Gensol Engineering's retail, FII holdings spiked weeks before Sebi crackdown
Retail and foreign institutional investors significantly raised their stakes in Gensol Engineering during the January–March 2025 quarter, weeks before Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) issued a scathing interim order against the company for fund diversion and severe corporate governance lapses.
ADVERTISEMENT According to the latest shareholding pattern, the retail investors, defined as resident individuals with holdings up to Rs 2 lakh, increased their stake from 23.44% in December 2024 to 30.68% in March 2025, a steep 7.24 percentage point quarter-on-quarter jump.
At the same time, foreign institutional investor (FII) holding also surged, rising from 0.63% to 4.88% in the same period.
This build-up in public shareholding occurred prior to Sebi's public order on Gensol, raising serious concerns about information asymmetry, timing of disclosures, and whether retail investors unknowingly entered the counter while corporate misconduct brewed beneath the surface.It is interesting to note that between FY20 and FY25, promoter holding dropped from 70.72% to 35%, even as revenues rose from Rs 61 crore to Rs 1,152 crore. Even on a quarter-on-quarter basis, the company's promoter shareholding witnessed a decline. The promoter shareholding for the quarter ended March 2025 stood at 35.87%, significantly down from 62.65% at the end of the December 2024 quarter.
ADVERTISEMENT
Also read: ETMarkets Smart Talk: Harshad Patwardhan, managing Rs 1591 cr AUM, offers playbook for creating wealth with sector-focused strategy
In January, Gensol announced a 1:10 stock split, which made its shares more affordable for small investors. The move coincided with a broader rally in clean energy and EV stocks, and Gensol, with impressive top-line growth, fast became a retail favorite.
ADVERTISEMENT By March-end, the company's investor base had widened, retail interest had soared, and FII presence had grown. However, it should be noted that this increasing investor participation occurred just before Sebi revealed the extent of financial irregularities and fund diversion at the company.Sebi's investigation, triggered by a complaint in June 2024, culminated in an interim order in April 2025, revealing that Gensol diverted Rs 977.75 crore in loans from IREDA and PFC, meant for electric vehicle procurement. Only 4,704 out of 6,400 planned EVs were actually bought.
ADVERTISEMENT Over Rs 200 crore was found unaccounted for, allegedly routed through Go-Auto and Capbridge Ventures, promoter-linked entities. The funds were allegedly used for luxury personal expenses, including a DLF Camellias apartment and a Rs 26 lakh golf set.In its order, Sebi accused the promoters of treating Gensol as a personal piggy bank, cancelling the stock split, ordering a forensic audit, and barring both Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi from the securities market. The regulator also cited falsified documents, a breakdown in internal controls, and gross misuse of company funds.
Additionally, it should be highlighted that earlier in the month of March, CARE Ratings downgraded Gensol's credit ratings of bank facilities totaling Rs 716 crore to CARE D, indicating default or high credit risk. The long-term bank facilities of Rs 639.7 crore were downgraded from CARE BB+ (Stable) to CARE D, while the long-term/short-term bank facilities of Rs 76.3 crore were downgraded from CARE BB+ (Stable)/CARE A4+ to CARE D.
