'We should be mad as hell': NC legislators who've survived breast cancer seek improved detection
A radiologist reviews the results of a mammogram. (Photo: Getty images)
When Senate Democratic Leader Sydney Batch (D-Wake) was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 39, she was not thinking about the cost of treatment. She was only thinking about her boys.
'My kids were five and seven. I was just thinking about whether or not I would live long enough to be able to dance with my sons at their weddings,' Batch recalled at a Tuesday press conference.
Batch, a primary sponsor of Senate Bill 553, said the 'Save More Tatas Act' would provide health coverage parity for breast cancer diagnostic imaging.
Far too many women in North Carolina don't get diagnosed with breast cancer early, because they don't get the proper diagnostic treatment and preventative treatment that would save their lives.
'Most importantly, you sure as heck shouldn't be in a situation where women are denied access because they can't afford the actual screenings,' said Sen. Batch.
Sen. Val Applewhite (D-Cumberland) said when she retired from the United States Air Force after 20 years, she received a screening mammogram as she was processed out of the military. It came back normal.
A year later she credits divine intervention with saving her life.
'My mother, who had passed years earlier, came to me in my dream. She said, 'Val, go get a mammogram.' So, I made the appointment. And that's when I got the diagnosis, I had breast cancer. I was lucky.'
Applewhite was lucky that she was working at the Pentagon. She received her cancer treatment at Bethesda Naval Medical Center, the same place the President of the United States receives medical care.
'That access, plain and simple, is what saved my life. Too many people in North Carolina don't have that,' said Applewhite.
The Cumberland County Democrat said another portion of SB 553 would allocate $3.5 million to help recruit and retain mammography technologists in rural and underserved areas.
Rep. Mary Belk (D-Mecklenburg) is yet another member of this extraordinary sorority of breast cancer survivors.
Belk said she had finished a grueling day of campaigning in 2016 when she felt something.
She didn't want to call it a lump. That was too scary. But she made time for an overdue breast exam.
'I heard the words that no one wants to hear: You have breast cancer,' said Belk. 'I was diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer, three months before my first election.'
Approximately 14,700 women in North Carolina will have breast cancer this year. Fourteen hundred will not survive, Belk said.
But with first rate care, her cancer went into remission. She was one of the lucky few who did not worry about the cost of imaging.
'Women who need these medically necessary tests are skipping them because they cannot afford the co-pays,' said Belk.
Breast MRIs in North Carolina can cost anywhere between $260 and over $1,300, depending on one's health plan.
Belk is the primary sponsor of House Bill 297. The Breast Cancer Prevention Imaging Parity bill would require insurance companies to cover diagnostic, screening as well as supplemental breast exams to the same extent as mammograms.
This coverage is especially important for women with dense breasts who are at risk of being diagnosed at later stages.
Sheila Mikhail falls into that category. The self-described 'serial, biotech entrepreneur' created multiple companies in the Research Triangle Park along with thousands of well-paying jobs.
Yet when cancer was found in her left breast, she repeatedly had to push for additional screenings of her right breast.
The oncologist told her she was causing a 'ruckus', but the office would do a supplemental test at a cost of $1,200.
The breast MRI found a second tumor that was not detected by an ultrasound or a diagnostic mammogram.
'I was fortunate because I could afford to pay. I found my right tumor just before it metastasized.'
Mikhail wants lawmakers to pass both HB 297 and SB 553 and have insurance companies cover supplemental ultrasounds and MRIs for breast cancer.
But the time to pass these bills this session is growing short. May 8th marks the crossover deadline for bills to pass at least one chamber to stay eligible for consideration.
Senate Bill 553 has been stuck in the Rules committee since March.
Belk's bill ('Breast Cancer Prevention Imaging Parity') was approved by three House committees, but before a floor vote in mid-April, it was withdrawn from the House calendar and kicked back to the Rules committee. No reason was provided.
