Here are the 4 home trends that are hot in 2025
The NAHB asked 3,000 recent and prospective buyers what they want most in newly built homes.
Newly built homes may be shrinking, but buyers aren't sacrificing comfort and quality.
Buyers said that a great outdoor living space and smart technology are must-haves.
Americans buying newly built homes are working with a lot less space, but that doesn't mean their expectations are any lower. In fact, it means they're looking to maximize every square foot.
At the 2025 National Association of Real Estate Editors conference held earlier this month in New Orleans, Rose Quint, assistant vice president for survey research at the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), shared during a panel discussion what today's homebuyers value most.
Drawing from NAHB's 2024 What Home Buyers Really Want report, a national survey of more than 3,000 recent and prospective homebuyers, Quint revealed that buyers are prioritizing spacious kitchens, ample outdoor space, and smart technology.
"High home prices and elevated mortgage rates have made homebuyers keenly aware of what features add the most value to their daily lives," Quint said. "Buyers have determined that investing in the kitchen, in a patio, and home security features enhances the livability of a home."
According to NAHB's survey, here are four trends shaping homebuying — from a bigger kitchen that focuses on efficiency to smart thermostats that allow homeowners to control their home's temperature remotely.
1. Buyers want a bigger kitchen.
The American home may be shrinking, but one space buyers aren't willing to give up is the kitchen.
"For those buying a smaller house, if that's what it takes to make the math work, we ask: What part of the home will you shrink? And they say, take the square footage from the home office, the dining room, even the living room, but for God's sake, stay away from the kitchen," Quint said.
Homebuyers don't just want a large kitchen; they're looking for efficiency and a space that brings the family together. This means they're asking for bigger island spaces, walk-in pantries to store food and appliances, and even special-use storage for wine and spices.
NAHB data shows that a central kitchen island is a top desired feature among buyers. In some luxury homes, Quint said buyers are even requesting two islands to accommodate cooking, dining, and entertaining needs.
2. Porches and patios are making a comeback.
Outdoor living areas have become more important than ever, especially as homes get smaller and offer fewer gathering spaces.
Survey data from the NAHB shows that 86% of respondents said they want a patio, and 81% said they'd like a back porch — a sign that porches are making a comeback.
The numbers tell the story. In 2008, just 47% of newly built single-family homes had patios; by 2023, that figure had climbed to 64%. Likewise, the share of homes with porches rose from 60% to 68% over the same period.
"Buyers want a patio. They want a front porch," Quint added. "They want exterior lighting to enhance the outdoor appeal of their home, landscaping, and a deck. If the home's shrinking, at least that space allows them to have more living space."
3. The modern McMansion can't beat a classic home.
For a while, it felt like you couldn't drive through a neighborhood without seeing rows of boxy, modern homes. You know the look — white or gray stone exteriors, oversized rectangular windows, and often a flat roof.
They may be trendy, but those minimalist builds may not be dominating the market after all. Today's buyers are leaning more toward traditionally designed homes inspired by classic styles like the kind of house you'd see on "Full House."
While there's no clear majority when it comes to architectural preference, NAHB's survey found that 34% of respondents prefer traditional homes. Meanwhile, 26% favor contemporary designs, 17% lean toward bold modern styles, and just 12% prefer transitional homes, which blend modern aesthetics with traditional elements.
4. Homebuyers are tech-obsessed.
From smartphones to smart cars, Americans crave cutting-edge tech, so of course, we want it in our homes, too.
The NAHB found that the tech features homebuyers want most in their homes include wireless security systems, security cameras, video doorbells, smart thermostats that let them automate their home's temperature, and multi-zone HVAC systems so they can control the temperature in each room separately.
