What happens in Ohio if the U.S. Dept. of Education is defunded?
Middle school teacher Joe Decker sits with Statehouse reporter Morgan Trau. (Photo by Morgan Trau, WEWS.)
Ohio public schools have been begging the state for funding for air conditioning, for pencils, for special needs supports in their buildings. The U.S. Department of Education helps to fund many of their facilities, but with the looming threat that this money is going to be pulled, teachers are paralyzed.
'I see kids whose families don't have enough to eat,' middle school teacher Joe Decker said. 'Kids who have to share beds with siblings.'
Decker knows that he serves some of the least privileged kids in the state. Columbus City Schools receives more federal money than any other district in Ohio.
'I already have students who are falling asleep because they're hungry; I already have students who aren't coming to school because they have to take care of a sick sibling; I have students who are afraid to come to school because of ICE, that think they're going to be snatched up by law enforcement just because of where their family is from,' he continued, referencing how the Trump administration is permitting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to go into schools.
Every single student, more than 50,000, enrolled in Columbus City Schools in 2018 was considered 'disadvantaged,' according to research done by The Ohio State University. At the time, the average household income was about $47,000. Anecdotally, Decker said that where he teaches, Mifflin Middle School, is on the lowest end of the average income level.
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in 1997 in DeRolph v. State that the way the state funds schools is unconstitutional, relying too much on property taxes.
Throughout the next three decades, lawmakers went back and forth on policy in an attempt to fix the unconstitutionality. The Ohio Education Association (OEA), as well as lawmakers on each side of the aisle, have deemed that it has been unconstitutional since then. However, some Republicans argue that because they are no longer using the struck-down policy, and since nothing else has been deemed 'unconstitutional' in court, it can't be considered unconstitutional.
Either way, there has been a bipartisan effort for years to fix the funding system.
In 2021, a proposal that advocates cheered was finally passed. It required $333 million additional dollars a year for K-12 education funding — or about $2 billion overall. It is called the Cupp-Patterson Fair School Funding Plan (FSFP).
The rollout was supposed to take six years and is meant to change how public dollars are provided to schools. It would give additional support to local districts. The first two years were partially funded, the second two years were fully funded, and there are just two years left to go.
However, cuts are still taking place — and not every school gets what it needs.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
With cuts made by lawmakers, Decker is already dealing with an increase in the number of kids in his class.
'There are no limits on how many special education children could be placed in my classroom — I might have 24 along with like 10, 15 more mainstream kids,' he said. 'I've had classrooms from 42 to 26, I think.'
'You have much bigger issues than worrying about school funding,' this reporter remarked to him. 'The safety, the care, the hunger.'
To each item mentioned, he nodded.
'Yes,' he said. 'It brings me to tears when I'm talking about my students.'
From the consolidation of their English as a Second Language classes to deciding to close numerous schools this past December, school funding is always top of mind for Decker.
Columbus City Schools receives about $70 million from the federal government per year, according to data from the U.S. Department of Education.
Statewide, OEA reports that the federal agency funds $1.5 billion through programs like Title 1 to help low-income families and the IDEA program to assist families with special needs.
'What would happen to your classroom if that funding went away?' we asked Decker.
'It's already happening; the boat is sinking,' he replied. 'We're bleeding our schools dry.'
President Donald Trump and his allies have proposed defunding the U.S. Department of Education with an executive order set to come soon, according to state lawmakers.
Some Ohio Republican leaders are encouraged by the administration's endorsement to disband the agency.
'We're going to have a better idea of what Ohio education needs are than they are in Washington D.C.,' said Ohio Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon.
McColley is one of the decision-makers who determines how much state money gets sent to Ohio schools. We asked him what benefits he sees, and he said flexibility.
'The Constitution originally envisioned the federal government would have no role in education and that it would be the states that control their own education,' he continued. 'The problem after the Department of Education was established is it's now basically legal bribery to the states to say 'You have to take this federal money, and you have to do everything that we're asking you to do.''
That so-called legal bribery, Decker responds, is just money for marginalized students. McColley argued back that the right amount of money would go into the best hands if state leaders got access to it.
'We're much more likely to figure out the education issues in this country by doing it that way than having a top down approach,' the Republican said.
But Trump can't do this himself. Constitutionally, Congress would need to decide how federal funds are distributed. This could mean that states would be put in charge of funding for low-income students and special needs resources. There are some safeguards to Title 1 and IDEA, and they can't just disappear without further congressional action.
