Watching Trump from afar, Israel fears being left out of a new Middle East it helped create
For decades, Israel has leveraged its special relationship with the United States to serve as a gatekeeper to Washington. From the Camp David Treaty with Egypt to
the Abraham Accords
brokered by Trump in his first term, Arab states seeking U.S. favor usually had to first make nice with Israel. And rarely did their interests prevail if they clashed with Israel's.
But on Wednesday, to Israel's dismay, Saudi Arabia and Turkey brokered
a historic meeting
between Trump and Syria's new president, and Trump portrayed
his decision to lift sanctions
on Damascus as a favor to his host, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Israel, which still views Syria as a security threat and had urged Trump to keep the sanctions in place, was ignored, as it apparently was on a number of recent U.S. initiatives in the region, from the
ongoing talks with Iran
to the
ceasefire with Yemen's Houthi rebels
. Asked Friday if he knew Israel opposes U.S. recognition of Syria's new government, Trump replied: 'I don't know, I didn't ask them about that.'
'This week there was a party in the Middle East — a grand ball full of colorful costumes, money and gold changing hands — and we found ourselves playing the role of Cinderella before the transformation,' columnist Sima Kadmon wrote in Israel's Yediot Ahronot daily.
'The fairy godmother we thought we had flew off to Saudi Arabia and Qatar.'
Israel sidelined
Trump skipped Israel on
his first major foreign tour
, which instead took him to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
Israel was also left out of
a deal with Hamas to free an American hostage
from Gaza, where Israel is trying to destroy the militant group. Trump reached a separate truce with Yemen's Houthi rebels that has allowed them to train their fire on Israel, and is holding
talks with Iran on its nuclear program
that could bring about another deal that Israel rejects.
There have been no open clashes between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, both of whom say relations have never been better. Trump has yet to scold Israel, at least in public, as former President Joe Biden occasionally did, over civilian deaths in the Gaza Strip.
But compared to Trump's first term, when he
upended decades of U.S. foreign policy
to lend unprecedented support to Israel, something has changed.
A focus on quick wins
This time around, Trump seems to be hunting for quick wins — big investment deals to boost the American economy and diplomatic agreements
like the India-Pakistan ceasefire
and the release of hostages.
In that respect, Netanyahu has little to offer.
Israel's
19-month military campaign in Gaza
has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians and reduced entire towns to rubble but has yet to achieve either of Netanyahu's war aims — the defeat of Hamas and the return of all the hostages taken in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that ignited the war.
Netanyahu has refused to end the war in exchange for the release of the remaining hostages, or to accept a pathway to Palestinian statehood — key Saudi demands for the kind of historic normalization accord that Trump has long sought.
'Trump has given Israel many opportunities, and ammunition prohibited by the Biden administration, to end the war in Gaza. This is what Trump wants,' said Eytan Gilboa, an expert on U.S.-Israeli relations at Israel's Bar-Ilan and Reichman universities. Instead,
the war is intensifying
.
'Netanyahu is coming closer to the status of a loser in Trump's eyes,' Gilboa said.
Trump denies rift and few expect pressure over Gaza
Trump has downplayed any rift, telling reporters on the tour that his relationships with regional leaders are 'good for Israel.'
The irony is that Israel is being excluded from a regional realignment that it largely created, by inflicting punishing losses on Iran and its allies after the Oct. 7 attack. Its thrashing of Hezbollah in Lebanon hastened the downfall of Syrian President Bashar Assad, and Iran may be more open to concessions on its nuclear program after
a wave of Israeli retaliatory strikes
last year.
Michael Oren, a historian and former Israeli ambassador to the U.S., said there is at least one precedent for Trump's approach.
'It's going to drive the people in Washington crazy, but it most closely resembles the Obama administration,' he said.
On Barack Obama's first visit as president to the Middle East, he too skipped Israel. Oren, a critic of that administration who was Israel's envoy to the U.S. at the time, said Obama repeatedly violated an unspoken rule of U.S.-Israeli relations — that there be no surprises. That led to public spats with Netanyahu, especially around the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal.
Few expect a repeat under Trump — or that he will publicly press Israel to wind down the war in Gaza, despite
the humanitarian catastrophe
unleashed by its war and blockade.
Trump has said the days of the United States
giving 'lectures' to Middle Eastern countries
are over — that decades of American intervention have done more harm than good.
And the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the last place any American president would look for a quick win.
'He's not looking for a fight with Israel,' Oren said. 'He wants to end the war, but the war can end in different ways.'
