logo
How Business Leaders Can Step Up And Support Young People Who Want To Enter The Workforce

How Business Leaders Can Step Up And Support Young People Who Want To Enter The Workforce

Forbes22-07-2025
Gary Ivory is the president and CEO of Youth Advocate Programs, Inc.
Young people's access to educational and vocational opportunities is crucial for communities to thrive.
Consider a study published in 2016 that looked at the 'relationship between intergenerational educational pathways and crime in the United States.' The researchers found that 'downward educational pathways were predictive of increases in crime, whereas upward pathways were associated with decreases in crime.' In other words, young people who surpassed their parents' education level, especially those who received a four-year college degree when their parents didn't, were less likely to be involved in criminal activity as young adults.
As for youth workforce development being vital for communities to thrive, a report published in 2022 by the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-Pal), which examined summer youth employment programs (SYEPs), shed light on the issue. One finding? 'There is promising evidence that SYEPs have positive effects on a range of youth development outcomes including socio-emotional skills, academic and career aspirations, and work habits associated with job readiness.'
My experience working with young people in various communities has shown me that when young people have educational and workforce development opportunities, they are more likely to become productive and hardworking members of society, which in turn strengthens communities and the economy. Businesses, both large and small, can play a crucial role in this process. Business leaders can help young people get the support they need to explore and pursue educational and vocational opportunities.
Why Business Leaders Should Get Involved
One conversation can completely change the course of a young person's life. I've found this to be especially true for young people facing complex life circumstances, such as poverty and instability at home. Unfortunately, I've observed that there is a narrative that some young people are not capable of succeeding because of the obstacles they've faced in life, because of their neighborhoods or zip codes. But my team and I have found that this isn't true—they are capable of contributing at a high level.
Be it through offering funding, educational or employment opportunities or mentorship, business leaders can ignite life-changing conversations. For instance, a young person who receives a college scholarship funded by a local business may end up in a psychology class, where speaking with their professor puts them on a path toward pursuing a graduate degree in the field. A medical clinic that opens its doors to young people to shadow physicians can spark behind-the-scenes conversations that inspire them to pursue careers in healthcare. A mentor who sits down with a young person and explains their career path can introduce them to a type of job they didn't even know existed.
Helping young people become invested in their education and career benefits everyone. Free market capitalism requires that there are enough people capable of filling jobs. When business leaders help connect youths to educational and workforce development opportunities, they are shaping the workers of tomorrow—and the futures of their communities.
How Business Leaders Can Contribute
There are three main ways that business leaders can contribute to helping young people secure educational and workforce development opportunities. As I mentioned earlier, those three ways are via offering funding, educational or employment opportunities or mentorship.
Starting with funding, business leaders can contribute to educational scholarships and other funds, such as internship stipends and transportation subsidies. For example, at my nonprofit, we created a scholarship, funded by employee donations, for systems-involved program participants and their parents and guardians. Financial support can help young people facing challenging situations participate in educational or vocational endeavors. For instance, a college scholarship can help a young person from a low-income household pay tuition fees and purchase books and meals, giving them the chance to work toward a degree. An internship stipend can make it possible for a young person to take a summer opportunity that they otherwise couldn't have if the internship were unpaid. A transportation subsidy could help a young person without a car purchase a bus pass so they can get to and from work.
Business leaders can also create educational or employment opportunities for youths. By doing so, businesses can get extra help, and young people can gain valuable experience. For instance, for my nonprofit's Supported Work program, we partner with companies to provide subsidized employment opportunities to participating young people.
Additionally, business leaders can offer their time and serve as mentors, sharing their career paths and experiences with young people. For instance, my nonprofit designed a curriculum to prepare individuals who face employment barriers for jobs that align with their gifts and talents.
Business leaders can create and run their own programs to offer funding, educational or employment opportunities or mentorship. Or they can collaborate with nonprofits to do so. There are pros and cons to each approach. For example, an advantage of a business's leaders creating and running their own mentorship program for their community is that they will have more oversight of the process. However, a disadvantage is that they will have to navigate challenges, such as behavioral and mental health obstacles that participants might face, on their own, rather than working with nonprofits that specialize in navigating workforce development challenges.
The Key Principles For Success
Regardless of how business leaders choose to get involved or whether or not they decide to roll out initiatives on their own or collaborate with nonprofits, based on my experience, there are two key principles for success when working with young people to connect them to educational and vocational opportunities.
First, business leaders should meet young people where they are. Young people have different educational and career goals, and that's OK. For instance, some may need support getting their GEDs. Some might need math tutoring. Some might want to learn a trade, such as welding. Others might want to pursue art school. Regardless of what the specific goals are, business leaders should respect them.
Second, business leaders should be authentic. I've found that young people want authenticity and respond to genuine interactions. By being themselves, business leaders can show young people possibilities, and young people can go out and turn those possibilities into realities, ultimately strengthening their communities.
Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New tariffs, alarming job numbers and a high-profile firing: A wild week for the Trump economy
New tariffs, alarming job numbers and a high-profile firing: A wild week for the Trump economy

