logo
Massive ‘giant woolly RAT' triple the size of regular rodent found as enormous creatures dubbed ‘largest in the world'

Massive ‘giant woolly RAT' triple the size of regular rodent found as enormous creatures dubbed ‘largest in the world'

The Sun21-05-2025
A RARE species of giant woolly rat has been documented in photos and video footage for the first time ever.
The elusive, nocturnal Subalpine Woolly Rat, or Mallomys istapantap, can be found high up in the mountains of New Guinea.
3
3
New Guinean Woolly rats are some of the largest murine rodents in the world - and are triple the size of the average rodent in the UK or US.
Despite its total length of 85cm, 8cm-long paws, and body weight of roughly 2kg - the giant woolly rat has evaded researchers for decades.
The species was last recorded 30 years ago and had never before been photographed until now.
František Vejmělka, a Czech doctoral candidate from the Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences and the University of South Bohemia, is the first person to scientifically document the Subalpine Woolly Rat in the wild.
With help from several local tribes, Vejmělka was able to document the rare species while on a six-month expedition from the base to the summit of Mount Wilhelm - the highest peak in Papua New Guinea at 4,509m high.
"It's astonishing that such a large and striking animal has remained so poorly studied," said Vejmělka.
"How much more is there to discover about the biodiversity of tropical mountains?"
The creatures are typically found in regions up to 3,700metres high.
Its nocturnal habits - and the inaccessibility of its habitat - have made it extremely difficult to observe in the wild.
And until now, the Subalpine Woolly Rat was known to science only from a handful of museum specimens.
Vejmělka documentation means scientists now have biometric measurements of the creatures.
They also have knowledge other aspects of its lifestyle, such as the animal's diet, parasites that affect them, and activity patterns.
The shaggy-furred rat climbs trees at night, hides in underground burrows or tree canopies during the day, and feeds exclusively on plant matter.
"If it weren't for the indigenous hunters who accompanied me in the mountains and helped me locate the animals," said Vejmělka. "I would never have been able to collect this data."
3
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WA Museum partnership with Woodside criticised as record-breaking marine heatwave decimates coral reefs
WA Museum partnership with Woodside criticised as record-breaking marine heatwave decimates coral reefs

The Guardian

time5 days ago

  • The Guardian

WA Museum partnership with Woodside criticised as record-breaking marine heatwave decimates coral reefs

