Parking spot you don't want to put car in during hot weather – it's ‘the worst thing you can do' & could cost you £1800
With temperatures set to ramp up to 30C again towards the end of the week, drivers may be tempted to park cars under shady trees, to stop them from overheating.
2
And although this may seem like a smart idea, Kazimieras Urbonas, Supplier Excellence Manager at Ovoko revealed that this could actually be the worst place to park your vehicle.
Tree sap damage
The car expert explained that if you park your motor under a tree it could get covered in tree sap or bird droppings.
And although this may not seem like the worst problem, it could lead to thousands of pounds worth of damage.
Kazmieras revealed that the sap and droppings will not only make your car look dirty, it will also likely damage the bodywork of your vehicle.
He added that this could also affect the value of your motor, meaning that it will be worth less when you want to sell it on.
The expert explained: "Most people don't realise that parking under trees can actually be one of the worst things you can do for your car's paintwork.
'What seems like a convenient, shaded spot can lead to damage that affects both the appearance and value of your vehicle.'
More of a problem during summer
Tree sap poses a greater risk in the summer months, as trees produce more of the substance during this time, and the hot weather bakes the sap on to cars.
It is a good idea to regularly inspect your car during the summer months, to check for any damage from tree sap.
Removing the sap as soon as you notice it will help to reduce the possibility of long term damage.
Kazmieras added: 'Tree sap doesn't just sit on the surface.
"It actually penetrates the clear coat and can cause permanent staining.
"In hot weather, the sap becomes more corrosive and can eat through the protective layers of your paintwork.'
How to remove tree sap
If the damage to your car isn't particularly severe, you can remove if yourself using household products such as rubbing alcohol, WD-40, or cooking oil.
To use these products, simply apply them to a micro-fibre cloth, and then gently rub the affected area.
Make sure to wash the product off with water, and then reapply wax or sealant to protect the paint.
However, if the damage is more severe, you may have to pay a professional to get the paint corrected, which could set you back as much as £1800.
The expert added that bird droppings can also cause serious damage to vehicles.
He said: "'The acidic nature of bird waste can cause immediate damage, especially when left in direct sunlight.
"What starts as an unsightly mess can quickly become a permanent mark that requires expensive paint correction.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Car
12 minutes ago
- Auto Car
A Corvette designed in England? Inside GM's new Leamington Spa base
GM's new European design base was set up by director Julian Thomson Close Ashbourne Drive sounds a bit more like a street full of retired bank managers than the location of an imposing, all-new General Motors advanced car design studio. But then Spa Park, through which Ashbourne Drive runs, isn't your usual British industrial estate either, missing out on shabby factories, Portakabins selling burgers and cars badly parked on every footpath. Instead, GM's new European design base, quietly set up around three years ago on the outskirts of busy Leamington Spa by its director, Englishman Julian Thomson, is a tribute to the designer's art in itself. It is one of those impressive industrial buildings of the modern era designed for maximum interior flexibility – in this case, spacious mezzanine floors front and rear for offices and meeting rooms, a covered working area on one side of the ground floor for around 30 people and huge windows on the other to flood the working area with light. The whole thing provides 25,000 square feet of space, dedicated to unbridled creativity, and outside is a high-walled yard for exterior viewings, complete with its own dark Tarmac, because cars look different on real roads. In the centre of the building – occupying the approximate space of two tennis courts – are spaces for half a dozen full-sized car models in development, overhung by automated milling machines that can shape designs, according to digital instructions, even when the human staff are asleep or away for the weekend. All rooms are sparsely but expensively furnished: this place may have started life as an industrial unit, but there's an aura of warmth and homeliness about it that encourages pride and feeds creativity. 'The amount of work we've done in the past couple of years is immense,' says Thomson. 'We've touched every brand, we've made lots of good friends and contacts in GM and we're already very much part of the process.' Still, the question hangs: why does GM need a design operation in Europe? After all, in the medium term, it will sell only electric Cadillacs, Corvette sports cars and some top-end commercial vehicles here, and these will very much be American cars. There used to be an impressive GM design studio at Luton, back in the heyday of Vauxhall, and an even bigger one at Rüsselsheim in Germany when Opel became the senior brand, but those were swept away when the PSA Group bought Opel-Vauxhall eight years ago. Thomson has no doubts about his usefulness. If you run a multi-branded car company such as GM, he contends, more than anything else you need good ideas. And plenty of them. 