Environment Canterbury's Chair Rebuffs Government's Directive To Stop Planning
Environment Canterbury (ECan) chairperson Craig Pauling said the work of local government still needs to continue.
''At ECan we've already been impacted by stops to planning and I am personally disappointed some good things in our Regional Policy Statement, which would have made a difference, can't happen.''
The policy statements provide an overview of resource management issues in a region.
Resource Management Act (RMA) Reform Minister Chris Bishop this week announced the government would halt changes to district and regional plans.
It comes ahead of a shake-up of the RMA, which is expected to come into effect in 2027.
Pauling made his comments during a panel discussion at the Local Government NZ conference on Thursday, July 17.
''I would encourage you not to stop the planning. Don't stop thinking. You've got to do the analysis.
''Keep the thinking going, so when things do land you are in the best position.''
ECan voted in November to put its RPS on hold until January 2026, while it awaits more certainty with RMA reform.
It has been unable to adopt a plan change to fix issues in the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan, following a Supreme Court decision on a water bottling plant in Christchurch in 2023.
The future makeup of councils
There has been speculation the RMA reform could lead to regional councils being scrapped, but both Bishop and Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said no decision had been made.
Bishop, who met with regional council chairs during the conference, indicated an announcement was likely by the end of the year.
Pauling said it made sense to consider the shape of local government alongside the RMA reform, as regional councils came into being in 1989, in anticipation of the RMA, which was enacted in 1991.
He admitted there were flaws with the present model, as local and regional councils didn't always work together.
''My personal view is separating land-use between city and regional councils was wrong. We've had so many occasions when land-use has been consented non-notified and then it needs water table allocations (from the regional council).''
LGNZ passed a remit at its annual general meeting calling for a review of local government functions and governance arrangements.
Its chief executive Susan Freeman-Greene said local government needed to be proactive and lead the changes required.
Under existing legislation there are only two alternatives for regional government - regional councils and unitary authorities.
Speaking to Local Democracy Reporting, Pauling said more options were needed, as different regions had different challenges.
Canterbury is much larger than other regions, has more braided rivers and catchments, a centrally located population and sparsely populated districts such as Kaikōura, Hurunui, Mackenzie and Waimate.
''We need to be having the conversation and asking the questions. Would Kaikōura and Waimate survive as unitary authorities?''
Splitting the region into three - North, Mid and South Canterbury has been mooted - but Pauling thinks it would be ''problematic''.
South Canterbury would likely be the largest unitary authority in the country in terms of geography, but with a population of only 60,000.
The Hurunui district alone is the same size as Taranaki and half the size of Auckland, but with a much smaller population.
A Christchurch or Greater Christchurch unitary authority has also been mooted, but questions have been raised about whether the rest of Canterbury would have a sufficient ratepayer base to manage regional council functions.
Pauling said he believed it would be ''unworkable''.
Another option, which ECan councillors considered at a recent workshop, was a Canterbury or South Island Assembly.
This was based on the Greater Manchester model, where the existing local councils could continue and the mayors or council representatives and Mana Whenua representatives could form an assembly to make regional decisions.