Batch said she has had many, many conversations with her Republican colleagues, but faces opposition because some insurance companies don't want another mandate that requires them to pay for additional coverage.
Sen. Applewhite said this should not be a partisan issue. She'd like female voters to call their representatives.
'You know our breasts are not Democrats or Republicans, but the men in this building that have power, don't help us — won't help us save lives. We should be mad as hell.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Collins opposed to PEPFAR, global health rescissions proposed by Trump
Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) said Wednesday that she is opposed to a Trump White House proposal that would claw back money Congress has already appropriated for global health programs, including the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). 'I do not support the rescission for PEPFAR and global health programs,' Collins told reporters as she walked into a meeting in the Capitol on Wednesday afternoon. The White House on Tuesday sent lawmakers a request to rescind $9.4 billion in funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting, which were targeted for cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Congress needs to approve the rescissions package to codify the DOGE cuts. The package would cut nearly $9 million from PEPFAR and $400 million from global programs intended to control the spread of HIV/AIDS. Congress has 45 days to act on the package, which will be considered on a procedural fast-track in the Senate, allowing it to pass the upper chamber with a simple majority vote. Collins in a statement Tuesday said the Appropriations Committee 'will carefully review the rescissions package and examine the potential consequences of these rescissions on global health, national security, national security' and other congressional priorities.
Chicago Tribune
6 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump tax bill will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit and leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO says
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's big bill making its way through Congress will cut taxes by $3.75 trillion but also increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, according to an analysis released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The CBO also estimates an increase of 10.9 million people without health insurance under the bill by 2034, including 1.4 million who are in the United States without legal status in state-funded programs. The package would reduce federal outlays, or spending, by nearly $1.3 trillion over that period, the budget office said. What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill'In the words of Elon Musk, this bill is a 'disgusting abomination,'' said Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, reviving the billionaire former Trump aide's criticism of the package. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he called Musk late Tuesday to discuss the criticism but had not heard back. 'I hope he comes around,' Johnson told reporters. The analysis comes at a crucial moment in the legislative process as Trump is pushing Congress to have the final product on his desk to sign into law by the Fourth of July. The work of the CBO, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress, will be weighed by lawmakers and others seeking to understand the budgetary impacts of the sprawling 1,000-page-plus package. Ahead of the CBO's release, the White House and Republican leaders criticized the budget office in a preemptive campaign designed to sow doubt in its findings. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the CBO has been 'historically wrong,' and Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the CBO was 'flat wrong' because it underestimated the potential revenue growth from Trump's first round of tax breaks in 2017. The CBO last year said receipts were $1.5 trillion, or 5.6% greater than predicted, in large part because of the 'burst of high inflation' during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. White House Budget Director Russ Vought said when you adjust for 'current policy' — which means not counting some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that are simply being extended for the next decade — the overall package actually doesn't pile onto the deficit. He argued the spending cuts alone in fact help reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion over the decade. Democrats and even some Republicans call that 'current policy' accounting move a gimmick, but it's the approach Senate Republicans intend to use during their consideration of the package to try to show it does not add to the nation's deficits. Vought argued that the CBO is the one using a 'gimmick' by tallying the costs of continuing those tax breaks that would otherwise expire. Leavitt also suggested that the CBO's employees are biased, even though certain budget office workers face strict ethical rules — including restrictions on campaign donations and political activity — to ensure objectivity and impartiality. 