Six new dames and knights in honours
There are 88 women and 100 men drawn from areas including arts and media, business, community work, education, science, health and sport.
There are six new knights and dames.
Community wellbeing advocate Ranjna Patel, plant scientist Emeritus Professor Alison Stewart and former equestrian and spinal cord injury advocate Catriona Williams become dames.
Former president of the Court of Appeal Mark Cooper KC (Ngāti Mahanga, Waikato-Tainui), Sistema Plastics founder and philanthropist Brendan Lindsay and Air Rarotonga founder and Cook Islands tourism advocate Ewen Smith are the new knights.
In the entertainment field, comedian Dai Henwood, children's entertainer Suzy Cato, food writer David Burton and TV host, author and fundraiser Jude Dobson are appointed Officers of the New Zealand Order of Merit.
In sport, recently retired pace bowler Tim Southee, the Black Caps' all-time leading international wicket-taker, Black Fern double Olympic gold medallist Portia Woodman-Wickliffe (Ngāpuhi, Mgāati-Porou and Ngāti Kahu), double Olympic gold medallist Ellesse Andrews and White Ferns captain Sophie Devine are among those honoured.
Former All Black Murray Mexted, who has also been a commentator and mentor, and sports governance expert Don McKinnon are also honoured.
Prominent politicians include former National ministers Steven Joyce and Ruth Richardson, former assistant speaker and Manawatū mayor Ian McKelvie, and former Labour list MP Dover Samuels (Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Kura, Ngāti Rēhia).
Mr Joyce and Ms Richardson are made Companions of the New Zealand Order of Merit, Mr McKelvie is made a member of the New Zealand Order of Merit and Mr Samuels is appointed a Companion of the King's Service Order.
Other well-known Māori honoured include tikanga and mātauranga expert Dr Alishia Moeahu (Ngāti Awa, Ngā Tūhoe, Ngāti Tūwharetoa, Ngāti Rangitihi, Ngāti Mahuta, Ngāti Paoa, Ngāti Hikaairo, Te Aitanga a Mahaki, Rongowhakaata, Ngāti Porou); breast cancer expert Dr Maxine Ronald (Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Wai); Waitangi National trust chairman Pita Tipene (Ngāti Hine, Ngāti Te Tārawa) kaupapa waka advocate Joe Conrad (Te Aupōuri, Ngāti Kuri, Ngāi Takoto, Te Rarawa, Ngāti Hauā).
Pacific recipients include Arthur Anae, Okesene Galo, and Annie Scoon.
Prominent figures from the Asian community honoured for their work are Dr Ai Ling Tan, Panchanatham Narayanan and Santosh Prasad Bhandari.
— RNZ
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Rights Aotearoa: Minister's Ban On Te Reo Māori In Year-1 Readers Breaches New Zealand's Human Rights Obligations
Rights Aotearoa condemns the Education Minister Erica Stanford's decision to exclude Māori words from new Ready to Read Phonics Plus books for five-year-olds (except for character names). This directive, confirmed in Ministry documents and ministerial comments, represents a retrogressive step that undermines children's cultural rights and New Zealand's international and domestic legal commitments. On a prima facie view, the policy conflicts with at least five UN instruments New Zealand has ratified. First, ICCPR Article 27 protects linguistic minorities' right to use their own language and, per the Human Rights Committee's General Comment No. 23, requires positive measures by the State to safeguard that right. A blanket removal of te reo Māori from foundational readers sits squarely at odds with that obligation. Second, ICESCR Articles 13 and 15, read with the Committee's General Comment No. 21, require States to make cultural life accessible and to refrain from measures that restrict participation—especially for minorities and indigenous peoples. Stripping Māori vocabulary from early-years materials narrows access to culture in the very context where language attitudes are formed. Third, the Convention on the Rights of the Child obliges that education foster respect for a child's own cultural identity, language, and values (Article 29(1)(c)) and protects indigenous and minority children's right to use their language (Article 30). The directive is difficult to reconcile with those aims. Fourth, CERD (and General Recommendation No. 23) calls for active measures to preserve and promote indigenous languages. A rule that singles out Māori words for exclusion from standard resources risks indirect discrimination and runs counter to that guidance. Fifth, the UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education prohibits distinctions based on language that impair equality of treatment in education and recognises minorities' right to use and teach their own language. Domestically, the directive cuts against NZBORA s 20 (rights of linguistic minorities) and the Māori Language Act 2016, which affirms te reo Māori as a taonga and an official language and requires a Crown strategy (Maihi Karauna) to revitalise and normalise its use across public life. Schools are also required to give effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi under the Education and Training Act 2020. Paul Thistoll, Chief Executive of Rights Aotearoa, said: 'Language visibility in a child's first readers is not a matter of taste; it is a matter of rights. Removing te reo Māori from Year-1 books is a legally retrogressive measure that marginalises indigenous language in mainstream schooling and undermines New Zealand's binding commitments at home and abroad. The minister is engaging in cultural suppression.' Rights Aotearoa calls for the following immediate actions: 1. Rescind the directive and confirm that Māori words will continue to appear in all new early-literacy readers as appropriate to context and pedagogy; 2. Release the relevant Ministry papers in full and consult with Māori education stakeholders, literacy experts, and the Māori Language Commission; 3. Align early-literacy resources with obligations under ICCPR, ICESCR, CRC, CERD, the UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education, NZBORA, the Māori Language Act, and the Education and Training Act.
