Swallow Roundabout chaos: Why is there no Dundee bypass?
The topic of a Dundee bypass has raised its head once again after recent traffic chaos at the Swallow Roundabout.
Drivers have faced long delays after the installation of traffic lights at the junction, while there has also been confusion over signs and road markings.
That has led to hundreds of motorists complaining to the Scottish Government via a councillor.
Some – including The Courier columnist Steve Finan – say a city bypass would be the obvious solution.
So why has a Dundee bypass never been built?
The Courier looks at the history of the proposal and what barriers it has met.
The idea of a Dundee bypass to reduce traffic on the Kingsway has been on the cards for nearly two decades.
A 2008 Scottish Government report outlined a 'Northern Peripheral Bypass' as one of two options to improve traffic.
The other option was to upgrade the Kingsway's roundabouts and junctions.
The report said a new road could leave the A90 to the west of Invergowrie and rejoin the A90 north of Dundee.
It was estimated the bypass would cost between £250 million and £500m at that time.
The report said a bypass could reduce Kingsway traffic by up to 50% and improve journey times between Aberdeen and the central belt by up to 15 minutes.
The report also argued a bypass would be less expensive than making incremental improvements to the A90.
Transport Scotland said at the time: 'The bypass route is expected to provide more value for money than the on-line upgrade.'
However, the government body also acknowledged the bypass would likely 'introduce adverse environmental impacts' in the countryside north of Dundee.
In January 2013, Dundee City Council and the Scottish Government said they would hold talks about a potential Dundee bypass.
It prompted renewed calls in 2014 from Aberdeenshire and Aberdeen City transport partnership, Nestrans, for a Dundee bypass to be built.
Then-Aberdeenshire councillor Peter Argyle told the Evening Telegraph he would back bypass plans.
He said: 'If you're looking to have a good transport network, then having a major through-route from a particularly dynamic part of Scotland through to the central belt that passes through another city isn't ideal.
'A bypass would be hugely advantageous.'
However, Dundee City Council said it wanted to focus on upgrading the Kingsway instead.
In June 2014, the Scottish Government published The National Planning Framework 3.
It once again outlined plans for a bypass as part of Dundee's regeneration.
The Courier reported how the framework had suggested how a 'new alignment bypassing the city' could be an option for upgrading the A90.
A reader's letter published in the Evening Telegraph in February 2019 said: 'If one travels north from London, the first set of traffic lights and congestion is at Dundee.
'The Aberdeen bypass is almost complete now, leaving Dundee as the only city between London and Aberdeen without a proper bypass.'
In July that year, The Courier also reported how a crash on the A90 had caused traffic chaos and prompted further calls for a bypass.
Kevin Keenan, leader of the council's opposition Labour group, said the issues showed the 'difficulties of not having a bypass outside the city'.
In October 2019, The Courier reported how plans for a bypass to the north of Dundee were being reappraised by the Scottish Government.
However, in December 2022, it was revealed the plans had been 'consigned to history' in the latest Scottish Government Strategic Transport Projects Review.
This report called for road safety improvements to be made to the A90 between Perth and Aberdeen but did not mention a bypass.
According to the report, Holyrood was instead getting behind an 'integrated transport plan' for the A90 in Dundee.
The idea has not been back on the table since.
Maurice Golden, Scottish Conservative MSP for the north-east, has previously spoken out in favour of a bypass.
He believes the Scottish Government's decision to focus on improving the Kingsway was a mistake.
He said: 'Dundee desperately needs an alternative like a bypass which would reduce emissions, ease congestion and improve quality of life.
'Dundonians look north and see the great impact the Aberdeen bypass has had and wonder why they've got nothing.
'The current state of affairs with traffic in Dundee is intolerable.
'This plan must be revisited as a key infrastructure priority.
'Electric cars and public transport need good quality roads too.'
A Transport Scotland spokesperson said: 'We currently have no plans to take forward a Dundee northern bypass or relief road.
'An upgrade to the A90 Kingsway or a possible Dundee northern bypass was considered in 2022.
'But the supporting transport appraisal concluded that it would only bring modest benefits in comparison to the significant environmental and financial costs of a new road.
