logo
Australia has had record flu cases this year – and that's before winter arrives. What's going on?

Australia has had record flu cases this year – and that's before winter arrives. What's going on?

The Guardian22-05-2025
Australia is being struck by a surge in respiratory illnesses, with record breaking inter-seasonal flu cases since the start of the year.
However, flu remains the 'underdog of infectious diseases', in that people underestimate its severity, and as a result vaccinations rates remain stubbornly low, Prof Julie Leask from the University of Sydney, says.
What are the case numbers and how can you protect yourself?
In 2025 there had been 83,402 flu cases nationally, as of Tuesday, according to the government's national notifiable diseases surveillance system (NNDSS). It represents a rise of more than 10,000 more cases compared to the 73,641 flu cases reported to the end of May last year.
There have also been 67,141 cases of Covid-19, and 52,611 cases of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) – which causes infections of the lungs – to date this year, as of Tuesday, according to the NNDSS.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Prof Paul Griffin, an infectious diseases physician from the University of Queensland, says the country is experiencing a record-breaking surge in respiratory illnesses, with flu cases the highest ever recorded outside the traditional winter months.
'This year's cases are well above what we've seen for the past five years for January, February, March and April, very clearly,' Griffin says.
Griffin says it is unclear what the high number of cases will mean for the rest of the season: 'We don't know till we're in it. It does mean with that number of cases already, low vaccination rates, the impact is already very significant and more significant than it should be because we've got a very small proportion of people vaccinated.'
Figures from the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance show that in the year to date only 11.7% of children between six months and five years old received the flu vaccine, despite this age group being among the most at-risk of developing serious complications.
Only 7.6% of five- to 15-year-olds, 12.8% of 15- to 50-year-olds, 21.2% of 50- to 65-year-olds, and under half (46.9%) of those over 65 have had vaccines to date this year.
Griffin says 'with that much flu already, it's very clear we need to have as many people vaccinated as possible and we're well below that. The vaccine rates are still terrible.'
Leask says flu vaccination needs to be a habit for Australians, with data showing once someone receives a vaccine one year, they tend to continue it the next. It's important for healthcare workers to encourage patients to initiate that habit, she says.
Griffin urges everyone to get vaccinated for flu, as well as consider taking other steps to prevent getting infected, like hand hygiene and air purifiers and even mask wearing for high-risk people.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TikTok natural contraception trend ‘fuelling unwanted pregnancies'
TikTok natural contraception trend ‘fuelling unwanted pregnancies'

Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Telegraph

TikTok natural contraception trend ‘fuelling unwanted pregnancies'

Birth control advice promoting natural contraception on TikTok is putting women at risk of unwanted pregnancies, a study has found. Researchers in Australia found more than half of content creators on the social media platform reviewed (53 per cent) rejected hormonal methods of contraception, while just over a third (34 per cent) expressed distrust in health professionals. The team analysed 100 TikTok videos on contraceptive health that had collectively gained nearly five billion views and 14.6 million likes. Fertility awareness and cycle tracking (38 per cent) and the Pill (35 per cent) were the most frequently discussed subjects, according to the findings published in the journal Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Dr Caroline de Moel-Mandel, the lead researcher from La Trobe University, said TikTok was a growing source of contraceptive information for young adults, but much of the content was 'unreliable' and of poor quality, putting pressure on young people to sort fact from fiction. She said: 'Many TikTok creators promoted natural contraceptive methods like fertility tracking without disclosing their limitations, which include accurately tracking hormone fluctuations, motivation and partner cooperation. 'Importantly, they failed to mention that these methods are generally ineffective when used on their own. 'This kind of misinformation, combined with a growing distrust in healthcare professionals can result in unsafe decisions and ultimately, unplanned pregnancies.' Most influencers aren't health professionals Only 10 per cent of the analysed videos were created by health professionals, while the rest featured first-hand experiences and beliefs from influencers and general uploaders, or advice from self-proclaimed 'hormonal health coaches' or wellness educators with significant reach. Megan Bugden, the study's co-author and lecturer in public health at La Trobe, said that while videos by health professionals gained on average more likes and followers, TikTok's algorithm amplified influencers' voices with greater reach over medical experts. She said: 'Social media is reshaping health care providers' relationships with patients. 'We encourage health professionals to rebuild trust through shared decision-making on contraceptive options, which may increase patient satisfaction and mitigate unreliable information posted online.' With TikTok's widespread reach, Ms Budgen said women's and public health organisations also have a 'significant' role to play in countering misinformation. She added: 'Young people deserve accurate information to make informed contraceptive health decisions, regardless of background or resources. 'Public health organisations should collaborate with social influencers to promote safe and effective contraceptive information through messages that resonate with younger audiences.'

