Trump turmoil roils Wall Street macro trading
New York: For anyone on Wall Street still clinging to a time-honoured macro-investing playbook, Trump 2.0 has been a source of endless punishment.
Market narratives keep shifting faster than traders can adjust positions.
Tariffs are on, tariffs are off – then they're on again.
One minute it's 'Sell America', the next 'buy the dip'. Old-school fiscal anxieties land, just as Nvidia Corp sells a vision of AI-driven productivity nirvana.
To cap it off, President Donald Trump's unpredictability – trade, foreign relations, taxes and so on – is making life brutal for institutional pros paid to predict the market cycle.
And the numbers show it: macro hedge funds are off to their worst start to a year in at least two decades.
That confusion was on full display last week. As the US commander-in-chief fumed over the 'Trump Always Chickens Out' jab, and again as a legal ruling threatened his signature tariff weapon, some on Wall Street braced for retaliation.
Yet in the end – buoyed by signs of still-solid corporate earnings and bets on economic resilience – Trump's combative posture failed to scare off risk-loving investors.
The S&P 500 closed up almost 2% last week, notching a 6% gain overall in May, its best monthly performance since late 2023.
High-yield bonds also climbed in May, with an index posting its highest return in 10 months.
Difficult dimension
'Macro trading, which has never been easy, has just taken on a whole other difficult dimension,' said Priya Misra, portfolio manager at JP Morgan Asset Management. 'You can still position for a macro trend but you have to absolutely prevent getting whipsawed.'
Nothing last week inspires much confidence that the rally is built to last. Traders still see the economy sputtering enough to warrant two US Federal Reserve rate cuts this year, while the inflation risk from tariffs remains as uncertain as ever.
At the same time, policy flip-flops, data head-fakes, and the White House's reactive posture have made macro forecasting a bitter exercise.
In just six months since Trump's re-election, markets have priced in everything from an economic boom and resurgent inflation to outright recession.
These fast-moving narratives are confounding the macro set, including trend-following quants, futures speculators and managers trying to stay ahead of shifting data.
The HFRX Macro/CTA Index is down 4.3% this year through last Wednesday, the worst start since at least 2004.
'It's been very hard to filter the noise and get to the signal,' said James Athey, a portfolio manager at Marlborough Investment Management Ltd.
'Many systematic strategies have probably struggled, forced to de risk into falling markets, only to find they had low net and gross risk levels when the market turned so they missed the recovery.'
May will go down as a stretch when defensive strategies adopted in the April chaos backfired with rare force.
Pain hit value stocks, bearish options, fixed-income havens, trades tied to stagflation – in short, anything premised on the idea that April's volatility would linger or worsen.
US Treasuries fell as traders questioned the sustainability of US debt.
An exchange traded fund (ETF) tracking long-dated bonds trailed the S&P 500 by the most since 2022.
Searching for safety
Playing it safe in equities proved costly, too. Defensive shares lagged their cyclical counterparts by 10 percentage points, the second-widest gap since the start of the 2009 bull run.
Betting on stagflation-like outcomes – slowing growth and strong inflation – misfired. A Goldman Sachs Group Inc stock basket wagering that scenario tumbled for the worst month in two decades.
Prudent defensiveness quickly turned into a liability. Two of the largest ETFs linked to the Cboe Volatility Index, or VIX, each slumped at least 25%, a moment of reckoning for those who have piled into these protective funds this year.
Meanwhile, popular buffer funds such as the FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF – a darling trade of this year that limits downside risk while capping the upside – underperformed.
So did derivative-powered ETFs like the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF – strategies favoured by income-seeking investors that attracted billions this year.
Amid the twists and turns, retail investors who stayed the course are having a moment of quiet vindication.
After a record pace of dip buying in April, US$10bil has since flooded the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, a favoured destination of retail money.
For many investors, the best strategy has been to do nothing, rather than venture into the almost impossible task of figuring out the next Trump turn.
Since election day, the S&P 500 is up 2% overall – masking how vicious the whiplash has been, with stocks sinking to the brink of a bear market before a powerful comeback.
Another way to frame the market-timing challenge: If you missed the worst five days, you're up over 20% now. If you missed the best five, you're down 16%.
To Ed Al-Hussainy, a rates strategist at Columbia Threadneedle, the mistake traders keep making is underestimating the economy's natural resilience. Amid the turbulence, his team is pulling back from aggressive positions.
