logo
Bipartisan bill would ban Ohio police from using arrest, ticket quotas

Bipartisan bill would ban Ohio police from using arrest, ticket quotas

Yahoo07-03-2025

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Law enforcement agencies in Ohio would be banned from requiring officers to meet arrest and ticket quotas under a bipartisan Statehouse bill.
State Rep. Bride Rose Sweeney (D-Westlake) reintroduced the legislation last week in the Ohio House as House Bill 131 alongside Rep. Kevin Miller (R-Newark), a former State Highway Patrol officer of 20 years. The bill, which defines a quota as a certain number of arrests made or citations issued for any offense that a police officer must meet in a time period, aims to enhance public safety.
U.S. Supreme Court likely to side with Ohio woman's reverse discrimination claim
'Law enforcement officers' primary job is to protect and serve our community — they can't do that if they are expected to meet arbitrary quotas that don't reflect the safety needs of the community,' said Sweeney, who also introduced the measure last General Assembly. 'We want our law enforcement officers to be evaluated based upon the quality of their police work, not the quantity of tickets they can write.'
Similar legislation banning quotas has been enacted in 25 other states, including Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, South Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, the pair said. They also touted support from the Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Association (OPBA) and the Fraternal Order of Police.
George Sakellakis, OPBA director of organization, argued that when agencies arbitrarily dictate a certain number of arrests or citations that an officer must issue to keep their job, the trust between the public and law enforcement, as well as the very nature of constitutional policing, is needlessly tested.
'Ohioans must be assured that any citation or arrest is valid, legitimate, and necessary. Police officers, sheriff's deputies and troopers are true professionals who risk their lives to serve our communities, not revenue generators,' said Sakellakis. 'They got into this business to protect our neighborhoods, not occupy them. We are thankful that the legislature is tackling this important issue.'
Franklin County court restricts immigration enforcement to protect due process
State Senator Tom Patton (R-Strongsville) also supports the legislation, and has introduced a sister bill in the Ohio Senate, Senate Bill 114. The measure would also prohibit law enforcement from requiring officers to meet quotas, and ban agencies from offering a financial reward or other benefits for meeting quotas.
'Law enforcement officers already have the difficult task of keeping us all safe, and should not be saddled with the additional and unreasonable burden of generating revenue for the bureaucracies they serve,' said Patton. 'Quotas make officers' jobs even harder by undermining public trust in law enforcement. Filling quotas also encourage unnecessary encounters between the public and officers, further hindering our primary goal of maintaining public safety.'
H.B. 131 has been referred to the House Public Safety Committee for further consideration and awaits sponsor testimony. S.B. 114 has been assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee and is scheduled for sponsor testimony on Wednesday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Voter rights groups say Ohio GOP voting overhaul threatens the state's citizen initiative process
Voter rights groups say Ohio GOP voting overhaul threatens the state's citizen initiative process

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Voter rights groups say Ohio GOP voting overhaul threatens the state's citizen initiative process