'When it comes time to make prognostications on economic growth, they've always been wrong,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said at a press conference. Asked if it's time to get rid of the CBO, Scalise did not dismiss the idea, saying it's valid to raise concerns. Alongside the costs of the bill, the CBO had previously estimated that nearly 4 million fewer people would have food stamps each month due to the legislation's proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. The bill, called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act after the president's own catch phrase, is grinding its way through Congress, as the top priority of Republicans, who control both the House and the Senate — and face stiff opposition from Democrats, who call it Trump's 'big, ugly bill.' All told, the package seeks to extend the individual income tax breaks that had been approved in 2017 but that will expire in December if Congress fails to act, while adding new ones, including no taxes on tips. It also includes a massive buildup of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security. To help cover the lost revenue, Republicans want to slash some federal spending. They propose phasing out green energy tax breaks put in place during Democrat Joe Biden's presidency. New work requirements for some adults up to age 65 on Medicaid and SNAP would begin in December 2026 and are expected to result in less spending on those programs. Republicans argue their proposals are intended to make Medicaid and other programs stronger by rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. They want the federal funding to go those who most need health care and other services, often citing women and children. But Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said those claims are bogus and are simply part of long-running GOP efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, as most states have expanded Medicaid to serve more people under the program. 'They just want to strangle health care,' Schumer said. The package also would provide a $4 trillion increase to the nation's debt limit, which is now $36 trillion, to allow more borrowing. The Treasury Department projects the debt limit will need to be raised this summer to pay the nation's already accrued bills. Now in its 50th year, the CBO was established by law after Congress sought to assert its control, as outlined in the Constitution, over the budget process, in part by setting up the new office as an alternative to the White House's Office of Management and Budget. Staffed by some 275 economists, analysts and other employees, the CBO says it seeks to provide Congress with objective, impartial information about budgetary and economic issues. Its current director, Phillip Swagel, a former Treasury official in Republican President George W. Bush's administration, was reappointed to a four-year term in 2023.
Boston Globe
14 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What is the Congressional Budget Office? And why is it a target of Trump?
The budget office also projected that by 2034, 10.9 million more people would be uninsured, due to proposed spending cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Related : The bill now Advertisement In the weeks ahead of the CBO's analysis, the White House and Republican leaders have criticized the budget office in an effort to sow doubt in its findings. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Here's what to know about the nonpartisan agency and what the Trump administration has said about it: What is the CBO? The CBO is a nonpartisan agency that helps lawmakers estimate the cost of proposed legislation and provides reports on federal spending. It's led by a director appointed by Congress to a four-year term, with the selection alternating between the House and Senate Budget Committee chairs. The CBO emphasizes that political affiliation plays no role in its hiring process, stating it selects candidates 'solely on the basis of his or her fitness to perform the duties of the position.' Advertisement Is the CBO partisan? CBO hires analysts based on their expertise, not political affiliation. Staff is expected to maintain objectivity and avoid political influence. In evaluating potential employees, the CBO says that for most positions it looks at whether that person would be perceived to be free from political bias. Like other federal employees, the CBO's staff is also prohibited from making political contributions to members of Congress. The CBO's director, Phillip Swagel, served in former Republican President George W. Bush's administration as an economic adviser and as an assistant secretary at the Treasury Department. What has the CBO said in the past about Trump policy? The budget office said in April 2018, during Trump's first term, that tax receipts would reach $27 trillion from fiscal years 2018 to 2024. However, receipts came in about $1.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected and Republican lawmakers have seized on that discrepancy since then. The CBO later reported that revenues were higher than expected because of the 'burst of inflation' during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. There was also an increase in economic activity in 'the later years of the period' adding $700 billion. Also, new tariffs added about $250 billion, with other legislation partially offsetting those factors. What Trump and his allies have said about the agency Ahead of the CBO's analysis, Trump slammed the agency in a 'The Democrat inspired and 'controlled' Congressional Budget Office (CBO) purposefully gave us an EXTREMELY LOW level of Growth, 1.8% over 10 years,' Trump wrote. 'I predict we will do 3, 4, or even 5 times the amount they purposefully 'allotted' to us (1.8 percent) and, with just our minimum expected 3 percent growth, we will more than offset our tax cuts (which will, in actuality, cost us no money!),' Trump added. Advertisement In an 'The CBO sometimes gets projections correct, but they're always off every single time when they project economic growth,' Johnson told NBC News. '[The CBO] always underestimate the growth that will be brought about by tax cuts and reduction in regulations,' Johnson added. At a Alyssa Vega can be reached at
