West Coast Iwi Back Moves To Speed Up Goldmining Consents
The Mana Whakahono a Rohe partnership deal is up for its five-year review. It formally acknowledges the partnership and relationship between council and Poutini Ngi Tahu.
West Coast iwi are backing a plan to making resource consents less of a bureaucratic maze for alluvial goldminers.
The West Coast Regional Council is aiming to speed up the consent application process by working with Poutini Ngāi Tahu and the industry to write standard conditions and clearer templates.
Goldminers keen to capitalise on the current gold price have been queuing for consents in recent months.
And some have complained about the complexity of the process and the time it takes to gain council and iwi approval of conditions.
Under the RMA, the council must work with manawhenua on environmental matters – a policy reinforced by the Mana Whakahono a Rohe partnership deal it signed with Poutini Ngāi Tahu in 2020.
The agreement is now up for its five-year review.
And at a public workshop this week, Poutini Ngai Tahu Partnership and Economic Development Manager Ashley Stuart said the council had not yet lived up to the agreement by sorting out the practicalities.
'We haven't fully delivered on actions set out in the agreement and have come to realise there is an actual level of discomfort for some, in how this is working in practice,' Ms Stuart said.
The value of collaborating with iwi for the good of the West Coast economy had not changed, but there was a need for more clarity on who did what, and when.
'It's not a tradeoff – it's a balance,' Ms Stuart said.
The changes proposed in the document spell out council and iwi responsibilities to work together on consents for other activities as well, including drinking water supplies, sewerage systems, landfills and flood protection
'But … we cannot keep spending time working re-actively, assessing every single consent as if it's the first time we've worked together. We're going backwards if we keep going on that route.'
Council chair Peter Haddock said the Council had a great relationship with West Coast iwi and he treasured that, but agreed the consent process needed streamlining.
'I've looked at a couple (of mining applications) – they're going back and forth between the council and Poutini Ngāi Tahu and it's holding things up.'
Ngati Waewae representative Francois Tumahai agreed.
'You're right – it's doubling up and we don't need to. (But) with a set of conditions everyone agrees on, we're done and dusted.'
The Mana Whakahono a Rohe review was intended to iron those glitches out, Mr Tumahai said.
'We don't want to hold things up. Poutini Ngāi Tahu is a big promoter of mining on the West Coast and we intend to stay that way.'
WCRC chief executive Darryl Lew said goldmining was not the only industry that stood to gain from a clearer, simplified resource consent application system.
'We will start with mining and go thematically through some of our intensive work areas; dairy effluent consents, point source discharges from wastewater plants; even down to whitebait stands, because we have 500 of those up for renewal in the next 18-months,' Mr Lew said.
If the council and iwi could agree with iwi on standard consent conditions for alluvial goldmining in the next couple of weeks, the next step would be a workshop with industry representatives to see if everyone could agree.
Councillor Allan Birchfield waved a copy of a resource consent he was granted in 1993 under the RMA for alluvial mining at Red Jacks Creek.
The three-page consent – seen by LDR – required him to build a weir to protect a rail bridge and supply a stockpile of rock for repairs.
The council need look no further than its own records for examples of simple consent forms, he suggested.
'You've gone wrong over the years, made it more and more complicated. We should have worked out a set of conditions for any site.. get it signed and get people to work.'
In response to a question, Ms Stuart said the impending RMA reforms were unlikely to change the requirement for councils and iwi to work together.
'But even if it does change would we want to move away? Some question, do we have to partner? … We don't have to work with industry, but we do because it's the right thing to do.'
The partnership agreement simply set out how that would happen and gave the iwi no extra powers, Ms Stuart said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Landlord Confidence On A Knife Edge: 80% Says Election Will Decide
AUCKLAND, 14 August 2025 — New data from the Auckland Property Investors Association (APIA) shows New Zealand's rental sector is in a state of cautious watchfulness. Four in five landlords say their investment confidence hinges on the next general election, reflecting both the scale of current reforms and the uncertainty of what comes after them. Major Findings Election-dependency risk: 80% of landlords say their confidence depends on the outcome of the next election, with 56% saying 'significantly.' Policy climate challenge: 56.9% believe the current policy environment is unsupportive of investment while 41.5% view it as stable or supportive. Many see today's uncertainty as short-term disruption caused by the scale of reform, particularly the overhaul of the Resource Management Act, which aims to fix long-standing problems in planning and housing supply. Transparency unlock: 82% say they would be more willing to support reforms, even those they initially disagree with, if the government provided clearer data and policy rationales. Compliance squeeze: Nearly half (48.2%) report compliance has become harder since October 2023, pointing to an opportunity to streamline administration alongside policy change. 'Confidence is the foundation every investment rests on,' says Sarina Gibbon, GM of APIA. 'Overhauls like the RMA reforms are major resets. We have to accept that some disruption is the cost of fixing deep problems. What worries investors is the risk that the next government will tear up the plans before the work is done. Housing needs policies that outlast election cycles so investors can commit with certainty.' She adds, 'Some parties are naturally more inclined toward private investment, but this survey shows investors care more about stability than partisanship. Certainty of policy settings matters more than who wins, because it's the only thing that keeps capital in the market long enough to build the homes we need.' APIA Recommendations For policymakers: Bipartisan commitment to core housing settings will reduce the risk that new reforms are unravelled by the next administration. For the housing market: Predictability attracts capital. Short-term disruption is acceptable if the long-term rules are clear and durable. For voters: Housing stability and political stability go hand in hand. A cycle of reversing policies every three years undermines both supply and affordability. About Auckland Property Investors Association (APIA) The Auckland Property Investors Association (APIA) is a leading advocacy group representing the interests of property investors throughout Auckland. Committed to promoting education, advocacy, and networking opportunities, APIA actively shapes policies impacting the property investment landscape. APIA strives to cultivate a supportive environment for property investors while advocating for policies that uphold the rights and responsibilities of both landlords and tenants.