Field staffers for the Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol deliver boxes containing petitions with 222,198 signatures to Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, July 5, 2023, at the loading dock of the Office of the Ohio Secretary of State, 180 E Broad St in Columbus, Ohio. (Photo by Graham Stokes for Ohio Capital Journal. Republish photo only with original article.) A coalition of government watchdog groups are warning state legislation could hobble Ohio's initiative process. Direct democracy has been available to Ohioans since 1912, and citizen-led groups can organize initiated statutes or constitutional amendments. The proposals would create strict new paperwork requirements and add other administrative hurdles like requiring many circulators wear a badge identifying themselves as 'paid' even if they're given something as small as a pen for signature collection. Above and beyond changes to the initiative process, the bills would also eliminate ballot drop boxes and require all voters to show proof of citizenship to cast a ballot. 'Bottom line, this is attack on direct democracy,' Jen Miller from Ohio's League of Women Voters argued. 'This is an attack on local control. It's an attempt to bully, intimidate, harass, and possibly prosecute people just because they want to take part in democracy,' Common Cause Ohio Executive Director Catherine Turcer praised the people who grab clipboards and collect signatures to put proposals on the ballot. 'This extreme legislation is an attempt to bully, intimidate, and hassle these front-line heroes,' she argued. The paperwork involved in signature gathering is already complex and time consuming. She explained circulators have to fill out a standard form — name, address, employer, etc. — when they turn in petitions. But the new bills would ratchet up the stakes of that relatively banal procedure. Right now, if the circulator messes something up, they can cross it out and write their initials. Opponents warn of harm to eligible voters if Ohio lawmakers require citizenship documents 'And it is accepted as a change that was legally made,' Turcer explained. 'House bill 233, and Senate bill 153, would make it so that any error here, anything that you made a mistake on, it would mean that the entire booklet would be invalid. And just, I can't imagine the number of signatures that would just get tossed out.' She added that provisions requiring circulators to wear a badge identifying themselves as 'paid' if they accept 'anything of value,' sets an unrealistic standard. 'If I were to give a clipboard and a pen to a volunteer, and a t-shirt that says the name of the campaign,' she explained, 'anything of value would then mean that a circulator would have to get a badge.' That's more paperwork, she said, and thus more chances for something to go wrong. Turcer also criticized a provision requiring an individual to be registered to vote prior to signing a petition, rather than by the time the petition gets filed with election officials. 'One of the things that we often do is check registration before we before people sign,' Turcer explained, 'so that we can get somebody registered as we're doing a ballot measure.' Taking that opportunity away doesn't just reduce their signature count, Turcer argued, 'it also stops that opportunity for a voter-to-voter conversation about, well, this is why you should get registered. These are the things that are coming up on the upcoming ballot.' Ohio Unity Coalition Executive Director Petee Talley drew a straight line from 2023's Issue 1 defeat, which rejected a GOP-led effort to make it harder to amend the state constitution, and the current slate of legislation. She argued the latest bills are 'retribution' for that defeat. Talley took particular offense at the provision requiring signature gatherers wear a badge if they're compensated. 'If I wanted to give a can of cold pop and a slice of pizza to someone and maybe even a t-shirt that (Turcer) alluded to, suddenly they're going to have to add wearing a badge to all of that stuff?' she asked. 'It's nothing but intimidation. It's nothing but bullying,' she argued. 'It's voter harassment, and this is an attack on our voice and our rights, and we're not going to stand for it.' Miller walked through the follow-on consequences of requiring paid circulator badges. Some voters will mistakenly think volunteers who got a slice of pizza are actually getting a paycheck, she said. 'We should expect opposition trackers attempting to catch circulators without their badges,' she added. 'And with the increase in uncivil and polarized rhetoric in political venues, this could result in intimidation or even violence against circulators or voters signing those petitions.' What's more, Miller said, 'boards of elections would have to become badge police.' It's a task they don't have the money, manpower or expertise to carry out, she argued. The requirement voters be registered before signing a petition? Miller said that might be a problem, too. 'We don't even know if boards of elections have the technical capacity right now to verify that a voter registration was valid on the date that the voter signed,' she said. One reason that might not have come up is that, so far, county boards haven't been able to weigh in. The bill's first and second hearing happened during the early voting period for this May's primary election. The third hearing landed on the day boards had to certify the election. Asked whether she thought that was intentional, Miller said, 'I don't think it matters. It's shameful, either way. There is no more important constituent when it comes to democracy bills than the boards of elections.' Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

National, Ohio Republican budgets prioritize corporate welfare and donor handouts over Ohio families
National, Ohio Republican budgets prioritize corporate welfare and donor handouts over Ohio families

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

National, Ohio Republican budgets prioritize corporate welfare and donor handouts over Ohio families

