logo
Letters: Irish and Austrian leaders should respect public's desire for real neutrality

Letters: Irish and Austrian leaders should respect public's desire for real neutrality

Both Ireland and Austria are unfortunately in a very similar position.
In each country, the political and media elites are adamantly opposed to neutrality even though in each country public opinion is adamantly in favour. As a result, governments in both countries have over many years salami-sliced away genuine neutrality while being unable to take the final step of joining Nato. This results in a situation that pleases no one.
It is time for our leaders to accept that the Irish people support neutrality. Neutrality does not mean isolationism. During the early years of Ireland's UN membership, diplomats such as Frank Aiken, Frederick Boland and Conor Cruise O'Brien leveraged our neutrality to make us a trusted broker between East and West. This culminated in the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Austria also played its part. Its chancellor Bruno Kreisky was a renowned proponent of positive neutrality and helped broker the Helsinki Final Act, another important moment in Cold War detente.
If we are to follow the Austrian model, it should be the positive neutrality of Bruno Kreisky.
Stephen Kelly, Peace and Neutrality Alliance, Glenageary, Co Dublin
People are opening their eyes to the situation in Gaza – 20 months too late
I see the change coming. I see the word 'genocide' creeping into newspaper articles, not everywhere yet and not in huge black lettering across the front page as it should be but meekly and hesitantly, like dipping its toes into the waters first to see what this change of tack might bring.
I see interviewers ease up just a little with their unending 'do you condemn October 7?' chorus while still playing their game of a 'need for journalistic balance'. They won't let that go for quite some time yet.
I see politicians who once believed that everything, no matter how heinous or in contravention of international law it might be, was permissible in the name of self-defence, become now quite adamant that what is being done is apparently 'despicable', 'completely unacceptable' and 'intolerable'.
I see well-dressed liberals pull out hastily adjusted scripts and speak in well-rehearsed tones with just the right grimacing of facial features to help portray enough concern and feeling to hide the months of not giving a shit that went before.
It turns out, you see, that the claim of self-defence when placed against the possibility of thousands of starving children doesn't work so well, and searching for those famous tunnels beneath the bodies of emaciated babies and toddlers sits uneasily with the public.
So let them all try and run for cover – media, politicians, artists, whoever. It won't work. It's been too long. We have seen too much and we are destroyed inside for ever more.
As the book says, 'One day everyone will have always been against this.' But seriously, if it took someone 20 months to reach this side of the line, then there is something very, very wrong with them.
Dorothy Collin, Rathangan, Co Kildare
Netanyahu and Hamas are cold-blooded killers – both must be stopped now
A young Jewish couple just starting out in life together, who worked for the Israeli embassy, were murdered by an alleged Palestinian sympathiser in Washington DC last Wednesday.
A Palestinian couple further on in their lives together, both doctors attending to the dire needs of their compatriots in Khan Younis, had nine of their 10 children murdered by an Israeli airstrike on Saturday.
Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is out of control, Hamas mercilessly exploits its own people and the world, having averted its gaze for a long time, has now firmly closed its eyes. With humanity having thrown away its ethical and moral compass, future Wednesdays and Saturdays or any other days in the weeks to come, will bring even worse abominations. The generations to come may never forgive us, nor indeed should they.
Michael Gannon, St Thomas Square, Kilkenny
We have our problems in Ireland, but many more reasons to be cheerful
At a time when public sentiment often feels anxious or weary – shaped by both global upheavals and local pressures –it's worth stepping back to recognise that Ireland has many reasons for measured optimism. This isn't naive cheerfulness, but perspective earned through experience.
We're beginning to see more thoughtful approaches to housing emerge: community-led developments, innovative use of derelict sites and policies that prioritise people over profit.
Meanwhile, Ireland's ­democracy continues to distinguish itself through its civility and genuine engagement. The success of the Good Friday Agreement institutions and cross-border co-operation demonstrates something increasingly rare – the ability to have difficult conversations with nuance rather than noise, while the everyday decency that characterises public discourse speaks to deeper democratic health.
In research and innovation, Ireland consistently punches well above its weight. From groundbreaking medical technologies to climate solutions, from fundamental scientific research to creative industries, the country's intellectual output reflects both ambition and expertise. The education system, while still evolving, is increasingly attentive to student well-­being, creativity and practical skills, alongside academic achievement.
Perhaps most significantly, Irish identity itself remains a quiet but genuine strength. Rooted in history yet cosmopolitan in outlook, modern Irishness encompasses empathy, inclusion and collective endeavour as much as it does tradition and heritage.
Ireland faces real ­challenges – housing, climate adaptation, economic inequality among them. But there's wisdom in recognising what's working well and building from those foundations. In an era of global uncertainty, Ireland's combination of pragmatic governance, innovative spirit and social cohesion offers a model worth nurturing.
Enda Cullen, Tullysaran Road, Armagh
Hopefully we'll scoff Choc Ices again before summer's end
The sun is gone and the showers are back, the northerly breeze is blowing away any trace of summer. And yet we live in hope. As Christy Moore sang in Lisdoonvarna, 'Anyone for the last few Choc Ices, now?'
M O Brien, Dalkey, Co Dublin
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

