logo
EXCLUSIVE The villages on the doorstep of Britain's new 'super prisons': Fuming locals warn house prices will plunge because of new 1,700-inmate jails built to solve overcrowding crisis

EXCLUSIVE The villages on the doorstep of Britain's new 'super prisons': Fuming locals warn house prices will plunge because of new 1,700-inmate jails built to solve overcrowding crisis

Daily Mail​20-05-2025

Villagers near two planned 'super prisons' complain the developments are being 'railroaded' through by the government and are making it hard to sell their homes.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood is spending £4.7billion to build a total of three new jails near existing ones in a bid to create 14,000 new places by 2031.
One of the planned prisons is on green belt land north of HMP Wymott and HMP Garth in Chorley, Lancashire - where residents say drug-carrying drones already blight daily life.
At another site, HMP Gartree in Leicestershire, builders hope to start the main construction phase later this year - after the previous secretary of state, Michael Gove, overruled local planners.
While officials promise the new jail will create 600 jobs and inject millions into the local economy, residents complain it has been 'shoehorned' into 'scenic' countryside.
Margaret Coy, 73, had long ridden her horse on the land when it was just a quiet bridleway flanked by green fields, but is now unable to access it after diggers began preparatory works.
She told MailOnline: 'I think it's a waste of nice scenery to be honest. It's obviously been pushed through, so we haven't really got a say in it.
'They should be thinking of the normal people who use this land. We can't do that now because there are diggers there, which makes me very sad.'
Jo, a 49-year-old district councillor, bought her house ten-years-ago due to its countryside views.
'Initially I was a member of the Gartree action group and we fought against the new prison, then obviously it went to appeal and Gove overruled it,' she said.
'I feel like we've just been railroaded over here, that's the only way to describe it. There used to be sheep all over and now we wake up to diggers.
'That is all owned by the MoJ and they rented it to farmers. I bought this house five years ago because it was next to all the fields and such a peaceful place to be.
'Now it's all diggers, it's horrendous. They're 8am until 6pm, Monday to Friday. I had to fight to stop them doing Saturday mornings.
'If that goes through and they start to, my life will be hell.'
The existing HMP Gartree can hold 700 men, but the new site will house 1,700.
'We're going to have over 2,000 prisoners on our doorstep - more than three times the amount at the moment,' Jo continued.
'My other fear is if they change it to a category C. I think it would be worse because you don't get much hassle with a category B.
'But I've heard that category C can get really bad outside, with people waiting for them and trying to get drugs in.
'The MoJ aren't the greatest neighbours. All these prison officers turned up at 4.30am the other morning and were talking loudly. They woke everyone up.
'It splits the street as some people work there and the rest just live here.'
Jane Huxley, a 71-year-old who lives in nearby Foxton, said the scale of the new jail would cause problems.
'It's not that there's a problem with having a prison in the neighbourhood - we'd have one for years - but this is huge and I have no idea how they're going to staff it,' she said.
'It's going to cause traffic problems too.'
Diana Cook, 76 - a parish councillor in the village of Lubenham - said: 'If we really need the prisons, I appreciate they have got to go somewhere. But we told them this was the wrong place.
'It did not have sufficient access for building and operation.'
Reece Richards, 42, who lives locally, raised concerns about the impact on property prices, claiming that people were struggling to sell their houses.
'No one wants a new prison. We've already got one - we don't need another,' he said.
The pattern of government ministers overruling planners was repeated in Chorley, Lancashire, which is set to host a new 1,700-capacity prison alongside the existing HMP Wymott and HMP Garth.
A previous refusal by the planning inspectorate was recently overturned by housing minister Angela Rayner.
Myra McHugh, 82, is a keen bowler at Wymott Bowling Club - which will be knocked down and replaced with the new prison's entrance.
She said: 'The main thing that really aggrieves me is it's gone to appeal several times, it's now on its final appeal I believe.
'On several of those appeals, we have been backed - we have had specialist surveyors down and they say the roads are not fit for all the traffic.
'Angela Rayner, after the last appeal when all the specialists had said ''no, the roads aren't fit'', she just went ''oh it'll be alright''.
'She's never been near the place, she doesn't know it. But she thinks it's going to be fine when all the experts say it's not.
