N.B. cannabis producer rebrands, seeks larger international market
One of the largest cannabis players in Canada keeps growing and growing.
Organigram, which recently rebranded to Organigram Global to penetrate the American and International markets, currently employs more than 700 people in the Greater Moncton area.
'We're the fourth largest employer in the private sector and the ninth overall in the province,' said Nathalie Kubrick, executive vice president of operations at Organigram Global. 'In terms of impact, we employ 725 people, that's 725 families.'
Those employees work inside a 550,000 square-foot growing and distribution operation in the Moncton Industrial Park which cost close to half a billion dollars to build.
Yearly operating expenses total around $80 million, and the monthly power bill is $1 million.
Organigram Global
Organigram Global employs over 700 people in the Greater Moncton area. (CTV Atlantic / Derek Haggett)
Business is strong, but Kubrick said they are heavily burdened by an excise tax.
'It represents 30, 40 per cent of our revenue so a lot of companies in Canada are diverting their kilos to international because you don't have to pay that excise tax when you sell internationally,' said Kubrick. 'And because of that heavy burden on excise tax, profitability is an issue for a lot of companies in Canada.'
Domestic sales are the main market with Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia being the biggest buyers, but the international market is increasingly becoming a larger part of Organigram's portfolio.
'We sell to Germany, the U.K. and Australia, Israel and we're really focusing on growing our footprint primarily in Europe where some of the regulations are changing,' said Kubrick.
When driving by the massive facility in the city's west end, the production smell can be noticeable at times.
Organigram Global
Domestic sales are the main market for Organigram Global, with Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia being the biggest buyers. However, the international market is increasingly becoming a larger part of Organigram's portfolio. (CTV Atlantic / Derek Haggett)
City of Moncton Councillors Daniel Bourgeois and Charles Leger said they've received complaints from citizens about the smell emanating from Organigram.
'This odour situation has been ongoing for many years,' said Leger in an email. 'The municipality has also contacted Organigram with concerns.'
Kubrick said there is still a bit of a stigma around cannabis.
'We want to be a good neighbour. We want to do the right thing every time. We have invested quite a bit in the last two years in terms of mitigating the smell,' she said. 'We're always willing to invest in making sure that we are a good neighbour. We do harvest every day so it smells every once in a while but we have invested in recirculating the air indoors in order to really minimize the smell as much as we can.'
As far as competing with the illicit market, Kubrick said they focus on quality, everything is regulated, and that's what sets them apart.
'To be fair, the legal market is much more controlled. The cannabis plant is a fascinating plant. It absorbs pesticides and heavy metals from the earth, so you really don't know what you're getting when you're buying from the illicit market,' said Kubrick. 'Everything that comes out of here is tested heavily and that's how we win against the illicit market.'
As far as the future goes, Kubrick said the focus will be on global expansion.
'We started selling beverages in the U.S. and really focusing our growth in the international market and bringing our own brands, Organigram brands, into the international market while maintaining our market share leadership here in Canada which is really important to us because it's our base,' said Kubrick.
For more New Brunswick news, visit our dedicated provincial page.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What US consumers can expect from new tariffs on imported goods
American businesses and consumers soon will have a better idea of how President Donald Trump's foreign trade agenda might affect them now that the United States has imposed higher tariffs on products from dozens of countries. It's been nearly 100 years since the nation had an overall import tax rate as high as the one set Thursday. But the individual impact on business costs and consumer prices could vary as much as the tariffs applied to goods of nearly 70 U.S. trading partners, from complicated economies like the European Union to the small African nation of Lesotho. Exports from a majority of them are getting taxed at 15%. For a handful of countries in Asia, the rate is 19%. Products from the rest are subject to taxes of 20% to 50%. Meanwhile, a 55% tariff on Chinese-made goods is scheduled to take effect next week if a U.S.-China trade deal is not agreed on before then. Businesses in the U.S. and abroad have been dealing in various ways since February with Trump's fluctuating tariffs on specific products and countries. Many automakers appeared to have absorbed the costs for now. But recent government data indicated that retail prices for groceries, furniture and appliances started creeping up in June. Because tariffs are a tax on imports, economists have expected U.S. consumers to foot at least part of the bill eventually. The country-specific round enforced Thursday, together with the president's earlier tariffs on specific sectors such as automobiles and steel, will increase prices 1.8% in the short term, the Budget Lab at Yale estimated. That's the equivalent of a $2,400 loss of income per U.S. household, according to the non-partisan policy research center The projections were based on an analysis of duties implemented this year through Wednesday, as well as a doubling of the levy on items made in India that Trump said would be implemented near the end of August. 