"Court was expected to provide information": Prakash Ambedkar slams Bombay HC judgement on validity of 2024 Maharashtra polls
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], June 26 (ANI): Vanchit Bahujan Aaghadi (VBA) chief Prakash Ambedkar on Thursday criticised the Bombay High Court's dismissal of a petition challenging the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly election results.
He said that while the court has a duty to examine such matters, it appeared to have overlooked the concerns raised. The petition, backed by Ambedkar, alleged discrepancies in the voting process, including votes cast after the official deadline.
Earlier, Bombay High Court dismissed Chetan Ahire's petition, alleging bogus voting in the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections.
Addressing the media on Thursday, Ambedkar, who argued the case in the court, said, 'Chetan Ahire had filed an important issue regarding the conduct. It was about checking whether this election was free and fair or not.'
He added that Ahire had filed a Right to Information (RTI) request and asked for data regarding the polls, but the RTI reply said that the information was not available.
'To get information whether it (election) was done according to the law, we had asked those in Delhi to file an RTI. The reply received from RTI was that the information we requested is not available.
On the issue of 76 lakhs votes cast after 6 pm, which was also a question taken up by the Bombay HC, the VBA chief said, 'Once the time is up, if you want to vote, slips are distributed. According to the Election Commission's press note, 76 lakh votes were cast. Tell us whether those slips are available. The Election Commission has made a law; all this is binding. Did the polling officer give information?'
On the petition filed in the court, he added that instead of considering it as a writ petition, the court took up the matter as an election petition and gave the verdict.
'So we did not get a (RTI) reply, then this petition was filed. The main point was that the legal obligations that require giving information... If the parties and the court are to give information to the election committee, there is a situation where this is a writ petition, but the court considered it an election petition and considering it as an election petition, they gave such a verdict,' he said.
He further added, 'The Election Commission's press note was attached to the petition, and the Loksatta article was attached...How can we believe this news? It has no strength, the judge said.'
'There are reports that the voting done and the counting of votes do not match in 96 places. When asked through RTI, it was said that this information is not available. Whether it is in accordance with the law was asked, but there is no answer to this question in the judgment,' Ambedkar said.
On the judgment, Ambedkar said, 'The court was expected to provide information, but unfortunately, the right to information will be obstructed by this. Examination is the duty of the court. But the court did not see it'
He further said that two doubts arise here, that those who organised the election may have pressed the button to cast a vote or they may have received instructions from someone.
'This is not our personal dispute. If there is no document of voting after the time has expired, two doubts arise. Those who organised the election may have pressed the button, or they may have received instructions,' he said.
The Bombay HC on Wednesday dismissed a petition that alleged bogus voting and had sought to set aside the results of the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections.
A Division Bench comprising Justice GS Kulkarni and Justice Arif S Doctor rejected the petition filed by Mumbai resident Chetan Ahire, who had challenged the validity of the election results based on votes allegedly polled after the stipulated 6 pm deadline.
Pronouncing its order after reserving it earlier this week, the court said: 'We have no manner of doubt that this writ petition needs to be summarily rejected. It is accordingly rejected. The hearing of this petition has practically taken the whole day, leaving aside our urgent cause list, and for such reason, the petition would certainly warrant dismissal with costs; however, we refrain from doing so.' (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
EC says Congress' demand for digital copy of Maharashtra voters' list ‘not tenable': Report
A day after the Congress urged the Election Commission to provide a machine-readable digital copy of Maharashtra's voters' list, PTI reported on Thursday, citing poll body sources, that the demand is 'not tenable' under the existing legal framework. Congress seeks digital voter list, polling day footage from Maharashtra, Haryana.(HT File ) They also added that a similar plea by the party was dismissed by the Supreme Court in 2019. The report added that while Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has been demanding a machine-readable digital copy of the electoral roll for the past seven months, poll body sources said the party's demand is 'not new.' "Rather, it forms part of a strategy by the political party for well over eight years, a fact that appears to have been selectively obscured in the present representation," an EC source told PTI The news agency, citing Election Commission sources, reported that while Rahul Gandhi's renewed demand is in line with the Congress party's long-standing position, it is 'not tenable within the contours of the prevailing legal framework.' The report added that the issue had already been raised before the Supreme Court in a 2018 writ petition filed by Kamal Nath, then president of the Madhya Pradesh Congress Committee. The sources reportedly said that Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, may not have been fully apprised of the finality with which the matter was settled in judicial records. Referring to the Supreme Court's 2019 verdict in Kamal Nath vs Election Commission of India, the report quoted sources as saying that the court had found merit in the EC's submissions. They pointed out that Clause 11.2.2.2 of the Election Manual refers to 'text mode,' and that the draft electoral roll in that format had already been provided to the petitioner, as noted by the apex court. 