Trans protest to be held in Birmingham following rallies in London and Edinburgh
Trans rights protesters will descend upon Birmingham on Saturday for a demonstration in response to a Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman.
It comes after similar rallies were held in London and Edinburgh at the weekend, following the justices' ruling on April 16 that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'.
It means that trans women cannot use single-sex female toilets, changing rooms or compete in women's sports, according to the head of Britain's equalities watchdog.
Organisers of the Birmingham rally said the demonstration will aim to show solidarity with those affected by the ruling, which they say has far-reaching implications for transgender people accessing single-sex services and spaces.
Brendan McPhillips, one of the organisers of the event, said the city would be presenting a 'united front against hatred and discrimination'.
He said: 'This protest is set against the historic backdrop of the gay panic, the lives lost to the AIDS crisis, and reminiscent of the fights from yesteryear that only yester-queers will fully understand. We have seen this hate before and now we must stand united against it once again.
'We stand in a united front, united with a single, common goal; for the BIPOC (black, Indigenous and people of colour), Asian, white, brown, black, Irish traveller and Romani trans, non-binary and intersex voices that have been ignored for too long.'
Among the groups supporting the protest, which will be held at 6pm in front of the Birmingham HIV and Aids Memorial in Hurst Street, are Brum Against Hate, the Birmingham LGBT centre and trade unions including Unison and the National Education Union.
Thousands of supporters gathered in central London on Saturday for what was billed as an 'emergency demonstration' in response to the Supreme Court's ruling.
The Metropolitan Police said it is examining footage from the event amid claims some demonstrators had placards featuring death threats.
It is also appealing for witnesses after seven statues were vandalised during the protest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
Oklahoma says it will retry death-row inmate, after US Supreme Court tossed conviction
June 9 (Reuters) - Four months after the U.S. Supreme Court threw out Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip's murder conviction and granted him a new trial, Oklahoma's attorney general said on Monday that he will retry him and seek a life sentence. Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond, who supported Glossip's appeal to the Supreme Court of his conviction for commissioning a murder for hire, said that he will not pursue the death penalty for Glossip, who had argued on appeal that prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence during his original trial. Drummond said he was not seeking the death penalty this time because the man who admitted to killing the victim in the murder-for-hire plot is serving a sentence of life without the possibility of parole. 'While it was clear to me and to the U.S. Supreme Court that Mr. Glossip did not receive a fair trial, I have never proclaimed his innocence,' Drummond, a Republican, said in a statement announcing his office's decision. A spokesperson for Drummond's office said they did not have a date for the trial, but that Glossip's next court date is June 17. Don Knight, an attorney for Glossip, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Drummond's office reexamined the case after the justices, in a 5-3 ruling authored by liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, reversed a lower court's decision that had upheld Glossip's conviction and had allowed his planned execution to move forward despite his claim that prosecutors had acted improperly. Glossip, now 62, was originally convicted of commissioning a murder and sentenced to death for the killing of Barry Van Treese, owner of the Best Budget Inn motel in Oklahoma City where Glossip was a manager. He has spent 27 years in prison. All parties agree Van Treese was fatally beaten with a baseball bat by maintenance worker Justin Sneed, who eventually became the star witness for the prosecution. Sneed, who was a methamphetamine addict, confessed to the murder but avoided capital punishment by accepting a plea deal that involved testifying that Glossip paid him $10,000 to do it. Glossip admitted to helping Sneed cover up the murder after it occurred but denied knowing Sneed planned to kill Van Treese or encouraging him to do so. The evidence disclosed in 2023 by Drummond — including a prosecutor's hand-written notes from a meeting with Sneed — cast doubt on Sneed's credibility, according to Glossip's lawyers. They said they were kept in the dark about Sneed receiving psychiatric treatment for bipolar disorder immediately after his arrest, and that prosecutors failed to correct Sneed's false statement about his prescription for the medication lithium.
