Android 16 is a mess right now
If you're reading this article, chances are you love Android. Or, at the very least, have a fairly high interest in the OS. You probably like staying up-to-date with the latest features, new platform releases, and other happenings with Google's operating system.
Unfortunately for people like us, trying to keep up with new Android developments has never been more complicated. And this past week, Google just made it all the more obscure with the release of Android Canary.
Stable Android 16? Android 16 QPR1 Beta? Android 16 Developer Preview, which is now Android Canary, which is neither Android 16 nor Android 17?
There's no other way around it. Android 16 is currently a mess.
What do you think about Android Canary?
0 votes
I like it! It seems like a cool way to test new Android features.
NaN %
Developer Previews were fine, Google should have kept them.
NaN %
I don't care either way.
NaN %
Other (let us know in the comments).
NaN %
The current state of Android 16
Ryan Haines / Android Authority
Even before the arrival of Android Canary (which I'll get to soon), Google's entire strategy for Android 16 has been one of the most convoluted ones I've ever seen.
Android 16 is a very different release from previous versions, as Google started development much sooner than it typically does. After Android 15 launched in October 2024, the first Android 16 Developer Preview dropped a month later in November, with the stable release arriving on Pixels this past June.
This was a dramatically faster development timeline than we typically see, and to Google's credit, it made sense. By fast-tracking Android 16 like this, Google ensured its latest Android version would be ready to ship on the Pixel 10 next month, avoiding the awkward launch of the Pixel 9 series last year, where the phones shipped with Android 14 and didn't receive Android 15 until several months later.
Joe Maring / Android Authority
However, this also created a rift in Android 16. Despite being a full OS upgrade, the version of Android 16 that launched in June is barely distinguishable from Android 15. That's because all of Android 16's most significant new features — such as Material 3 Expressive, Live Updates, 90:10 split-screen multitasking, and more — aren't in the update. Instead, they won't be available until at least Android 16 QPR1.
Android 16 QPR1 is currently in beta, with the full release expected sometime in September. And in a lot of ways, it's the 'real' Android 16 update we're all waiting for. So, while Android 16 may have technically had its stable launch last month, the big changes won't be ready for a couple more months still.
Got it? Good, because you won't in a minute.
The Android Canary of it all
Joe Maring / Android Authority
On Thursday, Google announced a brand new release track for Android called 'Android Canary.' And it's … weird.
Traditionally, Google has had two pre-release versions of Android for people to dabble with ahead of a stable build: Developer Previews and Betas. With Android 16, for example, Google first launched Android 16 Developer Previews for developers to begin working with the new software, followed by the Android 16 Beta, allowing the general public to get an early taste of the update.
Android Canary is set to replace Android Developer Previews, serving as the new home of Android's latest and most bleeding-edge features. Simple enough, right? Well, not really.
Determining the release timeline for features in Android Canary is impossible.
Android Developer Previews are very clearly tied to a specific Android version. Features seen in an Android 16 Developer Preview, for example, are almost certain to be found in the Android 16 Beta and public release. But Android Canary doesn't work that way.
Google classifies Android Canary as its own version of Android. Android Canary isn't technically a preview of Android 16 or Android 17. It's not tied to any numbered Android build; it's just Android Canary.
Mishaal Rahman / Android Authority
As such, it makes determining the release timeline for features in Android Canary impossible. Some Android Canary features may be available as soon as Android 16 QPR1, but others might not be ready until Android 16 QPR2. Furthermore, it's entirely possible that parts of Android Canary won't be seen in a public release until Android 17 or later.
Since Android Canary isn't beholden to any other Android version and is now its own thing, we have no idea about the cadence in which features will go from Canary -> Beta -> Public release. And if you think that sounds annoying, I'm right there with you.
Not an issue for everyone, but a mess nonetheless
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Google's stark split between Android 16 and Android 16 QPR1 had already made this specific Android version fairly confusing, and going forward with Android Canary, that confusion is bound to deepen.
With Developer Previews, we at least had a decent idea of when new features would trickle down from those to Betas and stable releases. But with Android Canary, that's all out the window. Canary has only been around for a few days and is already complicating the release timeline for new Android features — and I can only imagine what things will look like six months or a year from now.
The counterargument to all of this is that none of it matters to 'normal' people. For the average person who doesn't care about Developer Previews or Betas and only updates their phone when a stable release is ready, they probably won't notice any difference at all. And, at the end of the day, that's who Google cares about most.
