logo
McClain Delaney, Parrott both file candidacy statements for 2026 midterm election

McClain Delaney, Parrott both file candidacy statements for 2026 midterm election

Yahoo15-02-2025
Voters in Maryland's 6th Congressional District could see a rematch between U.S. Rep. April McClain Delaney and former state delegate Neil Parrott in the next midterm election.
Delaney, a Democrat from Potomac, and Parrott, a Republican from Hagerstown, have both filed updated statements of candidacy with the Federal Election Commission for 2026, online records show.
A statement of candidacy allows a person to designate political committees to raise money on their behalf for a specific election.
In response to a request on Thursday for comment about his filing, Parrott referred to a recent newsletter to his supporters.
"I filed with the FEC to keep my campaign account open for financial purposes. It's considered part of an 'exploratory' campaign," Parrott said in the newsletter. "I didn't make an announcement, and I didn't file to run with the Maryland Board of Elections."
Parrott also criticized McClain Delaney in the newsletter for referencing his statement of candidacy in a fundraising text for her own 2026 campaign.
"She owns houses totaling more than $25 Million, all outside of Maryland's 6th District, yet she is asking people for their money to fund her next campaign," Parrott said.
A spokesperson for McClain Delaney could not be reached by phone or email on Thursday and Friday about the congresswoman's statement of candidacy or about Parrott's comments.
McClain Delaney won the 6th District seat in 2024 with 53.05% of the vote, according to data from the Maryland State Board of Elections. Parrott received 46.72% of the vote.
Prior to the 2024 election cycle, McClain Delaney had never run for public office. Her husband, John Delaney, held the 6th District seat from 2013 to 2019, but the district lines have since been redrawn.
Parrott won the Republican nomination for the 6th District seat in 2020 and again in 2022, but lost both times to former U.S. Rep. David Trone.
Trone did not seek reelection in 2024. He instead ran for an open U.S. Senate seat, but lost to now-Sen. Angela Alsobrooks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Map Shows Democratic Plan for New California Districts
Map Shows Democratic Plan for New California Districts

Newsweek

time29 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Map Shows Democratic Plan for New California Districts

