Europe: Stocks close lower as caution lingers on US trade policy progress
EUROPE'S main stock index closed lower amid broader declines on Wednesday as investors monitored progress in trade negotiations with the United States and assessed a slate of economic data from the region.
The continent-wide Stoxx 600 index closed 0.61 per cent lower at 548.93 on the day, after two consecutive sessions of gains due to US President Donald Trump delaying tariffs on the European Union.
Reports on Tuesday said EU policymakers had asked the region's leading companies to provide details of their US investment plans.
German automakers including BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen are in talks with Washington on a possible import tariff deal.
The automobile sector was 0.7 per cent higher.
Despite signs of a thaw in the trade tensions between the US and Europe, investors remained on edge as they struggled to keep up with the erratic nature of Trump's trade policies.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'Over the next weeks, the market will be in a relatively tight trading range because investors are waiting to see what Trump does,' said Nick Brooks, head of economic and investment research at ICG.
Brooks added that it was too early to say anything definitive about automakers talking directly with the US as negotiations lie in the hands of the EU as a whole.
Germany's main stock index retreated 0.8 per cent after hitting a record high earlier in the session, while the mid-caps index hit its highest since April 2022.
Fresh data indicated that German import prices unexpectedly contracted by 0.4 per cent year-on-year in April and that unemployment in Europe's largest economy grew at a faster-than-expected pace in May.
Uncertainty stirred up by US trade policy shifts and price pressures are leading to higher expectations that the European Central Bank will cut interest rates next week.
In France, the CAC 40 index closed 0.5 per cent lower, reversing earlier gains after gross domestic product figures showed slight growth in the first quarter, as expected.
The defence index extended gains by 0.7 per cent as investors continued to flock towards the military ammunition companies amid little hopes of a pause to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine tensions.
Reuters reported that Russia's conditions for ending the war in Ukraine include a demand that Western leaders pledge in writing to stop enlarging Nato eastwards and lift a chunk of sanctions on Russia.
Elekta shares topped the Stoxx 600 after beating estimates for fourth-quarter sales, up 5.9 per cent.
Kingfisher fell 3.6 per cent as the home improvement retailer's first-quarter results failed to impress investors.
Stellantis dipped 2.2 per cent. The Jeep-maker named insider Antonio Filosa as its top boss.
Global markets were focused on quarterly results from AI chipmaker Nvidia, due after the close of trading on Wall Street. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Business Times
US consumer spending growth slows while inflation remains soft
[WASHINGTON] US consumers hit the brakes in April after the strongest month of spending since early 2023 while inflation remained tame, consistent with a slowing economy. Inflation-adjusted personal spending rose 0.1 per cent after rising 0.7 per cent a month earlier, Bureau of Economic Analysis data showed Friday. The personal consumption expenditures price index, excluding food and energy, increased 0.1 per cent from a month earlier. Compared with a year earlier, the so-called core inflation gauge rose 2.5 per cent from April 2024 – the smallest annual advance in more than four years. The figures illustrate an undercurrent of anxiety among many American consumers about the economy after the weakest quarter for spending in nearly two years. While higher duties on imports have yet to show up more broadly in higher goods prices, sentiment has slumped and the outlook for personal finances stands at a record low. The modest rise in spending reflected an increase in services that more than offset a decline in durable goods outlays. At the same time, the Trump administration has walked back or paused some tariffs as negotiators work toward trade deals with key partners including China and the European Union. On Wednesday, a US court issued a ruling that blocks many of the import taxes. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Separate data out Friday showed a massive narrowing of the US merchandise-trade deficit in April on the largest-ever decrease in imports. The constant state of flux in trade policy has nonetheless fuelled uncertainty, with consumers' spending attitudes hanging in the balance. Meanwhile, Federal Reserve policymakers will likely keep interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future until they get more clarity on the impact of tariffs not only on prices but also on other pillars of the economy like the labour market and consumer spending. Economists are paying close attention to the degree to which companies are passing through higher import duties to consumers. A measure of goods inflation that excludes food and energy climbed 0.3 per cent. While many companies have so far been absorbing or offsetting much of the hit from tariffs, retailers including Walmart and Macy's Inc have indicated Americans will start seeing price hikes soon. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Business Times
There's a ticking time bomb in Trump's ‘big, beautiful Bill'