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New tariffs, alarming job numbers and a high-profile firing: A wild week for the Trump economy

Tariffs putting the squeeze on businesses and consumers while bringing in billions of dollars for the United States government. A job market that is showing major signs of cracking even as the unemployment rate remains subdued. Tech stocks surging on Wall Street, fueled by the artificial intelligence boom — as many other sectors are ailing. As Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on social media earlier this week: 'the Trump economy has officially arrived.' The past week was already primed to be a doozy for data, with investors and analysts eagerly anticipating updates about economic growth, jobs and the Fed's latest interest rate decision. Major companies like Apple, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft reported their latest financial results. Trump's deadline for trade deals was set for Friday. But what happened this week turned out to be more extraordinary than anyone expected. 'I'm sending off red flares: We're on the precipice of a recession,' said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, a financial research company. 'If tariffs keep increasing, I don't know how we avoid a recession.' Coming into this week, the U.S. economy had generally been considered in good shape despite mounting uncertainty and concerns about slowing growth. The week kicked off in Scotland with the announcement of a deal with the European Union that would set tariffs at 15%, ending months of uncertainty surrounding the United States' largest trade partner. Trade talks then moved to Sweden, where leading officials from the U.S. and China held two days of negotiations. The talks yielded neither a deal nor a formal extension of the two countries' trade truce, which will expire Aug. 12. 'The meetings were very constructive,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told reporters after the talks wrapped up. 'It's just that we haven't given the sign-off.' Given the importance of trade relations between the world's two largest economies, the cliffhanger meant the cloud of uncertainty created by Trump's tariffs gambit persisted, despite some deals having been struck with other major trading partners including the European Union and Japan. Tuesday offered little reason for renewed optimism, with the international shipping giant UPS again declining to issue financial forecasts for the rest of the year, prompting investor concern about the impact of Trump's shifting trade war and causing company shares to tank. Wednesday began with the Commerce Department reporting figures for second-quarter gross domestic product, or GDP, which measures economic growth in the U.S. The data showed an annual gain of 3%, beating expectations. But the same report also contained worrisome signs about business investment, even as price growth was accelerating. Later that day, the Federal Reserve announced it was keeping its benchmark interest rate unchanged, in part due to those inflation concerns. That drew the ire of Trump, who has spent weeks hounding Fed Chair Jerome Powell to lower the key lending rate. In remarks following the central bank's announcement, Powell pointed to ongoing concerns about the potential for Trump's tariffs to raise prices for U.S. consumers — but critically, referred to the jobs market as 'solid.' Notably, two members of the rate-setting board — both appointed by Trump — dissented, the first time that has occurred in more than three decades. Blowout earnings from Microsoft and Facebook parent Meta — two companies at the center of the AI investment boom, which is a key part of Trump's domestic agenda — helped the stock market reach fresh highs early Thursday. Microsoft briefly became the second company to be worth more than $4 trillion on the stock market. Yet by the time the markets closed that day, stocks had erased their gains after Trump sent letters to more than a dozen pharmaceutical companies demanding they offer U.S. customers more competitive pricing for new medicines and giving them 60 days to comply. Late Thursday evening, Trump unveiled a sweeping new set of tariffs that unilaterally imposed higher import taxes on a host of trading partners, including allies like Canada and Taiwan. The new effective rate of more than 15% delivered a shock to global markets. The month closed with the Treasury Department reporting monthly tariff collections had hit another new record of more than $29 billion. In an interview with NBC News that evening, Trump touted the expansive new tariffs, saying he believed it all was going 'very well, very smooth,' even as he remained open to new deals. Then Friday's jobs report arrived. At 8:30 a.m., the Bureau of Labor Statistics published revisions showing sharply lower jobs totals for May and June than initially reported, while also finding the economy had added just 73,000 jobs in July, far below expectations. All told, it suggested the U.S. has gained an average of just 35,000 jobs a month over the past three months — and excluding the increases seen in the health care industry, the U.S. had lost more jobs than it had created. The unemployment rate, however, remained at 4.2%, a sign that overall joblessness remains subdued. However, many economists noted the data point is largely attributable to the president's immigration crackdown, which is shrinking the overall labor force. The White House hailed the loss of foreign-born workers as it also noted a more sustained increase in the labor force among native-born workers. 'If we're swapping out foreign-born job holders for American-born job holders, I think that's a win,' White House chief economic adviser Stephen Miran told Axios. He added that there was 'really good reason' to believe the economy would improve, citing Trump's trade deals and tax cuts. But for Trump, the public's larger takeaway of a weakening labor market prompted an unprecedented response: Shortly after 2 p.m. ET on Friday, the president announced his intention to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics over what he said were errors in the jobs data, as well as accusations the agency had 'manipulated' the numbers prior to the 2024 election. Neither allegation has been corroborated. The move sent shockwaves through Washington, with some experts warning it risked lowering the U.S. to the level of authoritarian regimes. 'President Trump is once again destroying the credibility of our government by firing expert and nonpartisan officials because he does not like the facts that they present,' said Max Stier, the CEO of the nonpartisan Partnership for Public Service. 'Governments that go down this path find themselves in ugly territory very quickly.' It was not clear whether the outgoing BLS commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, a Biden administration appointee, would seek to challenge her removal in court. As it turns out, in addition to nominating a new head of the critical data agency, Trump will also get to name a new member to the Fed's rate-setting board after Adriana Kugler, another Joe Biden appointee, unexpectedly announced her resignation late Friday. Both nominees still must be confirmed by the Senate, which remains narrowly controlled by the GOP. Asked if the White House continued to harbor concerns about the direction of the economy, Kush Desai, a White House spokesman, issued the following statement: 'In his first term, President Trump used an America First economic agenda to deliver historic working class prosperity and the first reduction in wealth and income inequality in decades. In his [second] term, President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale — as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come.' That view is not shared among other economists. 'All of this is troubling: a weakening economy, slowing labor market, rising inflation, rising tariffs, political influence on a statistical agency, more political influence on Fed, tensions with Russia & the onset of a market correction,' EY Parthenon chief economist Greg Daco wrote on X. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio

President Lula hits back as Trump tariffs threaten US-Brazil trade showdown
President Lula hits back as Trump tariffs threaten US-Brazil trade showdown

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

President Lula hits back as Trump tariffs threaten US-Brazil trade showdown

Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, has said he does not fear getting on the wrong side of Donald Trump, as South America's largest economy braces for the introduction of 50% tariffs. Trump announced plans to slap Brazil with tariffs on 1 August earlier this month, partly in retaliation for a supposed political 'witch-hunt' against his far-right ally Jair Bolsonaro. The former Brazilian president faces decades in jail for allegedly plotting a military coup to stop Lula from taking office after the former lost the 2022 presidential election. On Wednesday, Trump signed an executive order confirming that the US would impose 50% tariffs on Brazil. The order did not mention the previously-cited 1 August deadline, but indicated that the new duty would be enforced from next week. In a rare interview with the New York Times, clearly designed to send a message to the White House on the eve of a potential trade war, Lula urged the US president to avoid creating a 'lose-lose' relationship between two of the largest economies in the Americas and said he did not fear publicly criticizing Trump, whom he recently called an 'emperor'. 'There's no reason to be afraid. I am worried, obviously, because we have economic interests, political interests, technological interests. But at no point will Brazil negotiate as if it were a small country up against a big country. Brazil will negotiate as a sovereign country,' said Lula, who has enjoyed a bounce in the polls after Trump's threat. Lula indicated his officials were willing to negotiate economic issues with the US: 'In politics between two states, the will of neither should prevail. We always need to find the middle ground. This is achieved not by puffing out your chest and shouting about things you can't deliver, nor by bowing your head and simply saying 'amen' to whatever the United States wants.' But Brazil's president indicated that the political future of Bolsonaro – whose plot allegedly included plans to assassinate Lula – was a judicial matter and therefore non-negotiable. 'Brazil has a constitution, and the former president is being tried with a full right to a defense,' Lula insisted. The 79-year-old leftist said his message for Trump was 'that Brazilians and Americans do not deserve to be victims of politics, if the reason President Trump is imposing this tax on Brazil is because of the case against former President Bolsonaro'. Trump's decision to cite Bolsonaro's plight as one of the main justifications for his move against Brazil has left many observers doubting that the 'Trump always chickens out' (Taco) maxim will apply to the Friday deadline facing Lula's government. The US president has likened Bolsonaro's 'disgraceful' treatment to attempts to prosecute him after he unsuccessfully tried to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election. Bolsonaro has denied plotting a coup but has admitted seeking 'alternative ways' of stopping Lula from taking power. 'I'd be very surprised if Trump pulled back in this case, not just because of his friendship with the Bolsonaro family … but above all because in Trump's mind it reflects his own trauma,' the American Brazil specialist Brian Winter told the Estado de São Paulo newspaper this week. Lula hinted he believed a retreat might be possible, comparing the current situation to unfounded fears over the millennium bug. 'Do you remember when we were about to turn from 1999 to 2000, and there was worldwide panic that the computer systems were going to crash? Nothing happened,' said Lula, although he admitted he could not be certain 'nothing will happen'.