'The recommendation from the second Strategic Transport Projects Review was that further, more detailed work was required to develop a solution that delivered for both local residents and through-traffic.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Live
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Live
Plans to demolish Edinburgh offices for hundreds of student flats set to be granted
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Plans to demolish two Edinburgh offices for a mixed-use development comprising hundreds of student beds are set to be granted. The application, referring to land at 595 and 597 Calder Road, near the A720 City Bypass, will be discussed among councillors during this week's development management sub committee meeting. It has been listed for a detailed presentation as it is contrary to the development plan and has an outstanding unresolved objection from a statutory consultee. SEPA has also objected to the plans, meaning the Scottish Government will have to be informed of the outcome. In July 2024 the plans were put forward by HAMCAP Pentland Gait Ltd which would see Currie House and Herriot House demolished. In their place, a mixed-use development including employment/commercial use and 370 student beds, amended from 382, are proposed. Vehicular access, cycle parking and landscaping are all included. The student accommodation would consist of cluster and studio flats with over 1,300sqm of office and commercial space with a mezzanine level. The building would be six-storeys high, increasing to seven on the east side. The commercial/flexible employment part of the building will be two storeys high and will form an enclosed block with a courtyard in the middle with an opening for access on the ground floor to the north of the building. (Image: Google Maps) A landscaped area will be provided to the north east of the block. On the ground floor, there will be student amenity space, with direct access to the courtyard, two cluster flats, cycle storage, bin storage and commercial/flexible employment floorspace. Despite planning officers stating the application is contrary to the local development plan, they have recommended consent be given as it will "re-use previously developed land where buildings are not contributing to the business and industry or economy of the city." They did, however, add there is a risk of flooding and concerns have been raised by environmental agency SEPA. The meeting's agenda added: "It will use land more efficiently, is in a sustainable location and the building will be sustainable building. The use of conditions will ensure that landscaping and biodiversity enhancements are appropriate. "There will not be an adverse impact on the character of the area. Future occupiers will have a good living environment and there will not be an unreasonable loss to neighbouring amenity. In terms of flood risk, the existing building is at risk of flooding and the proposed building will not increase the risk nor adversely impact the flood plain or storage area. "There are concerns regarding flood conveyance and the proposed use relating to vulnerability (from SEPA). However, there will be no living accommodation on the lower ground floor or the ground floor. Conditions relating to flood design and floor levels will reduce the risk to occupants. "In this context, the proposal is acceptable, and it is recommended that the application be granted subject to conditions." The application is set to be discussed during Wednesday's meeting.
Edinburgh Reporter
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Winter fuel payment announced in England and Wales means uplift for Scotland
In England and Wales, people who are old enough to receive the State Pension and who have income of less than £35,000 will receive a Winter Fuel Payment this winter. This adds up to 9 million pensioners south of the border – which the UK Government says is around three quarters of all pensioners living there. Winter Fuel payments are no longer paid to Scottish pensioners. In winter 2024/25 pensioners were paid Pension Age Winter Heating Payment through the DWP, but in 2025 The Scottish Government announced that the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment will be paid by Social Security Scotland to all qualifying pensioners. The payment will be either £200 or £300 and £100 to other pensioners. Payment will be made to everyone born before 23 September 1958, who lives in Scotland – and who is in receipt of certain other benefits. The UK Government also confirmed that the change – which is a u-turn on Keir Starmer's previous announcement – will cost around £1.25 billion in England and Wales. It is believed that means-testing of the Winter Fuel Payment will save around £450 million, subject to certification by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) compared to the system of Winter Fuel Payments for everyone regardless of income. In Scotland this payment is devolved and the UK Government said the government will receive a 'mechanical uplift' in their funding as a result of the change in England and Wales. It is thought that might be around £100 million. Social Justice Secretary, Shirley Anne Somerville, said: 'The UK Government's decision to cut the winter fuel payment was a betrayal of millions of pensioners and that is why the Scottish Government took action to introduce a winter heating payment for all pensioners in Scotland. 'I welcome any extension of eligibility by the UK Government, but this is a U-turn the Chancellor should have made a long time ago. But there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that. Unfortunately, it still sounds as if many pensioners will miss out. 'We have once again not been consulted on the policy and its implications in Scotland and will scrutinise the proposals carefully when then are announced. I would therefore urge the UK Government to ensure the Scottish Government is fully appraised of the proposed changes as soon as possible. 'The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government wrote to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury last week to urge the UK Government to share its plans with us as quickly as possible, so that we can understand any implications for our own programmes and, crucially, our budget.' Previously the UK Government announced that Winter Fuel Payments would be restricted to pensioners in receipt of Pension Credit. When First Minister, John Swinney, attended the round table meeting in London at the end of May he asked the prime minister to restore winter fuel payments to all pensioners regardless of means. The costs will be accounted for at the Budget and incorporated into the next OBR forecast. The Chancellor said she will take decisions on funding in the round at that forecast to 'ensure the government's non-negotiable fiscal rules are met', and confirmed that this will not lead to permanent additional borrowing. Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, said: 'Targeting Winter Fuel Payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest. 'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the Winter Fuel Payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. This will mean over three quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.' HMRC will reclaim the payment from anyone earning more than £35,000 and no-one is required to take any action or register for the payment. Winter Fuel Payments are worth £200 per household, or £300 per household where there is someone over 80. Shared payments are made to pensioners not on an income-related benefit. Scottish Labour Scottish Labour Social Security spokesperson, Paul O'Kane, said: 'This is welcome news that will bring even more money to Scotland – on top of the record funding settlement Labour delivered in the budget. 