'It's no longer good enough to design cars for one territory or another,' he says. 'Your designs must be understood everywhere. You need diversity among designers too – different backgrounds and ages. If you had a studio in just one area, you would get a very strong viewpoint reflecting specific trends, aspirations, lifestyles. GM knows this, and it knows it needs to gather influences from Europe. That's why we're here.' Other foreign locations leave no doubt that GM's global intentions are as strong as ever: there are two studios in the US (Detroit and California), plus one in South Korea and another in China. The establishment in Ashbourne Drive seems to have been driven by when Thomson became available and the empathetic relationship he has developed with Michael Simcoe, GM's vice-president of design. Thomson is very experienced: he trained at the Royal College of Art in London, where he was sponsored by Ford, then joined Lotus, where he took the top job after Peter Stevens left, and famously designed the original Elise. After a couple of years at Volkswagen advanced design in Barcelona, he moved to Jaguar Land Rover, where he formed a happy partnership with Ian Callum, taking the top job when Callum departed. Then came GM. 'They said I could put this place anywhere in Europe,' says Thomson, leaning back contentedly in his Warwickshire office, 'so I suppose we could now be in Nice. But I like this area. It's a real hotbed of car design talent; there are half a dozen other big studios in the area. And I wanted to get things up and running quickly, to make a good impression. I had friends in design here who I absolutely knew were the best in the business so I was able to put a team together quickly. We've got 35 people – designers, engineers, digital designers and clay modellers – and we're a great team.' Thomson acknowledges that he's no architect, but he devised the studio layout himself, using prior experience of other studios, advice from experts and by talking to designer friends in the pub. He sent a detailed proposal off to GM and the bosses agreed to build something very much like it – a decent start. 'Of course there were some tough times,' says Thomson. 'I remember being in Thailand once, turning on a Teams [video conferencing] call late at night and being confronted by a grid of about 10 angry builders wanting to talk about drains and electrical supply. But we worked it out. That was just a low point. We're really happy with what we have now. It's working brilliantly.' Easily GM Design Europe's best-known piece of work so far is their concept for a Corvette C10 – one model beyond the C9 that is approaching production as a replacement for today's C8. It is one of three concepts commissioned by Simcoe as a way of influencing the C9. It's an unusual way of doing things, but the UK effort has evidently been well received across the pond. One of the challenges for Europe is dealing with the issue of Americanness, says Thomson: 'When we did the Corvette, some people thought we would just do a European car with a Corvette badge on it. "But that would have completely missed the point. Corvette has a tremendous history; it's the world's most successful sports car. We had to respect that – but hopefully give it some freshness and some features that would make people think.' The key to this new challenge of doing American cars in Europe, believes Thomson, is to recognise the things Europeans value in American design: 'Everyone watches American films and TV and buys American clothes. Ideas of optimism, of confidence, of entertainment are seen a lot of American design. "You see it in engineering projects like Nasa's Apollo programmes. Our job is to present this from a new viewpoint and not to be stuck in a groove.' The fact that Thomson has been involved in advanced design for much of his career – at VW, at Ford and now at GM – makes him more confident than most might be about the British studio's job of presenting designs that probably won't make production but will probably affect those that do 'We need a certain naivety to be valuable,' he explains. 'We don't know what a [Chevrolet] Silverado is like the Americans do. It wasn't bred into us. We have an impression, but that's a different thing. Our value, part of our brief, is to play the role of the customer and look at the product with fresh, questioning eyes.' I suggest that it's hard not to imagine American design teams, who might be working on their third generation of some well-known model, being irritated by a bunch of British upstarts. But Thomson bats the idea away: 'Our aim is to be surprising with no surprises. We don't want just to annoy people but to stretch their thinking a bit and to present new ways of reaching design goals. Sometimes we're there to shock people.'Thomson has in a long career seen unfortunate examples of an absence of this 'stretching'. He recalls an event at VW when no fewer than 18 full-sized concepts for the next Passat were presented, most of whose creators were intent on 'winning' by anticipating what other teams did rather than presenting their best work. At Jaguar, he recalls, a constant comment on advanced design proposals was: 'That's not a Jag.' This experience is the main reason why Thomson always involves his entire team in formative discussions about every new project. He has seen the value of diverse ideas and the dangers of not hearing them. 