logo
EXCLUSIVE The villages on the doorstep of Britain's new 'super prisons': Fuming locals warn house prices will plunge because of new 1,700-inmate jails built to solve overcrowding crisis

EXCLUSIVE The villages on the doorstep of Britain's new 'super prisons': Fuming locals warn house prices will plunge because of new 1,700-inmate jails built to solve overcrowding crisis

Daily Mail​20-05-2025

Villagers near two planned 'super prisons' complain the developments are being 'railroaded' through by the government and are making it hard to sell their homes.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood is spending £4.7billion to build a total of three new jails near existing ones in a bid to create 14,000 new places by 2031.
One of the planned prisons is on green belt land north of HMP Wymott and HMP Garth in Chorley, Lancashire - where residents say drug-carrying drones already blight daily life.
At another site, HMP Gartree in Leicestershire, builders hope to start the main construction phase later this year - after the previous secretary of state, Michael Gove, overruled local planners.
While officials promise the new jail will create 600 jobs and inject millions into the local economy, residents complain it has been 'shoehorned' into 'scenic' countryside.
Margaret Coy, 73, had long ridden her horse on the land when it was just a quiet bridleway flanked by green fields, but is now unable to access it after diggers began preparatory works.
She told MailOnline: 'I think it's a waste of nice scenery to be honest. It's obviously been pushed through, so we haven't really got a say in it.
'They should be thinking of the normal people who use this land. We can't do that now because there are diggers there, which makes me very sad.'
Jo, a 49-year-old district councillor, bought her house ten-years-ago due to its countryside views.
'Initially I was a member of the Gartree action group and we fought against the new prison, then obviously it went to appeal and Gove overruled it,' she said.
'I feel like we've just been railroaded over here, that's the only way to describe it. There used to be sheep all over and now we wake up to diggers.
'That is all owned by the MoJ and they rented it to farmers. I bought this house five years ago because it was next to all the fields and such a peaceful place to be.
'Now it's all diggers, it's horrendous. They're 8am until 6pm, Monday to Friday. I had to fight to stop them doing Saturday mornings.
'If that goes through and they start to, my life will be hell.'
The existing HMP Gartree can hold 700 men, but the new site will house 1,700.
'We're going to have over 2,000 prisoners on our doorstep - more than three times the amount at the moment,' Jo continued.
'My other fear is if they change it to a category C. I think it would be worse because you don't get much hassle with a category B.
'But I've heard that category C can get really bad outside, with people waiting for them and trying to get drugs in.
'The MoJ aren't the greatest neighbours. All these prison officers turned up at 4.30am the other morning and were talking loudly. They woke everyone up.
'It splits the street as some people work there and the rest just live here.'
Jane Huxley, a 71-year-old who lives in nearby Foxton, said the scale of the new jail would cause problems.
'It's not that there's a problem with having a prison in the neighbourhood - we'd have one for years - but this is huge and I have no idea how they're going to staff it,' she said.
'It's going to cause traffic problems too.'
Diana Cook, 76 - a parish councillor in the village of Lubenham - said: 'If we really need the prisons, I appreciate they have got to go somewhere. But we told them this was the wrong place.
'It did not have sufficient access for building and operation.'
Reece Richards, 42, who lives locally, raised concerns about the impact on property prices, claiming that people were struggling to sell their houses.
'No one wants a new prison. We've already got one - we don't need another,' he said.
The pattern of government ministers overruling planners was repeated in Chorley, Lancashire, which is set to host a new 1,700-capacity prison alongside the existing HMP Wymott and HMP Garth.
A previous refusal by the planning inspectorate was recently overturned by housing minister Angela Rayner.
Myra McHugh, 82, is a keen bowler at Wymott Bowling Club - which will be knocked down and replaced with the new prison's entrance.
She said: 'The main thing that really aggrieves me is it's gone to appeal several times, it's now on its final appeal I believe.
'On several of those appeals, we have been backed - we have had specialist surveyors down and they say the roads are not fit for all the traffic.
'Angela Rayner, after the last appeal when all the specialists had said ''no, the roads aren't fit'', she just went ''oh it'll be alright''.
'She's never been near the place, she doesn't know it. But she thinks it's going to be fine when all the experts say it's not.
