Glasgow restaurants shortlisted for Uber Eats award
The Glasgow nominees include YAYAS, Non Viet, Okome, Porto Piri Piri, Piatto, Shawarma King, and Hook'd.
Read more:
Watch classy Daizen Maeda moment as he trains with former club
Matthew Price, general manager of Uber Eats UK, Ireland and Northern Europe, said: "The Restaurant of the Year Awards are not just celebrating restaurants, we're investing in the future of food.
"The new Next Gen Trailblazer Award is a bold step in backing the young innovators who are rewriting the rules of hospitality."
Now in its fourth year, the competition recognises the impact of small and independently run restaurants on their communities and the wider food industry.
The top prize is a £100,000 investment to help the winning restaurant grow, while all finalists will receive £5,000 and a tailored support package from Uber Eats.
The judging panel includes figures from the world of food, including entrepreneur and musician Levi Roots, Irish celebrity chef and TV presenter Clodagh McKenna, and last year's winner Natty Crutchfield.
Mr Crutchfield, whose restaurant Natty's Jerk in Portsmouth took home the top honour in 2024, said: "Winning Restaurant of the Year was life-changing.
"We've grown faster than we ever imagined, and we're proud to be part of a community that supports independent businesses."
A new category introduced for 2025 is the Next Gen Trailblazer Award, which will recognise hospitality entrepreneurs under 27.
The winner will receive a £10,000 business development grant and development support, with the category judged by content creator and cookbook author Seema Pankhania.
Uber Eats is encouraging the public to support their favourite eateries by nominating them at ubereatsawards.com.
The 2025 awards ceremony will take place in London at Here @ Outernet, bringing together regional winners, industry leaders, media, and special guests to celebrate the best of independent dining.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
24 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Irish leaders welcome clarity on EU-US trade deal and pharma tariffs cap of 15%
Taoiseach Micheal Martin said the trade agreement represented a 'significant win' for the EU while Tanaiste Simon Harris said it offered an 'important shield' for Irish exporters. The EU struck a trade deal with the US on July 27, five days before Mr Trump said a 30% tariff would kick in for the bloc. The deal sees 15% tariffs on most EU goods including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US. There are 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircrafts and aircraft parts, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars over three years. In the aftermath of the deal, it was not clear whether 15% would remain the rate for the pharma sector or be increased. The EU-US statement published on Thursday said that as of September 1, the US will apply a maximum tariff rate of 15% on generic pharmaceuticals, their ingredients and chemical precursors. 'The United States intends to promptly ensure that the tariff rate, comprised of the MFN (Most Favored Nation) tariff and the tariff imposed pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, applied to originating goods of the European Union subject to Section 232 actions on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber does not exceed 15%.' Mr Harris, Ireland's deputy premier and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, welcomed the assurances for the pharmaceutical and semiconductor sectors. 'We welcome clarity that the deal includes a single, all-inclusive 15% tariff on EU goods,' Mr Harris said. 'We also now have assurance that this rate will extend to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. 'This provides an important shield to Irish exporters that could have been subject to much larger tariffs pending the outcomes of Section 232 US investigations into these sectors.' Mr Harris said this offered a 'first step' to a more 'comprehensive and formal agreement with the US in the future'. 'Our intention now is to see what other carve outs can be made in areas of interest for Irish exporters.' Irish premier Micheal Martin said the statement brought 'greater clarity and certainty' to what the EU-US agreement would mean in practice. 'This is especially important for enterprises that either import from or export to the US,' he said. 'Given the scale of the pharmaceutical and semiconductor sectors in Ireland, it is important that the Joint Statement confirms that 15% is a ceiling that will apply to EU exports in these areas in all circumstances, including when the current US Section 232 investigations are concluded. 'While I have been clear all along that I do not support tariffs, this is a significant win for the EU. 'Given the significance of the airline sector to Ireland, a specific carve-out for aircraft and aircraft parts is also welcome. 'There are areas where further work remains to be done, including a potential carve-out for med-tech products and spirits. 'I hope this will be advanced as quickly as possible. We will continue to advocate for these sectors given their significant importance to our domestic economy.' Paul Sweetman, chief executive of the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland, welcomed the joint statement as providing 'greater clarity to business on the future of the transatlantic trading partnership, worth over four billion dollars daily'. 'The framework brings more certainty and allows for further work to grow our mutually beneficial economic relationship,' he said. 'In supporting the US-Ireland and US-EU trading relationships into the future, we must also focus on enhancing competitiveness. 'Now is the time to make smart policy and investment decisions to deliver critical infrastructure projects, meet future skills needs, bolster our RD&I ecosystem, and secure Ireland's position as a digital regulatory hub. 'AmCham will continue to work closely with the Irish Government, the US administration and our EU and US partners in growing investment on both sides of the Atlantic.'