The WA Greens and the state's peak conservation body have condemned the extension of a research partnership between the Western Australian Museum and Woodside, as the state reels from a record-breaking marine heatwave that has killed corals over a 1,500km stretch of ocean. The five-year continuation of the 'longstanding collaboration', in which the gas giant supports the museum's biodiversity research along the WA coastline, would allow for further targeted research along the Gascoyne coast, according to announcements. In a post on its LinkedIn page, the museum wrote that 'to mark the milestone' Woodside was supporting free general admission to the WA Maritime Museum on Sunday 17 August for the 'Woodside Energy Open Day' and the event would feature 'family-friendly activities all about marine science' as part of National Science Week. The new deal – which extends the 28-year partnership – and the open day have been promoted in front page advertisements in WA media this week. Sign up: AU Breaking News email It has prompted fury from climate advocates and the WA Greens as it coincides with the release of research about the extent of the damage caused by a record-breaking, climate-change fuelled marine heatwave to the state's coral reefs. The heatwave, which started to build off the north-west WA coast in August 2024, has been called 'the most severe coral bleaching on record for Western Australian coral reefs'. It has left 75% of affected coral either bleached or dead, according to a group of scientists from state and federal government departments, agencies and universities who worked on this week's report. The WA Greens fossil fuels and climate action spokesperson Sophie McNeill wrote to the museum on Tuesday seeking a briefing from its director Alec Coles 'because it seems like they [the museum] don't understand the relationship between fossil fuel companies and the devastating impacts of climate change we are seeing right now on our marine environment'. 'It is so inappropriate that the WA Museum has chosen to continue its partnership with one of the world's largest fossil fuel companies as our world heritage listed coral reefs are literally dying in front of our eyes,' McNeill said. 'As one of the state's biggest polluters, Woodside should not be allowed anywhere near marine science in Western Australia given they are responsible for the current devastation we are seeing along our coastline that is so universally loved by all.' McNeill expressed concern that children visiting museums to learn about oceans were being exposed to branding from 'the very same fossil fuel giant that is contributing to the death of our coral reefs'. 'It is deeply alarming that our precious institutions here in WA are so deeply captured, just like the WA Labor government, by fossil fuel companies like Woodside,' she said. In a statement, a spokesperson from WA Museum described it as 'independent, science-led, and committed to the people and the environment of Western Australia'. The spokesperson added that WA Museum relies on 'a diverse range of funding sources – including government, competitive research grants, philanthropic contributions, and corporate support'. They continued that 'engaging constructively and transparently with industry' allowed WA Museum to expand knowledge of WA's ecosystems, 'foster dialogue between sectors' and 'ensure that decisions about environmental impact are informed by the best available science'. The Conservation Council of WA said the museum, as a state government institution, should reject the extended sponsorship arrangement. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'If there is funding required the government should show some leadership and actually put up the money and ensure that important research is still continuing,' executive director Matt Roberts said. 'So that we're not relying on the very industry that is causing our marine systems to be on the brink of collapse to fund the research into that collapse.' Roberts said the council was organising a 'requiem for our reefs' at the Maritime Museum on Sunday to highlight the 'devastating impact of Woodside's emissions on WA's coral reef system, and calling for public support to stop Australia's biggest polluter from drilling for new gas under the pristine Scott Reef in the Browse Basin'. Paul Gamblin, the chief executive of the Australian Marine Conservation Society, questioned Woodside's motives, asking'what do they seek to gain from it?' 'Particularly given the very clear evidence of the marine environment coming under increasing stress, one might imagine we're going to see more of this kind of sponsorship and public relations.' The spokesperson for the WA Museum said 'Woodside neither directs the research, nor participates in it [and] the Museum retains all intellectual property generated, other than that vested in Traditional Owners'. Woodside referred back to the company statement released last week, which said the ongoing collaboration had 'led to the discovery and description of numerous new species, and significantly increased understanding of the marine environment of Western Australia'. Chief executive Meg O'Neill said last week 'this renewed collaboration reaffirms Woodside's commitment to responsible environmental management and the ongoing discovery of WA's unique marine biodiversity'.

Air pollution filters help scientists produce first UK wildlife survey using eDNA
Air pollution filters help scientists produce first UK wildlife survey using eDNA

The Guardian

time08-08-2025

  • The Guardian

Air pollution filters help scientists produce first UK wildlife survey using eDNA