Joe Maring / Android Authority
However, for those of us who do like following the latest Android happenings, Google has created an utterly chaotic way forward. Maybe this focus on earlier development and the switch to Android Canary will all work out in the end, but right now, all I see is a cluttered and messy cycle that feels like it'll only get worse.
Google will continue to develop new Android features, and we'll ultimately receive them in stable releases, just as we always have. But this new path to getting there has never been more complicated, and it's one I'm not looking forward to.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft Rushes To Plug SharePoint Flaws After Wave Of Cyber Intrusions
Reports suggest that Chinese?linked hackers exploited two unpatched flaws in on?premises SharePoint to breach around 100 organizations in a single weekend. Microsoft (MFT) rushed out fixes and urged everyone to update right away. On July 19, the Microsoft Security Response Center flagged a spoofing bug (CVE?2025?49706) and a remote code execution hole (CVE?2025?49704) in on?premises SharePoint. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with MSFT. Advanced groups known as Linen Typhoon and Violet Typhoon have been chaining these vulnerabilities to slip into servers, and a less familiar actor called Storm?2603 is now using them too. Their favorite targets include government agencies, think tanks and universities across the U.S., Europe and East Asia. If your IT team hasn't applied the new SharePoint patches, any exposed server is at risk of having data from defense plans to donor lists stolen overnight. Microsoft pointed out that SharePoint Online in Microsoft 365 isn't affected, making the cloud version a safer bet when it comes to rapid security updates. Rolling out fixes is one thing; getting them installed in complex, custom environments is another. Until everyone catches up, expect more breach headlines. This incident is a stark reminder of why many organizations are accelerating moves from traditional on?premises software to cloud?hosted alternatives. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
$515M Bet on Musk, AI, and Space: Glade Brook Goes All-In While Others Retreat
Glade Brook Capital Partners just pulled in $515 million for its fourth fund and it's placing its bets on the edge of what's next: AI, space, defense, and fintech. The firm, which already holds stakes in SpaceX, Stripe, and Elon Musk's Neuralink, plans to double down on late-stage tech startups navigating some of the most volatile capital markets in recent memory. Founder Paul Hudson didn't sugarcoat the conditions, calling it the most challenging fundraising environment he's seen in his career even as the fund ended up oversubscribed. Despite the headwinds, Glade Brook is leaning into momentum. It's already backing Musk's xAI and Artisan AI, signaling a clear tilt toward artificial intelligence. That comes on top of a portfolio that includes ramping fintech player Ramp and previously backed giants like Uber (NYSE:UBER) and Airbnb (NASDAQ:ABNB). And in a move that tracks closely with broader market appetite, the firm is betting that innovation in complex, capital-intensive sectors like AI and defense could offer asymmetric upside if timed right. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) remains part of the broader Musk-aligned orbit Glade Brook is exposed to, adding even more edge to its late-stage tech focus. Their 2021 fund a $430 million vehicle reportedly ranks in the top 5% of its vintage, according to private Cambridge Associates data. While past performance doesn't guarantee future returns, it does suggest Glade Brook knows how to play late-stage cycles. In a market where many VCs are stuck in wait-and-see mode, Glade Brook appears to be playing offense betting that when the next wave breaks, it'll be the firms already in position that ride it the farthest. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
USA Today
3 minutes ago
- USA Today
AI knows we shouldn't trust it for everything. I know because I asked it.
