logo
Florida House leader calls for volunteers for redistricting committee

Florida House leader calls for volunteers for redistricting committee

Yahoo07-08-2025
TALLAHASSEE — Under mounting pressure from President Trump to get more Republicans elected to Congress, Florida House Speaker Danny Perez has taken the rare step of putting together a committee to look at redistricting.
The announcement comes the same day Trump said he wants Congress to conduct a mid-decade census that would exclude residents who are not in the country legally.
In a memo to House members Thursday, Perez, R-Miami, stopped short of calling for a special session on redistricting, saying the Legislature didn't have the time or resources. Instead, he said, he was looking for volunteers to sit on a special committee on redistricting that would convene in October when all the other interim legislative committees are set to begin hearings.
'As many of you are aware, there are national conversations ongoing in other states related to midterm redistricting,' Perez said, noting that a recent Florida Supreme Court ruling in the Black Voters Matter case raises questions about some of the provisions of the Fair Districts amendments voters overwhelmingly approved in 2010.
The approval of those amendments required lawmakers to draw political boundaries that aren't gerrymandered to keep themselves or their party in power or deprive minorities access to the candidates of their choice. And they must be as compact and contiguous as possible.
The amendments provided the legal grounds for Common Cause to sue the state over its 2012 congressional map and a subsequent map it was ordered to redraw, ultimately leading to the court approving a congressional map in 2015 drawn up by Common Cause and the League of Women Voters. That map was adopted in 2016.
In upholding DeSantis' 2022 map, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the federal rule against racial gerrymandering had sway over the state's Fair Districts amendments' non-diminishment clause about protecting minority districts.
'Exploring these questions now, at the mid-decade point, would potentially allow us to seek legal guidance from our supreme court without the uncertainty associated with deferring those questions until after the next decennial census and reapportionment,' Perez said.
Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, warned that redrawing 'Congressional maps outside of the standard post‑census cycle threatens fair representation, undermines the intent of our democratic system, and risks silencing our diverse communities.'
Perez said it was an unexpected opportunity, but the Legislature doesn't have the 'capacity to engage in the full redistricting process' as it did from 2020 through 2022.
'Thus, we will focus our inquiry on the Congressional map, which was the subject of the recent Florida Supreme Court case, and any relevant legal questions,' Perez said.
House members have until Aug. 15 to apply to the committee, whose members will be announced along with regular interim committee assignments in September, he said.
Anyone who has talked about running for Congress or made statements favoring or disfavoring a particular incumbent or political party, which is prohibited by Florida law, will be automatically be disqualified, he added.
Trump has already called on several GOP-controlled states to increase the number of Republican seats. Texas was the first state to hold a special session on redistricting to add three to five new Republican seats, a process that stalled when Democrat legislators left the state and prevented a quorum to vote on the new map.
Gov. Ron DeSantis has also said several times that he would like the Florida Legislature to convene a special session on redistricting, believing they could get an extra three to five Republican seats out of it.
Republicans gained four seats with the 2022 map drawn by DeSantis, giving them a 20-8 majority over Democrats.
Some political experts have warned such a move could backfire and create more narrow Republican-leaning swing seats than there are now, which could help Democrats regain some seats they lost with the current map.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is House size the solution to the gerrymandering problem?
Is House size the solution to the gerrymandering problem?

Boston Globe

time4 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Is House size the solution to the gerrymandering problem?

Plymouth Advertisement To be truly representative, why not expand House to 10,000 members? Jeff Jacoby's suggestion to enlarge the House of Representatives as a way to end the gerrymandering wars was a good idea but did not go far enough. Today's data and data processing capabilities would still make gerrymandering possible, even if the United States tripled the number of members of the House, and districts would still be too large. Large districts enable the wealthy and special interests to make our representatives beholden to them, and enable outside money to influence what our country's Founders meant to be local elections. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Technology is distorting our electoral processes. Why not use technology to support the democracy the Founders envisioned? Why not expand the House to 10,000 members, with each member representing approximately 34,000 constituents? That's close to the same number when the country was founded, 30,000. We should also end the requirement that all members be physically present and use more video conferencing and other technology to support the actions needed for the House to govern. This would make the 'people's chamber' once again the people's chamber, reduce the cost of elections, make representatives more accessible, and truly eliminate gerrymandering. Advertisement Richard Amster Cambridge Gerrymandering isn't the only problem with the House I stand in complete agreement with both Jeff Jacoby's analysis of the gerrymandering problem and his fitting solution. Our Framers intended Article 1 of the US Constitution, which establishes Congress, to be the most significant. They wanted House members to be close to the average citizen. They anticipated this body increasing in size with our nation's increasing population, to accurately reflect the views and needs of the people. Capping the number of representatives at 435 in 1929 was wrong — and so is the historic practice of gerrymandering, famously done in Massachusetts in 1812 and repeated often since then in virtually every state. But our nation's lawmaking body is also undermined by two related factors — the use of seniority in committee assignments and the lack of term limits. Partly as a result, representatives spend too much time on political pandering, fund-raising, and trying to manage age-related infirmities. Instead of giving committee assignments to the longest serving members, who have been waiting in the wings and feel entitled to the role, grant them to members with practical experience in the work of that committee. And while we're in the mood for change, let's allow representatives only four terms. This should be sufficient time for each to make substantive contributions, especially in smaller districts more 'in touch' with their constituents. Advertisement Peter Vangsness Medway Small districts aren't enough: We need good government initiatives Jeff Jacoby proposes enlarging the House of Representatives as a solution to political gerrymandering. But it's important to note that the term 'gerrymander' goes back to Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry, who signed a state redistricting plan into law in 1812. Wags referred to one tortuous, lizard-shaped, North Shore district as a 'Gerry-mander.' The congressional districts at the time had about 35,000 constituents each, and digital computers were still more than a century from their birth. So you do not need large congressional districts, or computers, to engage in gerrymandering. To point out something that should be obvious, running an honest government requires bipartisan support for fair districting practices, honest ethics oversight, and effective protection against foreign government interference. Donald Segretti, Lee Atwater, Roger Ailes, and others have for decades used dirty tricks to win elections — and many of these dirty tricksters have been Republicans. At the same time, the purging of voter rolls has often disproportionately affected Democratic voters. This contrasts with a decades-long effort by Democrats to improve voting access and integrity, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the post-Watergate campaign-finance reforms. The disparity is stark between the Republicans, who are backing away from bipartisanship and good government initiatives, and the Democrats, who remain committed to them. Stuart Gallant Belmont