'That's my main grievance because we've been fighting this for probably nearly three years now.'
Local horse riders and dog walkers were upset about the loss of green space - with trees and greenery set to be ripped up as part of the plans.
Dave Williams, 64, was tired and fed up with the planning process.
Having lived on Wray Crescent for 20 years, he said: 'They've not considered locals whatsoever, no consideration.
'It's going to destroy part of the green belt, there's a multitude of not just the fauna, like animals and birds that use that land, cyclists, walkers.
'Through the Covid period I'd never seen so many people walking and cycling around here, never.
'It's going to take five years to construct, there are going to be larger than 40-tonners, 200 a day - one every 90 seconds.'
He added: 'When you look around and see what the infrastructure is - they're talking about a prison where prisoners can actually be rehabilitated and get back into society.
'Look at what we've got around here, there's no trains, there's an hourly bus service into Chorley and Preston - so how are the prisoners going to get around?'
Late last year, HMP Garth, an open prison, was described as 'like an airport' by prison inspector Charlie Taylor due to the volume of drugs being flown in by drone.
One couple who live near the prison site, who asked not to be named, said people in the area were selling up to try to get away.
Now, they say, they're stuck as they face a loss in value if they try to sell up.
The mother-of-two, who has lived in the area for four years, said: 'It's very rural, and now I don't even know what we're going to have, but I've heard it's going to be three or four storeys.
'There's a lot of issues, my partner was working nights the other day, it was after nine and there were fireworks going off.
'It was like they'd set them off in our garden, they do that as a distraction, there's loud bangs, the dog's going mad.
'The speeding cars that speed around to the other side of the prison and set more off over there so they can send drones in a different way. It's for drug and phone drops.'
Another horse rider in her late 50s, who asked not to be named, said she thought the death penalty should be brought back in to keep the prison population down.
Parish councillor John Dalton, 61, said: 'I moved here 19 years ago, I knew the prisons were here, all the residents knew the prisons were here.
'We have no objection to living in this area with two prisons very close by, obviously the prisons are in an enclosed area, so we don't have a problem.
'This is one of the safest areas in Lancashire to live. You can leave your cars open, you can leave your front doors open - there's not a problem with there being two prisons here.
'The major problem with the third prison is the entrance to the prison.
'As anybody is aware of the area, it's very congested, very narrow - those are the major concerns of the residents, there's no concern over a new prison, it's the siting of the entrance to the prison.'
The third prison will be located near HMP Grendon in the village of Grendon Underwood, Buckinghamshire.
At a press conference last week, Shabana Mahmood said Britain could not simply 'build its way' out of the prison capacity crisis, as she revealed new rules aimed at freeing up space.
This includes a standard 28-day 'recall' period for released prisoners who are locked up again for breaking the rules – even those who commit new offences.
The Justice Secretary told a press conference last week that said Britain's prison capacity would not be solved only by building new jails
Currently, freed inmates can be kept behind bars for the rest of their sentence if they are recalled.
The new policy will free up 1,400 spaces in prisons amid the overcrowding crisis. Officials said if no action was taken, they would run out of space by November.
But Ms Mahmood was accused of presiding over a 'recipe for the breakdown of law and order', while victims' groups voiced alarm at the move.
Ms Mahmood repeated doom-laden warnings she first deployed last summer when she introduced a scheme allowing most inmates to be freed after serving just 40 per cent of their sentences, and which led to lags popping champagne corks outside prison gates.
She said: 'The consequences of failing to act are unthinkable. If our prisons overflow, courts cancel trials, police halt their arrests, crime goes unpunished and we reach a total breakdown of law and order.'
There were 13,600 recalled prisoners behind bars in March. About a fifth are sent back to jail because they have committed fresh crimes. Ms Mahmood said the 28-day recall period will apply to criminals serving sentences of between one and four years.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Investigation launched after deportee breaks free on Heathrow runway
Investigation launched after deportee breaks free on Heathrow runway

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Investigation launched after deportee breaks free on Heathrow runway

