logo
NSW Premier, Police Minister staffers to front Dural caravan inquiry after arrest threat

NSW Premier, Police Minister staffers to front Dural caravan inquiry after arrest threat

News.com.au6 hours ago

NSW Premier Chris Minns has slammed the threat of arrest for five political staffers as a 'dangerous precedent' after he refused to front an inquiry into the Dural caravan bomb plot.
Five staffers for Mr Minns and Police Minister Yasmin Catley risked the possibility that a warrant would be issued for their arrest after they failed to attend the third hearing of the inquiry last Friday into the relationship between the caravan plot in Sydney's northwest and the passing of strict anti-hate laws.
Independent MLC and inquiry chairman Rod Roberts confirmed the staffers had since agreed to attend a special hearing of the committee on Friday during an interview with 2GB's Ben Fordham on Wednesday morning.
'As a result of the (Legislative Council) president Ben Franklin seeking legal advice from Bret Walker, one of the eminent silks in relation to constitutional law, he has ruled that the Legislative Council is in their rights … to seek arrest warrants for these people that didn't comply with the summonses,' he said.
'But, the government has capitulated now overnight (and) waved the white flag and we're going to make arrangements for a committee hearing on Friday for these five to attend.'
Mr Roberts said he had received an 'undertaking' from the five staffers that they would attend the inquiry 'at this stage'.
He described it is a 'very big backdown' from Mr Minns and that it was 'unprecedented that a Premier would take it to that level'.
'I don't know where he got his advice from – his legal advice – but, it's been reaffirmed by the leading constitutional lawyer in Australia that we are within our rights,' Mr Roberts said.
Asked about the reversal, Mr Minns said he was 'disappointed about the circumstances' that led to his staff being summoned.
'Don't take my word for it. Listen to the chair of the committee who said the reason they're being called in is because I won't appear before the committee.
'So, in a punitive way, pulling in staffers to this upper house inquiry.
'I think that the very troubling information that staff would be arrested and held potentially overnight via police custody is a massive overreach.'
Mr Minns said staff would 'make up their own minds' about whether to attend, and he was offering them support as their employer.
He went on to slam the committee as 'unleashing extraordinary powers of police or the courts' on what was 'close to a kangaroo court'.
'That's a breach or a step that no one has taken in the parliament's history, and there's very good reason for that,' he said.
'Does anyone truly believe that the members of that committee, given everything that they've said prior to the committee's opening hearing, are going to be soberly assessing the information before them and making a non-political decision?
'I think they've already shown inherent bias in their approach to all of these inquiries, and they don't follow due process.
'So, I think it's a dangerous precedent for the state, but at the end of the day, we are where we are.'
Mr Minns went on to accuse the committee of pushing the 'common understanding' that all anti-Semitic incidents in Sydney were related to the Dural caravan plot.
Appearing later on 2GB, Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said he was 'glad' about the reversal.
'It shouldn't have come to this,' he said.
'There shouldn't have been the threat of warrants and arrests, but this is a premier and a government (that) think they're above the law.
'Just imagine if witnesses subpoenaed to court gave the bird sign to the court.'
After receiving a letter on Friday afternoon regarding the staffers, Mr Franklin instructed the clerk to seek legal advice.
'This morning, I have met with Mr Brent Walker SC who has given me the benefit of his verbal advice on the matter,' he said on Tuesday.
'On the receipt of his advice in written form, I intend to table it in the House given the significance of this issue.
'In the meantime, I am considering his advice and its implications, as I tend to make a statement to the House later this week on my intended action.'
The inquiry was established to determine who not what and when about the explosives-laden caravan, which police later claimed was not a terrorism plot and instead part of a criminal conspiracy.
It has so far heard evidence from leading figures in NSW Police as well as government staff.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NRL boss Andrew Abdo defends new powers that allow players to be charged for incidents MRC misses
NRL boss Andrew Abdo defends new powers that allow players to be charged for incidents MRC misses

News.com.au

time31 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

NRL boss Andrew Abdo defends new powers that allow players to be charged for incidents MRC misses