THIRTY years ago, when I was a rookie reporter, a veteran writer offered me sage advice: whenever presented with a government or corporate document that is more than 100 pages long, hunt for hidden bombs. Donald Trump's thousand-page (plus) 'big, beautiful Bill' is a case in point. Since the House of Representatives passed it last week, this fiscal act has been (rightly) lambasted for many reasons: it favours the rich over the poor; cruelly cuts social safety nets; and recklessly expands the debt. Even Elon Musk is upset. But what investors should also fret about, if they care about the state of Treasuries or are a non-American entity holding US assets, is a clause buried in the bowels of this behemoth called section 899. This would enable the US Treasury to impose penalties on 'applicable persons' from 'discriminatory foreign countries' by increasing US federal income tax and withholding rates by up to 20 percentage points on their US investments, on a variable scale. It might thus be viewed as a novel 'revenge tax' (as some lawyers call it) that Trump could use to bully friends and foes alike in trade negotiations. So, at best, all this undermines prior efforts to build a collaborative global tax system via groups such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, with its undertaxed profits rules. At worst, it makes Trump look like a feudal European king intent on using tax as a capricious tool to extract foreign tribute. Either way, it undermines the idea that America is a place of consistent investment laws – and has shocked lawyers in countries such as Canada. 'Section 899 is toxic (and) a potential game-changer for foreign investment,' Larson Gross, a tax advisory group, told clients this week. Or as Neil Bass, a Canadian lawyer wrote in his own missive: 'The US just declared a tax war and it's targeting allies.' George Saravelos, an analyst at Deutsche Bank, writes in a client note: 'Section 899 challenges the open nature of US capital markets by explicitly using taxation on foreign holdings of US assets as leverage to further US economic goals.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up So will this actually become law? The only honest answer (as with so much of Trump policy-making) is 'no one knows'. Trump's bark, after all, is often worse than his bite, and the courts sometimes rein him in, as seen with tariffs this week. Known unknowns In any case, there are a host of known unknowns around section 899. The Senate might insist that this clause is watered down or removed. Or if the surcharge stays intact, there may be provisions to let affected non-American investors and companies offset this against domestic tax bills. No one exactly knows how a 'discriminatory foreign country' will be defined (although the Treasury is supposed to regularly report on that). Nor is it entirely clear what investors and companies might be hit. At first glance, the Bill only affects non-US investors and companies already subject to US tax. But, as I recently noted, the White House recently warned in an executive order that it might overturn a crucial 1984 ruling that exempted Chinese investors, among others, from a prior 30 per cent withholding tax on assets such as US Treasuries. If so, those flows might be hit by section 899 too, as analysts such as Michael McNair suggest. Another reason for uncertainty is splits among Trump's own advisers. I am told that some love the idea of imposing revenge taxes on foreigners, since it will play well with the Maga base – and a think-tank allied with vice-president JD Vance reckons that such taxes could raise US$2 trillion revenue in the next decade. And figures such as Howard Lutnick, commerce secretary, are keen to find new weapons to wield in their trade negotiations with the EU and Canada. As the law firm Davis Polk points out, the fact that those two regions – along with the UK – impose digital services taxes could make them easy targets for section 899 measures. But Scott Bessent, Treasury secretary, is likely to be wary of invoking section 899 since he does not want to scare global investors away from Treasuries. After all, he needs to sell oodles of US government bonds to fund the ever-expanding debt – and there are already hints of some capital flight. Undermining global trust Either way, the key point is that the mere presence of section 899 in this Bill – whatever ultimately happens – is likely to further undermine global trust, given that it shows that the Trump team is at least entertaining the idea of turning trade wars into capital wars, in the future. No wonder investment groups ranging from Canadian pension funds to mighty Asian institutions tell me that they are stealthily diversifying away from US assets. Or that Federal Reserve officials recently fretted about the likely damage to America's economy if its 'safe haven' investment status is undermined. As legislative bombs go, this is self-defeating. The Senate should kick it away. FINANCIAL TIMES
Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Business Times
US: Wall St opens lower as Trump says China violated tariff terms
[NEW YORK] Wall Street's main indexes opened lower on Friday (May 30) as trade worries deepened after US President Donald Trump accused China of violating a tariff agreement, while investors assessed the latest inflation data. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 23.4 points, or 0.06 per cent, at the open to 42,192.35. The S&P 500 fell 8.5 points, or 0.14 per cent, at the open to 5,903.67, while the Nasdaq Composite dropped 44.7 points, or 0.23 per cent, to 19,131.219 at the opening bell. REUTERS