'That's my main grievance because we've been fighting this for probably nearly three years now.'
Local horse riders and dog walkers were upset about the loss of green space - with trees and greenery set to be ripped up as part of the plans.
Dave Williams, 64, was tired and fed up with the planning process.
Having lived on Wray Crescent for 20 years, he said: 'They've not considered locals whatsoever, no consideration.
'It's going to destroy part of the green belt, there's a multitude of not just the fauna, like animals and birds that use that land, cyclists, walkers.
'Through the Covid period I'd never seen so many people walking and cycling around here, never.
'It's going to take five years to construct, there are going to be larger than 40-tonners, 200 a day - one every 90 seconds.'
He added: 'When you look around and see what the infrastructure is - they're talking about a prison where prisoners can actually be rehabilitated and get back into society.
'Look at what we've got around here, there's no trains, there's an hourly bus service into Chorley and Preston - so how are the prisoners going to get around?'
Late last year, HMP Garth, an open prison, was described as 'like an airport' by prison inspector Charlie Taylor due to the volume of drugs being flown in by drone.
One couple who live near the prison site, who asked not to be named, said people in the area were selling up to try to get away.
Now, they say, they're stuck as they face a loss in value if they try to sell up.
The mother-of-two, who has lived in the area for four years, said: 'It's very rural, and now I don't even know what we're going to have, but I've heard it's going to be three or four storeys.
'There's a lot of issues, my partner was working nights the other day, it was after nine and there were fireworks going off.
'It was like they'd set them off in our garden, they do that as a distraction, there's loud bangs, the dog's going mad.
'The speeding cars that speed around to the other side of the prison and set more off over there so they can send drones in a different way. It's for drug and phone drops.'
Another horse rider in her late 50s, who asked not to be named, said she thought the death penalty should be brought back in to keep the prison population down.
Parish councillor John Dalton, 61, said: 'I moved here 19 years ago, I knew the prisons were here, all the residents knew the prisons were here.
'We have no objection to living in this area with two prisons very close by, obviously the prisons are in an enclosed area, so we don't have a problem.
'This is one of the safest areas in Lancashire to live. You can leave your cars open, you can leave your front doors open - there's not a problem with there being two prisons here.
'The major problem with the third prison is the entrance to the prison.
'As anybody is aware of the area, it's very congested, very narrow - those are the major concerns of the residents, there's no concern over a new prison, it's the siting of the entrance to the prison.'
The third prison will be located near HMP Grendon in the village of Grendon Underwood, Buckinghamshire.
At a press conference last week, Shabana Mahmood said Britain could not simply 'build its way' out of the prison capacity crisis, as she revealed new rules aimed at freeing up space.
This includes a standard 28-day 'recall' period for released prisoners who are locked up again for breaking the rules – even those who commit new offences.
The Justice Secretary told a press conference last week that said Britain's prison capacity would not be solved only by building new jails
Currently, freed inmates can be kept behind bars for the rest of their sentence if they are recalled.
The new policy will free up 1,400 spaces in prisons amid the overcrowding crisis. Officials said if no action was taken, they would run out of space by November.
But Ms Mahmood was accused of presiding over a 'recipe for the breakdown of law and order', while victims' groups voiced alarm at the move.
Ms Mahmood repeated doom-laden warnings she first deployed last summer when she introduced a scheme allowing most inmates to be freed after serving just 40 per cent of their sentences, and which led to lags popping champagne corks outside prison gates.
She said: 'The consequences of failing to act are unthinkable. If our prisons overflow, courts cancel trials, police halt their arrests, crime goes unpunished and we reach a total breakdown of law and order.'
There were 13,600 recalled prisoners behind bars in March. About a fifth are sent back to jail because they have committed fresh crimes. Ms Mahmood said the 28-day recall period will apply to criminals serving sentences of between one and four years.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer doubles down on Israeli ministers' sanctions despite being slammed by US
Keir Starmer doubles down on Israeli ministers' sanctions despite being slammed by US

The Sun

time30 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Keir Starmer doubles down on Israeli ministers' sanctions despite being slammed by US