NRL chief executive Andrew Abdo has hosed down concerns from Panthers coach Ivan Cleary and the Rugby League Players Association over changes to the judiciary system that give the Australian Rugby League Commission new powers to charge players for on-field offences. The RLPA revealed last week it had 'serious concerns' with the decision to amend the judiciary code that gives the ARLC 'absolute discretion and extraordinary powers' to charge players. Cleary doubled down on Tuesday and said the lack of faith in the match review committee was 'disturbing', but Abdo is imploring people to not read too much into it. 'It's not a matter of intervention, this is an insurance policy that the commission has identified to make sure that the policy as set by the commission is being applied,' he said. 'All it really means is that the commission is able to, on very rare circumstances, if ever, apply to the judiciary to review a matter that may have been missed by the match review committee or may have, in their view, not been graded appropriately. 'There could be an upwards movement of the grading, it could be a downwards movement of the grading. This would be in very rare, exceptional circumstances as an insurance policy. 'It's not a case of us being in a situation where we're going to see this applied regularly, if at all, but it is there as an important insurance policy. 'The commission has no powers to make a final decision, those powers will sit with the judiciary.' Abdo was also forced to address Cleary's comments about the MRC following its decision to suspend Scott Sorensen for a tackle that injured Dallin Watene-Zelezniak. The Panthers coach was furious with the call and said the rule needed to be looked at. 'The actual hip-drop rule, I don't even know who wrote it or when it was written. It's very vague and nothing like why it was brought in,' he said. The RLPA’s position on the recent changes to the Judiciary Code. Read the full statement here: — RLPA | Rugby League Players Association (@RLPlayers) June 20, 2025 'Scott made a tackle that is in most people's eyes was a classic rugby league tackle. No one saw it, even the player who was tackled didn't think anything of it. 'Not any player on the field, not the referee, the touch judges and not 18,000 fans (thought it was bad) but someone got hurt, so we had to do a cold case and go back and try to find it.' Abdo said he hadn't heard those comments but refused to back down on the game's stance to protect players wherever possible. 'All I'll say is that for a number of years now we've spoken about the importance of players having a duty of care and avoiding what is a pretty dangerous tackle,' he said. 'We'll make no apology for wanting to protect players and we'll also put the onus on the defender to take all measures to avoid those indicators (of a hip-drop tackle).'

Jury finds man guilty of murdering beloved doctor Ashley Gordon in Doncaster after home invasion
Jury finds man guilty of murdering beloved doctor Ashley Gordon in Doncaster after home invasion

ABC News

time40 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Jury finds man guilty of murdering beloved doctor Ashley Gordon in Doncaster after home invasion

A man who was underage when he stabbed and killed young Victorian doctor Ashley Gordon has been found guilty of murder by a jury in the Melbourne Supreme Court. The man, who cannot be named due to legal reasons, pleaded not guilty to the murder, claiming he acted in self-defence. But throughout the trial, lawyers for the prosecution described how a group of boys broke into the young doctor's home twice in one night, before Dr Gordon chased them. The court heard they had been angling to steal his Mercedes AMG and ran when they heard him say 'Hello, boys' in the dark. Dr Gordon, 33, then told his housemate he was going after them, jumped in his car and scoured nearby streets before he found them. When Dr Gordon got out of the car, he told the boys there was nowhere to run. Three of the youths jumped a nearby fence, but one, known to the court as KT, who is now convicted of murder, stabbed him 11 times. Prosecutor Kristie Churchill rebutted claims by the defence that, at the time, the boy was scared and acting in self-defence. She pointed out that Dr Gordon's actions were "perfectly lawful". "He did not even put shoes on before he left his home. He was not seeking a violent confrontation." It was a 10.8 centimetre blow through Dr Gordon's chest that punctured his heart, lung, and aorta, which ultimately killed him. Since Dr Gordon's death, his family has been advocating for bail law reform, given that the accused was on bail at the time of his offending. Dr Gordon had made his Latrobe Valley home proud, evidenced by the large crowd that gathered to farewell him at his funeral. "Thank God the justice system had a small win today," Dr Gordon's sister Natalie Gordon said. "It's a massive relief, and we want to thank the community for all the support." Ms Gordon told the ABC the court process was almost unbearable. "It's the hardest thing I've ever had to sit through, listen to them trying to diminish his character and make him sound like the monster," Ms Gordon said. "It was really nice to hear the judge compliment us on the way we were able to hold ourselves together. "Our most heartfelt thanks to everyone for the ongoing support through the whole process and always believing in what a wonderful person Ashley was." Throughout the trial, the defence team maintained that the accused was acting in self-defence. In the days following the attack, the boys discussed fleeing the country and burnt their clothes under an overpass. "There'd be no reason to burn your clothing with the blood on them if you were only concerned about being caught for a break-in," Ms Churchill said. They compared the size of Dr Gordon, who was tall and athletic, with the accused, who was underage. But prosecutors maintained that no matter how scared the accused was of Dr Gordon, repeated blows with a knife the size of a pen were not an appropriate response. "An unarmed man, on his own, there clearly to apprehend him, whose house he'd just broken into in the dead of night, to produce a knife and plunge it into his chest, we suggest, is not a reasonable response," Ms Churchill said. The convicted man will face court for a further plea and sentencing at the Melbourne Supreme Court in October.