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Toi Tū Toi Ora reframed: Doco reveals Auckland Art Gallery politics of landmark Māori exhibition
The artists are all here tonight. The always-too-small foyer of SkyCity Theatre is bursting with a sold-out crowd for the premiere of Toi Tū: Visual Sovereignty, Chelsea Winstanley's documentary about what happened five years ago and a kilometre away at Auckland City Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki. There had been a crowd back in 2020, too, with many of the same people in it, for the opening of Toi Tū Toi Ora, which was not only the largest show in the gallery's history, but also the largest exhibition of contemporary Māori art there had ever been. Yet, amid the celebration, there was a whisper that something had gone wrong, that even as Toi Tū opened its doors, its curator, Nigel Borell, had resigned. A cover story in the NZ Herald's Canvas magazine a few weeks later finally told the public what the artists knew – that Borell and the gallery's director, Kirsten Lacy, had fallen out over what he described as 'different ways of viewing aspirations for Māori'. Winstanley had been on the inside of it all, filming what she had imagined would be a celebratory film that would accompany Toi Tū as it toured internationally. The show never toured, and she wound up with a different story to tell. Curator Nigel Borell: 'You have a moment to make some change.' Photo / Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki This is an audience that knows the story. It's also an extraordinarily engaged crowd. The next 100 minutes are dotted with swirls of applause, knowing laughter and even cheers as one artist or another comes up in the tale. What had originally seemed like an obstacle to the production – the pandemic – turned out to be something of a gift. The lockdown Zoom meetings with Borell, the gallery's longstanding artists' advisory board Haerewa, and Lacy and the gallery's senior management, all tiled across the screen, are rich documents in retrospect. There are murmurs and an audible gasp when Lacy, an Australian appointed to run the gallery in 2019, just as Borell's five-year dream for the exhibition was becoming a reality, is shown announcing her intention to go off on her own to conduct 'informal meet and greets' with iwi about how they would like to engage with the exhibition – effectively over the heads of Borell and Haerewa. Borell, sitting at home on Zoom, simply gets up and leaves the frame, to laughter from the audience. 'She's got to go with someone,' says painter and Haerewa's chair and founding member Elizabeth Ellis at a follow-up hui without Lacy. 'She's going to be discussing Māori stuff. We can't send her off, this young Australian woman, to carry our message.' Ellis and five other Haerewa members would eventually follow Borell in resigning. The film turns on an understanding of mana – translated on screen as 'authority to lead' – that will be familiar to many New Zealanders, but was not evident to Lacy. The gallery director arrived with an admirable record of working with indigenous artists in Australia but, it seems, an incomplete sense of the moment she was entering here. 'You have a moment to make some change,' says Borell at one point in the film. 'And if you don't use it in that way, then you're just taking up space.' Winstanley has gone out of her way not to be inflammatory, to the extent that some viewers could even wonder what all the fuss was about. She's after a teachable moment rather than a pile-on. Former Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki director Kirsten Lacy. Photo / Auckland City Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki 'I don't think she's a villain,' Winstanley says of Lacy the following morning. 'I think she is someone who … She's not Māori, she doesn't have the experience of having lived in this country, she doesn't understand or know that, and I think that's what comes across. And there's an opportunity, I think, for people in these positions. You can do what the beautiful Dr Maya Angelou says: 'Do the best you can until you know better – and when you know better, do better.'' Winstanley's original, more celebratory film survives through the twists of the story. We're taken straight from a troubled Zoom meeting to Reuben Paterson working out the lighting for Guide Kaiārahi, the crystalline waka taua that was Toi Tū Toi Ora's most prominent commissioned work, by virtue of its position at the gallery entrance. As commissions from Shane Cotton and Mataaho Collective take shape, we get a glimpse of the artists as purposeful engineers. The film, also commissioned by the gallery, provides an enriching context for the exhibition that will make viewers wish for a chance to see the art again with it all in mind. Indeed, that was the role it would have played had the exhibition toured as planned. Those plans were let go after Borell's departure – but the artists travelled even if the show did not. Eight New Zealand artists were invited to present at the Venice Biennale last year; all were Māori and all had been part of Toi Tū Toi Ora. An investment from the barrister Kahungunu Barron-Afeaki allowed Winstanley to fly there to capture the event, where Mataaho Collective claimed the Biennale's Golden Lion prize. Mataaho Collective won the Golden Lion award at the 