University of Galway defends new non-Irish speaking president amid Sinn Féin ‘step backwards' claims
University of Galway defends new non-Irish speaking president amid Sinn Féin ‘step backwards' claims

Irish Independent

timean hour ago

  • Irish Independent

University of Galway defends new non-Irish speaking president amid Sinn Féin ‘step backwards' claims

Today at 11:42 The University of Galway has defended its newly appointed president after the Sinn Féin spokesperson for Gaeilge said the university had taken a 'step backwards' by hiring a president with no Irish. Sinn Féin spokesperson for Gaeilge Aengus Ó Snodaigh TD wrote to the newly appointed president of University of Galway, Professor David J Burn and the chairperson of Údarás na hOllscoile, Máire Geoghegan-Quinn, seeking an urgent meeting to discuss the status of Irish in the university in the wake of the decision.

Ex-SDLP leader Colum Eastwood says he rejected a knighthood ... using 'strong language'
Ex-SDLP leader Colum Eastwood says he rejected a knighthood ... using 'strong language'

The Journal

timean hour ago

  • The Journal

Ex-SDLP leader Colum Eastwood says he rejected a knighthood ... using 'strong language'

FORMER SDLP LEADER and possible Irish presidential candidate Colum Eastwood said he rejected an offer for a knighthood from Westminster using 'strong language'. Speaking on BBC NI's Red Lines podcast with Mark Carruthers, the former Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) leader said a politician in Westminster extended the honour to him. 'I looked at the person and used language that I can't use in this podcast and said: 'Do you know who it is you're talking to?' 'People in the political establishment in London don't really understand the North, ' he said. The Foyle MP, who resigned as SDLP party leader last October, said the politician then asked him he if he would like to join the privy council, but he declined that offer too. The privy council is the formal advisory body to the monarch, privy counsellors advise the King on exercising the Royal Prerogative, which is the executive power of the monarch to make decisions such as declaring war. 'I said: 'I tell you what, the Budget's coming up, throw in a few quid for Derry from that Towns Fund and that'll do alright,' Eastwood said. 'So we got £20m for Derry as part of that conversation.' He described Westminster as 'bonkers' for 'going around offering people gongs to thank them or buy them in'. Advertisement 'As someone who doesn't want Westminster to even be running Northern Ireland I have absolutely no interest in any kind of gongs from any British government, I was happier with £20m for Derry.' The SDLP is a social democratic and Irish nationalist party in Northern Ireland. Their main aim is to join the North and South of Ireland using non-violent means and create a new Ireland. The party was formed in 1970, and led by John Hume from 1979 to 2001. It has previously been reported by the BBC that Eastwood is considering a bid for Áras an Uachtaráin . When asked by Carruthers about a potential candidacy, Eastwood said: 'The most important thing for me is to have a conversation about Irish unity as part of that presidential election'. Eastwood said a 'number of people from different political parties' have spoken to him about running in the election, but he has not yet made a decision on the matter. The Journal previously reported that Taoiseach Micheál Martin said he is not aware of any engagement with Eastwood over becoming the party's candidate for the Irish presidency. When Carruthers put this to him, Eastwood said: 'He should be surprised because we hadn't talked about it'. He said that although he had spoken to 'credible' people within different political parties in the Republic, he had not spoken to Fianna Fáil leadership at the time. The Foyle MP believes there will be a united Ireland 'a lot sooner than people think', and the Irish presidency would be useful in reaching this end. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Zelensky says he warned Trump that Putin is 'bluffing'
Zelensky says he warned Trump that Putin is 'bluffing'

RTÉ News​

time2 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Zelensky says he warned Trump that Putin is 'bluffing'