Daily Mirror
8 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
New Maddie evidence found in prime suspect's lair - from toys to 80GB hard drive
Christian Brueckner was revealed to be the chief suspect in the case of Madeleine McCann's disappearance with German police examining evidence from his property An explosive new Madeleine McCann documentary has revealed new bombshell evidence that may prove that Christian Brueckner is the prime suspect in the case. The new film hones in on circumstantial evidence found in his lair that points directly to why German national Brueckner is the prime suspect in the case that has gripped the world since Madeleine vanished in 2007. Clues have been few and far between since little Madeleine disappeared during a family holiday to the Algarve some 18 years ago. The investigation uncovers the disturbing finds at Brueckner's abandoned factory as well as his sickening obsession with young children. 'Madeleine McCann: Inside the Secret Evidence' digs into circumstantial evidence, including images of children's swimming costume and toddler toys that were found at his property. The Sun's documentary also claims police found a mask, guns as well as sickening child kidnap stories written by Brueckner. "A very small girl enters the room," he said. "She's definitely not older than five. Blonde, long hair tied in pigtails bounces cheekily back and forth as she comes towards me. I feel like I'm in paradise right now." In one harrowing tale reportedly penned by Brueckner described using chemical ether on a mum and toddler outside a preschool. The documentary also revealed the existence of an 80gb hard drive that could have played a key role in persuading investigators to go after Brueckner. The hard drive also put Brueckner at the heart of the search location in Arades Dam, in Portugal. The documentary also revealed Brueckner also wanted to "capture something small and use it for days." He also threatened it would not matter if "evidence is destroyed afterwards" before adding: "I'll make a lot of Police files show the biggest leap forward in the understanding of the case since German police announced in 2020 that Brueckner was the chief suspect in the Madeleine McCann case. The documentary also revealed how Brueckner refused to answer police questions and fail to give an alibi. Brueckner has not been formally charged over Madeleine's disappearance or her murder. It also featured an interview with Irish holiday rep Hazel Behan, 41, who Brueckner was cleared of having raped in 2005 during a trial in Germany last year. The documentary uncovered details that outlines investigators' fears that Brueckner could end up taking what he knows with him to the grave without any closure being given. The most recent search for any clues related to the search for Madeleine McCann lasted three days in Praia da Luz, last week. It happened close to where Brueckner is known to have had camped. German investigators were aided by Portuguese police and were seen using diggers and radar to search into the ground. Despite this "noting of consequence" was discovered.
NBC News
9 hours ago
- NBC News
Supreme Court just gave DOGE access to Social Security data. Here's what personal information is at stake.
The Supreme Court on Friday granted the Department of Government Efficiency access to Social Security Administration data that includes sensitive personal information of millions of Americans. The decision comes as the federal government sought a stay, or temporary suspension, after a federal judge blocked DOGE's access to that data in April. The nation's highest court granted an emergency application from the Trump administration to lift that injunction; the case is expected to proceed in lower courts. In its decision, the Supreme Court concluded the Social Security Administration may give DOGE access to agency records while the case plays out 'in order for those members to do their work.' Both the White House and the Social Security Administration called the Supreme Court decision a victory. In a statement, White House spokesperson Elizabeth Huston said it will allow the Trump administration to 'carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse and modernize government information systems.' Likewise, Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano in a statement said the agency 'will continue driving forward modernization efforts, streamlining government systems, and ensuring improved service and outcomes for our beneficiaries.' Yet others expressed grave concern in reaction to the decision, including Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, advocacy groups and plaintiffs in the case against DOGE and the Social Security Administration. 'This is a sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people,' said the coalition of plaintiffs including American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; the American Federation of Teachers; and the Alliance for Retired Americans, who are represented by Democracy Forward. 'This ruling will enable President Trump and DOGE's affiliates to steal Americans' private and personal data,' they said, while vowing to 'use every legal tool at our disposal' to prevent the misuse of public data as the case moves forward. Millions of Americans' sensitive data at stake The dispute focuses on how much access DOGE should have to Americans' personal data. The plaintiffs filed an initial complaint in early March, stating the Social Security Administration had 'abandoned its commitment to maintaining the privacy' of the sensitive personal information of millions of Americans under DOGE's influence. The Social Security Administration collects and stores some of the 'most sensitive' personally identifiable information of millions of Americans, ranging from seniors to adults to children, the complaint notes. When applying for a Social Security number, the agency requires the disclosure of place and date of birth, citizenship, ethnicity, race, sex, phone number and mailing address. It also requires parents' names and Social Security numbers. But the agency is also privy to other personal data, including personal health information, the complaint notes. That includes: driver's license and identification information bank and credit cards birth and marriage certificates pension information home and work addresses school records immigration and naturalization records family court records employment and employer records psychological and psychiatric health records hospitalization records addiction treatment records records for HIV/AIDS tests The Social Security Administration also collects tax information, including total earnings, Social Security and Medicare wages and annual employee withholdings. DOGE has not only accessed the agency's sensitive and protected information; it has also publicly shared it, according to the complaint. The actions of the defendants, including the Social Security Administration, DOGE and leaders including former head Elon Musk, have deprived Americans of privacy protections guaranteed by federal law and made their personal information vulnerable, the complaint alleges. In her dissent, Jackson, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, notes that records show 'DOGE received far broader data access' than the Social Security Administration usually allows in fraud, waste and abuse investigations. Typically, those investigations start with high level, anonymized data, with more access to more detailed information only granted as necessary. Justice Elena Kagan also dissented in the 6-3 decision. 'The government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now – before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful,' Justice Jackson wrote. While litigation is pending, the government has asked to temporarily suspend the lower court's temporary limitations on DOGE's access to Social Security data, she noted. 'But the government fails to substantiate its stay request by showing that it or the public will suffer irreparable harm absent the court's intervention,' Justice Jackson wrote.