'The last Tory government left our public finances in chaos but Labour has made good progress cleaning up the mess it inherited. 'The Winer Fuel Payment is a devolved payment in Scotland and Scottish Labour has long been clear that we want to see it reinstated for the majority of pensioners up here – but despite their loud spin, the SNP voted against our attempts to do so. 'The SNP must not go ahead with plans that would rob poorer pensioners in order to fund payments for millionaires. 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.' Scottish Greens Scottish Greens Social Security spokesperson Maggie Chapman MSP said: 'Cutting the Winter Fuel Payment was one of the first acts of this Labour government. Elected on a promise of 'change' they brought in sweeping austerity that harmed older people across the UK at a time when the cost of living remains sky high. 'There is no doubt that the damage has already been done, families will have lost loved ones, and illnesses will have been caused over the winter months because of the brutal decision by Rachel Reeves and the Labour Government. 'Labour's cutting of the Winter Fuel Payment, refusal to end the two-child benefit cap and regressive austerity measures are forcing people into poverty in Scotland and across the UK 'The reinstatement of the Winter Fuel Payment for some is a welcome move, but we must go further, the Labour government must end the two-child benefit cap which hits working class families the hardest, and they must reverse their cruel austerity policies. 'Poverty isn't inevitable. It's a political policy, a policy which Rachel Reeves has forced upon hundreds of thousands of people across the UK. If Keir Starmer has any shame, he would finally call an end to her disastrous time as Chancellor.' Independent Age Chief Executive Joanna Elson, CBE, said:'We are pleased that the UK Government has listened to the voices of older people on a low income and reconsidered what was an incredibly damaging change to the Winter Fuel Payment. By widening the eligibility criteria, more older people in financial hardship will now receive this vital lifeline in time for winter. 'Our helpline receives thousands of calls from older people making drastic cutbacks just to get by and the changes to the Winter Fuel Payment made this worse. For millions living on low incomes, the entitlement supports them to turn their heating on and stock up on food during the colder months. 'While the changes to the Winter Fuel Payment are positive, they are not a silver bullet that will end pensioner poverty. Around 2 million older people still live in poverty, and measures must be taken to ensure the long-term financial security of all people in later life. There needs to be a cross-party consensus on the adequate income needed in later life to avoid financial hardship. Once this is established, every older person should be supported to receive this amount. Nobody should have to live in poverty as they age.' Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'Commonsense has finally prevailed as the winter fuel cut is reversed for most pensioners. Whilst this is an important step forward, questions will be asked about how this disastrous decision was made in the first place, the damage may not easily be reversed. 'Leadership is about choices and the choice to pit workers against pensioners was simply wrong. 'Instead of what seems to be a never-ending cycle of cuts, Labour needs to revisit the fiscal rules and bite the bullet on a wealth tax. Britain is the sixth richest economy in the world, the idea that we would be picking the pockets of our pensioners was unnecessary and unforgivable.' When the government announced it was cutting the winter fuel payment, Unite mounted a campaign to get the decision overturned. This included organising a vote at Labour conference opposing the cut in winter fuel payments, and grassroots campaigning which got the cut partially reversed in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Westminster Like this: Like Related
The Courier
2 hours ago
- The Courier
Housing minister meets Raac campaigners in Dundee as key theme emerges
The housing minister has met with campaigners and the local authority in Dundee to discuss the Raac crisis affecting in the city. Paul McLennan sat down with Yvette and Wayne Hoskins on Monday afternoon to discuss a range of concerns, including communication issues between residents and Dundee City Council. Speaking to The Courier afterwards, Mr McLennan said: 'I met with the council earlier on today as well and asked them some questions about their approach. 'And I've spoken to Wayne and Yvette in more detail. 'There's some things that we've taken away, one of them is about communication both for council tenants and for private residents.' The housing minister believes local authorities should be taking the lead on informing residents about Raac-related issues and said learnings could be made. 'I think the key thing is communication between council and the Raac community – whether it's either residents or council tenants,' said Mr McLennan. 'The situation in Aberdeen is different to Dundee and is different to other parts, so the lead on this should be local authorities. 'One of the other things we talked about today was learning from other local authorities. 'In terms of Aberdeen, its communication has been different from Dundee, it's been different from North Lanarkshire and other parts of Scotland. 'So we look at best practice as well in terms of communication.' When asked outright if Dundee City Council had to improve on their communication, Mr McLennan said: 'I think they're just different approaches. 'It's an unsettling time for residents and council tenants and I think one of the key things is knowing what they need to know.' Earlier this week, Raac residents in Menzieshill were furious after being told to expect a repair bill by council for work on their flats which began without consultation. Mortgages and insurance concerns were the other key messages raised by the campaigners. The housing minister said the Scottish Government were continuing to ask Westminster to set up a UK Raac fund. However, he admitted that currently the UK Government was saying no. Mr McLennan pointed to Raac now being found in Wales and other previous instances where it was found in England. 'We believe it's a UK Raac issue and we've asked the UK Government to set up a Raac fund. 'They've said no at this stage, but we've went back to them.' The Courier is asking people to sign a petition to help homeowners gain a voice at Westminster. Dundee Raac campaign chairman, Wayne Hoskins, said it had been a good meeting with the minister. He told The Courier: 'We want answers for homeowners and tenants. 'We want answers on mortgages, we can't get mortgages on our property. 'How do we restore these to market value? We're losing £30k-40k on these properties.' The housing minister said he would return to Dundee for a public meeting on the issue.