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
Industrial users demand electricity market reform amid rising prices
Bridget Abernethy, the chief executive of the Electricity Retailers and Generators Association, argues that major disruption to the electricity market structure is the 'last thing we [New Zealand] can afford' As a major energy user and economic contributor, we would argue the opposite – New Zealand cannot afford the status quo to continue. Taking a 'we'll be right' attitude to nine years of price increases for wholesale users has had negative impacts for all consumers. Citing a 'decade of flat electricity prices' for household consumers, Abernethy notes a short-term period of marginal increases is inevitable. What is missing from this statement is that electricity costs have been anything but flat for wholesale users, with spot prices increasing 3.5 times in nine years. (Index graph– Averaged Spot Market Real Time Pricing with forecast to April 2026). How can this disparity between retail and wholesale pricing occur in a properly functioning market? Could it be because residential consumers would demand earlier political intervention if their bills skyrocketed to the same degree as that of wholesale consumers? We accept that inter-year volatility will increase with the rise in intermittent renewables. However, it is not the main factor hurting large industrial users – it is this rising average price that cannot be insulated by hedging forward. Hedging contracts are now unaffordable for most large users because futures hedge prices are linked to the rising spot prices. The wealth transfer from large industrial users to generators over the past decade in the form of inflated prices has not resulted in investment into more net supply. The market has not created sufficient incentives to build new generation ahead of when it is needed. Pan Pac general manager Tony Clifford at the Whirinaki plant. Photo / Warren Buckland Instead, generators have sat on approved RMA (Resource Management Act) consents and continued to profit at the expense of business. We have seen the impact on manufacturers in regional areas no longer able to operate profitably. Residential consumers are then affected through loss of employment and services, while the economy and our communities suffer. Blaming the shortage of gas as a driver of rising prices is overstating its impact. Electricity generation from gas makes up less than 10% of all electricity generated. While prices would have increased because of gas shortages, we dispute the premium over the relationship to the gas costs. Independent analysis of generator margins shows at least $38/MWh of increases cannot be explained by gas or ETS (Emissions Trading Scheme) charge increases. In summary, the gas shortage should not be impacting the electricity pricing to the extent claimed. However, the shortage of gas has been used to justify many years of high profits for generators and large dividend payouts to shareholders (which include successive Governments). These profits have not been reinvested into new generation until the recent threat of market intervention. We are not blaming generators for maximising profit; they are working within the existing market rules that incentivise them to keep the market on the edge, but we do have an issue with them telling only a part of the story to regulators, politicians and the public, that they can do nothing about rising costs and that consumers just have to ride it out. Market regulators and successive Governments have seen this train wreck approaching from a long way off but have chosen to do little. Simply not making a bold decision is a decision in itself.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
RMA Reforms To Deliver Jobs And Growth
Minister for RMA Reform The Government's second RMA Amendment Bill has passed into law, bringing in sweeping changes to many of the handbrakes on New Zealanders' lives, helping to drive economic growth, and laying the groundwork for job creation,' RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says. 'The Resource Management Act (RMA) has been holding New Zealand back for decades. It has let successive governments and councils say 'no' to progress, 'no' to development, and 'no' to building the houses, infrastructure, clean energy and other important projects that New Zealanders need to get ahead,' Mr Bishop says. 'Our full replacement for the RMA will be introduced to Parliament this year, be passed into law next year, and be in effect by 2027- but in the meantime, through this Amendment Bill, we're making it quicker and simpler to consent renewable energy, boost housing supply, and reduce red tape for the primary sector. 'The Bill contains five broad packages of changes which will remove roadblocks and cut red tape holding back progress for: Infrastructure and renewable energy Housing, including a streamlined process for removing heritage protections Farming and the primary sector Emergency and natural hazards package Resource Management system improvements 'We also added a new provision which requires Auckland Council to allow even greater housing and development around key stations benefitting from City Rail Link investment, to ensure Aucklanders reap the full benefits of this transformational investment into the city. 'We added changes to ensure a more cost-effective transition between the current RMA and the upcoming new planning system by putting a stop to councils making RMA plan or policy statement changes until the new system is in place in 2027. There will be some exemptions for important work that aligns with Government priorities, or for activities such as managing natural hazards. 'Alongside this change, we added a new a new regulation making power that will allow the responsible Minister to recommend changes or even removal of parts of council RMA plans and policy statements that are proven to be holding back economic growth, development, or job creation. 'This week we also took urgent action to prevent what could have amounted to a 'stop work' notice for thousands of New Zealand farmers, by further amending the Bill to broaden what water discharges can be allowed as a permitted activity. 'And, to the great excitement of countless Wellingtonians, we added a provision that removes heritage protections from the unsafe and derelict Gordon Wilson Flats in Wellington, clearing the way for the flats to be demolished so that new student accommodation can be built.' 'This legislation is part of our wider three-phase RMA reform programme. In Phase One, before Christmas last year, we repealed the previous government's overly complex RMA changes. 'Phase Two is now well underway, with our Fast-track one-stop shop up and running, the biggest package of national direction changes in New Zealand's history being worked through with decisions due before the end of this year, and this second Amendment Bill delivering meaningful improvements. 'Phase Three will see the complete replacement of the RMA with two new laws that better reflect the importance of private property rights. The new planning system legislation will be introduced to Parliament before the end of this year, pass into law next year, and be in effect by 2027.' The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill will be enacted the day after it receives royal assent, which is expected in the coming days. Fact sheet for a summary of changes to be enacted through the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill here.