'A lot of our younger people are better than me,' he says cheerfully. 'I know how to design a car, but I'm not one of them. There are plenty of times when I don't represent the customer as well as they do. Why would I employ a designer who has just done five years' training just to scribble down what I think? Thomson can't say when – or even whether – a car designed at Ashbourne Drive will ever appear in showrooms, and in a way he doesn't care. But if he comes to recognise certain lines on the C10 Corvette (and on other models that can't be named), he will know that he has fulfilled the brief. Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you'll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here. Next Prev In partnership with
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
Popular car dealership to shut in days after 54 years as owners launch huge closing down sale & free perk for customers
A POPULAR car dealership is due to shut down in weeks after 54 years, as owners have launched a huge closing down sale. It is an historic family-run business that has been a staple of the local community. Owners of Denbury Diesels, Mike and Tracey Perrman, have decided to retire from the industry after several happy decades . The used car dealership in Newton Abbot, Devon is now selling the final of their stock. They made the announcement on social media, thanking their "lovely" customers, but saying it had come to for them to step away. On Facebook, the business wrote: "It's been an amazing 54 years of trading as Denbury Diesels and looking after all our lovely customers past and present. "The time has now come to retire." They added that all vehicles sold will be given a two-year free warranty. "We have our retirement sale on and everything must go by the end of August." "We will be giving a 2 year free warranty with all vehicles sold." As one of the best and most well-loved car dealerships in the area, customers shared their sadness with the news. On social media, people came to wish the pair the best: "Happy retirement Perrymans, thank you for looking after me and and the Dodd boys so well and keeping us on the road." Dealership quotes driver $7,000 for a basic dashboard repair – but his local mechanic fixed it for $125 in two hours Another person added: "To Mike and Tracey, I hope that you both have a very happy and well deserved retirement." Denbury Diesels was a business that offered servicing, repairs, MOTs and diagnostics on all makes of cars, including light commercial vehicles, motor homes and minibuses, as well as sold them. It's site boasted a 12-bay workshop facility, and a paint and body shop.
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
Self-driving cars are coming to UK in 2026 & serious concerns remain – but there's also 5 incredible benefits
AN EXPERT has opened up on the challenges the UK faces as it approaches the adoption of self-driving technology. Recently, mega-brand Tesla revealed footage of two major test runs of one of its cars negotiating central London and Swindon's Magic Roundabout - without human intervention. 4 4 4 4 The clips showed a Tesla Model 3 navigating past iconic locations in central London, as well as Swindon's Magic Roundabout - a complex system of five mini-roundabouts arranged in a circle around a larger central one - while the person in the driver's seat was not holding the steering wheel. But the technology's potential and its imminent nationwide rollout - which could be by spring 2026 - have understandably sparked public concerns about safety, while also bringing up discussions on the transformative impact on the automotive industry. John Kushnick, Legal Operations Director at the National Accident Helpline, has been closely following these developments. He recently spoke to Sun Motors about how the tech could enhance safety and revolutionise transportation, although he remains cautious about its readiness for widespread adoption - citing public mistrust, regulatory hurdles and the necessity for greater transparency from manufacturers. Indeed, John emphasises that brands, such as Tesla, need to do a lot of work in addressing public mistrust. 'Everything has got to be transparent and I think that's where it has been lacking,' he said. 'If we look at Diesel-Gate as an example, if we leave it to companies, it will always be seen as in their best interest to hide any issues rather than show them in hope that they'll get away with it. 'None of us really know how self-driving cars work because they use massively complex software and AI in the background to make decisions - so we're never going to understand that. 