Barack Obama Sends Message to Texas Democrats Over Redistricting Battle
Barack Obama Sends Message to Texas Democrats Over Redistricting Battle

Newsweek

time5 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Barack Obama Sends Message to Texas Democrats Over Redistricting Battle

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former President Barack Obama has said he is "so proud" of Texas House Democrats who have fled the Lone Star State to break quorum, preventing the passage of a redistricting bill that would likely give the Republicans another five seats in the national House of Representatives. On Thursday, Obama spoke to rebel lawmakers by video call, a photograph of which was shared on X by the official Texas House Democrats account. This was shared in turn by Obama who added: "I am so proud of the Texas House Democrats and the work that they've done. "Their willingness to put themselves on the line to highlight the current assault on our democracy has set an example for what all of us have to do." Former U.S. President Barack Obama participating in a book talk with former German Chancellor Angela Merkel at The Anthem on December 02, 2024 in Washington, DC. Former U.S. President Barack Obama participating in a book talk with former German Chancellor Angela Merkel at The Anthem on December 02, 2024 in Washington, DC. Kevin Dietsch/GETTY This is a developing story and is being updated.

CNBC Daily Open: Under Trump, business and politics are becoming bedfellows
CNBC Daily Open: Under Trump, business and politics are becoming bedfellows

CNBC

time5 minutes ago

  • CNBC

CNBC Daily Open: Under Trump, business and politics are becoming bedfellows

Don't mix business with pleasure — or the music of the spheres might eject you from the skies even if you are an astronomer — but it seems, in the current milieu, there are no such restrictions between business and politics. U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is eyeing a stake in struggling chipmaker Intel, according to a Bloomberg report on Thursday. That consideration is primarily attributable to Intel's status as the only born-and-bred American company that can manufacture the fastest chips on U.S. soil. While some firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and Samsung, both of which can produce 3-nanometer chips — the most advanced semiconductors so far — have factories in the U.S., they are Taiwanese and South Korean companies, respectively, and probably do not enjoy apple pies on the Fourth of July. In combination with the news that Nvidia and AMD will pay the U.S. government a 15% share of their revenue from chip sales in China, as well as Apple committing to make more chips in America, the Trump administration seems to be consolidating a chip empire with the White House as its capital. To modify a song last heard by the Astronomer CEO before he was cast down to Earth: "I used to rule the world / Chips would rise when I gave the word."The Trump administration is reportedly considering a stake in Intel. The chipmaker is the only U.S. company that can manufacture the most advanced semiconductors in America. Intel's shares soared 7.4% after Bloomberg reported the news. China's economy falters in July. A series of data released Friday — retail sales, industrial output and fixed-asset investment — all underperformed economists' estimates. The statistics bureau attributed the disappointing performance to extreme weather last month. Berkshire Hathaway unveils a stake in UnitedHealth. Warren Buffett's conglomerate bought more than 5 million shares in the health care firm for a stake worth about $1.6 billion at the end of June, according to a regulatory filing. U.S. stocks flirt with the flatline. The S&P 500's 0.03% gain, however, means it closed at another high on Thursday. Asia-Pacific markets rose Friday. Japan's Nikkei 225 added more than 1% on the country's economy expanding more than expected in the second quarter. [PRO] European defense stocks will benefit from Trump-Putin meeting. Regardless of whether the talks result in any breakthroughs on the war in Ukraine, analysts think it's a "win-win" situation for defense stocks. Germany's Merz strikes sharp tone with Europe as he cozies up to Trump German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is looking to redefine Germany's voice in Europe and build a relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump — whom many of Merz's European colleagues do not see eye to eye with. The historically EU-friendly Merz, a former member of the European Parliament, now has a long list of complaints about the bloc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store