Powys County Times
24 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Irish leaders welcome clarity on EU-US trade deal and pharma tariffs cap of 15%
Ireland's premier and deputy premier have welcomed clarity on the EU-US trade deal, which sees the US commit to capping tariffs on pharma goods at 15%. Taoiseach Micheal Martin said the trade agreement represented a 'significant win' for the EU while Tanaiste Simon Harris said it offered an 'important shield' for Irish exporters. The EU struck a trade deal with the US on July 27, five days before Mr Trump said a 30% tariff would kick in for the bloc. The deal sees 15% tariffs on most EU goods including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US. There are 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircrafts and aircraft parts, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars over three years. In the aftermath of the deal, it was not clear whether 15% would remain the rate for the pharma sector or be increased. The EU-US statement published on Thursday said that as of September 1, the US will apply a maximum tariff rate of 15% on generic pharmaceuticals, their ingredients and chemical precursors. 'The United States intends to promptly ensure that the tariff rate, comprised of the MFN (Most Favored Nation) tariff and the tariff imposed pursuant to Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, applied to originating goods of the European Union subject to Section 232 actions on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and lumber does not exceed 15%.' Mr Harris, Ireland's deputy premier and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, welcomed the assurances for the pharmaceutical and semiconductor sectors. 'We welcome clarity that the deal includes a single, all-inclusive 15% tariff on EU goods,' Mr Harris said. 'We also now have assurance that this rate will extend to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. 'This provides an important shield to Irish exporters that could have been subject to much larger tariffs pending the outcomes of Section 232 US investigations into these sectors.' Mr Harris said this offered a 'first step' to a more 'comprehensive and formal agreement with the US in the future'. 'Our intention now is to see what other carve outs can be made in areas of interest for Irish exporters.' Irish premier Micheal Martin said the statement brought 'greater clarity and certainty' to what the EU-US agreement would mean in practice. 'This is especially important for enterprises that either import from or export to the US,' he said. 'Given the scale of the pharmaceutical and semiconductor sectors in Ireland, it is important that the Joint Statement confirms that 15% is a ceiling that will apply to EU exports in these areas in all circumstances, including when the current US Section 232 investigations are concluded. 'While I have been clear all along that I do not support tariffs, this is a significant win for the EU. 'Given the significance of the airline sector to Ireland, a specific carve-out for aircraft and aircraft parts is also welcome. 'There are areas where further work remains to be done, including a potential carve-out for med-tech products and spirits. 'I hope this will be advanced as quickly as possible. We will continue to advocate for these sectors given their significant importance to our domestic economy.' Paul Sweetman, chief executive of the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland, welcomed the joint statement as providing 'greater clarity to business on the future of the transatlantic trading partnership, worth over four billion dollars daily'. 'The framework brings more certainty and allows for further work to grow our mutually beneficial economic relationship,' he said. 'In supporting the US-Ireland and US-EU trading relationships into the future, we must also focus on enhancing competitiveness. 'Now is the time to make smart policy and investment decisions to deliver critical infrastructure projects, meet future skills needs, bolster our RD&I ecosystem, and secure Ireland's position as a digital regulatory hub. 'AmCham will continue to work closely with the Irish Government, the US administration and our EU and US partners in growing investment on both sides of the Atlantic.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
It's Brendan v The Board, Part 2... another summer of transfer discontent has left an unhappy manager and Celtic walking a £40m Champions League tightrope
By the time the 100th minute of a desperate struggle against Kairat had come and gone, it had become impossible to ascertain what Celtic 's plan was. Liam Scales, nominally a centre-half, was playing at left back. Daizen Maeda no longer seemed sure if his role was through the middle or out on the flank. Shin Yamada, a striker who'd replaced a midfielder in Benjamin Nygren, was everywhere the ball had just been. A bench which began with £6million Auston Trusty and £11m Arne Engels seated on it had been accommodating £9m Adam Idah since half-time with James Forrest giving the Irishman company once his 34-year-old legs could give no more. With a bang average visiting team comfortably defending their box on the rare occasion a dismal Celtic side ventured anywhere near it, there was an air of resignation among the home support long before the Norwegian referee mercifully blew for time. If ever a display mirrored a club's off-field preparation for a match then this was it: The most