'Cindy's Law' follows tireless fight by families of Cindy and Mona Smith
'Cindy's Law' follows tireless fight by families of Cindy and Mona Smith

ABC News

time40 minutes ago

  • ABC News

'Cindy's Law' follows tireless fight by families of Cindy and Mona Smith

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains the names and images of people who have died. This story contains some confronting details about sexual assault. Standing under a large fig tree near the NSW Parliament, Aunty Dawn Smith wipes away tears as she remembers her daughter Cindy and niece Mona as "good girls". "I always wondered what she would have been like today," she said. "What if she got married and had kids? You think of all of these things. I miss them very much." Teenage cousins Murrawarri and Kunja girl Mona Lisa ('Mona') Smith and Wangkumara girl Jacinta Rose 'Cindy' Smith died following a motor vehicle crash near Bourke in 1987. Their families have waged a decades-long fight for justice, with a coroner last year finding the police investigation into the man driving the car was "manifestly deficient" and impacted by racial bias. Now, thanks to their advocacy, a legal loophole that allowed the man to avoid prosecution for interfering with Cindy's body will be closed, nearly 40 years after her death. Cindy's family called this "Cindy's Law". "I'm feeling hurt," Aunty Dawn said, "the justice system failed us". "If we can help anyone, I'm willing to help them and give them advice." The 2024 coronial inquest found 40-year-old non-Indigenous man Alexander Ian Grant was driving the car in which Mona and Cindy were passengers and he was "highly likely" intoxicated. It heard a witness found him after the accident with his arm draped across Cindy's near-naked body. "Horrifyingly, the evidence indicates that Mr Grant sexually interfered with Cindy after she had passed," State Coroner Teresa O'Sullivan found. Ms O'Sullivan also found "numerous, significant failings" in the police investigation that led to Grant's acquittal on charges of culpable driving in 1990. "Had two white teenage girls died in the same circumstances, I cannot conceive of there being such a manifestly deficient police investigation into the circumstances of their deaths," she found. Crucially, Ms O'Sullivan noted police prosectors had dropped the charge against Grant of interfering with Cindy's body because they couldn't determine the time at which she died. With Grant dying in 2017, "the perpetrator escaped justice 'due to a loophole'," Cindy's family told the inquest. On Wednesday, the New South Wales Parliament introduced a bill that will enable the prosecution of offenders when it is not clear if an act of sexual violence occurred before or after death. In tabling the bill, NSW Attorney General Michael Daley made note of the family's presence in the chamber and said he was "proud" to be making the reform after their tireless advocacy. "Allowing a perpetrator to escape accountability through such a technicality is clearly unacceptable," he said. "Law reform cannot erase the tragedy of the loss of those two little girls but I'm grateful to have the opportunity to improve the law and make sure that no other offenders avoid justice." The National Justice Project's principal solicitor George Newhouse, who has been acting for the family, said they had long been "let down" by the justice system but felt they had finally been heard. "At least [in] changing the law, in the future someone might be held accountable," he said. "But they were let down, not just by the police, but by the DPP at the time who dropped these charges. "The coroner said if the police had done the investigation properly, there might have been enough evidence to convict the perpetrator at the time. "They just did not care about this family, and that kind of discrimination against First Nations people continues to this day." With no-one held accountable for the botched police investigation, Cindy's sister Kerrie Smith said she wants to see more than an apology from authorities. "We can't get closure now anyway because the bloke who done it, he died, he's gone, he didn't even been in jail for one day," she said. "So he got away with everything where our little girls, my little sister, my cousin died out on the road out there. And he lived his own life." Aunty Dawn agreed an apology is "no good because [the police] only say it, they don't mean it". "I'd like to see something done, get someone to be [held] accountable for not doing their job properly." Julie Buxton, who acted for Cindy's family at the coronial inquest, told ABC News Breakfast the family first made a complaint to the NSW Attorney General back in 1990. "It was absolutely devastating to lose the two girls, but then it was devastating to be caught in a system where the police just did not do their job to an adequate degree," she said. "I think it's a great tribute to the hard work that they have done and a tribute to the love and commitment to their children and to wanting to achieve greater change for others." Mona's sister Fiona Smith told the Indigenous Affairs Team the decades-long legal process brought up "a can of worms" but she is hopeful this legal change will help others. "All I'd like to know is that it will work, that it helps somebody down the track somewhere, and it stops this from happening again." Mr Daley told the Indigenous Affairs Team the reform means a "special verdict" can be granted by a jury where it is unknown whether the offending happened before or after death. It will carry a three-year maximum sentence. "It won't bring them back, nothing can, unfortunately, but it'll mean that this circumstance, which is very rare, can't happen again," told the Indigenous Affairs Team. "It'll shut that unfortunate loophole." Mr Daley acknowledged Cindy and Mona Lisa's families were let down by the justice system over many years. "The whole thing was really poorly handled by a range of people and government entities right from the start," he said. "We've got to learn from those mistakes and help people move on … and make sure it can't happen again." Kerrie Smith said she wants her sister Cindy remembered for the loving sister, daughter and niece she was. "She was a beautiful girl, you know."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store