SIR Keir Starmer yesterday doubled down on sanctioning Israeli ministers, despite being savagely rapped by the US. Donald Trump 's administration hit out at Britain after the PM broke with tradition and imposed a travel ban and asset freeze on two far-right members of Israel's government, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. 4 4 4 In a scathing attack on the move, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the sanctions 'do not advance American efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war'. Mr Rubio warned Britain 'not to forget who the real enemy is'. The US ambassador to the UK said he 'fully supported' Mr Rubio's slap down and warned the PM against 'impeding constructive dialogue'. Ben-Gvir, who is pushing to annex the West Bank and wants to permanently expel Palestinians from Gaza, said: 'The American administration is a moral compass in the face of the confusion of some Western countries that choose to appease terrorist organizations like Hamas. 'Israel is not afraid — we will continue to fight terrorism. 'History will judge the Chamberlains of our time.' At PMQs Sir Keir defended the sanctions as a bid to 'uphold human rights and defend the prospect of a two-state solution'. The PM said: "Acting alongside our allies, we have sanctioned individuals responsible for inciting appalling settler violence and expansion. "We will continue to support all efforts to secure a ceasefire, the release of all hostages despicably held by Hamas and the humanitarian aid that needs to surge in. Greta Thunberg's Gaza 'Freedom Flotilla' boarded & seized by Israeli forces 4

Experts cast doubt on Reeves' plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through ‘technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax
Experts cast doubt on Reeves' plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through ‘technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax

Daily Mail​

time35 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Experts cast doubt on Reeves' plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through ‘technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax

Experts have cast doubt on the Chancellor's plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through 'technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax. The Treasury said it planned to make more use of artificial intelligence, reforming the workforce – including through job cuts – and selling off its London property portfolio. The plans are forecast to save £13.8 billion a year by 2028/29 – including £9 billion a year from the health and social care budget alone. At the same time, a drive to recover more owed taxes is predicted to deliver a £7.5 billion annual gain by 2029/30. And government department administration costs will be culled by 11 per cent by the time of the next election, the Treasury projects – with another huge cut pencilled in for 2026 which will take the savings to 16 per cent, or £2.2 billion. Raoul Ruparel, a former Downing Street adviser to Theresa May, said the latter were 'pretty brutal real-terms cuts across the board'. 'Traditionally, these sorts of cuts are very hard to deliver,' said Mr Ruparel, who is director of the Boston Consulting Group Centre for Growth. The plans for efficiency savings rely heavily on making the National Health Service more productive – that is, doing more with less. They assume annual productivity growth of 2 per cent a year in the NHS, which the Treasury admits would mark a 'substantial increase' on improvements achieved in past years. The productivity plan 'will deliver efficiencies across all healthcare services, primarily through the combined impact of operational and clinical improvements, technology and digital transformation and workforce initiatives', the Treasury said. They will include reducing the use of agency staff and levels of sickness absence. The Government also plans to relocate more civil servants out of London, cutting the number by 12,000 by 2030. But at the same time, its ambition to bring in more unpaid taxes will involve hiring more people – with 5,500 compliance and 2,400 debt management staff expected to be brought in. The closure of 11 central London offices will save £94 million a year by 2032 and the disposal of properties no longer needed will bring in £1 billion, the Government said. Julian Jessop, economics fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs think-tank, said: 'There is huge scope to boost productivity and make efficiency savings in the public sector. 'It is much less obvious that this Government will be the one to do it.' Also among the expected savings is the claim that the Ministry of Housing will use AI to speed up routine tasks such as checking errors and note taking. 'This will reduce demands on staff time by an estimated 500,000 hours per year,' the Treasury said. Ms Reeves also announced that she will tear up Treasury rules designed to safeguard value for money in order to pour money into infrastructure projects in the Midlands and the North, where Labour is under threat from Reform. Regional mayors have railed for years at the Treasury's so-called 'Green Book' rules which direct investment to areas where it will produce the most economic benefit. Under the new system, the Treasury will limit the use of 'benefit-cost reviews' which have been blamed for halting investment in the North. The new proposals will mean that even projects where the costs outweigh the benefits may not 'automatically constitute poor value for money'.

