Trump-Putin summit in Alaska: One meeting, different goals
The US president said he believes that Vladimir Putin is heading to the meeting wanting to make a deal to end Moscow's war in Ukraine.
"I believe now he's convinced that he's going to make a deal. He's going to make a deal. I think he's going to. And we're going to find out — I'm going to know very quickly," Trump said during an appearance on Fox News Radio.
This isn't the first time Trump has made such a statement. He repeatedly stated that Putin wants to put an end to his full-scale invasion of Ukraine or at least that he can convince or even push Putin to make some sort of a deal.
These statements have not materialised, at least not until now. Every time Trump mentioned a possible ceasefire, Russia continued or even intensified its frontline assaults and aerial attacks against Ukraine.
The US president's rhetoric has somehow changed over the past few days, becoming a little less convincing and a lot less optimistic.
Earlier this week the White House officials even called the Alaska meeting merely a "listening exercise."
Over the past few days the US president himself played it down, describing the Friday summit as "setting the table for the second meeting," purportedly between Zelenskyy and Putin in the presence of Trump and possibly European leaders.
"We are going to have the second meeting if the first one goes well," Trump said, adding that he would prefer the second meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy to take place "almost immediately."
Asked if he believed he could convince Putin to stop targeting civilians in Ukraine, Trump replied: "I guess the answer to that is no, because I've had this conversation (with Putin)."
And yet Trump still says he believes some sort of a deal will be signed in Alaska.
What does Moscow want?
But for Moscow the agenda seems different.
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said no documents are expected to be signed during the Alaska summit.
Although Peskov said it would be a "mistake" to predict the outcome of Friday talks, he stressed that there are no plans for Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump to formalise any agreements.
"President Putin and President Trump are ready to talk and will discuss the most difficult issues," he added.
Putin's aide Yuri Ushakov, who is part of the Russian delegation at the Friday meeting, said the central topic of the Alaska summit is "settlement" of Russia's war in Ukraine, though economic cooperation and global security will also be discussed.
Putin himself held a special meeting on Thursday morning with the Russian authorities saying the US administration is "making sufficiently energetic and sincere efforts to end the hostilities, resolve the crisis, and reach agreements that are in the interests of all parties involved in this conflict."
Pointing at the Kremlin's main goal of restarting and possibly even normalising Russia's relations with the US - which for the Kremlin have nothing to do with Ukraine - Putin said the meeting is important "In order to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, in Europe, and in the world as a whole."
The Russian president did not mention any steps towards ending his war against Ukraine and instead focused on Moscow's contact with Washington, in an effort to position the Friday meeting as a summit of the world's superpowers.
The US-based Institute for Study of War assesses that the Kremlin is using the Alaska summit to portray Russia as a world power equal to the United States and to position Putin as an equal to Trump.
On Wednesday, leading Russian negotiator and Russian Direct Investment Fund CEO Kirill Dmitriev alluded to the 1945 Yalta Conference between the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union, claiming that the Yalta conference "won World War II" and that Putin and Trump will similarly "prevent World War III."
The Russia-installed head of the annexed Crimea region, Sergei Aksyonov, claimed that Trump should visit the region in order to agree to a "new Yalta peace."
Russian state-controlled media have also been pushing the Yalta summit comparison, claiming that "people who have a real influence on global processes" will be at the table in Alaska.
Donald Trump rejected the claims that a one-on-one meeting with the US president could be perceived as a reward for Vladimir Putin.