The Ohio Statehouse. (Photo by David DeWitt, Ohio Capital Journal.) Budget bills being shepherded through Congress and the Ohio Statehouse by Republican majorities are a reflection of priorities. Not mine and maybe not yours, but they are an explicit manifesto of the 'values' most prized by the controlling party. The federal budget bill and the one being hammered out in Ohio both put a premium on corporate welfare, as opposed to social safety nets, and the continued prosperity of fat cats who write big campaign checks, as opposed to everyone else. Federal lawmakers — more fearful of upsetting their Dear Leader than screwing their constituents out of healthcare and food aid — are doubling-down to enact a $2.4 trillion-dollar operating budget with unpaid tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the ultra-wealthy and corporations while millions go hungry and lose medical insurance. Besides the moral depravity of kicking the working-class poor to the curb to reward multi-millionaires and billionaires with lavish tax breaks, this deficit-ballooning monstrosity is predicted to explode the national debt to more than $50 trillion within ten years. The so-called deficit hawks who howl about paid-for spending budgets that increase revenue, reduce federal deficits, and reverse the unsustainable trajectory of today's roughly $29 trillion in public debt, will ram through the Trump's country club giveaway to the rich. They will vote for what the felon-in-chief (corruptly enriching himself on an epic scale) values above all else — money and power — while bankrupting the country, leaving 11 million Americans uninsured, and forcing countless families to ration meals. Trump supporters will lose what keeps them afloat, but what matters to the congressional invertebrates who represent them is only what matters to their amoral god king. They will spurn the many who struggle to survive to indulge the few who luxuriate in multiple homes and on super yachts. While sparse food banks turn away seniors on the edge of poverty and mothers desperate to stave off their children's hunger, the richest Americans will walk away richer, thanks to one party that prioritizes the interests of zillionaires and modern-day robber barons to maintain political dominance. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Ohio Republicans are using the same playbook as their federal counterparts to hand the wealthiest Ohioans a billion-dollar handout by lowering the state income tax on those making six figures plus with a single flat rate for everybody. But less than 3% of this tax cut would go to the bottom 80% of working Ohioans, according to Policy Matters Ohio. A tax expert with the nonpartisan research group testified that the other 97% 'goes to Ohioans in the top 20% of earners, making at least $139,000' while the top 1% alone (with an average income of over $1.7 million) rakes in 40% of the tax cut benefits. So much for equity in a regressive tax code proposal that eliminates graduated brackets for the gated community to pay a higher share of its considerable income. Who cares if Ohio's general revenue fund takes a 1.1 billion hit in lost revenue as a result? State lawmakers' rational for their fiscally irresponsible tax cuts to the mega-rich is identical to the one congressional Republicans offer for the bulk of their tax cuts going to the richest households and greediest corporations. It's the old, punctured 'trickle-down theory' that pretends fat cats with fatter wallets ignite economic growth. Proof to the contrary is abundant. So is evidence that subsidizing billionaire owners of sports teams with public money to build multi-billion-dollar stadiums is a bad bet for taxpayers. But that hasn't stopped leading Republicans in the Ohio Senate and Ohio House from bending over backward to accommodate Jimmy and Dee Haslams' ask for $600 million to take the Browns out of a perfectly good stadium on the lakefront and plop a new one into a working-class suburb right next to Cleveland Hopkins International Airport. The pols bow to the Haslams as deep-pocketed Republican donors and are committed to finding some way to finance the couple's private interests with public funds. But the party that engineered gerrymandered supermajorities in the legislature and exerts absolute rule in Ohio insists the state can't find any extra money for food banks (reeling from deep funding cuts under the Trump regime) and has unified around slashing food bank funding by nearly 25% despite rising demand across Ohio. Republicans also argue that fully funding public education in the state — under a bipartisan spending formula that came closest to meeting long ignored constitutional obligations — is not sustainable under a tight budget. But swelling state investments in a voucher boondoggle predicted to cost $1.25 billion by 2027, according to the Columbus Dispatch, to offset tuition costs for affluent families who can afford the private schools their darlings already attend is sustainable?? Statehouse Republicans blame budget constraints for cutbacks on opioid recovery programs, public libraries, public transit, safe drinking water initiatives, continued Medicaid coverage for kids up to age 3, and even no-cost breakfast and lunch for all Ohio students. They punted on property tax relief with clawbacks from fiscally responsible school districts yet managed to remove all elected members of the state education board in the Ohio House budget bill. But cash for brand new stadiums, a billion-dollar tax cut for the wealthy, and an open government spigot for expanded private school vouchers? Those are GOP priorities that value money and power above all else.

PA House passes bill requiring American-made steel in tax-payer funded projects
PA House passes bill requiring American-made steel in tax-payer funded projects

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

PA House passes bill requiring American-made steel in tax-payer funded projects

HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — The Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed a bill Monday requiring American-made steel for all tax-payer funded projects. State law already requires government projects to use American-made steel. However, H.B. 1018 would extend this requirement to private entities receiving public funds or tax incentives. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'This is one way to bring back good-paying, family-sustaining jobs – by leveling the playing field for hardworking people and industries that were economically steamrolled by unfair competition,' said Rep. Frank Burns (D-Cambria), who sponsored the bill. The bill, which is a part of Burns' larger 'American Made Jobs Plan,' passed the House 200-2. It will now move to the Senate for concurrence. Mexican aluminum, steel exporters say sales in US down 63% due to tariffs The bill comes as tariffs have driven down the demand for foreign-made steel. In February, President Donald Trump ordered a 25% tariff on Mexican and Canadian steel and aluminum imports. Exporters of Mexican steel and aluminum said that has led to a 63% drop in sales to the United States. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store