As the UK's Big Butterfly Count reaches more than 100,000 submissions, an international group of scientists have produced the first national survey of biodiversity using an entirely different approach. Instead of looking for species by eye, they took advantage of the samplers around the UK that constantly measure toxic metal particles in the air, and used them to measure tiny fragments of DNA. Dr Joanne Littlefair from University College London, part of the research team, said: 'Organisms lose bits of themselves all the time – dead skin cells, fragments of hair or feathers, saliva, even faeces and urine. Some of this will blow up into the air and become airborne 'environmental' DNA or eDNA.' Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Researchers were able to detect more than 1,100 plants and animals which included familiar UK species – trees, commercial crops, earthworms, newts, robins and badgers – as well as species of conservation concern, including skylarks and hedgehogs. The team found 65 species of butterfly and moth, including the gatekeeper (no 3 in the Big Butterfly Count) as well as the purple hairstreak, a butterfly that lives mainly in oak trees and is often overlooked. They also found established invasive species such as grey squirrels and muntjacs as well species that have only just arrived in the UK, and fungi that are considered crop pests as well as the pathogen that causes ash dieback. The UK national survey started from a chance spot on social media. Dr Andew Brown from the National Physical Laboratory said: 'We saw a social media post about airborne eDNA projects at a zoo in Cambridgeshire and wondered whether if the air pollution filters in our labs contained hidden information about local biodiversity.' These filters came from 15 samplers around the UK that constantly measure toxic metal particles in the air, installed in diverse locations from the kerb of London's Marylebone Road to rural Hampshire and a peat bog in Scotland. Some detections were not part of the natural ecosystems, but this data was useful for learning about how far eDNA could travel. Edible fish including seabass and hake were detected at Marylebone Road and traced to seafood stalls, including a market about 1.1km away. Exotic pets including peacocks and parrots were traced to outdoor aviaries. From this the researchers estimated that each air pollution monitoring site could detect the biodiversity of an area with a radius of about 19km. Prof Elizabeth Clare from York University, Canada, part of the research team, said: 'I think that this is only the beginning. Taking large national and continental measurements is now really possible. No other method can really scale to this geographic breadth.' Airborne eDNA compared well with the UK's other biodiversity data: a third of the species detectedthis way were nocturnal creatures that are hard to observe and can be under reported. Although some species were missed altogether, including blue tits and kestrels, the eDNA method may allow biodiversity changes to be tracked in places where they are not routinely surveyed by simply taking samples from air pollution measurement equipment that is used routinely around the globe.

Gardeners urged to collaborate to help moths and hover flies thrive in cities
Gardeners urged to collaborate to help moths and hover flies thrive in cities

The Guardian

time06-08-2025

  • The Guardian

Gardeners urged to collaborate to help moths and hover flies thrive in cities

Gardeners have been urged to work with their neighbours to support moths and hover flies after research found them to be particularly sensitive to urban landscapes. While bees get most of the attention when it comes to supporting pollinators in our cities, researchers found that their less glamorous – but no less important – counterparts from other orders are even more acutely affected by urbanisation. Three researchers from Sheffield's school of biosciences investigated the impact that urbanisation in the UK was having on pollinators and found that urban landscapes support 43% fewer pollinator species, with the biggest declines evident the further into the heart of the city they went. Emilie Ellis, the lead author of the study who carried out the work as part of her PhD, said: 'The original focus was going to be on bees as they're the most charismatic species. 'But then my interest in moths added this on to it, and then [co-author Stuart Campbell]'s interest in flies included hover flies. That's the kind of cool novelty of this manuscript, that we included three different pollinating groups that are very diverse.' The research, carried out over the summer of 2019, involved Ellis visiting allotments in Leeds, Leicester and Sheffield, in varying urban densities, to sample the number of pollinating insects from all three groups. 'We just collected insects every month for six months in eight sites in each city – so it was a lot of driving.' Their findings were sobering. They found that for every 10% increase in impervious surfaces – such as roads and building cover – there was a reduction of up to 7.5% in the variety of pollinating species. But the number of moths and hover flies of any species took a far greater hit compared with the number of bees. 'We hypothesise that this could be due to the fact that they've got more complex life cycles because they need those different kind of resources other than flowers to become adults,' Ellis said. But that crucial vulnerability also contains a potential answer. If gardeners and urban planners bear in mind the needs of other pollinators, then there are straightforward ways to cater to them. 'We're so good now planting flowers for pollinators like bees and that could be the reason why we're not seeing them decline,' Ellis added. 'It's just a matter of taking these guys into account and maybe having some more shrubs or a pond or something like that to also benefit those insects. 'The diversity of habitat is the most important – so you need your flower patch, you need a tree, you need some shrubs, you need an untouched bit of grass – and kind of just keeping the patches that you have diverse and catering for all different types of insects and animals. 'A huge thing that's important is collaborating and talking to your neighbours and families and friends and encouraging them to do it too. Because an individual allotment or flower garden is pretty small and almost useless, but when you create a whole network of people that are interested and engaged these small little patches can become these huge habitat networks in cities.' Ellis and her colleagues' findings are published in the Royal Society's biological research journal Proceedings B.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store