Trump to blame for high cost of living, Americans say in new poll
Trump to blame for high cost of living, Americans say in new poll

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump to blame for high cost of living, Americans say in new poll

Americans are struggling financially, grappling with debt and the rising cost of living, and are blaming the Trump administration and corporate interests for worsening economic outlooks for working families, according to a new poll. Six out of 10 Americans place blame on the Trump administration for driving up their cost of living, according to a poll conducted by Morning Consult for the Century Foundation, which asked 2,007 Americans how they are managing the high cost of living in the US economy, who they think is to blame and what are the solutions. Sixty three per cent said Trump had had a negative impact on grocery prices, and 61% said he had had a negative impact on the cost of living. Nearly half, 49%, said the Trump administration had had a negative impact on their finances. Nearly eight out of 10 Americans, including 70% of Republicans, fear that Trump's tariffs will increase the price of everyday goods. 'Donald Trump has simultaneously raised prices on everyday goods through a reckless approach to tariffs, a decimation of programs that help Americans afford healthcare, education, food and childcare, and then kneecapping federal regulators who keep banks and other big businesses from swindling consumers,' said Julie Margetta Morgan, president of the Century Foundation. 'This has created an alarming set of market conditions. Americans are left on their own to face high prices and low earnings, are building their own safety nets from a web of financial products, credit cards, buy now, pay later loans, payday loans and student debt, and companies have been given the green light to manipulate these products to boost their own profits without having to worry about following the law.' According to the poll, more than six out of 10 Americans said it had become more difficult to find a good paying job, buy a home and afford childcare. More than four out of five Americans, 83%, said they were concerned about the cost of groceries, with 46% saying they were very concerned. Some 47% said they were worried about being able to pay their rent or mortgage, 64% said they were worried about affording an unexpected medical expense. About 48% said they believed they would have trouble affording an unexpected $500 bill without borrowing. One in four said it would be 'very difficult'. A quarter of those surveyed said they spent at least three hours a day worrying about their finances and ability to afford basic necessities. Another 25% of respondents said they or someone in their household had skipped meals in the past year in order to make ends meet, and 26% said they had fallen behind on their monthly bills over the past year. Americans also fear things are getting worse economically, with 76% of those polled saying they fear a looming economic recession. Corporations and billionaires were seen as a big factor behind this financial anxiety, with 51% saying they believe corporations have had an active role in making life more difficult for average people over the past 25 years, and 52% saying billionaires have made life tougher. Half of those polled also believe congressional Republicans have made life more difficult, with 41% believing Democrats have made life more difficult. 'Millions of Americans, across parties, across backgrounds, are deeply anxious, and they're struggling to afford basics like housing and health care. Donald Trump is making these struggles worse,' said Rachel West, senior fellow at the Century Foundation. 'Americans believe the outsized influence of corporations and the wealthy has made their lives harder, and the risks they're taking to cope with high costs like taking on debt and tapping into their savings should sound an alarm for policymakers.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store