___
Follow AP's war coverage at
https://apnews.com/hub/israel-hamas-war
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump plans ride-along with troops in Washington, D.C., crackdown
President Trump said he's planning to ride along Thursday night with troops patrolling Washington, D.C., as part of his federal crackdown. 'I'm going to be going out tonight, I think, with the police and with the military,' Trump told conservative commentator Todd Starnes. 'So we're going to do a job. The National Guard is great. They've done a fantastic job.' Trump gave no additional details of which law enforcement or military units he might join or when and where. Trump's move to personally join the controversial crackdown, which has lasted for two weeks, would amount to a new escalation in the show of force from the White House. Hundreds of federal agents and National Guard soldiers have surged into the streets of the nation's capital this month, leaving some residents on edge and creating tense confrontations in the streets. Although the city has historically struggled with high crime, crime rates were sharply declining before Trump declared a putative emergency that required urgent federal intervention. Troops and agents from an alphabet soup of different agencies have set up checkpoints on busy city arteries, injecting their authority into daily life. Immigration enforcement has been a core part of the crackdown, rattling immigrants and Latino American citizens in many of the city's diverse neighborhoods. Since Aug. 7, when Trump began surging federal agents into the city, there have been 630 arrests, including 251 people who are in the country illegally, according to the White House. Trump has been ratcheting up the pressure since then, claiming control of the D.C. police department on Aug. 11 and deploying more National Guard troops from Republican-led states. Soldiers have been largely stationed in downtown areas, such as monuments on the National Mall and transit stations. But federal agents have started to operate more widely through the city, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser acknowledged Thursday. 'The surge of federal officers is allowing for different types of deployments, more frequent types of deployments, like checkpoints,' Bowser said. Democrats have denounced the federal crackdown as a political stunt. The law that permits the feds to exercise wide authority over law enforcement in Washington, D.C., says the crackdown can only last for 30 days unless Congress approves an extension. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has said Democrats will block any effort to extend Trump's emergency. _____
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
S&P Flags Risks Even As U.S. Keeps 'AA+' Rating
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. S&P Global is keeping America's credit standing intact. The agency reaffirmed its 'AA+' sovereign rating for the U.S. on Thursday, saying Trump's new wave of tariffs should generate enough meaningful revenue to cushion the fiscal hit from his tax-and-spending plan. The outlook stays stable, a nod to the economy's underlying resilience even as deficits remain stubbornly high. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with INTC. Is QQQ fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Growth, though, is expected to slow. S&P sees GDP rising just 1.7% in 2025 and 1.6% in 2026, before inching back toward 2% later in the decade. Debt is on track to climb near 100% of GDP, squeezed by swelling interest costs and the pressures of an aging population. Tariffs are already showing up in the numbers. Customs duty collections jumped $21 billion in July, though the monthly deficit still grew 19% year-on-year to $291 million. Longer term, estimates suggest tariffs could raise $2.9 trillion from 20262035, adding about $2,700 to the average taxpayer's bill in 2026 alone. Still, S&P warned of downgrade risks if deficits spiral or politics erode confidence in U.S. policymaking and the Fed's independencejeopardizing the dollar's role as the world's reserve currency. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
9 minutes ago
Groups urge US colleges to end campus surveillance to protect protesters
NEW YORK -- A coalition of more than 30 privacy and civil rights groups called on U.S. universities Thursday to dismantle campus surveillance and data collection, to protect student protesters and others from government retaliation. The demands, issued in a letter sent to leaders of 60 major universities and colleges, come as President Donald Trump has pressed schools to crack down on alleged antisemitism and take a harder line on demonstrations. But the groups said it is essential that universities resist that pressure, including threats to millions of dollars in federal research grants, to preserve the academic freedom and rights to expression of their students, faculty and others. 'We are open-eyed to the financial pressure that all campuses are under,' said Golnaz Fakhimi, legal director for Muslim Advocates, a civil rights group that has counseled students who participated in pro-Palestinian protests and which joined in signing the letter. 'But we think this is the moment for all campuses to hunker down' and hold the line against government interference. In their letter, the groups called on university leaders to refuse to cooperate with law enforcement agencies seeking to surveil, detain or deport students, and demanded they do more to secure and delete sensitive data. The letter also asked that schools reject restrictions on masks worn by some student protesters to conceal their identities, work to prevent doxxing and dismantle campus surveillance systems. 'Without immediate action, surveillance tools and the data they amass will be used to supercharge the virulent attacks on campus communities,' says the letter, coordinated by the group Fight for the Future. It was signed by 32 groups, including Amnesty International USA, the Electronic Privacy Information Center and the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. Several colleges introduced new security measures and protest guidelines following a wave of pro-Palestinian campus protests in spring 2024. The letter was sent to leaders of 60 schools, including Yale, the University of Michigan and Columbia, which last month agreed in a deal with the Trump administration to pay more than $220 million to restore federal research money that was canceled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. 'Surveillance does not make a university safer,' said Will Owen of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, which also signed the letter. 'It chills free speech, endangers students who speak out against injustice and it's really essential for campuses to protect their communities from the threat.'