"The reason these five features top the list is because homeowners are relying on technology to do two things: increase the safety of their home and improve temperature control," Quint said. "They want technology that works for them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
38 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Senators prep for a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate is expected to grind through a rare weekend session as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks and spending cuts by his July Fourth deadline. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators were expected to take a procedural vote Saturday to begin debate on the legislation, but the timing was uncertain and there is a long path ahead, with at least 10 hours of debate time and an all-night voting session on countless amendments. Senate passage could be days away, and the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. 'It's evolving,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as he prepared to close up the chamber late Friday. The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. 'We can get it done,' Trump said in a social media post. 'It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the spending cuts that Republicans are relying on to offset the lost tax revenues are causing dissent within the GOP ranks. Some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he is concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. 'I'm voting no on the motion to proceed,' he said. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pushing for deeper cuts, said he needed to see the final legislative text. The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals were determined to be out of compliance by the chief arbiter of the Senate's rules. One plan would have shifted some food stamp costs from the federal government to the states; a second would have gutted the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to a Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary objections and opposition from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Most states impose the provider tax as a way to boost federal Medicaid reimbursements. Some Republicans argue that is a scam and should be abolished. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the poorest Americans would face a $1,600 tax increase, the CBO said. One unresolved issue remains the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states. The cap is now $10,000. The White House and House Republicans had narrowed in on a plan for a $40,000 cap, but for five years instead of 10. Republican senators says that's too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, said he cannot support the compromise. 'There's no good reason for Republicans to chase a silly deadline,' Schumer said. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington, said they are 'very close' to finishing up. 'We would still like to meet that July Fourth, self-imposed deadline,' said Johnson, R-La. With the narrow Republicans majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board to ensure passage. Johnson and Thune have stayed close to the White House, relying on Trump to pressure holdout lawmakers.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
My grandfather ‘the destroyer': Inside the ruthless world of NJ's frozen veggie kings
When John Seabrook first discussed writing a book about his grandfather, C.F. Seabrook, and the family's agricultural empire with his mother, her response shocked him, as he reveals in 'The Spinach King: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty' (WW Norton). 'Don't write about your family,' she said. 'Just don't.' Seabrook was perplexed. 'Maybe she knew what I was going to find out,' he writes. In 'The Spinach King,' he unearths the story of how his grandfather created one of the world's largest farming operations, as well as the ugly means that got him there. 9 C.F. Seabrook with factory workers in the 1950s. The Seabrook family's pioneering expansion of the frozen vegetable market is chronicled in a new book. Seabrook Educational and Cultural Center 'Charles Franklin Seabrook, my grandfather, was the principal dreamer, main promoter, master builder, and autocratic ruler of this industrial farming empire – and ultimately its destroyer,' he writes. At its peak in the mid-1950s, Seabrook Farms owned or controlled 50,000 acres in southwestern New Jersey, employed 8,000 people, and grew and packed about a third of the nation's frozen vegetables. Dubbed the 'Henry Ford of Agriculture,' C.F. Seabrook had taken over his father's farm in 1911, transforming its fortunes with his innovative approach to agriculture. He introduced new irrigation and mechanization and diversified into building roads and railroads. But it was his pioneering use of quick-freezing vegetables in the 1930s, partnering with Birdseye, that sent Seabrook stratospheric. 'In our family history, he was Thomas Edison and Henry Ford in the same Dagwood sandwich; a great American who had elevated us from dirt farmers to industrialists in a single generation,' writes John Seabrook. Seabrook Farms was so successful that a 1959 Life magazine story described it as 'the biggest vegetable factory on earth.' 9 C.F. Seabrook seen here with his family. Courtesy of John Seabrook 9 A tractor at Seabrook Farm, the family's vast agricultural estate in New Jersey. Heritage Images via Getty Images In 1969, meanwhile, director Stanley Kubrick featured an astronaut in '2001: A Space Odyssey' sucking a Seabrook Farms Liquipack on their way to the moon. Thousands of workers worked for Seabrook: Russians, Syrians, Germans, Hungarians, Jamaicans, and Japanese Americans, many personally sponsored by Seabrook under the Displaced Persons Act and all paying rent to him. Workers were divided into three sections; whites, 'negroes' and Americans, with each living in separate 'villages' and their rent depending on their ethnicity. African-Americans were given the worst accommodation, without water or sanitary facilities, with European immigrants receiving the next level of housing, and Americans the best standard. 9 Seabrook was known for his ruthless anti-labor practices, most notably during a 1934 labor strike by company workers. Bettmann Archive It also determined their job. 'In the workplace, Blacks were confined to the field and weren't allowed to work in the plant at all, to say nothing of management, which was entirely white, Protestant, and male,' adds Seabrook. Behind the public image of the successful businessman was a man feared by everyone. 'Ambition, energy, and ingenuity drove his rise,' writes Seabrook, 'but violence and terror allowed him to maintain control.' 