But even if the meeting doesn't go well and there is no second summit with the leaders of Ukraine and Europe, Putin will already have emerged from diplomatic isolation for the first time since the beginning of his full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Washington attorney general sues Trump administration over police takeover
The attorney general for the US capital, Washington DC, has sued Donald Trump's administration on Friday, August 15, over what he called a "hostile takeover" of the city's police force, which the Republican president said was necessary to fight violent crime. Earlier this week, Trump placed the capital's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under federal government control while also sending 800 National Guard troops onto the city's streets. Attorney General Pam Bondi then issued an order to install a hand-picked official, Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole, as "emergency" police commissioner on Thursday. Federal law governing the capital "does not authorize this brazen usurpation of the District's authority over its own government," Attorney General Brian Schwalb wrote in a filing lodged in federal court. "Defendants have unlawfully seized operational control of MPD, including by assuming positions in the chain of command and issuing policy directives to MPD." "By declaring a hostile takeover of MPD, the Administration is abusing its limited, temporary authority under the Home Rule Act, infringing on the District's right to self-governance and putting the safety of DC residents and visitors at risk," Schwalb said in a statement on social media. "This is an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call DC home." Schwalb has asked for a temporary restraining order on Bondi's order, and for the court to declare that Trump's executive order exceeds his authority over the District of Columbia. A hearing has been set for 2:00 pm local time (1800 GMT). Special status Unlike the 50 states, Washington operates under a unique relationship with the federal government that limits its autonomy and grants Congress extraordinary control over local matters. Since the mid-1970s, the Home Rule Act has allowed residents to elect a mayor and a city council, although Congress still controls the city's budget. Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, said late Thursday that "there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official." The overwhelmingly Democratic city faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime, plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged. Yet Washington police data show significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024, although that was coming off the back of a post-pandemic surge. Bowser said earlier this week that violent crime was "at its lowest level in 30 years." Washington is also ranked 15 th on a list of major US cities by homeless population, according to government statistics from last year. Trump, meanwhile, has said he wants to tackle homeless encampments, and move those sleeping rough "FAR from the Capital." On his Truth Social platform, Trump this week described Washington as "under siege from thugs and killers," with higher crime rates than "many of the most violent Third World Countries."
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Pushing Kyiv to give up land 'will force Ukrainians to the streets'
A possible deal to end Russia's war against Ukraine will include 'land swapping' from both sides, US President Donald Trump said, which in reality means territorial concessions for Ukraine. Kyiv forces do not occupy any of Russia's territory, meaning there could be no deal regarding returning Moscow its land. All of the land in question is the territory Russia has occupied in Ukraine since the first invasion in 2014 followed by Moscow's all-out war in 2022. If Trump pressures Ukraine to relinquish its territory, he would not be convincing Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Instead, he will have to persuade the people of Ukraine. And unlike Trump, Zelenskyy understands who will have the last word, just as he knows that even he cannot convince the Ukrainian people of what they reject. The county's civil society demonstrated it well enough, including just weeks ago. Anton Liagusha, Dean of the Graduate Department of Social Sciences and Humanities at the Kyiv School of Economics, told Euronews that if Ukrainian authorities are pressured into territorial concessions, 'it will force the Ukrainian people to take to the streets.' 'This will not so much be a story of protest against the authorities, but a cry from the Ukrainian people to the whole world to be treated as a great country in the centre of Europe, and not just viewed by the US as a piece of land," Liagusha said. "Ukrainians are a full-fledged nation, and Ukraine is a great state with its own legislation.' Liagusha explained that ever since Ukraine became an independent county, the society has clearly established its decisive power when 'during the Revolution of Dignity (in 2014), and before that the Orange Revolution (in 2004) and before that the Revolution on Granite in 1991, we saw that people do not accept power in terms of authoritarianism and clear hierarchy.' 'The president in Ukrainian society is not a king, meaning that his will does not determine the will of the entire Ukrainian people," he pointed out. 'We all hear what society says' Since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion in early 2022, this balance of power has crystallised even more clearly 'when we see in Ukrainian society that almost every family has been affected by this war, directly or indirectly," according to Liagusha. 'People are fighting against the aggressor, for democracy, and for our country to become a member of the European Union and be part of Europe," he said. And so, whatever decisions are made with the participation of the president, it means that these decisions can be confirmed by Ukrainian society through direct street demonstrations.' This was proven yet again in July when thousands of Ukrainians took to the streets to protest against the bill that could have effectively eliminated the independence of the country's anti-corruption institutions. Thousands of Ukrainians demonstrated until Zelenskyy proposed a new bill only days later to restore the independence of the anti-corruption bodies. Nationwide protests forced the government to overturn the initial bill in a move widely seen as a win for democracy in Ukraine, even during Russia's all-out war. Demonstrators made it clear that their anger was directed solely at the bill, and their demands were limited to restoring the independence of anti-corruption bodies. But after three revolutions in just over 30 years, one of which resulted in ousting the pro-Russian Victor Yanukovich in 2014, Ukrainian presidents and authorities are very sensitive to the voice of the street. Having signed a new bill, Zelenskyy himself said, 'We all hear what society says. We see what people expect from state institutions to ensure justice and the efficiency of each institution.' Zelenskyy surely knows what to expect from Ukrainian civil society should there be pressure to cede territories. But Ukraine's foreign partners, specifically the US, do not seem to comprehend it. When asked why, Liagusha said the reasons can be explained by the level of comfort of life. 'Life in the United States and many European countries is more or less stable and comfortable," he explained. "These societies have long lacked experience with large-scale protests and the high level of activity seen in Ukrainian civil society.' Liagusha also points out that Western democracies primarily view Ukrainian civil society as self-organised groups of people that are created or organised to solve specific tactical problems and issues. 'There is no understanding that the volunteer movement, civil society for the protection of human rights, and activists in various fields are truly such a society and are the creators of the new Ukrainian state.'