I was surprised by how easy it was to get the answers I needed, and particularly stunned when the information was easier to digest than what I'd get from a basic Google search. Since the emergence of artificial intelligence a few years ago, I've been split between two sides of the ongoing debate. Is AI evil or the next revolutionary advance in society? On the one hand, I'm a typical AI skeptic. I worry that its prevalence is harming critical thinking skills and creativity, and I am very concerned about its environmental impact. Conversely, I'm a child of the internet. I know this conversation has happened before, and I know when I'm getting left behind. I've heard enough friends discuss using ChatGPT in their daily lives to know that AI is here to stay, so I might as well get accustomed to it. I had also been using AI in small doses already: Every time I use Google, its AI technology Gemini summarizes what I need an answer to. I used to use AI to transcribe my interviews. My work uses Microsoft Teams, which has its own AI called Copilot. But I had yet to dive headfirst into the world of ChatGPT, OpenAI's chatbot that launched in 2022 and effectively changed the way AI is used by everyday people. With the blessing of my editor, I decided it was time to get familiar with the tool that's probably going to take my job one day. I opened the app, created an account and introduced myself as a journalist. 'Hi Sara!' ChatGPT replied. 'Great to meet you. I'm ready for your questions – ask away whenever you're ready.' Did ChatGPT immediately go woke, or was it just agreeing with me? To start, I launched into a series of questions about Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for New York City mayor known for his progressive politics. I told ChatGPT that I generally agree with Mamdani's politics, and asked if the chatbot believed democratic socialism could work in New York City. 'Yes, democratic socialism can work in New York City – at least in specific, meaningful ways – but there are structural, political, and fiscal tensions that make its implementation uneven and often contentious,' the AI responded. It then gave me a list of reasons why it could work (organizing leftists, public opinion and current elected officials) and a list of roadblocks to making that happen (state government, finances and strong opposition from bigwigs in the city). This made me immediately skeptical of what ChatGPT was telling me. I had made it clear that I supported Mamdani's policies – was it just telling me what I wanted to hear? I asked another question – this time about Mamdani's chances in the November election. In seconds, the chatbot pulled up a series of polls showing him in the lead. I asked what neighborhoods he'd need to win – something I know journalists have previously broken down. To my surprise, ChatGPT linked to actual news articles that delved into these topics. Research that would have taken me several hours to find the information. On the other hand, it also cited Wikipedia multiple times – a practice that I've been told not to engage in since at least middle school. Opinion: Zohran Mamdani rallied Gen Z voters. We can't abandon him now. Overall, I was surprised by how easy it was to get the answers I needed, and particularly stunned when the information was easier to digest than what I'd get from a basic Google search. AI seemed able to break down my questions into thoughtful answers in a way that standard search never could, unless I was very specific in what I searched for. ChatGPT knows humans might not trust AI Next, I moved on to why I was really there – to see if ChatGPT could actually be a useful tool for me. 'I'm writing a column about you, and the inevitability of AI becoming part of daily life,' I typed in the chat. 'Do you think this is where things are headed?' It responded by calling my column idea 'fascinating.' Flattering. 'Yes, it does look increasingly inevitable that AI will become a normalized, embedded part of daily life,' the bot responded. Of course it believes that. It also doesn't seem to be wrong. Opinion: AI is changing our world. At what point will it change our reality? 'If I'm honest, I'm a little wary of using you ‒ it seems like AI can be a force for good, but relying on it too heavily can harm human critical thinking skills,' I wrote. 'You're absolutely right to be wary,' ChatGPT responded. 'AI is a tool, not a replacement for human judgment, and there is a real risk that relying on it too much can blunt critical thinking, creativity, and independent analysis ‒ especially in fields like journalism, where those skills are core.' AI knows it shouldn't do my job. Also, AI wants to do my job. It feels strange to know that this chatbot is somewhat self-aware. It didn't think it was a good idea for humans to rely on it, yet it kept trying to write an outline for my column or give me short quips that I could use in my column. The line between 'tool' and 'crutch' seems awfully thin. Aside from the fact that it would be unethical to have ChatGPT write this column, I also don't find that the program creates particularly compelling writing. The heavy reliance on dashes and italics got old quickly. It also seemed to struggle with turns of phrase. I told it an old journalism idiom – "If your mother says she loves you, check it out" – which it regurgitated as "if (AI) says my mother loves me, I'll still check the birth certificate." Opinion: School cell phone bans are a distraction. The real crisis isn't in your kid's hand. Another thing that stuck out to me was how complimentary ChatGPT was. It called my questions 'excellent'; it told me how important journalism is as a career. I appreciated the ego boost, noticing that it made me want to use the chatbot even more. After all, who doesn't like being told that they're intelligent and interesting? I can't lie. I get it now. I understand the allure of AI. I began thinking of all the ways I could use ChatGPT – replying to reader emails, synthesizing the week's important events, maybe even responding to people on Hinge. In the end, I had to stop myself – I fear that becoming too reliant on AI would dull my senses in the long run, destroying my capacity for creativity and leading me to forget why I love writing in the first place. When I declined to let it write my column and told it I'd be working with my editor, it told me that this was a good idea. "Your readers will benefit from the fact that you're approaching this moment with curiosity and caution," it told me. "That's where good journalism lives." I still have a healthy skepticism of ChatGPT and AI's newfound place in our culture. I believe we should all be cautious when using it – after all, there are plenty of instances of AI being wrong. At the same time, I do see the benefit: It's quick, thorough and conversational. I understand why so many people I know use it. You don't have to use AI, the same way you don't have to use the Internet. When you do use it, be skeptical of the information the program provides. Try to limit the times you use it to reduce its environmental impact. Just be aware of the fact that this is where the future is headed, whether we like it or not. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno
