logo
'Austerity in new clothes': Labour MP calls out Anas Sarwar on spending cuts

'Austerity in new clothes': Labour MP calls out Anas Sarwar on spending cuts

Yahoo23-03-2025

ANAS Sarwar has been called out for insisting his party has not implemented austerity measures as a Labour MP has insisted that they have – but 'just dressed in new clothes'.
Clive Lewis, the Labour MP for Norwich South, has publicly debunked Sarwar's claims that Labour's spring statement will be 'the very opposite of austerity'.
The Scottish Labour leader was quizzed earlier this week about his party's members quitting over the proposed £5 billion in welfare cuts as the MSP claimed austerity is simply when public spending "goes down".
However, Lewis has refuted Sarwar's claim as he said austerity measures aren't just about 'raw numbers' and that it is about choices.
READ MORE: Police decline to intervene as anti-abortion protesters flout buffer zone law
Sharing a video of Sarwar at Holyrood, the MP wrote on social media that austerity happens when public spending doesn't keep up with inflation, population growth and rising needs, like poverty, climate crisis and an ageing population.
'Even if the budget rises in cash terms, cuts still fall hard in real terms. That's austerity — just disguised,' Lewis said.
He went on to explain that the £5bn is a cut to welfare spending because how benefits are uprated is changing, which includes freezing thresholds, cutting inflation links like the Local Housing Allowance, and capping eligibility.
Lewis (below) added that despite the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) spending more overall, because more people are struggling the UK Government will spend less than it would have under the previous rules.
(Image: Newsquest)
'That £5bn is a 'cut' in planned support, not total spend. A real-terms cut to the poorest, during a cost-of-living crisis,' Lewis said.
'This is austerity by stealth.'
Lewis made the final point that Labour's plan is to implement austerity measures not by shrinking the state but rather by restructuring it by increasing spending on defence and corporate welfare and decreasing spending on social security.
'What we need isn't just more spending,' he added. "We need different spending — grounded in economic democracy, not deference to capital.
'I'm afraid austerity's still here. Just dressed in new clothes.'
Last week Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall (below) outlined the UK Government's controversial plans to reform welfare which included tightening the eligibility criteria for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) in a move which has been heavily criticised by politicians and campaign groups.
Kendall confirmed applicants for PIP will now need to score a minimum of four points in at least one activity to qualify for the daily living element adding the changes were necessary, so the benefits system is focused on 'support for those in greatest need'.
The Fraser of Allander Institute previously noted that a £1bn reduction in PIP spending through reduced caseload would worsen the Scottish Budget by around £115 million.
Kendall also outlined plans to scrap the work capability assessment for Universal Credit and that the UK Government will consult on whether the health top-up to the benefit should be delayed for those aged under 22.
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn MP warned the cuts 'will harm the most vulnerable, push disabled people into poverty' and mark 'the start of a new era of austerity cuts under the Labour Party'.
Scottish Labour have been approached for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ventura County government pay practices benefited CEO employees, audit shows
Ventura County government pay practices benefited CEO employees, audit shows

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ventura County government pay practices benefited CEO employees, audit shows

Employees of the top administrative office in the Ventura County government won substantial pay increases at disparate rates during the last few years of ex-CEO Mike Powers' tenure, an audit shows. Ventura County Auditor-Controller Jeff Burgh released a report on the audit of pay practices in May, three years after ordering the investigation from the Washington, D.C., law firm of FordHarrison. He has tied the delay to the complexity of making comparisons between the County Executive Office and dozens of other county departments and more recently the departure of Consuela Pinto, the firm partner in charge of the audit. Pinto informed him she was leaving the firm and that no other staff members were familiar with the audit, Burgh said. Reached via email, Pinto declined to comment. The county paid FordHarrison $82,000 before the auditor's office took over the audit in April 2024 and completed it, Burgh said. The audit examined a four-year period when Powers was the top executive for the county government, from January 2018 until he was forced out by the Board of Supervisors in March 2022 over a harassment claim filed by a female manager. Powers, who served as CEO for 11 years in all, denied any wrongdoing and filed a wrongful termination lawsuit that is still pending. The audit looked at whether employees of the CEO's Office received reclassifications of their positions into higher paying ones more often, started employment at higher points on the county pay scale, and won merit raises above 5% at a higher rate than people in several other departments. The query compared the pattern for employees of the CEO's Office with those in the General Services Agency, Information Technology Services, the Public Works Agency and the Auditor-Controller's Office. Burgh had initially said the analysis would compare compensation decisions for the CEO's Office with roughly two dozen other agencies in the large county government, but that it was narrowed down to four due to the volume of documents that needed to be gathered. The findings showed: Of 38 people whose jobs were reclassified, 20, or more than half, worked in the CEO's Office. Part of the paperwork was missing to support the reclassifications for 16 of the 20 CEO employees, but no omissions were cited for workers in the other departments. Typically, reclassification results in a 5% pay bump and a higher salary range. It's allowed for a variety of reasons including when someone's job duties change. Significantly more employees in the CEO's Office were eligible for and received merit increases above 5% than employees in the other four agencies. Three received the highest possible merit increase of 10%. CEO staff were hired above the midpoint of the salary range at a significantly higher rate than new hires in the other four agencies selected for the comparison. Almost half of 54 new hires in the CEO's Office got the benefit during the four-year period covered by the audit compared with a quarter in the auditor's and information technology offices and about 10% in the general services and public works agencies. Neither Powers or an attorney representing him in his lawsuit against the county could be reached for comment. In her response to the audit, current CEO Sevet Johnson said the audit report did not provide any evidence of preferential treatment, much less actual abuse of the personnel system for the benefit of the CEO's office. Nor did it show any violations of personnel rules, regulations or policies, she said. When he ordered the audit in 2022, Burgh said he did so after some county employees and managers expressed concerns about the appearance of disparate treatment for employees in the CEO's Office. Burgh said staff in his office had previously considered doing an audit of personnel decisions in the CEO's office, but that the "tipping point" came when former CEO public information officer Ashley Bautista was promoted to senior deputy executive officer three months after being hired. At the time, county officials tied the promotion to an expansion in her job duties. They appeared to grow dramatically during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Burgh said in 2022 that pay decisions benefiting other employees of the CEO's Office had also come to his attention. No specific employees including Bautista are mentioned in the audit report. Burgh said that's because they are personnel matters. The county's human resources department is a division of the County Executive's Office, an arrangement that the report suggested was too cozy. That structure and what was called "lack of independent oversight" appeared to result in more favorable personnel actions affecting compensation of CEO employees than the other four agencies reviewed, the report said. Reclassification of jobs in the CEO's office appeared to encounter fewer obstacles than in the other agencies, was not always supported with complete documentation, and was approved at a higher rate, the report said. The analysis called for additional safeguards to improve accountability for salary and other decisions for positions in the office. Human Resources should report directly to the Board of Supervisors and be moved out of the CEO's Office, the report advised. Johnson took strong exception to the audit findings even though she was not in charge of the CEO's Office at the time covered by the investigation. Johnson said Burgh does not possess the necessary expertise in employment practices to perform the audit himself, questioned whether he could be impartial, wanted to know why the law firm was no longer involved in the project and faulted the sample of agencies in the comparison. Still, she said the human resources division would endeavor to make improvements in cases where the findings clearly support such a change. Burgh said he expected any corrections to be completed by the end of next year. Kathleen Wilson covers courts, mental health and local government issues for the Ventura County Star. Reach her at This article originally appeared on Ventura County Star: Ventura County pay practices benefited CEO employees, audit shows