Fashion Network
5 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Trump tariffs a stone in the shoe of 'made in USA' cowboy boots
The manufacture of iconic "made in the USA" cowboy boots is set to suffer from President Donald Trump 's 30% tariffs on South African exports that came into force in August. Texas's most renowned makers of the southern US fashion staple source the ostrich leather they require exclusively from the small South African town of Oudtshoorn, 400 kilometres (250 miles) east of Cape Town. Known as the world's "ostrich capital", Oudtshoorn is nestled in the semi-arid Little Karoo valley just inland from the southern coast and is home to a few hundred thousand people and about as many of the giant flightless birds. "We just don't know how bad the impact will be, but positive it wouldn't be," said ostrich farmer Laubscher Coetzee of the tariffs that kicked in after South Africa appeared unable to negotiate a new trade deal with Trump. More than half of the global supply of ostrich-derived products -- from feathers to leather and meat -- comes from nearly 200 farmers around Oudtshoorn who are joined in the Cape Karoo International (CKI) group, said its managing director Francois de Wet. South Africa as a whole supplies about 70% of the world's production, he said. Luxury handbag manufacturers in France and Italy are among the CKI's main clients. It also ships 20% of its ostrich leather to top Texas bootmakers such as Lucchese, Justin and Rios of Mercedes, whose boots are sold at several hundreds of dollars a pair. Ostrich is "an extremely important leather in our industry", Ryan Vaughan, CEO of the Rios of Mercedes manufacturer, told AFP. "It's very resilient, it forms to the foot," he said, wearing a typical cowboy hat. Coming from "a long line of cattle ranchers", his family brand was born in Texas in 1853 and employs 250 people. The tariffs "would make a dramatic impact in our business and in the western industry," he said, "because it's not just us that build a lot of cowboy boots out of ostrich leather". It is also the case of Tony Lama, an El Paso bootmaker supplied by CKI that has given a pair to every recent Republican president. Donald Trump received cowboy boots emblazoned with "MAGA" made out of "American alligator" skin, according to a press release. De Wet from the CKI said he believed the South African supply of ostrich leather to the US manufacturers did not run counter to a push by the Trump administration for production to be brought home. The United States did not have enough ostriches to provide the required leather, he said. "We export the raw material, the ostrich leather. They can't produce it from local ostriches in the US. They don't have them," he told AFP. "They do all the value-adding in the United States," he said. "So therefore, in terms of the pure definition of what the Trump administration would like to see, in this case, we do it already." The soft skins, recognisable by spots left by the large ostrich feathers, are currently sold to American manufacturers for around $20 a square foot. "We exported more than the usual volume of ostrich leather to the US in the past two-three months, so we have a little bit of a buffer," said de Wet. "For the moment we don't expect any layoffs in the short term," he said. But "in the long term, if we have to pick up the full tariff, it will definitely... cause a shrinkage of our business." The consumer could also not be expected to pay an extra 30% for the already pricey boots, he said. "So the tariff will have to be split between the exporter... and the importer, and preferably also a part paid by the end consumer." It is the unique climate of the Little Karoo, which gets less than 400 millimetres (nearly 16 inches) of rain a year, that makes it ideal for ostrich rearing, said Coetzee, a fourth-generation Oudtshoorn farmer. "That is the reason the ostrich industry is still here 200 years after (it started)," he said. His great-grandfather built the family home in 1896, when the price of ostrich feathers rivalled that of gold because of their value to the women's fashion industry. The extravagant "ostrich palaces" of the time are a reminder of the industry's previous major crisis, when the market collapsed in the early 1900s as the arrival of the low-roofed motor car ended the fashion for high-feathered hats. Copyright © 2025 AFP. All rights reserved. All information displayed in this section (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the contents of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presses.