Whatever is decided, Pauling said local communities need to be involved in the decision making ''or it wouldn't fly''.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
14 hours ago
- Newsroom
Anne Salmond: The ‘war' on NZ values
For some time now, various environmental non-governmental organisations have been talking about a 'war on nature' in New Zealand. Many initiatives highlight the gravity of what's at stake – the 'Fast Track' Act, the Regulatory Standards bill; proposed amendments to the Overseas Investment Act, the National Environmental Standards for Commercial Forestry, and National Directions under the Resource Management Act affecting forests, fresh water and soils; the radical rewriting of the Resource Management Act, the removal of regulatory powers from local councils and talk about the abolition of regional councils; and the defunding of environmental groups and initiatives. The way these measures work is often deliberately opaque. Most New Zealanders do not realise that under the Regulatory Standards Bill, for instance, the oft-touted appeal to freedom for 'persons' under this bill is as much (or even more) about freedom for corporations as it is for individuals, since under the law, corporations are treated as legal 'persons.' Under the tangled weave of amendments to the Overseas Investment Act, international corporations are given relatively unfettered access to exploit natural resources in New Zealand, whether in mining, forestry or building infrastructure, even in our most prized and/or vulnerable landscapes and seascapes. These amendments work together with the 'Fast-track Approvals' Act, the Regulatory Standards Bill, proposed amendments to national directions under the Resource Management Act, the radical rewriting of the Resource Management Act and many other measures to reduce restraints on harmful extractive activities. At the same time, many international corporations use the infrastructure paid for by taxpayers and ratepayers, pay little or no tax, expatriate their profits, exit when their activities cease to be profitable and too often leave behind costly and lasting damage (e.g. oil exploration, mining and industrial forestry) for ratepayers and taxpayers to pay for. How is that supposed to generate long-term prosperity for New Zealand, and New Zealanders? These and other new legislative and regulatory measures give local corporations similar, relatively unfettered rights, even if they inflict lasting damage on local communities and the environments they live in. How does that square with the PM's launch last month of a new '100% Pure New Zealand' tourism campaign? An insistence on economic calculation is a two-edged sword. If Fonterra, for instance, insists on charging international prices for butter and other produce to other New Zealanders, then by the same logic, other New Zealanders should have the right to charge Fonterra for the damage they cause to rivers, lakes and aquifers; the harm to citizens' health, safety and enjoyment; and their contributions to New Zealand's carbon and biodiversity global debts. That's not happening, though. So wealth flows out of the country, or into the pockets of relatively limited number of local shareholders, directors and chief executives, while waterways, landscapes and the climate are wrecked, and other citizens experience a reduced quality of life and an increased cost of living. In order to achieve these one-way flows of wealth, there's been a barrage of measures that diminish accountability to the electorate. Not surprisingly, some are now also talking about a 'war on democracy' in New Zealand. This is epitomised by the way the proportional principle that underpins MMP has been undermined during coalition negotiations, with large numbers of measures with little or no electoral support signed off without public scrutiny, followed by a blitzkrieg of legislation aimed at exhausting parliamentary and public opposition. This 'war on democracy' includes the overuse of urgency in Parliament to enact measures with as little debate as possible; the undue influence of lobby groups and party funders; the debasement of select committee processes; the silencing of public servants and attempts to harness them to ideological agendas instead of the public interest; the use of Parliamentary Service-employed political staff to attack individual critics; attacks on universities and the rule of law; the undermining of local government while centralising executive power; and to cap it all, unheralded and unwanted changes to electoral processes that are likely to disenfranchise large numbers of voters. Many MPs seem to have forgotten who pays their salaries, and the job they've been hired to do in Parliament – i.e, to serve the interests of all New Zealanders, faithfully and well. That applies to all MPs, whether in government or opposition. At times, the fight against a barrage of harmful legislation is left to voluntary organisations and individual citizens with limited resources, when that is the primary responsibility of opposition MPs. Democracy in New Zealand is staggering under these assaults. This begs the question, does this add up to a 'war on New Zealand' and New Zealanders? Whose interests are being served by the current legislative agenda? Unheralded amendments to the Pay Equity Act, passed under urgency and aimed at constraining the incomes of low paid (mostly) female workers; a host of measures that reduce incomes, increase precarity and worsen working conditions for many; the loss of access to affordable housing, reliable and affordable childcare and healthcare, and the ability to put food on the table; increases in unemployment, homelessness and child poverty; the failure to give citizens the assurance that if they are disabled, ill, out of work or hit by disaster through no fault of their own, they will be supported, and that they can afford a reasonable retirement – all raise questions about how New Zealand is being governed at present. No wonder so many New Zealanders are leaving the country to look for a brighter future. There can be no worse indictment against any government. These are heartland issues, I think, that cut across the political spectrum. A love of our country, its heritage and landscapes, a belief in democracy and a fair deal for all, and a desire for a good future for our children and grandchildren is not the preserve of any one political party in New Zealand. A widespread sense of frustration and helplessness is not helped by the