get funded by New Zealand on Air is to reflect our cultural identity. Now, what is our cultural identity now?' Highlighting her experience producing a docu-series about Auckland's Football Club, Forever FC, Christie says: 'If you go to Auckland FC, it's very different [to NZ On Air criteria]. It's 20 immigrant families within one team. I think that we have to really open up about what we think our culture is.' New Zealand's small population, while a challenge, could be turned into a strength if the industry embraced creating distinctively local stories and tailoring them for international sale. 'We're belly-gazing, basically,' she says. 'We don't think, 'If I adjust this show by 20%, I might be able to sell it to Australia or a smaller American channel.'' NZ On Air needs to adapt to the new global content environment and stop treating cultural identity and commercial potential as mutually exclusive. 'There should be a massive tick if you've got international viability in anything,' she says. Scrambling for cash Christie welcomes the increase in screen production rebates announced in the Budget, but says we should be aiming higher. 'It's working in bringing film production into New Zealand. That provides jobs. The problem is, it's working for wages,' she says. 'It is less than half the cost to make shows here than most places in the world. 'We should be taking huge advantage of that, while creating our own IP … creating things we own.' New Zealand used to have a stronger international outlook, but the industry has become bogged down in local funding battles, Christie says. 'We were leading the world in creating formats in the early 2000s. Now we just don't do it because we're all scrambling to get that little bit of New Zealand On Air money.' * Watch the full interview with Dame Julie Christie on 30 With Guyon Espiner.
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
Concerns KiwiSaver Is Being Used As ‘Piggy Bank' To Solve Financial Woes
Article – RNZ A growing number of New Zealanders are making hardship withdrawals from their retirement savings. , Money Correspondent KiwiSaver is in danger of being considered a 'piggy bank' to solve all of New Zealanders' financial woes, one provider says, and too many people are tapping into their savings on hardship grounds. Founder of Kōura KiwiSaver scheme Rupert Carlyon was wary of calls for settings to be changed to allow people to use their money to buy farms. He said KiwiSaver was already being called on to solve the country's housing and infrastructure crises. Carlyon said changing the rules to allow more withdrawals sent the wrong message to people, who should be using KiwiSaver for their retirement. Instead, they were tapping into KiwiSaver in growing numbers. In April, 4220 people withdrew savings for financial hardship reasons, up from 3700 in April 2024. They withdrew a combined $37.6 million. 'It encourages more and more people to think about it like a piggybank. It's scary what's happening in that space,' he said. He said he saw people making repeated hardship withdrawals, depleting their balance. 'People come back multiple times with the same claims… it's hard to figure out what's real and what's not.' He said it would now not be possible to close the 'hardship loophole' because people expected it to be available and any change could dent confidence in the scheme. But he said it should be tightened up so there was a limit on the number of withdrawals that could be made within a certain timeframe. 'The other part is it's very resource intensive. We spend on average up to six hours per financial hardship claim… It's hard on staff because they often have to say no when they want to say yes.' A spokesperson for Public Trust, one of the KiwiSaver supervisors, said people were not required to repay hardship withdrawals if it was found they were not necessary. 'Their future self might not thank them for dipping into their retirement savings. We see situations of real and urgent need… there are strict rules and checks in place to help ensure withdrawals are only approved for genuine financial hardship, and applicants need to sign a legal declaration confirming their situation. 'If someone doesn't use funds as intended, it could affect their ability to make another hardship withdrawal in the future.'