'Retailers have been able to hold the line on pricing so far, but the new increased tariffs will significantly raise costs for U.S. retailers, manufacturers and consumers,' Jonathan Gold, Jon Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy at the National Retail Federation trade group, said in an emailed statement to The Associated Press. Here's what to know about the tariffs and where U.S. consumers are most likely to notice effects: How we got here Trump unveiled sweeping import taxes on goods coming into the U.S. from 66 countries, the European Union, Taiwan and the Falkland Islands in April. He said the 'reciprocal' tariffs were meant to boost domestic manufacturing and restore fairness to global trade. The president paused the country-specific tariffs a week later but applied a 10% tax to most imports. In early July, he began notifying countries that their exports would be subject to higher tariffs on Aug. 1 unless they reached trade deals. A week ago, he pushed the start date to Thursday. In the meantime, Trump announced a 35% tariff on imports from Canada, but delayed action on Mexico while negotiations continued. However, a free trade agreement reached with Mexico and Canada during Trump's first term shields most of those countries' products from punishing duties. The president also ordered a 50% tariff on goods from Brazil. This week, he signed an executive order to take India's tariff rate from 25% to 50% for its purchases of Russian oil. The timing gives India and Russia a chance to negotiate with the Trump administration. Other duties not specific to countries remain in place, such as a 50% tariff on imported aluminum and steel announced in June. Trump also threatened 100% tariffs on computer chips that aren't made in the U.S. The administration has said tariffs are still coming on imported pharmaceutical drugs. Tariffs are already impacting prices The U.S. Commerce Department reported on July 31 that prices rose 2.6% in June, up from an annual pace of 2.4% in May. Earlier in July, the government reported that its primary inflation measure, the Consumer Price Index, also ticked higher in June as the cost of furniture, toys and other frequently imported items increased. Shoppers should be prepared to pay more for clothes and shoes because the combined tariffs 'disproportionately affect clothing and textiles,' according to the Budget Lab at Yale. It estimates that shoe prices will go up 39% temporarily and stay 19% above where they are now. For apparel, the Budget Lab put the comparable figures at 37% and 18%. Overall, Americans face an average tax of 18.6% for imported products, the highest rate since 1933, the research center said. Food and drink prices will climb The tariffs will almost certainly result in higher food prices, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. The U.S. simply doesn't make enough of some products, like bananas or coffee, to satisfy demand. Fish, beer and liquor are also likely to get more expensive, the foundation said. The U.S. Wine Trade Alliance and other alcohol industry trade groups sent a letter to Trump that warned a 15% tariff on European wines and spirits could result in more than 25,000 American job losses and cost the industry nearly $2 billion in lost sales. 'Mr. President, we need toasts, not tariffs, as we head into the most important season for our industry,' read the letter dated Wednesday. Wine distributors and retailers avoided price increases before now by accelerating shipments from France and other EU countries earlier in the year. But with the EU's tariff rate raised to 15% on Thursday, customers may see European wines costing 30% more in September, U.S. Wine Trade Alliance President Ben Aneff said. Car prices hold steady — so far Some automakers already raised prices to counteract tariffs. Luxury sports car maker Ferrari said last week it was waiting for more details of Trump's trade deal with the EU before scaling back a 10% surcharge it put on most vehicles in the U.S. For the most part, automakers waited for details instead of passing on tariff costs to consumers. But that could change. General Motors said on July 22 that the impact of the tariffs could get more pronounced in the third quarter of the year. GM has estimated the tariffs will cost it $4 billion to $5 billion this year. Toyota reported Thursday a 37% drop in profits in the April-June quarter, cutting its full-year earnings forecasts largely because of Trump's tariffs. Still a clouded picture Even with so many new tariffs kicking in, the tariff situation remains fluid. Trump's use of an emergency powers law to implement tariffs is being challenged in the courts. The case is expected to wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Moreover, the tariffs on goods from China haven't been finalized. Consumers may start seeing more effects when the administration ends a tax exemption for small parcels sent from other countries. Trump last week signed an order to suspend the 'de minimis' exemption that has allowed shipments valued at $800 or less to enter the U.S. duty-free. International e-commerce companies have widely used the rule to avoid paying customs charges. Trump withdrew the exemption in early April for goods shipped from China and Hong Kong tariff-free. It is now set to be eliminated for low-value packages from every country on Aug. 29. ___ AP reporter Colleen Barry in Milan contributed to this report.