'The clause nowhere says that the draft electoral roll has to be put up on the Chief Electoral Officer's website in a 'searchable PDF'. Therefore, the petitioner cannot claim, as a right, that the draft electoral roll should be placed on the website in a 'searchable mode'. It has only to be in 'text mode' and it is so provided,' the apex court had observed. On Wednesday, the Congress urged the Election Commission to provide a machine-readable digital copy of Maharashtra's voters' list, along with polling day video footage from both Maharashtra and Haryana, within a week. Both the Congress and Rahul Gandhi have repeatedly accused the poll body of manipulating voter data to benefit the BJP. Gandhi has also alleged that last year's Maharashtra assembly elections were rigged. The Election Commission has rejected these allegations, saying that elections are conducted strictly in accordance with electoral laws enacted by Parliament.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Bengal main target: Mamata Banerjee says 'NRC-like approach' in voter roll revision
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday questioned the Election Commission's new electoral roll guidelines ahead of the Bihar Assembly election, likening it to the NRC process, saying it was aimed at politically targeting West Bengal, which will head to the polls next accused the poll panel of isolating voters born between July 1987 and December 2004 and seeking documentary evidence of their citizenship in the name of "special intensive revision of electoral rolls".advertisement"I received two letters from the poll body, each comprising 25-30 pages. I haven't been able to go through them in detail so far. But from what I have understood from a cursory glance, the commission is now seeking a declaration form from voters born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, which is Annexure D in one of the letters, where they will have to submit birth certificates of both parents as proof of citizenship," Banerjee said. "I don't understand the reason behind the Election Commission's move or the rationale behind selecting these dates. This is nothing short of a scam. I seek clarification from the Commission on whether they are trying to implement the NRC through backdoors. In fact, this looks to be more dangerous than the NRC, which every political party in opposition must resist," she alleged that voters' names were being deleted allegedly at the BJP's behest and questioned the Election Commission's move ahead of the Bihar Assembly polls slated to be held later this year."There are many scams in this declaration form. I just pointed out one of them. The names get cancelled on the instructions of the BJP at the last moment. Bihar is not a factor, as only 2.5 months are left for the polls. Other states, especially Bengal, are targeted. They want to capture using the commission and agencies," she revealed that the letters were sent to the Bihar government and a copy was forwarded to her as well."Nothing will happen in Bihar because the BJP rules that state and the state elections there are at the doorstep. Their real target is Bengal. They want to delete the names of valid young voters. Many parents will not be able to furnish their birth certificates. They are targeting the migrant worker community of Bengal, students, villagers and uneducated voters,' she Chief Minister claimed that voters who will be removed from the electoral roll would be kept in detention camps and lose their identity."Those who are studying or working outside should be careful that their names are in the voter list till the last day [of polling]. I got information that 100 migrant workers are being held captive in Odisha's Cuttack. Some of our people are held in Balasore police station as well. Why are these incidents happening daily?" Banerjee totally condemn the attitude of the agency, run by the BJP itself. The Election Commission is functioning as per Amit Shah's instructions these days. He is running the country," she asserted that the Trinamool Congress was the first opposition party to raise its voice on the issue and urged other parties to speak out people to stay vigilant of such "attempts to snatch away their right to vote", Banerjee warned that the move will "backfire on the BJP".- Ends(with inputs from PTI)
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
ECI initiates process to delist 345 dormant political parties in first phase of cleanup drive
New Delhi: The Election Commission of India (ECI) has launched a major cleanup exercise targeting dormant political entities, starting proceedings to delist 345 Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs) across the country. These parties, according to the Election Commission, have failed to contest a single election since 2019 and are untraceable at their registered addresses. The move comes under the leadership of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, along with Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. The poll panel, in its press statement issued on Thursday, stated that out of the over 2,800 RUPPs currently registered, many no longer meet the basic requirements for continued registration under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. "Thus, a nationwide exercise was conducted by the ECI to identify such RUPPs, and 345 such RUPPs have already been identified till now", it said. As a result, Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) of the respective States and Union Territories have been directed to issue show-cause notices to these parties. "In order to ensure that no party is unduly de-listed, the CEOs of the respective States/UTs have been directed to issue show-cause notices to such RUPPs, following which, these parties will be given an opportunity through a hearing by the concerned CEOs", the poll panel said. The final decision on delisting will rest with the ECI after reviewing the parties' responses. The political parties (National/State/RUPPs) in the country are registered with the ECI under the provisions of Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act 1951. Under this provision, any association once registered as a political party gets certain privileges and advantages, such as tax exemptions, amongst others. The move is seen as a step towards curbing misuse of political registration for undue advantages, and is expected to bring more transparency and accountability into the political process.