'We would be better served to block grant that money to the state of Ohio and to all the other 49 states and basically say, 'Look, the beauty of this country is we have 50 laboratories of democracy,'' McColley continued. 'Some states are gonna get it right. Some states are gonna get it wrong. But we're going to be able to figure out the states that got it right and then hope to implement that on a wider basis.'
But if Ohio does get a lump sum, Decker doesn't trust elected leaders will do the right thing.
'I know lawmakers won't do what is right because I've watched what they've already done,' the teacher said. 'It's going to the private schools.'
For years, Ohio has been a champion of another Trump priority: private school vouchers.
Trump and his new education secretary Linda McMahon are focusing on shifting funding priorities to 'school choice,' or selecting alternative options to public schools. Federal funding will open up to private schools, and there will be grants that enable families to pursue faith-based education.
Ohio spent nearly a billion dollars on private school voucher scholarships in 2024
Just last year, the GOP leadership in Ohio sent roughly $1 billion in public dollars to private schools. Families in Ohio can get thousands of dollars to send their children to a nonpublic school. This year, the House Speaker Matt Huffman, R-Lima, is looking to slash at least $650 million in public education spending in this General Assembly's budget, arguing that private schools are better than public.
'What is the least expensive, acceptable educational product for the taxpayer?' Huffman asked rhetorically. 'If someone says they're willing to take a $7,000 scholarship voucher and go to a private school rather than going to the school that… on average in the state, it's about $15,000 — that's better for the taxpayers.'
Gov. Mike DeWine has said he would be fully funding public schools, but an analysis by the Legislative Service Commission shows a $103 million cut from traditional public schools over the two-year budget while costs for private charter schools and vouchers would go up another $500 million.
'We're proud to be offering students and families more choices than ever in terms of how they receive their education,' the governor said when announcing his budget in February. 'Ohio has a long history of supporting parents and supporting choices made by parents regarding the education of their children.'
At the time of the budget announcement, journalists and the public were unable to see what the funding breakdown was.
'Do you think the voucher system is a way to privatize education?' this reporter asked Decker.
'Most definitely,' he responded. 'Governor DeWine is giving our public school money to families out in New Albany, out in Pataskala, out in Dublin, so that they can hand over tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars to a private school. The people at that school are going to turn around and give the money back to Governor DeWine and other people who will just keep that circle going.'
Decker mentioned the wealthy suburbs of Columbus, and he isn't wrong about money going there.
The number of students receiving Ohio 'EdChoice Expansion' vouchers increased from 23,272 students during the 2022-2023 school year to 82,946 students during the 2023-2024 school year, according to data provided by the Ohio Department of Education & Workforce (ODEW).
But the number of students enrolled in private schools during the 2023-24 school year only increased by 3,719 students, according to ODEW.
DeWine and other legislative leaders argue that some public schools don't have what parents want.
'There's no educational system where one size fits all works for everyone,' now-U.S. Senator Jon Husted said while he was still lieutenant governor during a press conference.
Another problem with vouchers, according to Decker, is the lack of accountability they have.
Private schools aren't fair because they get to pick and choose their students, Decker argued.
'Talking about political realities — it's de facto segregated,' he said.
Mifflin, he explained, has a student body population that is 70% Black students and 20% Hispanic, 5% Asian-American, and the remaining 5% white. All the kids who can't afford private schools, even with a voucher, or won't get in due to racial discrimination, will be stuck at the grossly underfunded public schools, he said.
'Taking away money from our public schools is demoralizing our public schools, it's demoralizing our students and just cutting them 1,000 times over and over,' he said, welling up with tears. 'It is heartbreaking to watch day after day.'
Now, at the Ohio Statehouse, lawmakers are still debating how much state money should be going to schools.
With the threat of cuts to both state and federal money, teachers believe the privatization of education is imminent — and the least privileged will suffer the most.
Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on X and Facebook.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Newsom's office compares LA riots against federal agents to sports celebrations
Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office downplayed the riots gripping Los Angeles, likening them to sports celebrations that notoriously break out in Philadelphia after an Eagles' victory. "LA riots? Have these geniuses ever seen what happens when the Eagles win a playoff game?" Izzy Gardon, Newsom's communications director, told Fox News Digital on Sunday morning. Philadelphia notoriously sees sports revelers flood the city after beloved teams such as the Eagles or Phillies win championships, sometimes setting cars ablaze and causing property damage. The city even greases city light poles to dissuade partiers from scaling them and deploys additional police to the streets while often wearing riot gear. Fox News Digital reached out to the governor's office to ask about claims by California Republicans and natives that Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass bore some of the blame for the riots. They and other local Democrats issued messages defending illegal immigrants and condemning federal agents for carrying out deportation raids in the left-wing city. California Republicans Slam Newsom, Bass For Letting La Burn With Riots Amid Trump Immigration Blitz "Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass have a real habit of letting Los Angeles burn," Republican California Rep. Darell Issa posted to X on Saturday evening. Read On The Fox News App "If only Karen Bass fought against the Los Angeles fires like she fights for illegal aliens," Issa added in another post, referring to the Palisades fire that tore through Southern California in January. Federal Officials Slam Democrats For 'Dangerous' Rhetoric As Ice Agents Face Violent Mobs In La, Nyc "Gavin Newsom is unqualified for a plethora of reasons, the least of which is his support of illegal alien insurrectionists. He is an all purpose, all around loser," Hollywood actor and California resident James Woods posted to X. Federal officials have also pinned blame for the violence on Democratic elected officials who have "villainized and demonized" ICE law enforcement, Fox Digital previously reported. "This is on you, Governor. It is a shame that California openly defies federal law and sides with illegal aliens, including hardened criminals, against its own citizens," Harmeet Dhillon, former vice chair of the California Republican Party and current assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Department of Justice, posted to X. "The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom must call for it to end," DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin wrote in a statement. "The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens.… From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end." Social Media, Trump Admin Erupts Over La Mayor's Reaction To Ice Raids: 'You're A Criminal Too' Newsom on Friday described the Trump administration's immigration raids in Los Angeles as "chaotic and reckless." "Continued chaotic federal sweeps, across California, to meet an arbitrary arrest quota are as reckless as they are cruel. Donald Trump's chaos is eroding trust, tearing families apart, and undermining the workers and industries that power America's economy," Newsom's statement read. The press office doubled down in support of shielding illegal immigrants from deportation in a response X post to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Saturday. "In recent days, violent mobs have attacked ICE Officers and Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations in Los Angeles, California. These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens," Leavitt posted to X. Newsom's office responded: "These are anything but basic. Your indiscriminate sweeps are terrifying entire communities and detaining hardworking, tax-paying Californians. It's cruel escalation and must end." When asked about the riots, and California Republicans condemning the violence and Newsom's stance on immigration on Sunday morning, the governor's office compared the lawlessness to street parties after an Eagles win. Patel Promises Fbi Coming For Anyone Assaulting Cops As Los Angeles Erupts Over Ice Raids The riots in Los Angeles, however, have included targeted attacks on federal law enforcement officials, including violent protesters lobbing rocks and other items at immigration officials. U.S. Border Patrol Chief Michael W. Banks, for example, shared a photo of a Border Patrol agent's bloody hand that was injured by a rock flying through the windshield. Trump signed a presidential memorandum on Saturday to deploy 2,000 National Guardsmen to Paramount, California, to help quell the violence, and has also slammed the local leaders for the chaos. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump posted to Truth Social on Saturday article source: Newsom's office compares LA riots against federal agents to sports celebrations
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Political divide widens as Trump deploys National Guard to Los Angeles
By Nandita Bose BEDMINSTER, New Jersey (Reuters) - Republicans and Democrats traded barbs on Sunday after President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles amid massive protests against increasing and divisive immigration raids. "Important to remember that Trump isn't trying to heal or keep the peace. He is looking to inflame and divide," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy said in one of the most direct rebukes. "His movement doesn't believe in democracy or protest - and if they get a chance to end the rule of law they will take it." Democratic Senator Cory Booker condemned Trump for deploying troops without California's approval, warning it would only escalate tensions. On NBC's "Meet the Press" he accused Trump of hypocrisy, and noted the president's inaction on January 6, 2021 when thousands of his supporters raided the U.S. Capitol and his subsequent pardons for those arrested. Footage showed at least a half dozen military-style vehicles and riot shields on Sunday at the federal building in Los Angeles with federal law enforcement firing gas canisters to disperse demonstrators protesting against the ICE crackdown. California Governor Gavin Newsom and Trump sparred over the protests, with Newsom condemning the federal response as an overreach, saying Trump wants "a spectacle," while the president accused Newsom of failing to maintain order. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson on Sunday defended Trump's decision and said he had no concern about the National Guard deployment, adding, "One of our core principles is maintaining peace through strength. We do that in foreign affairs and domestic affairs as well. I don't think that's heavy handed." Republican Senator James Lankford said Trump is trying to de-escalate tensions, pointing to scenes of protesters throwing objects at law enforcement. He recalled similar unrest in 2020 in Seattle and Portland, where National Guard backed local law enforcement amid racial justice protests. The protests against the raids have become the latest focal point in a national debate over immigration, protest rights, and the use of federal force in domestic affairs. It also has fueled discussion on the boundaries of presidential power and the public's right to dissent.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republicans Say They're Cool With Trump Deploying Troops Against Protesters