9 The Seabrook family partners with Bird's Eye vegetables as part of the expansion plan that made them frozen food leaders. REUTERS The way he tackled a strike in the summer of 1934 was typical. Seabrook's revenues from quick-freezing were slow to materialize, and by that summer, it became necessary to cut wages and lay off workers. 'That was when the trouble started,' says Seabrook. 9 Bird's Eye products were so ubiquitous that they were even featured in the movie '2001: A Space Odyssey.' With resentment stoked by the workers' miserable living standards, C.F. Seabrook amassed a vigilante strike force to subdue protests and even enlisted the local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan to crush the 'Communist agitators' holding up operations. The results were violent and terrifying; the KKK burned crosses outside black workers' homes. Belford Seabrook, one of C.F. Seabrook's three sons, reportedly threw a small bomb into a house with a mother and her children inside. Workers had their homes surrounded with chicken wire to prevent their escape, and tear gas was employed to quell protestors. 9 C.F. Seabrook was compared to other American industrial moguls such as Henry Ford and Thomas Edison (above). Bettmann Archive Appeals were made to New Jersey Gov. Harry Moore to declare martial law and send in the National Guard. While a deal was eventually struck, most black strikers were fired, and others were evicted from Seabrook properties. C.F. Seabrook would, years later, recruit Japanese Americans from World War II incarceration camps, a 'model minority who would never challenge the old man's authority,' writes Seabrook. Remarkably, John Seabrook had never heard about the strike before he started researching for his book. Even his father, John M. Seabrook, who took over the business from his father, had never mentioned it. 9 'The Spinach King: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty' is written by John Seabrook. 9 'All that's left of the world that my bootstrapping grandfather built is a small museum at one end of the basement of the Upper Deerfield Township Municipal Building,' said author John Seabrook. 'This was arguably the single most significant event in Seabrook Farms history,' he writes. 'How could I have remained clueless of an event that convulsed the family, the company, the county, and the state?' Just as Seabrook Farms prospered during World War I, so it did again in World War II, as quick-freezing came into its own. But by April 1959, with his health failing, C.F. Seabrook had sold the business. By the end of the 1970s, Seabrook Farms was no longer. The plant was demolished, and the land was given to the township in lieu of taxes. 'All that's left of the world that my bootstrapping grandfather built is a small museum at one end of the basement of the Upper Deerfield Township Municipal Building,' adds Seabrook. 'Here the memory of C.F. Seabrook, his multicultural workforce, and his vegetable factory is preserved, swaddled in gauzy nostalgia.'
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Walmart exec sounds the alarm on concerning customer trend
It's a pretty hard time to be a retailer right now. It doesn't matter if you're a large, multinational company or a niche shop on Main Street. Related: Amazon makes a massive $4 billion bet to take on Walmart The world of commerce is filled with complicated problems that often lack clear-cut solutions. That's especially the case in retail in the U.S. since the Trump administration announced broad tariffs that affect many countries around the world. Tariffs, or the duties companies pay to import foreign goods, are designed to help protect domestic interests and workers. They also tend to make items more expensive - either for companies or consumers. And some of the newly instituted tariffs affect our biggest trading partners. As it stands now, current tariff rates on China are at just over 50%. That means that a company would pay an average of a 50% tax to bring in Chinese-made goods to sell in the U.S., per the Peterson Institute for International Economics. In reciprocation, China's average tariff rate on U.S. goods is over 32%. "President Trump refuses to let the United States be taken advantage of and believes that tariffs are necessary to ensure fair trade, protect American workers, and reduce the trade deficit - this is an emergency," an official White House fact sheet argues. Image Source: Jones/Bloomberg via Getty Images Tariffs certainly make the business side of things more complex. If they work with foreign suppliers, U.S. companies must now make a hard decision: either continue working with these suppliers and accept a more expensive operation, or seek domestic suppliers. Neither of these options is particularly easy. More Retail: Walmart makes drastic change amid alarming customer trendLowe's makes one of its largest ever billion-dollar acquisitionsSubway owner makes major billion-dollar fast food acquisitionAmazon makes a harsh decision amid concerning customer trend If a company chooses the former option, it must incur the price associated with tariffs. This often means either absorbing heightened costs that cut into their bottom line, or passing costs off to customers. Often, many companies do a mix of both, leaving no party happy with the solution. If a business chooses the latter option and seeks out new domestic suppliers, it must scramble to find one without disrupting supply chain and inventory too much. This can be a next-to-impossible task. Tariffs can make shopping more complicated, too. This is especially the case when dealing with a large-scale corporation, like Walmart (WMT) , which juggles extremely complex supply chains around the world and whose business hinges on pleasing millions of customers. Related: Walmart makes drastic change amid alarming customer trend On June 9, at the Oppenheimer Consumer Growth & E‑Commerce Conference, Walmart CFO John Rainey said his company was forced to get more nuanced when it comes to purchasing products from suppliers in the midst of the tariff uncertainty. "Let's use a barbecue pit as an example," Rainey explained. "If that's being imported and it has a certain tariff applied to that, given the elasticity expectations around that, we're going to sell fewer of them." So Walmart would purchase fewer barbecue pits under the assumption that fewer customers would be making bigger purchases on more expensive items. In some categories, Walmart might be buying "as much as 20% less of items to make sure that - or try to ensure that we don't get into a situation where we can't sell through the inventory that we you can't carry throughout the year," he continued. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