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners
President Donald Trump's plans for 100% tariffs on computer chips that aren't made in the U.S. are stoking confusion among businesses and trading partners — boosting stocks for leading semiconductor companies while leaving smaller producers scrambling to understand the implications. 'We are still waiting for official guidance,' said Limor Fried, founder and engineer at Adafruit Industries, a small electronics maker in New York. The chips that go into Adafruit's products come through U.S. sales and distribution companies as well as direct from companies in the Philippines and Taiwan. If those chips aren't exempt, 'it would increase the costs that go into our designs as the semiconductors are the most expensive component in our assemblies,' Fried said. 'For many of these tariffs, we often have to wait until we get a bill to know our exposure, and then we adjust our pricing to account for the increases.' The U.S. imports a relatively small number of chips because most of the foreign-made chips in a device — from an iPhone to a car — were already assembled into a product, or part of a product, before it landed in the country. 'The real question everybody in the industry is asking is whether there will be a component tariff, where the chips in a device would require some sort of separate tariff calculation,' said Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Trump said Wednesday that companies that 'made a commitment to build' in the U.S. would be spared the import tax, even if they are not yet producing those chips in American factories. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' Wall Street investors interpreted that as good news not just for U.S. companies like Intel and Nvidia, but also for the biggest Asian chipmakers like Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company that have been working to build U.S. factories. But it left greater uncertainty for smaller chipmakers in Europe and Asia that have little exposure to the artificial intelligence boom but still make semiconductors inserted into essential products like cars or washing machines. These producers 'probably aren't large enough to get on the map for an exemption and quite probably wouldn't have the kind of excess capital and margins to be able to add investment at a large scale into the United States,' Chorzempa said. It's also not clear how the chip-specific tariffs would apply to trading partners that already made broader deals with Trump — such as agreements with the European Union, Japan and South Korea that tax most goods at 15%. The announcement came more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his administration's most onerous tariffs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of autos and contributed to higher inflation. Chorzempa said chip tariffs could again raise prices by hundreds of dollars per vehicle if the semiconductors inside a car are not exempt. 'There's a chip that allows you to open and close the window,' Chorzempa said. 'There's a chip that is running the entertainment system. There is a chip that's kind of running all the electronics. There are chips, especially in EVs, that are doing power management, all that kind of stuff.' Much of the investment into building U.S. chip factories began with the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022, providing more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry. Trump has vocally opposed those financial incentives and taken a different approach, betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for electronics.
Globe and Mail
4 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Cushman & Wakefield Announces Renewed Science-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Targets
Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE: CWK), a leading global commercial real estate services firm, today announced renewed science-based greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets that raise the bar on climate ambition across its operations and the client properties it manages worldwide. The updated targets introduce higher emissions reduction objectives and a refined methodology for addressing the Scope 3 emissions that make up the vast majority of its value chain footprint. Cushman & Wakefield Operations: Reduce absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions across Cushman & Wakefield corporate offices and operations by 73.1% by 2034. This target reflects an increase in ambition following strong progress toward the firm's original 50% reduction goal that was set for 2030. Managed Client Properties: Reduce Scope 3 GHG emissions by 66.3% per square foot of managed area for clients by 2034. This new intensity‑based target replaces the firm's previous Scope 3 client engagement commitment with a more robust emissions‑intensity metric aligned to the performance of properties the firm manages on its clients' behalf which are within Cushman & Wakefield's operational control boundary. Net-Zero Value Chain: Maintain commitment to reach net‑zero emissions across the entire value chain (Scopes 1, 2 and 3) by 2050 in line with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) Corporate Net‑Zero Standard. 'Since first setting science‑based targets in 2021, we've worked hard to reduce our own operational footprint and help clients decarbonize the buildings they own and occupy,' said Jessica Francisco, Cushman & Wakefield's Chief Sustainability Officer. 'With these renewed targets, we are reaffirming our progress to date and our intent to go further, faster.' Cushman & Wakefield established its first near‑term, SBTi‑approved targets in September 2021 and, in July 2022, became one of the first companies to have a net‑zero target approved under the SBTi's Corporate Net‑Zero Standard. In the years since, the firm has continued to invest in data management improvements, renewable electricity procurement and partnering with clients to deliver shared, sustainable value. These efforts, among others, have informed the firm's decision to commit to the next generation of targets. The firm intends to report annually on progress toward its 2034 targets through its annual Sustainability Report, in addition to other voluntary and regulatory disclosures, as applicable. Cushman & Wakefield believes these targets are important in the global effort to mitigate the adverse impacts of climate change and will assess them as necessary, based on SBTi guidelines and the evolution of the firm's strategy. 'Our clients are asking for data‑driven pathways to net zero. By expanding our Scope 3 target from an engagement metric to an emissions intensity target, we're aligning our services and accountability with what matters most—real decarbonization in the built environment,' said Francisco. Learn more about sustainability at Cushman & Wakefield and read the firm's recently published 2024 Sustainability Report here. About Cushman & Wakefield Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE: CWK) is a leading global commercial real estate services firm for property owners and occupiers with approximately 52,000 employees in nearly 400 offices and 60 countries. In 2024, the firm reported revenue of $9.4 billion across its core service lines of Services, Leasing, Capital markets, and Valuation and other. Built around the belief that Better never settles, the firm receives numerous industry and business accolades for its award-winning culture. For additional information, visit
