Plan to merge Highland and Aberdeenshire-based machinery rings
Two Scottish farming co-operatives have announced plans to merge their operations.Laurencekirk-based Ringlink Scotland Ltd and Highland Business Services Ltd (HBS) would have a combined membership of more than 4,000 farmers and crofters and an annual turnover of £100m, if the deal goes ahead.North Kessock-headquartered HBS will ask its members to vote on the plans next month. If approved, the merger could take place on 1 August.In farming, "rings" enable farmers to pool resources such as machinery and workers, and first started taking off in Scotland about 50 years ago.
Borders Machinery Ring was the UK's first when it was set up in 1987, and Ringlink Scotland became the second when it was established a year later.
'Reduce costs'
The proposed new business would take the Ringlink Scotland name and could involve about 450 workers in total.It would operate in the Highlands, Argyll, Angus and Fife.HBS will ask its members to vote on the merger on 11 July.Ringlink Scotland said it would retain its offices in Cupar, Coupar Angus, Oldmeldrum and Elgin.Chairman James Porter said: "Both rings have worked closely together over the last few years and the proposed merger is the next logical step forward in the machinery ring concept in the north of Scotland."HBS chairwoman Anne Rae Macdonald the merger would be a "significant step" in the Highland group's development.She added: "The merger will enable the joint business to build on existing resources, help find new opportunities for our farming and crofting businesses, provide on-going support for staff and reduce costs in areas such as administration, computer software and professional fees."There are a number of other rings in the Scotland, and about 30 in total across the UK.Among the aims of rings are to overcome staff shortages and also help individual farmers avoid having to buy expensive machinery.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
38 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Do you qualify for disqualification?
Debbie McIlwraith Cameron on the new rules applicable to senior roles within charities Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It is a criminal offence to act, or continue to act, as a charity trustee if you are disqualified under the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 and you may be liable on conviction to imprisonment, a fine or both. With such consequences, charities must have a working knowledge of the disqualification criteria. Existing criteria: You cannot be appointed, or continue to act, as a charity trustee if: (i) you have an unspent conviction for an offence involving dishonesty or under the 2005 Act; (ii) you are bankrupt/sequestrated; (iii) you have granted a Protected Trust Deed/entered into an Individual Voluntary Arrangement; (iv) you have been removed by a court from being a charity trustee, or (v) you have been disqualified from being a company director. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Disqualification is determined before appointment, and if a trustee's personal circumstances change, they are under a duty to disclose this, as their appointment must automatically cease. Charities must employ due diligence when it comes to employee backgrounds, says Debbie McIlwraith Cameron While you may have to rely on information provided in good faith, there are publicly available methods to carry out due diligence, e.g. OSCR's searchable Record of Removed Persons on its website. Exemptions: An individual may apply for a waiver from OSCR for a specific charity, a type of charity or charities in general. Each case is considered and decided on its own merits. OSCR lists the variables and supporting evidence it will consider in its guidance. Some disqualification criteria are time-sensitive. Automatic disqualification because of a conviction, bankruptcy and a Protected Trust Deed only exists while they remain unspent and undischarged. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The changes: The implementation of the Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Act 2023 extends disqualification criteria in two ways. The automatic disqualification list will now include being convicted of the following offences: terrorism, money laundering, bribery, perverting the course of justice, wilful neglect of duty by a public official/misconduct in public office and sexual offences. The key change is that the criteria will now extend to employees/volunteers holding a role with 'senior management functions' within the charity, as well as charity trustees. The 2023 Act defines 'senior management function': (i) if the function relates to the management of the charity and the individual is not accountable to anyone higher within the charity, except the charity trustees (e.g. the Chief Executive role), or (ii) if the function relates to the control of money, and the only person the individual is accountable to (except the charity trustees) is someone else exercising a senior management function other than to do with the control of money (e.g. Finance Director). In guidance published by OSCR, the regulator is clear that an individual's role/job title is not the deciding factor; you must consider the function the individual undertakes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Practical implications: Before the extensions are implemented later this summer, charities should undertake due diligence to ascertain whether any of the current trustees would come under the extended criteria and update any appointment/induction policies, and consider if any of their employees/volunteers carry out 'senior management functions' and if they must cease to act. Trustees may wish to add the potential consequences of automatic disqualification (e.g. loss of the Chief Executive/Finance Director, trustee numbers being below the minimum) and mitigation methods (e.g. due diligence, ability to re-deploy within the organisation) to the charity's risk register. If an automatic disqualification event were to occur, depending on the circumstances, it would be advisable to seek HR/employment advice.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Miliband warned that green tech project faces collapse without £4bn injection
A green technology project pioneered by Ed Miliband faces collapse without an additional £4bn in funding, industry chiefs have warned. Olivia Powis, the chief executive of the Carbon Capture and Storage Association, said the fledgling technology must receive support from Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, at her spending review on Wednesday despite having been recently awarded almost £22bn in public subsidies. It wants the money – funded by consumers and taxpayers – to expand the two carbon-capture projects already approved by Mr Miliband, the Energy Secretary, and to kick-start two more, including one in Scotland. Ms Powis said there was a 'critical need' for further funding commitments from the Government. She warned that, without the extra cash, even the two schemes approved by Mr Miliband may never go ahead. She added: 'The UK supply chain is ready to respond with the skills, innovation and capabilities needed to make UK carbon capture a world-leading industry. 'But continued government commitment and a pipeline of future projects is essential to ensure that domestic suppliers can compete, scale up and create lasting jobs across the country – otherwise we will see investors and this industry go overseas.' Approving the initial £21.7bn last autumn, Ms Reeves described it as a 'game-changing technology [that] will bring 4,000 good jobs and billions of private investment into communities across Merseyside and Teesside'. However, MPs have warned that the technology is 'unproven' and 'high-risk'. Jeremy Pocklington, the permanent secretary at the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, told the public accounts committee last December that 75pc of the money to fund carbon capture would come from levies on consumer and business energy bills and the rest from taxes. Experts warn that CO2 capture may only be 50 to 60pc efficient, meaning some CO2 still enters the atmosphere. Projects backed by the Government so far include the HyNet scheme in Merseyside and Net Zero Teesside, for which contracts were signed last year. The industry wants cash to expand those projects and add another two: the Acorn project on Scotland's east coast and the Viking project based in the Humber. Mr Powis said: 'We estimate this new industry will create 50,000 new highly skilled jobs and retain another 50,000 jobs in existing industries like steel. 'It will contribute to new industries like sustainable aviation fuels, and generate a cumulative £94bn in value for the economy by 2050.' 'Even the Greens reject it' But Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, said the policy would add to consumer bills and do little for the environment. He said: 'We should scrap this technology. This is an outrageous demands for unproven technology that will make zero difference to climate change. Even the Greens reject it.' Carla Denyer MP, co-leader of the Green Party, added: 'Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is being used as green-wash by the fossil fuel industry, allowing them to continue extracting coal, oil and gas. 'This technology is a distraction from what we should be focusing on, namely, boosting renewable energy and storage, energy efficiency and home insulation programmes and working with nature and land managers to capture carbon naturally.'
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Charity begins with honesty among trustees
Debbie McIlwraith Cameron on the new rules applicable to senior roles within charities Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It is a criminal offence to act, or continue to act, as a charity trustee if you are disqualified under the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 and you may be liable on conviction to imprisonment, a fine or both. With such consequences, charities must have a working knowledge of the disqualification criteria. Existing criteria: You cannot be appointed, or continue to act, as a charity trustee if: (i) you have an unspent conviction for an offence involving dishonesty or under the 2005 Act; (ii) you are bankrupt/sequestrated; (iii) you have granted a Protected Trust Deed/entered into an Individual Voluntary Arrangement; (iv) you have been removed by a court from being a charity trustee, or (v) you have been disqualified from being a company director. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Disqualification is determined before appointment, and if a trustee's personal circumstances change, they are under a duty to disclose this, as their appointment must automatically cease. Charities must employ due diligence when it comes to employee backgrounds, says Debbie McIlwraith Cameron While you may have to rely on information provided in good faith, there are publicly available methods to carry out due diligence, e.g. OSCR's searchable Record of Removed Persons on its website. Exemptions: An individual may apply for a waiver from OSCR for a specific charity, a type of charity or charities in general. Each case is considered and decided on its own merits. OSCR lists the variables and supporting evidence it will consider in its guidance. Some disqualification criteria are time-sensitive. Automatic disqualification because of a conviction, bankruptcy and a Protected Trust Deed only exists while they remain unspent and undischarged. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The changes: The implementation of the Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Act 2023 extends disqualification criteria in two ways. The automatic disqualification list will now include being convicted of the following offences: terrorism, money laundering, bribery, perverting the course of justice, wilful neglect of duty by a public official/misconduct in public office and sexual offences. The key change is that the criteria will now extend to employees/volunteers holding a role with 'senior management functions' within the charity, as well as charity trustees. The 2023 Act defines 'senior management function': (i) if the function relates to the management of the charity and the individual is not accountable to anyone higher within the charity, except the charity trustees (e.g. the Chief Executive role), or (ii) if the function relates to the control of money, and the only person the individual is accountable to (except the charity trustees) is someone else exercising a senior management function other than to do with the control of money (e.g. Finance Director). In guidance published by OSCR, the regulator is clear that an individual's role/job title is not the deciding factor; you must consider the function the individual undertakes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Practical implications: Before the extensions are implemented later this summer, charities should undertake due diligence to ascertain whether any of the current trustees would come under the extended criteria and update any appointment/induction policies, and consider if any of their employees/volunteers carry out 'senior management functions' and if they must cease to act. Trustees may wish to add the potential consequences of automatic disqualification (e.g. loss of the Chief Executive/Finance Director, trustee numbers being below the minimum) and mitigation methods (e.g. due diligence, ability to re-deploy within the organisation) to the charity's risk register. If an automatic disqualification event were to occur, depending on the circumstances, it would be advisable to seek HR/employment advice.