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Democrats have unveiled a proposed congressional map that would reshape political boundaries across the state and could give their party up to five new seats. "Earlier today, the DCCC submitted a proposed congressional map to the legislative public portal with collaborative input from stakeholders and legislators. We anticipate this proposal will have widespread support both among California office holders and various stakeholders across the state," Julie Merz, the executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said in a statement on Friday. "We will not stand by as Republicans attempt to rig the election in their favor and choose their voters. It's increasingly clear that Republicans will do anything to protect their narrow majority because they know they can't win on their disastrous legislative record which has raised costs and rips away health care for millions, all to give the ultra-wealthy a tax break," she continued. Why It Matters Redistricting, usually done once a decade after the Census, is being pushed mid-cycle in response to President Donald Trump's call for Texas to send "five more Republicans" to Congress. Trump urged Texas Republicans to redo the state's districts to help the party. Democrats, including California Governor Gavin Newsom, say they are "fighting fire with fire" by proposing new districts that could benefit their party. The move could reshape the 2026 midterms, where Democrats are hoping to retake the House and Senate. What To Know The proposed California redistricting plan targets five Republican representatives: Doug LaMalfa (District 1), Kevin Kiley (District 3), David Valadao (District 22), Ken Calvert (District 41) and Darrell Issa (District 48). LaMalfa's rural district would lose many Republican voters and extend west to more Democratic coastal areas. "If you want to know what's wrong with these maps—just take a look at them," LaMalfa wrote on X on Friday. "How on earth does Modoc County on the Nevada and Oregon Border have any common interest with Marin County and the Golden Gate Bridge? Voters took this power from Sacramento for just this reason. This is naked politics at its worst." Kiley's redrawn district would add Democratic-leaning Sacramento County and cut out much of the Eastern Sierra. "Make no mistake, I will win reelection to the House regardless of the proposed changes to my district," he said in a news release. "I fully expect that the beautiful 3rd District will remain exactly as it is. We will defeat Newsom's sham initiative and vindicate the will of California voters." Kiley has opposed gerrymandering, introducing legislation to block mid-decade redistricting. Meanwhile, Democratic Representative Ami Bera, who represents California's 6th congressional district, is weighing options to continue representing Sacramento, possibly by running in District 3. A redistricting map of California that Democrats have submitted. A redistricting map of California that Democrats have submitted. California State Assembly "I have had the honor of representing the Sacramento region in Congress since 2013. I intend to continue representing the Sacramento region in the next Congress," Bera said in a statement posted on X. "Right now, we must stop Donald Trump and Texas Republicans from gerrymandering their way to a House majority in 2026. I look forward to supporting this ballot initiative to level the playing field and fight back against Donald Trump's destructive agenda." Newsom said he would call a special election on November 4 to let Californians decide whether to adopt new congressional districts, a move that would bypass the state's independent redistricting commission. He said the proposal included a trigger clause, meaning it would take effect only if Texas or another Republican-led state advanced its own redistricting plan. California Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher criticized the proposed redistricting plan, calling the maps "rigged" and drawn "in secret to give Democrat politicians more power by dismantling the independent commission Californians created." He argued that the plan discarded years of public input, saying, "These maps shred the fair, transparent process voters demanded" and amount to "a rigged scheme cooked up behind closed doors." Gallagher accused Democrats of rushing the plan to meet a deadline, saddling taxpayers with a November special election and leaving "no real opportunity for public input." He added: "This is a mockery of democracy. If they can neuter the commission here, they can neuter it anywhere. Californians should choose their representatives, not the other way around." Newsom has also received criticism from Democrats. Jeanne Raya, a former Democratic member of the commission, voiced concern about transparency. "Somebody's going to be drawing maps, whether behind a real door, a virtual door," she said. "There will not be that transparency that is written into the independent commission's work and voters will suffer for that." Several good-government groups also oppose the governor's proposal, arguing that it politicizes redistricting and undermines the independent commission. Newsom defended the plan, saying it remained transparent because voters would have the final say. Unlike California's proposal, he said, the Texas plan would not go before voters. "We are talking about emergency measures to respond to what's happening in Texas and we will nullify what happens in Texas," Newsom said at a news conference alongside Texas Democrats. "We will pick up five seats with the consent of the people and that is the difference between the approach we're taking and the approach [Texas Republicans are] taking." Other Democratic-led states, such as New York and Illinois, are weighing new redistricting efforts but face legal obstacles or limited opportunities to gain seats. Meanwhile, Republican strongholds such as Ohio, Indiana, Florida and Missouri are seen as having greater potential to expand their representation through redistricting. What People Are Saying Former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger wrote on X on Friday: "I'm getting ready for the gerrymandering battle." California Governor Gavin Newsom said during a news conference earlier this month: "We have the opportunity to de facto end the Trump presidency in less than 18 months. That's what's at stake." Julie Merz, the executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee: "We applaud Governor Newsom and legislative leaders for their commitment to put this measure in front of voters, which not only levels the playing field against corrupt Republican efforts in Texas, but also reaffirms Democrats' commitment to redistricting reform and the use of fair, nonpartisan redistricting commissions nationwide." What Happens Next If lawmakers finish the plan by August 22, California voters will decide on November 4 whether to approve maps that would apply in 2026, 2028 and 2030—contingent on Republican-led states redrawing their lines first. Since 2010, California's maps have been drawn by an independent citizen commission.