Equality Act blamed for surge in failed race discrimination cases
Equality Act blamed for surge in failed race discrimination cases

Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Times

Equality Act blamed for surge in failed race discrimination cases

Equality laws are causing unsuccessful racial discrimination lawsuits to 'skyrocket', and more claims are made by NHS employees than those from any other organisation, according to a report. Between 2017 and last year the number of employment tribunals that included a claim of discrimination based on the defined characteristic of 'race' in the Equality Act 2010 almost tripled, from 285 to 829, research by the campaign group Don't Divide Us has found. In total, there were 5,523 cases over this period. Despite the rise in workplace discrimination cases, the levels of success have remained more or less unchanged since 2017, the report says. Only 281 claims were upheld in employment courts from 2017 to 2024, 5 per cent of those made. The group said the NHS was involved in more discrimination cases than any other employer, with 488 claims made in the period — of which 19, or 4 per cent, were upheld. Don't Divide Us believes in 'colour-blind anti-racism' and campaigns against 'divisive' political ideas such as critical race theory being imported from America. The findings have been published as part of a wider report on equality laws by the organisation entitled 'The Equality Act Isn't Working: Equalities Legislation and the Breakdown of Informal Civility in the Workplace'. It argues that rather than making society more equal and tackling discrimination, the Equality Act has contributed to a grievance culture in which people resort to legal action to resolve 'petty disputes and imagined slights'. The report says the remit of equality law has come under increasing pressure from lobby groups seeking to 'promote their role in the race-relations sector'. This trend has been exacerbated by the rise of identity politics and the increased politicisation of culture, it adds. Anna Loutfi, one of the report's authors and a barrister specialising in employment, equalities and human rights law, said it was time for the government to review the Equality Act and potentially repeal it. She said: 'The question is: Do we need the law to be based on protected characteristics? The reality of the workplace is that it is not neatly categorisable into people who 'share' protected characteristics and people who don't, though equality law demands that we think that way. 'Equality law is increasingly becoming divorced from reality, as employees rely on protected characteristics to argue poor treatment, rather than relying on the honest facts of their situation. Many litigants may try to rewrite the facts of their case to 'fit' a narrative of discrimination based on race, sex, disability etc. A cross word between two employees of different ethnic backgrounds can be transformed into racial harassment after the fact. 'The inadvertent effect of the Equality Act is to make the workplace environment more toxic, especially when it comes to issues such as race, between people who would have rubbed along fine before becoming aware of their respective 'protected characteristics'. 'Overall, protected characteristics in law are not adding to social cohesion; rather, they are inflating numbers of discrimination cases so society appears more and more discriminatory with every passing year, in spite of ever more diversity and inclusion initiatives — that surely can't be right.' Under the Equality Act, it is against the law to discriminate against someone based on nine protected characteristics. These include age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation. • Loutfi pointed to a recent case in April of a black female employee suing her boss for racism because it had been suggested she had been 'smoking something', which, she said, epitomised the way such protected characteristics were being 'weaponised' in the workplace. In the dispute, Gemma Spencer sued her employers for race discrimination when a company director, Mark Kelly, asked her line manager if she had been 'smoking something' after a perceived error. Spencer, an administration worker, told a panel that she had had her hair in braids when Kelly made the remark. After she accused him of racism, Kelly said he in 'no way meant to make some remark about her being a Rastafarian'. His assertion was rejected by the judge, who said the comment was 'unwanted conduct' that 'violated the dignity' of Spencer, who was awarded £35,109 in compensation. Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, director of Don't Divide Us, said: 'The Equality Act has achieved the exact opposite of its stated aim, making the UK a less tolerant and less equal place. It provides the legal scaffolding that supports this surge in workplace discrimination claims, the overwhelming majority of which have been found groundless. 'Instead of bringing greater fairness, equality, and harmony, the [Equality Act] has been a major vector for curtailing the fundamental freedoms for citizens to speak their mind, and to appear before the law as equal.' • Calling female staff 'lads' could be sex harassment, judge says The Equality and Human Rights Commission said: 'We have a statutory duty to monitor and advise on the effectiveness of our equality laws. While progress has been made towards a fairer country, we know challenges to equality remain and our society has not stood still. 'Increases in litigation may indicate an issue with how the legislation is being interpreted, and we consider all evidence carefully when we advise government and parliamentarians on the effectiveness of the Equality Act. However, a post-legislative review of the Equality Act is a decision for the UK government and parliament.' A government spokesperson said: 'The UK has a longstanding history of tackling all forms of discrimination and harassment. 'We are proud of the Equality Act 2010 and the rights and protections it affords individuals of all backgrounds, and will continue to uphold its provisions.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store