'We have to be sure that the companies understand it and then they're going to act in our best interest.' To address the public's potential mistrust, John believes manufacturers will have their work cut out to show they're willing to be open with the public - including the way they record and display their data, especially around accidents. He also highlights the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework to manage self-driving technology, explaining how regulators like the DVSA are not yet prepared to handle the complexities of self-driving vehicles. 'They'd have to up their game,' said John. 'You need some quite high-tech solutions to this because you're going to need to be having pretty regular updates to their systems.' One particular concern is legal and regulatory barriers, such as grey areas around liability when the car transitions control back to the driver. John explains that liability depends on the mode in which the car was operating. If the vehicle is in self-driving mode during an accident, the manufacturer is liable. However, if the driver takes over control, the responsibility shifts to them. He highlights grey areas where self-driving assistance fails or where the car detects it cannot operate properly and passes control back to the driver. Quoting a report by Faction, a company focused on developing autonomous vehicle technology, he said: 'If it's in self-driving mode and it has an accident, then the liability goes on to the manufacturer. 'If the driver has taken over control, then it's going to be on them. 'The grey area will be where it's assisted and the assistant doesn't work properly. 'There's also going to be situations where a car's in self-driving mode but it then detects that it can't work properly or it doesn't understand the layout, and it passes over to the driver. 'That's where you'd have to be able to say, have they been given enough time? Has anyone else taken over? If not, then the liability goes on the driver.' Indeed, John warns that any major accidents during the rollout of self-driving cars could severely harm public perception and slow adoption. He stresses the importance of careful implementation to avoid catastrophic incidents. Another problem that John points out is the UK's older and more complicated road infrastructure, which poses significant challenges for self-driving technology. Narrow roads, potholes, and rural areas make it harder for autonomous vehicles to operate reliably, compared to places in the US like Arizona or San Francisco, where self-driving cars are currently in operation. John said: 'In Arizona, it's a classic, you're not going to see many cars passing you, they're nice straight roads and San Francisco's, with a lot of those roads built on grids. 'That does make it easier. It is much harder where you've got potholes, which can then make the vehicles react in an unpredictable way. You've got narrow roads. 'How are the rules going to go, where you really have not got quite enough space for two vehicles? Is it just going to stop and not do anything? 'You've got all sorts of more complications here, because we've got older roads, we've got narrower roads, more rural roads. 'I also think we're slower to adopt energy. Once we see self-driving cars operating successfully in certain circumstances, I think public perception will start to shift.' FIRST STEP John, though, also believes self-driving tech could significantly reduce accidents by eliminating human error. He also believes that autonomous vehicles can learn from real-world data and improve their performance over time, making roads safer. "The good thing about this sort of technology is that you've got the ability to learn over time, and for that learning to stick,' John added. 'You can use technology to learn what happens in different circumstances and it can then help avoid accidents." John suggests that self-driving technology could eliminate specific types of accidents - such as distracted or impaired driving. "We have to see if on balance it is safer to have these vehicles, because it may actually mean we can reduce accidents,' he said. He also envisions a future where self-driving cars make transport more efficient and reduce the need for private car ownership. He predicts fewer cars parked on streets, as autonomous vehicles can operate as shared fleets, constantly in use and available on demand, with the shift able to open up urban spaces, reduce congestion and lower costs for individuals. He said: "Imagine a world without streets lined with parked cars. Once this really takes off, you won't need to own a vehicle - it'll be so much cheaper." Furthermore, with self-driving cars becoming more prevalent, insurance costs could decrease - since automated systems are likely to result in fewer accidents. Additionally, shared self-driving taxis could be cheaper than owning and maintaining a personal vehicle. John added: "For the sake of argument, if you're using an automated mode three-quarters of the time, you're actually driving less, so in theory the price should come down." What's clear is that self-driving technology offers the promise of safer roads, reduced congestion and transformative changes to transportation, although significant challenges remain. As John emphasises, "it's all about that first step. If you don't take it, you'll never get there."