'There's a great quote that I think comes from the army: 'slow is smooth, and smooth is fast',' he said. 'They use it to train military recruits. Applies to macro traders as well.' — Bloomberg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Asia could outstrip Europe as key beneficiary of US capital flight
AS global investors consider reducing their exposure to United States financial assets, the key question is where money flowing out of the US will go. While Europe may be the obvious destination, relative value metrics may favour emerging Asia. Even though US equities have recovered from the steep losses suffered in the week following US President Donald Trump's announcement of his "Liberation Day" tariffs, the same cannot be said of the US bond market. Since hitting a recent low on April 4, the 10-year Treasury yield has spiked by around 50 basis points, with bond investors demanding more compensation for the risk of holding longer-dated US debt. Worryingly, the benchmark Treasury yield has surged higher than nominal US gross domestic product growth — a key risk measure. Additionally, the usual positive correlation between Treasury yields and the US dollar has broken off, as rising yields are no longer attracting money to the "safest" asset in the world. The euro's almost 10 per cent rise against the dollar this year suggests that a significant portion of the capital flowing out of the US is going to Europe, likely driven by concerns about US policy as well as expectations of higher regional growth. Further monetary easing by the European Central Bank should promote economic activity, as should the expected surge in fiscal spending. The fiscal splurge is already offering a boost to European equities — the surprise winner thus far in 2025 — especially defence, industrial and technology stocks. Meanwhile, in emerging Asia — another potential destination for US capital outflows — the debt picture is better and the growth outlook is stronger. Government debt in many Asian countries is low, ranging from 37 per cent of GDP in Indonesia to around 85 per cent in China and India. Benchmark bond yields across the region have been declining since October 2023, speaking to fixed income investors' limited concerns about Asian countries' fiscal situations. In fact, yields in China, Thailand and Korea are all below those in the US, though those in Indonesia and India remain higher. Modest debt burdens mean there is also plenty of room for more fiscal stimulus in many countries, which could improve consumption, while the benign inflation environment should enable central banks in the region to continue cutting rates to stimulate growth. Emerging Asia also offers far more high-growth, technology companies than Europe. The release of the affordable Chinese artificial intelligence model, DeepSeek, Beijing's focus on semiconductors and advanced manufacturing and the country's electric vehicle dominance could all attract tech-focused investors looking for an alternative to the US. Even though European equities have outperformed their US counterparts significantly in 2025, the 12-month forward price-to-earnings multiple of the major European index, the STOXX50, is considerably lower than that of the S&P 500, at 15.4x and 21.0x, respectively, as of May 23. But the major emerging Asia equity index, the MSCI Asia ex Japan, is even cheaper at 13.4x. Moreover, earnings growth forecasts are higher in Asia than in either the US or Europe through 2026. Finally, reallocation of assets from the US could have a bigger positive impact on Asia than on Europe because of their relative sizes. Let's say five per cent of the US free floating market cap of around US$58 trillion, or roughly US$3 trillion, moves out. That would represent 36 per cent of Asia's market cap, but only 22 per cent of Europe's. Caution remains warranted, though. Asian nations' trade negotiations with the US will likely still encounter twists and turns, and increasing protectionism could hinder the region's more export-oriented economies. The capital flowing into emerging Asia is a double-edged sword because of the impact on Asian currencies versus the US dollar. If Asian currencies strengthen much more, the region's export engine could stutter. Investors, thus, have to keep a close eye on macroeconomics, geopolitics and policy statements, not just valuation metrics. But given emerging Asia's benign debt environment and positive growth outlook, both the region's equity and fixed income markets have the potential to benefit from the death of American exceptionalism.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Russia urges US and UK to restrain Ukraine after attacks on bombers
FILE PHOTO: Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov attends the BRICS Meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 28, 2025. Mauro Pimentel/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo MOSCOW (Reuters) -Moscow said on Wednesday that military options were "on the table" for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused the West of being involved in them. Russia also urged the United States and Britain to restrain Kyiv after the attacks, which Ukrainian officials have lauded as showing Kyiv can still fight back after more than three years of war. British and U.S. officials have said they had no prior knowledge of Ukraine's attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers at military bases over the weekend. Ukraine also tried to blow up a rail and road link with Crimea on Tuesday, and Russia says Kyiv blew up a highway bridge over a passenger train late on Saturday. U.S. President Donald Trump's Ukraine envoy said the risk of escalation from the war "going way up" after the attacks on the nuclear-capable bombers. A week earlier, Trump rebuked Russian President Vladimir Putin over a fierce aerial attack on Ukraine. "We urge London and Washington to react in such a way as to stop further escalation," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, who oversees relations with the U.S. and arms control, was quoted as saying by Interfax news agency. "All options are on the table," Ryabkov said, when asked what Russia's response to Ukraine's attacks would be. "This is a question for our military." Russia and the U.S. together hold about 88% of all nuclear weapons. Asked whether Russia thought the West was involved in the recent attacks, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said the West supplied weapons, gave target coordinates, refused to condemn such attacks and actively incited them. "These are several areas that prove the fact of the involvement, both direct and indirect, and the guilt of the West for the terrorist attacks that are taking place against civilians and civilian infrastructure facilities by the Kyiv regime," Zakharova said. Kyiv has not commented on the bridge attacks. Each side has accused the other of carrying out acts of terrorism during the conflict and each blames the other for a lack of progress at peace talks. Trump was not informed in advance of Ukraine's drone attacks on Russia, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said on Tuesday. A British government official said the government was not informed ahead of time. (Reporting by Dmitry Antonov; Writing by Gleb Stolyarov; Editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Timothy Heritage)
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
US private sector hiring sharply slows, drawing Trump ire
WASHINGTON: US private sector hiring hit its slowest pace since early 2023 in May, according to data from payroll firm ADP on Wednesday, significantly missing expectations in a month where all eyes are on the effects of President Donald Trump's trade war. Private sector employment rose by 37,000 jobs last month, slowing from the 60,000 figure in April and swiftly drawing a fiery response from Trump on social media. ''Too Late' Powell must now LOWER THE RATE,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform, blasting Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell whom he has repeatedly pressured to cut the benchmark lending rate. While the US central bank has started bringing down interest rates from the high levels of recent years, officials have proceeded cautiously as they monitor progress in cooling stubborn inflation. When inflation is low, central banks may opt to reduce rates, which typically encourages economic activity by reducing borrowing costs. But Trump's frustration comes at a time when 'hiring is losing momentum' after a strong start to this year, according to ADP chief economist Nela Richardson. She added in a statement that pay growth was also 'little changed in May.'