Kristi Noem's Net Worth—How the Homeland Security Secretary Built Her Wealth
Kristi Noem's Net Worth—How the Homeland Security Secretary Built Her Wealth

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kristi Noem's Net Worth—How the Homeland Security Secretary Built Her Wealth

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem has an estimated net worth of $5 million, according to Forbes. Noem's government salary is an estimated $235,100 per year. Noem Insurance, owned by Noem's husband, Bryon, is valued between $1 million and $5 million, per her latest financial of Homeland Security Kristi Noem has a multimillion-dollar fortune through her time in government, as an author, and via her husband's insurance business. Prior to her latest role in President Donald Trump's administration, Noem was the first female governor of South Dakota, her home state. Before she was elected governor, Noem represented South Dakota in the House of Representatives from 2011 to 2019. Noem and her husband, Bryon, have an estimated net worth of $5 million, according to Forbes. Here's how Noem made those millions. Noem's salary as the Secretary of Homeland Security is an estimated $235,100 per year, according to Forbes. Noem's most recent financial disclosure showed $241,519 in salary as governor of South Dakota, or about $121,000 annually. She likely earned about $174,000 per year as a member of Congress. Noem Insurance, owned by Noem's husband, Bryon, is valued between $1 million and $5 million, per her 2024 financial disclosure. Bryon also owns commercial real estate in Pierre, S.D., valued at over $1 million, according to the disclosure. Noem's disclosure shows that she owns livestock and equipment worth up to $100,000. The couple owns pasture land in Castlewood, S.D., valued at between $250,001 and $500,000, which has brought in up to $50,000 in rent or royalties. Noem, an author, has written several books. She reported a $40,000 advance for her book "Not My First Rodeo: Lessons from the Heartland" on her financial disclosure, as well as a nearly $140,000 advance for her book "No Going Back: The Truth on What's Wrong With Politics and How We Move America Forward." Read the original article on Investopedia

Swinney promises no ‘deal or co-operation' with Farage after by-election defeat
Swinney promises no ‘deal or co-operation' with Farage after by-election defeat

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Swinney promises no ‘deal or co-operation' with Farage after by-election defeat

Scotland's First Minister John Swinney has vowed he would not 'do any sort of deal or co-operation' with Nigel Farage after losing the Hamilton by-election. Scottish Labour took the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse seat in South Lanarkshire from the SNP but Mr Farage's Reform UK party also made gains in the Scottish Parliament ballot on Thursday. Speaking on the Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme on Sky News, SNP leader Mr Swinney said that if it was necessary to form a coalition to keep Reform out of government, he would 'pursue the policy priorities of my party', and pledged never to work with Clacton MP Mr Farage. The First Minister said he intended to win the 2026 Holyrood election, adding his party would 'get stronger' after losing the Hamilton seat, which it had taken in the 2021 Scottish Parliament election with 46% of all ballots cast, compared with its vote share of 29.35% in Thursday's by-election. Newly elected Scottish Labour MSP Davy Russell won with 8,559 votes while SNP candidate Katy Loudon took 7,957 votes. Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088 votes. Mr Swinney said: 'We've got to give people hope of what the future lies for Scotland, and that's as a country that can use our enormous energy wealth for the benefit of our people who are paying extraordinarily high fuel prices at the moment.' When asked if he would consider a coalition between the SNP, Labour and the Greens to keep Reform out of government, Mr Swinney said: 'We'll be going into that with the aim of winning that election. 'If you look at the result on Thursday, all the pollsters say that if that was applied across the wider electorate in Scotland, the SNP would remain by a country mile the largest political party in the Scottish Parliament. 'Now that's not good enough. I want to get stronger in that election, but I'll tell you one thing I will not do under any circumstances, is do any form of deal or co-operation with Farage. 'I just won't do it, and people need to understand that.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store