ADVERTISEMENT
Also read: Warren Buffett now owns 5% of all US Treasury bills, a larger holding than the Fed itself
ICRA also downgraded the credit ratings of various loan facilities amounting to Rs 2,050 crore. The long-term fund-based term loan of Rs 925 crore and fund-based cash credit of Rs 718.5 crore were both downgraded from [ICRA]BBB- (Stable) to [ICRA]D.Similarly, long-term and short-term bank guarantee (BG) facilities totaling Rs 406.5 crore and a sub-limit BG of Rs 51.3 crore were downgraded from [ICRA]BBB- (Stable)/[ICRA]A3 to [ICRA]D.Many investors entered the stock just before governance issues surfaced, amplifying their exposure to risk.Analysts say that this is not a case of poor timing, it's a failure in transparency, as the data clearly shows that thousands of investors walked into the stock unaware of what was brewing inside.Veteran investor Vijay Kedia warned of more 'Gensols' in the making, and Sebi echoed concerns that stock splits and aggressive capital raising can attract small investors to companies with opaque operations.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Vendors told to shift to new Morhabadi market building
Ranchi: The municipal corporation (RMC) on Tuesday formally sent notification to 161 selected vendors asking them to shift to the newly constructed vendor market near the Morabadi electricity office at the earliest. Additional municipal commissioner Sanjay Kumar said, "All allottees are to ensure the timely setup of their shops at the assigned stalls or platforms." He added, "The allotment was conducted with full transparency. Vendors who couldn't be allotted due to document issues can reapply during the second phase." The new market, built at a cost of Rs 1.36 crore with capacity to house 218 vendors, marks a push by the Ranchi Municipal Corporation to decongest footpaths and bring order to the vending ecosystem. Initially, 418 applied in April, out of which 169 were shortlisted based on eligibility, including PM SVANidhi registration and vendor IDs issued before March 5, 2022.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bank fraud case: Court rejects plea of accused to take part in trial without bail
Kanpur: Special Judge Companies Act Azad Singh on Tuesday rejected the plea of two accused who sought permission to appear and participate in the trial of Rs 7,820 crore bank fraud case without seeking bail. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The judicial official not only dismissed their application but also ordered that a date be fixed every week in the case. June 17 has been fixed as the next date of hearing. The accused applicants, Sunil Verma and Anoop Kumar Verma, had submitted an application before the court to allow their participation in the trial. Kaushal Kishore Sharma, special prosecutor for the case, strongly opposed the plea, stating that without obtaining bail they can not be allowed to participate in the proceedings. The Companies Act contains special provisions regarding bail, which override those in the Cr PC. Consequently, the judicial official dismissed the application and fixed June 17 as the next date of hearing. Sharma stated that the Serious Fraud Investigation Office had lodged a complaint against 69 accused on behalf of several banks in bank fraud amounting to Rs 7,820 crore. Some name and famed persons of the city were also implicated in the case while as many as 20 accused were residing abroad and their files had been separated from the main case. Sharma mentioned that the court had already issued a non-bailable warrant against the accused, Satish Chandra Gupta, who is living abroad. The two accused Sunil Verma and Anoop Kumar Badhera had approached the apex court, where an order was passed that no coercive action should be taken against them, although their application is still pending. On Monday last, they moved an application before the court, which was dismissed. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now One of the accused, Vikram Kothari, has died, while others such as Rahul Kothari, builder Vishwanath Gupta, industrialist Suyash Desari and others have obtained bail orders in their favour from the apex court. The special prosecutor added that both accused have also applied for permission to travel abroad, and the court has reserved its order on that prayer. Speaking with TOI, the special prosecutor stated that the accused had formed a company for mercantile trading. They acquired a letter of credit from a bank, claiming that the company would purchase rice from one country and sell it in another. However, they used the funds for personal gains and only displayed sales and purchases on paper. The corporate ministry detected the nexus and ordered the Serious Fraud Investigation Office to lodge a complaint in the Companies Act court in 2020. Kanpur has the Companies Act court, which is the only one in Uttar Pradesh.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Six firms booked for cheating medical device company of 2.23cr
Surat: Vesu police have registered a case of cheating against the proprietors of six firms from various states for allegedly duping a Surat-based medical device manufacturing company of Rs 2.23 crore. The case was filed following a complaint by Chintan Kapadiya, director of Envision Scientific Pvt Ltd. According to the complaint, Envision Scientific and its associate company, Concept Medical Research Pvt Ltd, supplied medical devices to the six accused firms over the past seven years. Despite repeated notices, emails and payment reminders, the firms allegedly failed to clear their dues. The companies named in the FIR include: Sakshi Enterprise (Raipur, Chhattisgarh), Bright Cardio Care (Perambalur, Tamil Nadu), SVR Medical Technologies (Thane), Meditree Health Solutions (Hyderabad), Hindustan Enterprises (Ranchi), Infinite Medical Solutions (Mumbai). The products supplied included a range of medical devices such as Albuminous, Mitigator, Nostrum and MagicTouch, among others. Kapadiya stated that both Envision Scientific and Concept Medical, which also operates a manufacturing unit in the Sachin industrial area, have faced continuous delays and non-payment from these firms, despite fulfilling all delivery obligations. Vesu police have booked all six firms under relevant sections of the IPC for cheating and initiated an investigation into the matter.