fragmentation of the debate, with those who want a healthy environment, a vibrant local democracy, a more equitable society and a Parliament that's dedicated to the public interest heading in slightly different directions. The loss of journalistic depth and independence in public media, and the use of algorithms and bots in social media to alienate and divide people make matters worse. A 'war on reality,' truth and evidence uses misinformation, slurs and 'double speak' to confuse attempts at resistance that are already uncoordinated and siloed. Yet at the same time, huge, spontaneous surges of opposition to the Treaty Principles Bill and the Regulatory Standards Bill, both provoking unprecedented numbers of submissions, suggest that many New Zealanders are eager to reclaim democracy in this country. Very few are willing to see fringe political parties, lobby groups and think tanks decide their future. There are some brilliant younger leaders waiting in the wings, and some are already in Parliament. If some of them reached across the aisles and agreed to tackle these challenges together, that might make a difference. One thing's for sure – party politics is not working well for New Zealand at present. Outside Parliament, there are also impressive younger leaders. What's needed is a banner under which Kiwis can come together to restore the accountability of the executive to Parliament, and to the people of this country. Perhaps a non-partisan Civic Assembly would be useful, with leaders and attendees from the wider community coming together to address key challenges to democracy in New Zealand, and devise strategies to tackle them. These challenges might include democracy and Parliament; democracy and the media; democracy and Te Tiriti; democracy and the environment; and democracy and inequality, for instance. Or a series of such meetings, in different locations? Any other ideas? In any case, something must happen, and soon. Democracy in this country is at a turning point. New Zealanders who value their democratic freedoms need to come together across different spheres of influence to talk, think and plan; step away from the abyss; and act to make a positive difference.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon dismisses Greens' Tauranga rail petition, says roads first
'What we really need to do is kick on and get serious about a high-quality roading infrastructure between Tauranga, Hamilton, and ultimately into Auckland,' he said. 'That golden triangle is critical to New Zealand's economy.' Luxon cited the State Highway 29 Ōmanawa Bridge Replacement project as a key development already under way. 'We're kicking that off before Christmas, which is excellent.' It was among $6 billion in government-funded infrastructure projects that Luxon, with Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop, recently announced were scheduled to begin in 2025. He also pointed to the exponential growth in the kiwifruit sector, which he said now generated $4 billion annually – up from $2.8b. 'Eighty per cent of that comes from this region, and it's moved via our roads. That's why we've got to get our roading infrastructure first and foremost sorted and done.' Luxon said building strong transport links was the single biggest change that could be made to unlock both economic and social benefits. Key ongoing regional priorities include the State Highway 29 upgrade through Tauriko West, the Takitimu North Link Stage 1 from Tauranga to Te Puna, and Stage 2 to Ōmokoroa. Luxon has previously described Tauranga's traffic as a 'zoo', underscoring the need for faster project delivery. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Photo / Brydie Thompson 'We've got to follow through. It's about freight, and it's about people getting home to their families,' he said. 'When we build good roading infrastructure, we boost productivity and get social benefits. We've got to focus on getting that roading network really sorted for New Zealand.' Luxon also addressed the housing shortfall in the region, saying several developments are currently progressing through the government's fast-track process. 'We've got new roads to build that will unlock housing capacity.' A 2023 capacity assessment warned of a shortfall of about 4000 dwellings in Tauranga by 2030 under high-growth scenarios. 'We've got to get the Resource Management Act sorted – there's no doubt about it,' Luxon said. 'When it takes 19 months to build a three-bedroom house, and building costs are 50% higher than in Australia, something's wrong. It's taking us too long to get resource consenting.' He noted that homes in New Zealand can be inspected up to 14 times, adding cost and delay. 'That's why we're pushing through planning law reforms and fast-track legislation. We want one-stop-shop approvals for nationally or regionally significant projects –be it housing, roading, or renewable energy.' Luxon expected the revamped planning framework to be in place by the end of the year. With significant population growth in Tauranga and the wider Bay of Plenty region, he also reaffirmed the need to maintain local healthcare investment. Christopher Luxon said the Government was working on a plan to prioritise and maintain healthcare investment. 'Simeon Brown, the new Health Minister's put together an infrastructure plan, so we have a really clear list of how we prioritise the health building from here on through.' Luxon said across New Zealand, the average age of health buildings is about 47 years. 'We'll continue to work through our health infrastructure plan.' The 10-year plan included seismic strengthening and expanding the Emergency Department as 'stage one' activities for Tauranga Hospital. On crime, Luxon pointed to what he described as an encouraging decline in serious offending since his Government reintroduced tougher measures, including the Three Strikes law (reinstated in June 2025) and a ban on gang insignia (effective November 2024). 'Gangs make up just 0.25% of the population, but they're responsible for 25% of violent crime. And now violent crime is down.' Luxon said the gang insignia ban has helped police uncover illegal firearms and drugs, key drivers of violence. He also cited a 60% drop in ram raids nationwide and a 40% increase in frontline police presence. 'All of that has led to our crime stats starting to come down, which has been really encouraging. 'We've got more work to do, but I think most New Zealanders would credit this Government for restoring law and order.'