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said he hopes talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin this week will centre on a ceasefire, adding that he warned Mr Trump that Mr Putin was "bluffing" about his desire to end the war. "I told the US president and all our European colleagues that Putin is bluffing," he said at a joint briefing in Berlin with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "He is trying to apply pressure before the meeting in Alaska along all parts of the Ukrainian front. Russia is trying to show that it can occupy all of Ukraine." Mr Zelensky added that he wanted a three-leader meeting, saying no talks about Ukraine should exclude Kyiv. Speaking following this afternoon's meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron said that Mr Trump said Ukraine must be involved in talks about territory in any ceasefire deal with Russia. The comments were the first indication of what came out of talks between Mr Trump, European leaders, and Mr Zelensky intended to shape Mr Trump's meeting with Mr Putin. Mr Trump's insistence on involving Ukraine, if confirmed, could bring a measure of relief to Ukraine and its allies, who have feared that Mr Trump and Mr Putin could reach a deal that sells out Europe's and Ukraine's security interests and proposes to carve up Ukraine's territory. Mr Trump and Mr Putin are due to meet in Alaska on Friday for talks on how to end the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict, the biggest in Europe since World War Two. Mr Trump has said both sides will have to swap land to end fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions. On a day of intense diplomacy, Mr Zelensky flew into Berlin for German-hosted virtual meetings with European leaders and then with Mr Trump. The Europeans worry that a land swap could leave Russia with almost a fifth of Ukraine and embolden Mr Putin to expand further west into the future. Since announcing the Alaska summit, Mr Trump has played down expectations for the talks, saying it would be a "feel-out" meeting as he seeks to end Moscow's war on Ukraine. In a first video conference earlier, Mr Zelensky and his host, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, met the leaders of Finland, France, Britain, Italy, Poland and the European Union as well as NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte to discuss their pitch to Mr Trump and try and shape the outcome of Friday's summit. Mr Trump and Vice President JD Vance later joined the conversation, according to a source familiar with the situation. The unpredictability of the summit in Alaska has fuelled Europeans' fears that the US and Russia could take far-reaching decisions over their heads and even seek to coerce Ukraine into an unfavourable deal. "We are focusing now to ensure that it does not happen - engaging with US partners and staying coordinated and united on the European side," said one senior official from Eastern Europe. Wary of angering Mr Trump, European leaders have repeatedly said they welcome his efforts while stressing that there should be no deal about Ukraine without Ukraine's participation. Watch: Meeting to gain 'better understanding' of conflict - White House Mr Trump's administration tempered expectations on Tuesday, telling reporters the summit would be a "listening exercise" for him to hear what it would take to get to a deal. Mr Trump's agreement last week to the summit was an abrupt shift after weeks of voicing frustration with Mr Putin for resisting the US peace initiative. Mr Trump said his envoy had made "great progress" at talks in Moscow. Half a dozen senior European officials told Reuters that they see a risk of a deal being struck that is unfavourable for Europe and Ukraine's security. They said European unity would be vital if that happened. Battlefield pressure mounts on Ukraine A Gallup poll released last week found that 69% of Ukrainians favour a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. But polls also indicate Ukrainians do not want peace at any cost if that means crushing concessions. Ahead of the calls, Mr Zelensky said it would be impossible for Kyiv to agree to a deal that would require it to withdraw its troops from the eastern Donbas region, a large swathe of which is already occupied by Russia. That, he told reporters yesterday, would deprive Ukraine of a vast defensive network in the region, easing the way for a Russian push deeper into Ukraine in the future. He said territorial issues could only be discussed once a ceasefire was in place and Ukraine had received security guarantees. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Alexei Fadeev said Moscow's stance had not changed since it was set out by Mr Putin in June 2024. As preconditions for a ceasefire and the start of negotiations, the Kremlin leader had demanded that Ukraine withdraw its forces from four regions that Russia has claimed as its own but does not fully control, and formally renounce its plans to join NATO. Kyiv swiftly rejected the conditions as tantamount to surrender. Russia makes biggest 24-hour Ukraine advance in over a year The Russian army made its biggest 24-hour advance into Ukraine in over a year just ahead of the Trump-Putin summit, according to an AFP analysis of data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War. The Russian army took or claimed 110 square kilometres on 12 August compared to the previous day. It was the most since late May 2024. In recent months, Moscow has typically taken five or six days to progress at such a pace, although Russian advances have accelerated in recent weeks. The US and Russian presidents, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, are to meet in Alaska on Friday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky acknowledged yesterday that Russian troops had advanced by up to 10 kilometres near the eastern coal mining town of Dobropillia, but that Kyiv would soon "destroy them." Russia said earlier that it had taken two villages close to Dobropillia. About 70% of Russia's advances in Ukraine so far this year are in the Donetsk region in eastern Ukraine, which the Kremlin claimed to have annexed in September 2022. As of 12 August, Moscow controlled or claimed to control 79% of the region, up from 62% a year ago. The Russian army has also been attempting to seize the mining town of Pokrovsk for more than 18 months, following its capture of Bakhmut in May 2023. The last two major cities held by Kyiv in the region are also at risk. They are Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, which is an important logistical hub for the front. Russian progress in Ukraine has accelerated every month since April. Between 12 August 2024 and 12 August 2025, the Russian army captured more than 6,100sq/km, four times more than the previous year, according to the AFP analysis of the institute's data. However, these Russian advances account for less than 1% of pre-war Ukraine's territory, including Crimea and Donbass.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store