Northern Beaches hospital agrees settlement after claims newborn left with lifelong disabilities
Northern Beaches hospital agrees settlement after claims newborn left with lifelong disabilities

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Northern Beaches hospital agrees settlement after claims newborn left with lifelong disabilities

Sydney's Northern Beaches hospital has settled outside court with a family after claims their baby was born by emergency caesarean at 25 weeks and left with lifelong disabilities. Court documents seen by Guardian Australia reveal the baby's mother presented to the hospital's birthing unit in 2022, complaining of lower abdominal pain on her right side. The woman – who cannot be named for legal reasons – says she was sent home without being given an ultrasound or undergoing any further investigation. When she presented to the hospital again two days later with worse symptoms, an MRI revealed she had acute appendicitis. During surgery to remove the appendix, it was found to be perforated and had a gangrenous tip, with free pus also found in the woman's pelvis. She was discharged from the hospital after three days without being provided with oral antibiotics, according to her claim. Also, she did not undergo CRP testing, which can detect signs of inflammation or infection, and was not assessed by the obstetrics and gynaecology registrar before her discharge. Less than a week later she presented again at the hospital feeling feverish and experiencing pain in her right flank, and suffering from diarrhoea and nausea. Sign up: AU Breaking News email She was transferred to Royal North Shore hospital, where she was diagnosed with sepsis and chorioamnionitis, an infection of the placenta and the amniotic fluid, and underwent an emergency caesarean. An amended statement of claim filed for the child on 20 June this year, with the mother acting in his place, alleged Northern Beaches hospital breached the duty of care it owed the child by failing to take 22 precautions. Those included failing to diagnose the mother with appendicitis on the day she first presented to the hospital and failing to perform the surgery to remove the appendix immediately. After the surgery, the precautions taken should have included performing blood tests, white blood cell count, CRP testing, an assessment by the surgical team, an ultrasound examination and an MRI investigation, the statement of claim alleged. The documents alleged the mother should not have been discharged when she was, as the hospital should have considered her perforated appendix, its gangrenous tip and the free pus and checked her inflammatory markers. She should also have been provided with antibiotics on discharge, the statement of claim alleged. The hospital's failure to take those precautions caused or materially contributed to the child suffering injuries, including the consequences of being born significantly prematurely, and general bodily trauma and shock, the statement of claim alleged. A statement of particulars filed on 24 May 2024 gave further details of the consequences of the alleged medical negligence on the part of the hospital. The document outlined claims that the child had experienced 'continuing disabilities' and 'loss of enjoyment of life', including continuing restriction on the enjoyment of and participation in normal social and recreational activities such as socialising with friends and family, domestic activities and recreational travel. The district court declined to allow access to the hospital's defence to the statement of claim. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The statement calculated the expenses the family would have for medications and doctors' visits for the rest of the child's life. The documents also alleged that the child had 'suffered a general diminishment in [his] ability to earn income and … is no longer able to compete evenly on the open labour market … in the future'. On 31 July the parties agreed to settle the matter, with the Northern Beaches hospital to pay a sum without admission of liability. The family requested that the amount not be made public. Northern Beaches is the only hospital in NSW where public services are provided by a private company, Healthscope, under a complex contract. After years of mounting debt and a string of complaints about care standards – including the death of two-year-old Joe Massa and a woman whose baby died in childbirth because an emergency caesarean was offered too late – the hospital went into receivership in May. The NSW government is trying to buy it. NSW Health referred a request for comment on the baby's case to Healthscope. A Healthscope spokesperson said: 'We reached an amicable resolution with the family which was approved by the court. Out of respect for the family, we will not be providing further comment on this matter. 'While adverse incidents happen at all hospitals, the team at Northern Beaches hospital (NBH) has been subjected to intense scrutiny and speculation. The fact is the hospital treats over 80,000 patients every year and the vast majority receive outstanding care,' the spokesperson said. 'Indeed, the recently published Clinical Excellence Commission (CEC) report on Northern Beaches hospital noted that the hospital is 'staffed by a committed and professional workforce with a shared focus on delivering safe, high-quality care.' The CEC also found that the level of serious incidents at the NBH (Harm Score 1) is broadly comparable to its peer hospitals.' Lawyers for the family said they declined to comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store