60th Venice Biennale for their installation Takapau. Photo / Creative NZ Although Toi Tū Toi Ora had made its case by breaking gallery attendance records – at least since the return of the landmark Te Māori exhibition from New York in 1987, to which it is consciously connected in the film – following the story to Venice meant, says Winstanley, that 'we were able to truly celebrate what having that kind of sovereignty meant and that's what I'd envisioned in the beginning. Because if the whole point of Toi Tū Toi Ora was to enable our art to live and thrive through a Māori lens, it didn't feel like it was able to do that fully, opening the way it did and with what happened.' Lacy, who resigned in April and left in June, saw a rough cut of the film before she departed. By that time, she had received the recommendations of an independent review of the gallery's relationship with Māori and appointed Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei chief executive Tom Irvine as her deputy director. The move had the effect of further stirring debate about Lacy's personal cultivation of mana whenua at the expense of the mana of Haerewa. Ngāti Whātua seems like a missing voice in the film. Irvine is currently acting director. Whoever is permanently appointed to the role will find plenty to think about and much to respond to in Toi Tū: Visual Sovereignty. A day after the premiere, the friends I went with were still exchanging messages about what it meant. Perhaps that's what teachable moments are meant to do. After selling out its screenings at the Auckland leg of the NZ International Film Festival, Toi Tū: Visual Sovereignty has screenings in Wellington (Aug 17, 23), Dunedin (Aug 24) and Christchurch (Aug 17, 21), see for more. Plans are underway for screenings beyond the festival. To request a screening go to Director Chelsea Winstanley: 'I'm not putting words in people's mouths.' Photo / Supplied Things Fall Apart Chelsea Winstanley on filming in a crisis. For film-maker Chelsea Winstanley, Toi Tū: Visual Sovereignty represents her most serious film in years. Her recent producer duties have been on former husband Taika Waititi's Oscar-winning Jojo Rabbit and before that What We Do in the Shadows and giving Disney's animated hits te reo makeovers. But TT:VS is also her debut feature as a director. Her career began with directing Whakangahau, a documentary short about cousins from her Paparoa marae running a tourism venture. It was her 2003 graduating film from the Auckland University of Technology and won a Media Peace Award. Her feature directing debut also focuses on another relation with Ngāti Ranginui iwi roots – Nigel Borell. Toi Tū: Visual Sovereignty started out of conversations she had with Borell in the years running up to the exhibition about what it took to stage an event of its size and ambition. When you spoke at the premiere, you seemed quite nervous about how the film would be received. For a few reasons, I suppose. This is my directorial debut – I've done enough producing in my life – and you're putting your film out into the world, it's all on you this time. But not only that, it's the community that I love the most. You love them so dearly that you just want to do right by them. Was there a distinct point where you knew that the story was going to be different from what you had thought it would be? Obviously, when Nigel had to make that decision, it really did change then. I was going to follow the whole exhibition and the background to it, because I don't think we ever really understand what goes into putting on something like that. I thought it was going to travel overseas, because that's what I was told. I was like, 'Wow, this is going to be amazing, a celebration from beginning to end.' And then when he made that decision, for himself, I had to go, 'Oh, all right, I have to now rethink how it's going to happen.' Other things were happening, too – everyone went through Covid. Even at that point, I was like, 'Oh, my god, is this show even going to come to fruition?' That was actually a moment, too. A small selection of the art shown as part of Toi Tū Toi Ora (clockwise, from left): Lisa Reihana, Ihi, 2020; Israel Tangaroa Birch Ara-i-te-Uru, 2011; Aimee Ratana, Potiki Series, 2005; and Shane Cotton, Te Puawai, 2020. Photos / Supplied What was the response after the screening for Kirsten Lacy and the gallery staff? Was there a response? It's challenging for anybody to have to observe themselves. But remember, when they watched that edit, it's not like it was a big surprise what happened there, the story was already out. It's about how you have to reflect on your position, so that was up to them. And they knew that I had final cut anyway, and I'm not putting words in people's mouths or anything like that. While I watched the film, I did find myself thinking I'd like to go and see the exhibition again, having absorbed all this context. Yeah, of course, and that's the wonderful thing for people who were fortunate enough to see the show. A lot of people said to me afterwards that it brought back so many memories, both people who were working there and those who had gone to the show and wanted to see it again. And I think, for us as a country, we need to have spaces where we can just see that beautiful, contemporary art all the time, not just these once in 20-year timeframes.
