The very simple tweak to your exercise routine that could 'significantly' improve body fat loss
Exercise is about far more than losing weight – from the mental health benefits to simply feeling strong, there's a lot to be gained from working up a sweat. However, I'd be lying if I said I wasn't interested in working off body fat at the gym, and it turns out there is a simple tweak you can make to your fitness regime that can aid fat loss.
It's all to do with the order of your workout. When I go to the gym, I tend not to have too much of a plan, but may do any combination of cardio (rowing machine, treadmill, stationary bike etc) and strength training exercises (lifting weights and bodyweight exercises). However, it turns out that simply tweaking my routine so I always do the latter first could be most beneficial, according to a study published in the latest issue of the journal of Exercise Science and Fitness.
The research was conducted by Dr Zhixiong Zhou, a researcher at the Capital University of Physical Education and Sports in Beijing. Along with his colleagues, he challenged 45 overweight men aged 18-30 to follow one of three approaches for 12 weeks.
One group did strength training (a mix of weighted bench press, deadlifts, biceps curls and squats) before cardio (30-minute indoor cycling) three times a week, while a second group completed exactly the same workout, but with the cardio element before the strength training. They were all given fitness trackers to monitor their daily.
A third control group stuck to their usual daily habits.
There was no surprise that after three months, the two groups who had been exercising regularly lost weight and gained lean muscle tissue. However, what was surprising was the discovery that lifting weights first had significant advantages when it came to fat loss.
'Our findings suggest that resistance training optimises fat loss when conducted prior to aerobic exercise,' Zhou told The Australian. Not only did the weights-first group lost more body fat overall, but they also lost more visceral, which settles around major organs and it strongly linked to cardiovascular diseases.
The weights-before-cardio group also displayed better muscular endurance and strength by the end of the trial. 'Overall, there were improvements in physical fitness when weights preceded cardio, particularly in terms of enhanced muscular and explosive strength,' Zhou says. 'It implies that resistance training, when performed as a warm-up prior to aerobic exercise, offers superior preparation for the body and facilitates a general enhancement in physical fitness over time.'
So why is doing weights before cardio the most beneficial when it comes to losing body fat? One possible explanation is that if you do cardio first your level of fatigue is so high that you can't put maximum effort into strength training afterwards. I certainly know that if I start a workout off with a 20-minute run I'm going to be an exhausted, sweaty mess for the rest of the gym session. But from now on I'll definitely head to the weights bench first, then the treadmill, and then try not to go home via the next door café
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
How long will you live? This exercise test may have the answer
A new study has shown how a simple exercise could predict natural and cardiovascular causes of death. Researchers wanted to see whether non-aerobic physical fitness, assessed by a sitting-rising test, could predict premature deaths in middle-aged and older people, and on Wednesday, their results were published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. They tested the theory on 4,282 adults aged 46-75 years from 1998 to 2023. Most of the participants, 68 percent, were men. 'None of them presented relevant physical or clinical limitations for fitness testing,' researchers said. All of the participants performed a sitting-rising test to evaluate the main components of non-aerobic physical fitness, which are muscle strength/power, flexibility, balance and body composition. The test was simple, yet not necessarily easy. Participants had to sit and rise from the floor without other body parts such as hands, elbows or knees touching the floor. Their instructions were as follows: ''Without worrying about the speed of movement, try to sit and then rise from the floor, using the minimum support that you believe is needed,'' the study's authors wrote. If participants used any extremities for support, they'd lose points. They also needed to steady themselves as a perceived partial loss of balance would knock down their score. Researchers found that non-aerobic physical fitness 'was a significant predictor' of natural and cardiovascular mortality in the participants. After following up with patients about 12 years later, researchers found there were 665 deaths due to natural causes. Those who scored a perfect 10 points on the sitting-rising test had death rates of 3.7 percent. Death rates tripled to 11.1 percent for people with a score of 8 points and 'dramatically increased' by 42.1 percent for those with a score of 0 to 4 points, according to researchers. The study was done at a private clinic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and most of the participants 'belonged to upper socioeconomic and education strata of the country.'
Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The very simple tweak to your exercise routine that could 'significantly' improve body fat loss
Exercise is about far more than losing weight – from the mental health benefits to simply feeling strong, there's a lot to be gained from working up a sweat. However, I'd be lying if I said I wasn't interested in working off body fat at the gym, and it turns out there is a simple tweak you can make to your fitness regime that can aid fat loss. It's all to do with the order of your workout. When I go to the gym, I tend not to have too much of a plan, but may do any combination of cardio (rowing machine, treadmill, stationary bike etc) and strength training exercises (lifting weights and bodyweight exercises). However, it turns out that simply tweaking my routine so I always do the latter first could be most beneficial, according to a study published in the latest issue of the journal of Exercise Science and Fitness. The research was conducted by Dr Zhixiong Zhou, a researcher at the Capital University of Physical Education and Sports in Beijing. Along with his colleagues, he challenged 45 overweight men aged 18-30 to follow one of three approaches for 12 weeks. One group did strength training (a mix of weighted bench press, deadlifts, biceps curls and squats) before cardio (30-minute indoor cycling) three times a week, while a second group completed exactly the same workout, but with the cardio element before the strength training. They were all given fitness trackers to monitor their daily. A third control group stuck to their usual daily habits. There was no surprise that after three months, the two groups who had been exercising regularly lost weight and gained lean muscle tissue. However, what was surprising was the discovery that lifting weights first had significant advantages when it came to fat loss. 'Our findings suggest that resistance training optimises fat loss when conducted prior to aerobic exercise,' Zhou told The Australian. Not only did the weights-first group lost more body fat overall, but they also lost more visceral, which settles around major organs and it strongly linked to cardiovascular diseases. The weights-before-cardio group also displayed better muscular endurance and strength by the end of the trial. 'Overall, there were improvements in physical fitness when weights preceded cardio, particularly in terms of enhanced muscular and explosive strength,' Zhou says. 'It implies that resistance training, when performed as a warm-up prior to aerobic exercise, offers superior preparation for the body and facilitates a general enhancement in physical fitness over time.' So why is doing weights before cardio the most beneficial when it comes to losing body fat? One possible explanation is that if you do cardio first your level of fatigue is so high that you can't put maximum effort into strength training afterwards. I certainly know that if I start a workout off with a 20-minute run I'm going to be an exhausted, sweaty mess for the rest of the gym session. But from now on I'll definitely head to the weights bench first, then the treadmill, and then try not to go home via the next door café
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
Dragon Man: Ancient skull 'reveals what mysterious Denisovans looked like'
Scientists have linked genetic material extracted from an ancient skull found in China in 2018 to a mysterious group of early skull, nicknamed 'Dragon Man' had fascinated experts because it didn't seem to match any other prehistoric human. Now, an expert study says it has linked genetic material from the fossil with previous bones belonging to an group of prehistoric humans called Denisovans. Read on to find out more about Dragon Man, the Denisovans and how they made the discovery. Who is Dragon Man? The "Dragon Man" or Homo longi was the name given to the early relative whose fossilised skull was first given to experts in China in 2018, after reportedly being first discovered back in skull is thought to be around 146,000 years old and has been identified as a male of around 50 years finding was extra interesting to scientists who said they believed the Dragon Man was closer to modern humans than Neanderthals. Who are the Denisovans? Meanwhile Denisovans were a species of ancient humans, distinct from Neanderthals, another species of ancient are extinct relatives of modern humans who at one point lived alongside homo sapiens (humans like us). Denisovans are believed to have lived in Asia, 285 thousand to 25 thousand years ago. They were first identified from DNA taken from finger bone found in Siberia in then although other Denisovans have been identified, their appearance had remained a mystery. A team from the Institute of Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing worked on linking the Dragon Man fossil to the team failed to retrieve DNA from the skull's tooth and petrous bone, a section at the bottom of the skull which is usually a rich source of DNA in it was the hardened plaque on the teeth known as tartar which gave them results they could on this evidence, Denisovans can finally be would have had strong brow ridges, larger teeth than Neanderthals and modern humans, but brains around the same size. "I really feel that we have cleared up some of the mystery surrounding this population," said Qiaomei Fu, lead author of the new research. "After 15 years, we know the first Denisovan skull."It's hoped that this research could help identify Denisovan bones in other museum collections too.