The Tribune's Quotes of the Week quiz for Aug. 16
The Tribune's Quotes of the Week quiz for Aug. 16

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

The Tribune's Quotes of the Week quiz for Aug. 16

Planes whizzing around the city for the annual Chicago Air and Water Show are a sign that summer is winding down. But before the planes came dark skies and tons of rain, with several parts of the Chicagoland under flash flood and severe weather warnings. But enough about the weather — let's recap what else happened this week. Chicago Public Schools students return to the classroom Monday as school leaders continue to hammer out the district's budget. At Wednesday's school board meeting, CPS CEO Macquline King presented a balanced budget that divided members, who must pass a spending plan by the end of August. Plus, the University of Chicago announced that it will pause admissions for Ph.D. and master's programs across several schools amid mounting financial strains. The city of Chicago is facing its own budgetary problems, with the city's chief financial officer speaking Tuesday about how new state actions could help. But City Hall did score a win when the mayor and Chicago Fire Fighters Union Local 2 reached a tentative contract agreement following years of bargaining. Both Republican and Democratic state politicians headed to Springfield this week for their party's day at the Illinois State Fair. The politicos weren't there merely to catch the Snoop Dog show and take in the butter cow, but also to give stump speeches, talk nationwide redistricting efforts and gear up for the 2026 midterms. Meanwhile, the Texas House Democrats who fled to Illinois last week said Thursday that they plan to return to Austin after lawmakers adjourn their current special session and California Democrats introduce their retaliatory map designed to neutralize the Texas GOP's efforts. From the crime and public safety beat, another corrupt Illinois politician is going to serve time, the Cook County state's attorney's office declined to charge the officers who shot and killed Dexter Reed during a March 2024 traffic stop and the Chicago police officer who fatally shot Officer Krystal Rivera earlier this year was stripped of police powers after being accused of battery against another female officer. Chicago is the subject of more threats from President Donald Trump. After mobilizing National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., to help fight crime, the president suggested doing the same in the Windy City. Trump also met with Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in Alaska on Friday to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. It's been a little more than a week since the latest round of U.S. tariffs took effect, but it's difficult to interpret the impact they've had on the economy. While the stock market soared to historic highs this week, the latest report from the consumer price index showed the cost of some everyday goods is climbing and the Federal Reserve announced that, across the board, inflation was unchanged. Back home, the Chicago Bulls are preparing to get back out on the court, releasing their schedule for the 2025-26 season, which starts on Oct. 22, and across town, the Sky notched their 11th loss in 12 games, as injured star Angel Reese sat out for a sixth straight. Things aren't much better for Chicago area baseball fans. The Cubs are falling further back from first place in the NL Central, the White Sox are 44-78, and Clarendon Hills suffered a stinging defeat in their opening game of the Little League World Series, losing 16-1. But you know who had a good week? Swifties. The pop star announced her 12th studio album, 'The Life of a Showgirl,' late Monday and appeared on her boyfriend Travis Kelce's 'New Heights' podcast Wednesday to discuss the upcoming record. Now let's get to it. Can you guess who said what this week? Take the Tribune's Quotes of the Week quiz to find out. Missed last week? You can find it here or check out our past editions of Quotes of the Week.

Texas Democrats poised to end standoff: 5 things to know
Texas Democrats poised to end standoff: 5 things to know

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Texas Democrats poised to end standoff: 5 things to know