An inquiry is under way into how an immigration detainee who was being deported from the UK managed to free himself from restraints and started to run, close to the takeoff paths of planes at Heathrow airport. The man who was captured on film sprinting across the runway at Terminal 2 on Sunday evening was about to be deported to India but managed to break free from the guards holding on to his waist restraint belt while escorting him to the plane. A spokesperson for Mitie, which holds a Home Office contract for removing migrants from the UK, told the Guardian: 'An investigation into the incident is under way. The individual was quickly apprehended, reboarded the flight, and was handed over to the relevant authorities on landing.' The incident came to light because it was captured by a plane spotter and aired on the YouTube channel Big Jet TV. The person who filmed the incident can be heard saying: 'What's going on here? Why would there be people running across the [tarmac]?' After the man was stopped, the narrator added: 'What the hell was that all about? They are stopping aircraft taxiing as well.' Metropolitan police sources confirmed that they played a role in detaining the man and that normal operations then resumed at the airport. John Van Hoogstraten, an aviation expert at Straten Consulting Services Ltd, said: 'What is known as the movement area of the airport is the entire airside. We have to consider all movement in this area, whether it's wildlife or something else. It's always a challenge for airports about how to get people on to planes if they're not using an air bridge. 'The minute an unaccounted person is airside there's no protection about what happens next in operations. In these cases aircraft have to cease operations. They will be told to stop immediately. Safety is paramount. A jet blast is sufficient to severely injure if not kill a person. The reaction of a pilot trying to land a plane and seeing a person try to cross a runway can be devastating.' A Heathrow spokesperson said: 'Working with partners, we have quickly resolved an incident at the airport involving an individual who accessed the airfield taxiway. The airport continues to operate as normal and passengers are travelling as planned.' Home Office sources confirmed that Mitie was investigating the incident.

Bhim Kohli: MPs demand sentence review for killers of man, 80
Bhim Kohli: MPs demand sentence review for killers of man, 80

BBC News

time36 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Bhim Kohli: MPs demand sentence review for killers of man, 80

Two MPs have called for a review into "unduly lenient" sentences given to two teenagers convicted of killing an 80-year-old man at a Kohli died in hospital a day after being attacked while walking his dog at Franklin Park in Braunstone Town, Leicestershire, in September.A 15-year-old boy was sentenced to seven years in custody for manslaughter at Leicester Crown Court on Thursday while a 13-year-old girl was given a three-year youth rehabilitation order and made subject to a six-month Mid Leicestershire MP Peter Bedford and Alberto Costa, MP for South Leicestershire, have written to the Attorney General's Office (AGO) calling for the sentences to be looked at. The AGO told the BBC it had received several requests to review the sentences given to the pair, who cannot be named due to their the Attorney General and Solicitor General agree the sentence appears unduly lenient, they can ask the Court of Appeal to review the sentence. 'Shocked and appalled' During the hearing on Thursday, prosecutor Harpreet Sandu KC said Mr Kohli was subjected to a "seven-and-a-half minute period of continuing aggression" at the boy racially abused Mr Kohli, attacked him and slapped him in the face with a slider shoe while the girl encouraged the assault and laughed as she filmed it on her attack left Mr Kohli with three broken ribs and other fractures, but Mr Sandhu KC said the fatal injury was to his spinal cord, caused by a spine sentencing, the victim's daughter Susan Kohli said she felt angry and disappointed the punishments did not match the severity of the he had written to the AGO, Bedford said: "I am shocked and appalled at the leniency of these sentences."These two young people will soon be able to move forward with their lives, while the family of Mr Kohli serve a life sentence of pain and grief."The Ministry of Justice has been contacted for comment.