The U.S. secretary of defense has threatened to send active-duty Marines into the streets of Los Angeles to confront protesters opposing the administration's detention and deportation of immigrants. At least three prominent Republicans don't seem concerned about potential overreach. 'The [Department of Defense] is mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles. And, if violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert,' Hegseth wrote late Saturday on X, formerly Twitter, on his personal account. This prompted ABC's Jonathan Karl to ask House Speaker Mike Johnson: 'Could we really see active duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles?' 'One of our core principles is maintaining peace through strength,' Johnson said during an interview on Sunday's episode of This Week. 'We do that on foreign affairs and domestic affairs as well. I don't think that's heavy handed. I think that's an important signal.' 'You don't think sending Marines into the streets of an American city is heavy-handed?' Karl asked. 'We have to be prepared to do what is necessary, and I think the notice that that might happen might have the deterring effect,' Johnson said. Active-duty military troops have not been sent in to suppress unrest since the 1992 Los Angeles protests after a jury acquitted four white police officers in the beating of Rodney King, a Black man who was pulled over for a traffic violation. The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits federal troops from engaging in civilian law enforcement unless there is a clear legal or constitutional basis for doing so. It was created to restrict the president's ability to use the military against civilians. The exception to Posse Comitatus is the Insurrection Act, which Trump has not invoked. Instead, Trump invoked Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which limits the troops' actions to protecting federal officials rather than enforcing laws. Title 10 gives Trump authority to deploy the National Guard during 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States' and two other specific circumstances. Chris Mirasola of Lawfare wrote that Trump's justification for using this authority is 'factually contestable and, even on the face of the memorandum, unusually weak.' Republican Sen. James Lankford on NBC's Meet the Press argued that by deploying the National Guard, Trump is 'trying to deescalate all the tensions that are there.' Newsom has said that Trump activating National Guard troops is 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions' 'This is an American city, and to be able to have an American city where we have people literally flying Mexican flags and saying, 'You cannot arrest us,' cannot be allowed,' Lankford said on Sunday. 'If someone violates the law, no matter what state that they're in, they're in violation of a federal law. They should face consequences for that.' Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin also criticized protesters for carrying Mexican flags. 'They were literally out there protesting, carrying a foreign flag. That is absolutely insane. They are not just peaceful protesters. These are illegals,' he said Sunday on State of the Union. 'Carrying a flag is not illegal, as you know,' CNN's Dana Bash responded. 'Foreign flag while you're attacking law enforcement, it's pretty bad,' Mullin said. Carrying a Mexican flag and saying 'You cannot arrest us' is not a prosecutable offense. It is free speech protected by the First Amendment. And the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) has been clear that anyone found destructing property will be arrested. 'Everyone has the right to peacefully assemble and voice their opinions,' LAPD posted on X. 'However, vandalizing property and attempting to seriously injure officers, whether Federal or LAPD, is not peaceful.' When Meet the Press host Kristen Welker pointed out to Lankford that 'Governor Newsom says there is no unmet law enforcement need. The LAPD says the protests were peaceful,' the senator claimed that it is 'clear' that the LAPD is 'being overwhelmed.' (LAPD has not said they are overwhelmed.) 'This wouldn't be an issue if California didn't promote sanctuary city policies to be able to tell people literally, 'You can violate federal law and live in our state, and no one will arrest you for this,'' Lankford said. 'Now suddenly when they are arrested for federal crimes then suddenly they go into this kind of protest saying, 'No, you can't arrest us here. We're immune from federal law.' That's not true.' Here, Lankford is being misleading. Sanctuary city policies do not grant anyone immunity, they only limit how state and local resources are allocated to aid federal immigration enforcement. Under the Tenth Amendment, states have the right to allocate resources as they see fit, and states have used that amendment in court to justify not assisting with federal immigration raids. It's disturbing that prominent GOP lawmakers are signing on to the president's use of authority to activate the National Guard — against a governor's wishes — and signaling their agreement that deploying active duty Marines against civilians would be fine with them should Trump choose to do so. 'Don't kid yourself they know they are absolutely getting cooked politically [with] their terrible bill and rising prices, and they want to create a violent spectacle to feed their content machine,' Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz posted on X late Saturday. 'It's time for the mainstream media to describe this authoritarian madness accurately.' More from Rolling Stone Trump's Response to L.A. Protests: What We Know The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Donald Trump Is Destroying the Economy and Waging War on the Poor Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence