logo
US sanctions Mexican banks for allegedly laundering money for drug cartels

US sanctions Mexican banks for allegedly laundering money for drug cartels

The US Treasury has slapped three Mexican financial institutions with sanctions, accusing them of laundering millions of dollars for cartels that are furthering the distribution of fentanyl into the US.
It is a move, under the Trump administration's new fentanyl sanctions authority, that officials say will block certain money transfers between the sanctioned banks and US banks.
The banks, CIBanco and Intercam Banco, as well as brokerage Vector Casa de Bolsa, "have collectively played a longstanding and vital role in laundering millions of dollars on behalf of Mexico-based cartels" US deputy Treasury secretary Michael Faulkender told reporters on Wednesday, local time.
He added the financial institutions were "facilitating payments for the procurement of precursor chemicals needed to produce fentanyl" and would now be "effectively cut off" from doing business with US financial institutions.
While the sanctions do not block property or cut off all global US dollar-based activities, as other Treasury sanctions have, they do prohibit US transactions with their locations in Mexico, a US Treasury official noted.
Although US sanctions against individuals and companies for links to Mexican organised crime groups are fairly frequent, measures against financial institutions are far less common.
The Mexican Finance Ministry said in a statement it was notified of the investigation and asked the US Treasury for evidence of illicit activity links to CIBanco, Intercam and Vector, but it received no "conclusive information".
Vector categorically rejected "any accusation that compromises its institutional integrity", it said in a statement.
It added that it reiterated its full willingness to collaborate with Mexican and US authorities to clarify the situation.
Intercam similarly "categorically" denied "any connection between this institution and any illicit practice".
CIBanco did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Experts said the move, although targeting relatively small institutions, could have significant impact on Mexico's financial system given the interconnectedness with the United States.
Luis Manuel Perez de Acha, a tax lawyer and money laundering expert in Mexico City, said the accusations were a "bombshell".
"The entire financial system passes through the United States, so they are practically left without operations," he said.
Vanda Felbab-Brown, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a specialist on organised crime, said the sanctions were "enormously impactful".
"This is a bold move. Being cut off from the US financial system is a death blow," she told Reuters.
"These are hardly the biggest banks in Mexico, but they are not small entities."
"These are medium-level banks," Ms Felbab-Brown said.
However, she said the sanctions were unlikely to "make any kind of dent in the financial flows of Mexican criminal groups".
According to the Treasury orders, CIBanco helped facilitate money laundering for a number of cartels, including the Jalisco New Generation, Beltran Leyva and Gulf.
Officials said the bank "facilitated procurement" of chemicals used to make fentanyl from China by processing over $US2.1 million in payments for the materials.
Vector was accused of facilitating money laundering for the Sinaloa and Gulf cartels, including $US1 million in payments for fentanyl chemicals.
The Treasury officials also said the Sinaloa Cartel used Vector to send bribes to former Mexican security secretary Genaro García Luna, who in October was sentenced to more than 38 years in prison by a New York court for the charges.
They estimated that transactions exceeded $US40 million.
The Trump administration has announced it is cracking down on Mexican cartels and fentanyl trafficking despite movement of the drug along the US border and overdoses within the country declining.
AP/Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside the psyche of 'daddy' Trump
Inside the psyche of 'daddy' Trump

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Inside the psyche of 'daddy' Trump

Donald Trump has declared victory in brokering a Israel-Iran ceasefire. And while it's on precarious ground, what's the "method behind the madness" in the US President's approach? And the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been choosing his words carefully, eager to not be seen as a "central player" in the regional conflict — with the Opposition labelling him "flat-footed." But is that a fair call? And as European nations agree to increase defence spending to 5 per cent, largely to appease the US President — will the Prime Minister's approach of progressive patriotism come under increasing pressure from Donald Trump? Patricia Karvelas and Fran Kelly are joined by John Lyons, ABC Americas Editor on The Party Room. Got a burning question? Got a burning political query? Send a short voice recording to PK and Fran for Question Time at thepartyroom@

Tech giants' net zero goals verging on fantasy: researchers
Tech giants' net zero goals verging on fantasy: researchers

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Tech giants' net zero goals verging on fantasy: researchers

The credibility of climate pledges by the world's tech giants to rapidly become carbon neutral is fading fast as they devour more and more energy in the race to develop AI and build data centres, researchers warned Thursday. Apple, Google and Meta said they would stop adding CO2 into the atmosphere by 2030, while Amazon set that target for 2040. Microsoft promised to be "net negative" -- pulling CO2 out of the air -- by the end of this decade. But those vows, made before the AI boom transformed the sector, are starting to look like a fantasy even as these companies have doubled down on them, according to independent analysts. "The greenhouse gas emissions targets of tech companies appear to have lost their meaning," Thomas Hay, lead author of a report by think tanks Carbon Market Watch and NewClimate Institute, told AFP. "If energy consumption continues to rise unchecked and without adequate oversight," he added, "these targets will likely be unachievable." The deep-dive analysis found the overall integrity of the climate strategies at Meta, Microsoft and Amazon to be "poor", while Apple's and Microsoft's were deemed "moderate". When it came to the quality of emissions reduction targets, those of Meta and Amazon were judged "very poor", while Google and Microsoft scored a "poor" rating. Only Apple fared better. The expanding carbon footprint of the five top tech behemoths stems mostly from the breakneck expansion of artificial intelligence, which requires huge amounts of energy to develop and run. Electricity consumption -- and the carbon emissions that come with it -- has doubled for some of these companies in the last three or four years, and tripled for others, the report found. The same is true across the sector: operational emissions of the world's top 200 information technology companies was nearly 300 million tonnes of CO2 in 2023, and nearly five times that if the downstream use products and services is taken into account, according to the UN's International Telecommunications Union. If the sector were a country, it would rank fifth in greenhouse gas emissions ahead of Brazil. Electricity to power data centres increased on average 12 percent per year from 2017 to 2024, and is projected to double by 2030, according to the IEA. - 'Quite unregulated' - If all this extra power came from solar and wind, CO2 emissions would not be rising. But despite ambitious plans to source their energy from renewables, much of it is still not carbon neutral. Studies estimate that half of the computing capacity of tech companies' data centres comes from subcontractors, yet many companies do not account for these emissions, the study points out. The same is true for the entire infrastructure and equipment supply chain, which accounts for at least a third of tech companies' carbon footprint. "There is a lot of investment in renewable energy, but overall, it has not offset the sector's thirst for electricity," Day said. Given the status of AI as a driver of economic growth, and even as a vector for industrial policy, it is unlikely that governments are going to constrain the sector's expansion, the report noted. "So far the whole AI boom has been altogether quite unregulated," Day said. "There are things these companies can and will do for future proofing, to make sure they're moving in the right direction" in relation to climate goals, he added. "But when it comes to decisions that would essentially constrain the growth of the business model, we don't see any indications that that can happen without regulatory action." The report identifies a number of ways in which the tech sector can curb its carbon footprint, even as it develops AI apace. Ensuring that data centres -- both those belonging to the companies as well as third party partners -- run on renewable electricity is crucial. Increasing the lifespan of devices and expanding the use of recycled components for hardware production could also make a big difference. Finally, the methods use for calculating emissions reduction targets are out-of-date, and in need of revision, the report said. mh-dax/phz

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store