Texas House Democrats who fled the state to stall a Republican redistricting plan have signaled they're ready to return to the Lone Star State in the coming days. The Texas state legislature wrapped up its first special session on Friday, one of the conditions the Democrats gave for ending their quorum break. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) quickly called a second special session, with Democrats' anticipated return set to clear the way for the Texas House to move forward with an aggressive gerrymander that could net five more House seats for the GOP in the midterms. But the quorum-breaking Texas Democrats are touting the national attention they've brought to the redistricting fight and looking for hope from California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has vowed to move forward with his own new map. Here's what to know as Democrats plan to end the standoff: Why now? It was always highly unlikely that Texas Democrats would be able to permanently thwart the GOP's redistricting effort. But by fleeing the state, they hoped to raise national attention over the issue and inspire Democrat-led states to move forward with their own new maps. In both cases, they succeeded. The Texas Democrats' decision to leave made the redistricting battle a national story. And now California is moving forward with its own effort to rewrite its congressional lines in the hopes of counteracting the Texas GOP. Other blue states may soon follow. The Texas Democrats also wanted to hold out until the first special session came to an end, which it did on Friday. They cited both that and California's decision to move forward with redistricting as its preconditions for coming home. The developments allow Democrats to frame the outcome as a victory, even if Republicans will also tout their return as a win. There were also other financial and political risks for the Democrats. They've been forced to parry Republican criticism that they're holding up other legislative business — including disaster relief for Texas affected by recent floods — by staying out-of-state. And each quorum breaker has been racking up $500-a-day fines for their absence, on top of threats of removal and arrest, as well as the logistical cost of living away from their homes. What does it mean for the new Texas maps? The new GOP-friendly maps are almost certain to pass once the Democrats return to the state. Even as they remained out of state, a set of new congressional lines passed in the state Senate, while an identical set of lines were also approved by a state House committee. House Republicans couldn't bring the new map to a floor vote in the lower chamber, however, until the Democrats returned. With the Democrats expected to return to the state, Republicans will have the quorum needed to hold a vote on and pass their map. The map would go next to Abbott for his signature before the new congressional lines are enacted. Texas Democrats knew they would inevitably return to the state since Abbott had threatened to call special session after special session until they returned. Democrats had no options available for blocking the new map from passing, since Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of the state legislature and the GOP also has a Republican governor. How are both sides spinning it? Republicans are touting their return as a win, since it means they will be able to move forward with passing new congressional lines. But Democrats are celebrating the outcome as a political victory too. 'Abbott thought he could silence Black and Latino Texans with his redistricting scheme. He was wrong. We fought back — now other states, starting with California, will neutralize their power grab,' the Texas House Democrats said in a statement posted on X. National Democrats also hailed it as a win that Republicans were unable to pass their new House map during the first special session. 'Under threats to their safety and livelihood, Texas Democrats have continued to deny Republicans a quorum to enact their rigged maps and ignited a national Democratic movement,' Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin said in a statement. 'From California to Washington, D.C, Democrats will continue to stand with the American people and the people of Texas as we battle against Trump and Republicans' anti-democratic attacks,' he added. But the White House is also pushing other states like Indiana and Missouri to redraw their maps as well – raising questions over how many states will ultimately get involved in the fight and have the upper hand. What does it mean for the wider redistricting battle? The redistricting battle in Texas has turned into a nationwide war, and that's unlikely to change anytime soon. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) wants to hold a special election in November to ask voters to weigh in on a ballot measure allowing the state legislature to redraw the state's congressional maps for the rest of the decade. 'I hope we are waking up to this reality. Wake up, America. Wake up to what Donald Trump is doing,' Newsom said at a Thursday event on the effort. 'Wake up to his assault, wake up to the assault on institutions and knowledge and history. Wake up to his war on science, public health and his war on the American people.' California Democrats released their proposed new map, which targets five Republican incumbents, on Friday night. Other states are also considering jumping into the fray. Ohio is already set to redistrict due to state requirements, and Republicans in Florida and Missouri have suggested they'll be revisiting their maps, too. Other blue states like New York and Illinois are also weighing redistricting now. Is it really the end of the fight in Texas? The next front in the Texas redistricting battle is likely to play out in the courts. As the Democrats' statement noted on Thursday, their legal counsel has advised them to 'return to Texas to build a strong public legislative record for the upcoming legal battle against a map that violates both the current Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.' 'We will return to the House floor and to the courthouse with a clear message: the fight to protect voting rights has only just begun,' it added. Democratic groups are likely to file a lawsuit once Texas passes its new map. If that battle plays out in state courts, it will almost certainly fail since the Texas Supreme Court has a conservative majority. If it were to somehow play out in federal court, it's not as clear-cut, given the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled favorably for Democrats in the past over the Voting Rights Act. At the same time, the U.S. Supreme Court still enjoys a conservative majority.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store