The Spinoff
5 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The Weekend: A tribute to everyone's favourite stranger
Madeleine Chapman reflects on the week that was. We had an unlikely hero on The Spinoff this week. The anonymous 23-year-old who featured in Tuesday's Cost of Being described herself as 'broke with expensive taste' and didn't hold back when describing how she spends her, admittedly, little money. Savings? Forget about it. 'Given that the planet seems like it's a couple years away from plunging into a full grim dystopia, I'll be using every dollar I have to assert my vivacity and joie de vivre while I still can.' Grooming and beauty expenditure? Limited, but 'I buy a pair of falsies [lashes] pretty regularly since I'm always crying mine off.' I love this woman, and evidently so did readers. The comments are wholesome, asking for a full column from this anonymous legend (note: she is real, but even we don't know who she really is, she just filled out the form). I personally received two texts from different friends asking for more entries like hers. This is all very wholesome but a little surprising to me. In my four years in this role, it has proven impossible to predict how readers will react to other people's lives. In another year, I would've bet safely on Tuesday's readers scoffing at a young person living at home for free and spending $400 on boots. What was it that so enchanted readers? We've had 'spenders' feature in the series before, and plenty of participants have thrown in pithy one-liners about their situation and the world at large. But there was something beautifully hopeful in this young person's attitude to living her life (despite the dystopian view on saving money). I suspect many readers with full-time jobs and mortgages and responsibilities delighted in knowing that at least one young person was out there making the most of their early 20s. And most importantly, she was funny. Trust me, you can get away with a lot if it's decorated with humour. Nearly 700 New Zealanders have filled out the Cost of Being questionnaire and all are beautifully unique, but the majority inevitably fall into the 'doing my best to be responsible' category. So if you're someone who is living your best fun life and has a story to tell, I invite you to contribute to the series. Maybe you too could be someone's hero. The stories Spinoff readers spent the most time with this week Joel MacManus uses 10 graphs to analyse why homelessness Is worse under this government The cost of being: A retail assistant who's 'broke with expensive taste' Alex Casey rounds up all the celebrities* running in local elections around the country this year Former race relations commissioner Joris De Bres responds to the renaming of the Rongotai electorate Chlöe Swarbrick was barred from the House all week – is that even allowed? Andrew Geddis explains Feedback of the week 'As a 19 year old, I don't think education about the internet is enough to prevent harm (because I had internet education). In an ideal world, parents would be able to monitor what their children are doing on the internet, but they can't and most won't. It feels like a significant chunk of the internet is designed to make you feel worse, especially now with the polarised political landscape (see Andrew Tate). I personally think a restriction of the internet for youth is in order, but then the hard part becomes actually doing it without privacy concerns (like giving ID to private corporations who might sell or leak it) or the government caring enough to not half-ass it. I do think a ban is too extreme, but I think people need to consult youth more who actually are growing/ grew up with it.' 'It seems like an important point is being missed that Chloe didn't call anyone spineless, she called for MP's to have a spine. They are very different things, one is an insult, the other is an invocation to show courage. '