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
How outgoing Whanganui council boss David Langford reflects on his tenure
'In the words of Leslie Knope from (NBC sitcom) Parks and Recreation, when they shout at me, it's just them caring really loudly.' Langford said the past five years for local government had been intense, mostly due to the amount of change imposed on the sector, such as Three Waters and Local Water Done Well reforms and the Government's plans to replace the Resource Management Act and Building Control Authority. 'Councils that come out the other side are going to look very different, and they are going to have to figure out their purpose and role in supporting the community,' he said. 'As New Zealand, we are one of the most centralised systems of government in the whole of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 'Our Government spends 93% of all taxes, and I think the average across most high income countries is more like a 70 (central) 30 (local) split.' He said Government conversations around rates capping and focusing on the basics sounded good, but 'what does that mean?'. 'Almost all our rates' money is spent on core services already, and the bits that aren't are the bits people really care about and fought to keep. 'We fund the Christmas Parade, and give $100,000 a year to surf lifesaving to help them patrol the beaches and keep our kids safe. That's not core services. 'If we put caps on rates, these are the things that will get hit.' The council achieved an average 2.2% rates rise for 2025/26, the lowest in the country. David Langford (left) with Sarjeant Gallery director Andrew Clifford. That was the culmination of the past 3.5 years of work, he said. 'The foundations we've laid here are going to serve the community well. 'Whoever comes in to replace me will like some things I've done and change some of them as well, but, hopefully, they'll keep the momentum going.' Langford said he would be disappointed if the district did not have the lowest rates increase next year as well, while still increasing investment in core infrastructure. There was an 11% increase in the council's infrastructure spend for 2025/26. A major part of the council's role was 'building things', whether it be fixing potholes or putting pipes in the ground, he said. 'There are a lot of armchair engineers out there, but it comes with the territory. 'Anybody who's watched an episode of Bob The Builder thinks they know how to do my job better than I do. 'Like I said before, if you're not up for the criticism, and you're not prepared to rise above it, this job is not for you.' Langford said challenges still lay ahead, such as the future of the NZ International Commercial Pilot Academy. The facility is under investigation by the Civil Aviation Authority, although four planes have returned to service. 'It delivers around $10 million of GDP into our economy, but the goal was also to get a business paying landing fees at the airport, so the ratepayer doesn't have to subsidise it as much. 'The intention was always to get it set up as an investment, and once it's running, sell it. 'Now's the time to hand it over to the private sector, but make sure we keep those benefits.' He said his proudest achievements was forming a citizens' assembly - 'a bold move' - to tackle the future of outdoor swimming in the district, including the Whanganui East pool. The assembly presented two recommendations at a council meeting this month, although the issue was left on the table until August 12. 'There's a heap of lessons we've learned and when council does the next one, it'll be a bit slicker and even better,' Langford said. 'For me, it was seeing the community step up and make the most of the opportunity, and really get engaged with an issue they care about.' Mike Tweed is a multimedia journalist at the Whanganui Chronicle. Since starting in March 2020, he has dabbled in everything from sport to music. At present his focus is local government, primarily the Whanganui District Council.