pitiful transfer window in recent memory manifest in a woefully inadequate show. While Brendan Rodgers ' players still ought to have acquitted themselves far better than they did, it was telling that the fingers of blame were angrily pointed in the direction of chief executive Michael Nicholson and chairman Peter Lawwell. Frankly, the level of rancour in the stadium suggested it's going to take more than an unlikely triumph in Kazakhstan on Tuesday to stop the disconnect between the supporters and the boardroom from deepening. Celtic's hierarchy had known that Scotland's champions would require to negotiate a play-off match since April of last year. They made £40m through direct entry last season. With a modest investment across the past two months, they'd have been all but assured of banking that gargantuan sum again. Instead, a squad with glaring inadequacies must pull this one out of the fire next week. Make no mistake - if they fail, it will be nothing short of a humiliation. Rarely has the old wisdom about what happens when you fail to prepare felt more apt. In the media room afterwards, the manager did his best to answer questions which mostly related to the chants of 'Sack the Board' - the response of thousands present to the lack of backing he's enjoyed from his paymasters to this stage. When pointedly asked if the fans should fans accept how their club's being run, the Northern Irishman played a straight bat. 'Well listen, that's not for me to answer.' In other words, ask those above me. If only we could. This speaks to one of the main issues at Celtic. The complete lack of communication between the boardroom and the rank and file. If the directors did hatch a plan beyond crossing their fingers and toes to get through this tie, then no one has made it known. It's not a good look to be stockpiling money when the team is crying out for reinforcements. Has Nicholson hit the bar with a succession of deals for players with pedigree or has he not even come close? In the unlikely event that he ever agrees to be scrutinised on the matter, it would be interesting to hear. From 20 paces, the picture is inscrutable. At last check, Celtic had £65.4m in the bank - with the promise of more money to come from the back end of last season's commendable run in Europe. Another £10m was piled on top when Kyogo Furuhashi left for Rennes in January. A further £16.5m followed when Nicolas Kuhn joined Como. As well as the regular season ticket money, the pot was further swollen by the sales of Gustaf Lagerbielke and Kwon Hyeok-kyo. All told, that's approximately £100m. More than enough to bolster the squad with plenty left in reserve. But instead of refuelling the vehicle and trying to go one better than their near miss against Bayern Munich, Celtic have put a few drips in the tank. Kieran Tierney returned from Arsenal on big wages but for no transfer fee. The £1.8m spent on Nygren from Nordsjaelland is the biggest outlay so far with Yamada costing £1.5m from Kawasaki Frontale. As well as the outgoing transfers of Furuhashi and Kuhn, the side has lost Jota to a long-term injury. That's an awful lot of pace, ingenuity and goals. The need to compensate for that ahead of Kairat was abundantly clear. Rodgers said it time and time again. They had the funds, yet they failed to deliver. You cannot blame those who've parted with their hard-earned cash feeling angry at watching the engine cough and splutter on Tuesday. Celtic as a club have never been more astute at making money. Their inability to reinvest it this year made Tuesday's debacle feel like an accident waiting to happen and again raises questions about how it operates. Appointed head of football operations in October, one of Paul Tisdale's stated roles included the 'identification and development of talent'. What's become of him? Have the targets he's presumably flagged up not matched up with the manager's expectations? Or have the club simply not been able to get deals over the line? Whatever the reason, it's clearly dysfunctional. There was a moment towards the end of Rodgers' pre-match press conference on Monday which got lost at the time but is now worthy of revisiting. Asked why Hayato Inamura, a defender who joined to much fanfare from Albirex Niigata, wasn't in his Champions League squad, the manager's answer was revealing. 'Yeah, very easy,' said the Rodgers. 'He's not quite at the level, as of yet, that I would expect.' Seriously? So why, you might well ask, is he even here? Who's sanctioning a move for a 23-year-old who isn't up to scratch when the team's crying out for players to help them reach the Champions League? It doesn't smack of a club where everyone is on the same page. Rodgers stopped just short of admitting this is the heart of the matter after Tuesday's stalemate. 'I don't necessarily need control,' he stressed. 'If there's alignment, I want what's best for the football team.' While it would be hard to argue that Idah, Trusty, Arne Engels or Paulo Bernardo (an unused sub against Kairat) have delivered value for money so far, a failure to give the manager what he so clearly needs to take the club forward serves no purpose. It's all becoming very reminiscent of seven years ago when Rodgers' barbs at the board preceded a loss to AEK Athens at this juncture and his departure in the February. As things stand, the smart money is on him heading for the hills when his contract expires next summer. The difference, this time around, is that no one will blame him.