These are Britain's options for tactical nuclear weapons. We must choose, and act
These are Britain's options for tactical nuclear weapons. We must choose, and act

Telegraph

time38 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

These are Britain's options for tactical nuclear weapons. We must choose, and act

As the dust begins to settle on the Strategic Defence Review, Lord Robertson's interview with the Telegraph 's Roland Oliphant answered a number of important issues. However his lordship danced around the critical and pressing issue of re-introducing a tactical nuclear capability to our national deterrent. This is vital against the background of continuous nuclear threats against the UK and Europe from President Putin and the gangsters who advise him. The need to show military strength to Moscow could not be more pressing. The re-introduction of a tactical nuclear capability would impact Putin's decision-making far more than a few hundred tanks or half a dozen capital ships, but it is not quite so straight forward as strapping a nuclear bomb to a jet or on the end of a cruise missile. If the UK sticks with our closest ally, probably still the US, we will most likely purchase some F-35A runway stealth jets to go alongside our existing jumpjet F-35Bs. The Bs have the advantage of being able to operate from our carriers, but their vertical thrust equipment means that they lack range and cannot carry larger weapons in their internal bays. The F-35A is also the only 5th generation stealth jet that is certified to carry nuclear weapons – specifically the American B61-12 nuclear gravity bomb. This can be carried by German jets, will soon be certified on Italian ones, and would most likely be our tactical option also. But this may not be a credible enough option to effectively deter Putin. Though the F-35 is paraded as the stealthiest thing in the sky it is not actually invisible to radar and it might be shot down before it could get above its target to drop its B61-12s. This brings up the need to be able to knock out Russian air defences in order to make our tactical nukes (or other air power) effective. Air defence is nowadays hugely important and has been possibly the defining issue in the Ukraine war. In my day, you became an air defence officer – a 'cloud-puncher' – if no other path was open. Today the air defence officers are the first pick. Air defences, even modern and powerful Russian ones such as the S-400, can be suppressed: we have seen Israel do this against Iran's S-300s before bombing some of Iran's nuclear research establishments this and last year. Recent Ukrainian attacks, most especially the strike last week on the Russian military air base at Bryansk show that Russian AD is not as water-tight as the Kremlin would have us believe. Nonetheless it might be a big ask to get F-35s almost on top of their target in order to deliver a free-falling gravity bomb like the B61-12. The other option possibly available to the UK is to do what the French have done: rather than a free-falling nuke, France has the Air-Sol Moyenne Portée (ASMPA) supersonic cruise missile, which can be released from its carrying jet hundreds of miles from the target. The ASMPA is supersonic, making it harder to knock down than a normal subsonic cruise missile. Our missile making capability is joint with France and Europe anyway, so if we went down this route we could partner with the French, who already know what they're doing in this area. Our existing subsonic Storm Shadow cruise missile is actually French too – the warhead is the only British part. It has been put to good use against Russia in Ukrainian hands, though it appears to need help – either US defence-suppression technology or special forces operations against Russian defence radars – to be fully effective. It could be argued that it is now Monsieur Macron and France who are our closest allies, as President Trump seems to shun us 'pathetic' Europeans. This could be a viable way forward. Even I, a soldier, can recognise that reintroducing a tactical nuclear air delivered capability is not an insignificant task. It is complicated by our current lack of any AWACS radar planes and other specialist defence-suppression equipment. Nonetheless we have been in the nuclear deterrence game almost since the beginning and our Atomic Weapons Establishment can at least furnish us with the key: the actual warhead. We might alternatively make a beginning by developing a home-grown nuclear tip for our stock of US-made, submarine-launched Tomahawk cruise weapons: the Tomahawk was originally developed to deliver nukes, so we know it can do that job. One thing I am sure of is the need. As a former commander of the UK and Nato's chemical and nuclear defence forces, I know the overwhelming impact that tactical nuclear weapons can have on the battlefield, and the huge advantage they give to an aggressor against somebody who does not possess these weapons. We must be ready to deal with the Russian bear. Putin will not be deterred by 12 more submarines in the ocean in the next decade, and Dad's Army covering the White Cliffs perhaps sooner – useful and vital as these things will be. As Uncle Sam backs away from the fight, the prospect of the UK joining France in fielding a tactical capability which could cripple a Russian army in the field would likely get Putin talking peace quicker than most other threats. For 80 years there has been nuclear equilibrium in Europe, but this has become unbalanced. It is the major metric in Putin's decision making, psychologically if not physically. It isn't very important which tactical nuclear option we choose – F-35A, a French style standoff weapon, or Tomahawk. What is important is that we choose at least one and get it into service.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store