SARC calls on Sindh govt to address farmers' issues
Programme will also focus on the reorientation of agriculture research for development of better crop varieties in terms of yield and pest resistance. PHOTO: FILE
Listen to article
The Sindh Agriculture Research Council (SARC), representing small farmers and peasants, has welcomed initiatives taken by the Sindh Government under Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah. However, it has also raised urgent concerns regarding the challenges faced by small growers, calling for immediate government intervention, according to a press statement released on Saturday.
SARC stressed the need for subsidies on solar tube wells and agricultural tools for small growers holding 10-25 acres of land. The statement highlighted that these farmers are often excluded from such benefits due to favouritism, political affiliations, or lack of access to agricultural officials.
While appreciating the government's initiative of issuing Kissan Cards to farmers, SARC expressed serious concern over the lack of a proper farmer census. Without accurate data, it warned, identifying beneficiaries for the Kissan Card would be problematic. SARC urged the Sindh government to address this issue, citing a landmark Sindh High Court judgment in PLD 202 Sindh 284 (Ghulam Ali vs Province of Sindh and others). The judgment directed the government to conduct a farmer census, provide health insurance, housing rights, freedom from bonded labour, and tenancy rights protection. However, the Sindh government has challenged this ruling in the Supreme Court instead of implementing it.
SARC criticised the delay in withdrawing the appeal against the high court ruling, stating that this has stalled the implementation of the Sindh Tenancy Act 1950 and its amendments. Farmers and peasants have repeatedly appealed for the withdrawal of this challenge, but their requests remain unanswered. SARC stressed that if the government drops its appeal, it would be seen as a pro-farmer move, earning appreciation from civil society and benefiting the agricultural sector.
The statement also noted that in October 2019, the Sindh High Court struck down Section 6 of the Sindh Tenancy (Amendment) Act 2013, which removed the prohibition of beggar (unpaid labour). Instead of enforcing this pro-peasant ruling, the Sindh government continues to contest it.
SARC also raised concerns about non-compliance with minimum wage laws, severe water shortages affecting small growers, ineffective vigilance committees monitoring bonded labour, and the lack of implementation of the Sindh Agriculture Women Workers Act 2019. It pointed out that Form 6, a document protecting the rights of haris (tenant farmers), is no longer available in revenue offices, with staff claiming it is no longer published. The statement further criticised the vigilance committees, noting that not a single case of bonded labour has been identified by them in two decades. All peasant releases have been secured through court orders under Section 491 of the CrPC or Article 199 of the Constitution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
23 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
High courts run without permanent top judges
Following the passage of the 26th Constitutional Amendment, adhocism appears to be growing across the superior judiciary. Despite the lapse of four months, the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) has yet to convene a meeting to appoint permanent chief justices for the Sindh High Court, Peshawar High Court and Islamabad High Court. The Balochistan High Court also remained without a permanent chief justice for more than three months. On May 19, the JCP approved the appointment of Justice Muhammad Ejaz Swati as BHC chief justice, but only for a period of two weeks. He retired on June 5. Justice Rozi Khan Barech, who ranked second in the BHC's seniority list, has now been appointed acting chief justice. Similarly, Justice Sardar Sarfraz Dogar has been serving as acting chief justice of the Islamabad High Court for the past four months. His seniority is currently under challenge in the Supreme Court. While the litigation may explain the delay in appointing a permanent IHC chief justice, no clear reason exists for the prolonged delay in appointments for the other three high courts. Since the passage of the 18th Amendment, the JCP has not previously delayed the process of appointing permanent chief justices for the high courts. Under the new constitutional arrangement, the executive holds a dominant role in the appointment of judges to the superior judiciary. However, senior judges, particularly the Chief Justice of Pakistan, have made no serious effort to restore balance in the appointments process. During the tenure of the current CJP, Justice Yahya Afridi, approximately 50 judges have been appointed to the superior courts, with the executive playing a key role in nominating many of them. No judge can now become a permanent chief justice without the executive's support. The government has thus succeeded in maintaining "like-minded" acting chief justices in key high courts. With the backing of former CJP Qazi Faez Isa, the government previously managed to elevate Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan from the Lahore High Court to the Supreme Court, reportedly because he was not their preferred choice to lead the LHC. At present, the executive is reportedly reluctant to elevate incumbent LHC CJ Alia Neelum, as the Punjab government is said to be comfortable with the current provincial judiciary. It is also learnt that the executive remains indecisive regarding the appointment of a permanent chief justice for the Sindh High Court. "It is the PPP that will decide about the permanent chief justice of the SHC," a source added. Reports suggest that PPP legal minds are divided on the nomination for the next SHC chief justice. Similarly, Justice Syed Mohammad Attique Shah, who was second in the seniority list of PHC judges, has been appointed as acting chief justice of the Peshawar High Court. The appointment of a permanent PHC chief justice is being delayed for known reasons. Lawyers are increasingly vocal about the disregard for senior puisne judges of PHC and BHC in the appointment of acting chief justices. It is learnt that PHC judge Justice Ejaz Anwar is not in the good books of powerful circles. Therefore, despite his seniority, he was neither elevated to the Supreme Court nor appointed as acting chief justice. The same applies to Justice Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail, who, though appointed as acting chief justice, could not secure clearance from powerful circles. Reports also suggest that he is a victim of judicial politics, and his relationships with some senior judges are not cordial. The current situation indicates that both senior judges are unlikely to be appointed as permanent chief justices of their respective high courts. Advocate Abdul Moiz Jaferii commented on Islamabad, saying, "It is a way to continue the farce that is the new Dogar court. There's a bunch of good judges there, so let's keep them all hanging and distracted". Speaking on Sindh, Jaferii added, it has the effect of a perpetual carrot being dangled before the senior-most judges in the province. "Let's see what you can do to please uswithout us really asking you to do anything specific. By keeping the corner court empty, you keep everyone in the race. And when you don't know what you're racing for or how long the race is, you start running cautiously. That is good enough. And it is exactly what they want." Lawyers believe that senior judges, who are at the helm and beneficiaries of the 26th Amendment, must take steps to restore the institution, whose independence has been compromised for the past six months.
Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
Senate body approves ‘Civil Servants (Amendment) Bill, 2024'
ISLAMABAD: The Senate Standing Committee on Cabinet Secretariat approved, 'The Civil Servants (Amendment) Bill, 2024' which makes mandatory for Grade-17 and above officers to declare their assets. The committee met with Senator Rana Mahmoodul Hassan in the chair at Parliament Lodges on Thursday. According to the bill, senior civil servants will now be required to disclose not only their own assets but also those of their spouses and dependent children. The declaration must also include foreign assets and liabilities. The asset details will be submitted to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), which will be authorised to make them public, while ensuring a balance between public interest and individual privacy. The bill also mandates the protection of personal information, including national identity card numbers, residential addresses, and bank account details. During the meeting, the cabinet officials to the committee that civil servants will be legally bound to disclose their assets once the bill becomes law. Senator Farooq H Naek said, 'this is a good piece of legislation,' Senator Anusha Rehman from Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) also endorsed the bill, pledging full support. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Alvi allowed to withdraw up to Rs1m
A constitutional bench of the Sindh High Court (SHC) has permitted former president Dr Arif Alvi to withdraw up to Rs1 million from his frozen bank accounts. A two-member bench of the SHC, headed by Justice KK Agha, heard a petition challenging the freezing of the former president's bank accounts. During the hearing, an investigation officer from Islamabad and National Cyber Crime Agency Director Waqar Ahmed appeared before court. Ahmed requested the court to grant additional time to submit the response.
