What happens in Ohio if the U.S. Dept. of Education is defunded?
Ohio public schools have been begging the state for funding for air conditioning, for pencils, for special needs supports in their buildings. The U.S. Department of Education helps to fund many of their facilities, but with the looming threat that this money is going to be pulled, teachers are paralyzed.
'I see kids whose families don't have enough to eat,' middle school teacher Joe Decker said. 'Kids who have to share beds with siblings.'
Decker knows that he serves some of the least privileged kids in the state. Columbus City Schools receives more federal money than any other district in Ohio.
'I already have students who are falling asleep because they're hungry; I already have students who aren't coming to school because they have to take care of a sick sibling; I have students who are afraid to come to school because of ICE, that think they're going to be snatched up by law enforcement just because of where their family is from,' he continued, referencing how the Trump administration is permitting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to go into schools.
Every single student, more than 50,000, enrolled in Columbus City Schools in 2018 was considered 'disadvantaged,' according to research done by The Ohio State University. At the time, the average household income was about $47,000. Anecdotally, Decker said that where he teaches, Mifflin Middle School, is on the lowest end of the average income level.
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in 1997 in DeRolph v. State that the way the state funds schools is unconstitutional, relying too much on property taxes.
Throughout the next three decades, lawmakers went back and forth on policy in an attempt to fix the unconstitutionality. The Ohio Education Association (OEA), as well as lawmakers on each side of the aisle, have deemed that it has been unconstitutional since then. However, some Republicans argue that because they are no longer using the struck-down policy, and since nothing else has been deemed 'unconstitutional' in court, it can't be considered unconstitutional.
Either way, there has been a bipartisan effort for years to fix the funding system.
In 2021, a proposal that advocates cheered was finally passed. It required $333 million additional dollars a year for K-12 education funding — or about $2 billion overall. It is called the Cupp-Patterson Fair School Funding Plan (FSFP).
The rollout was supposed to take six years and is meant to change how public dollars are provided to schools. It would give additional support to local districts. The first two years were partially funded, the second two years were fully funded, and there are just two years left to go.
However, cuts are still taking place — and not every school gets what it needs.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
With cuts made by lawmakers, Decker is already dealing with an increase in the number of kids in his class.
'There are no limits on how many special education children could be placed in my classroom — I might have 24 along with like 10, 15 more mainstream kids,' he said. 'I've had classrooms from 42 to 26, I think.'
'You have much bigger issues than worrying about school funding,' this reporter remarked to him. 'The safety, the care, the hunger.'
To each item mentioned, he nodded.
'Yes,' he said. 'It brings me to tears when I'm talking about my students.'
From the consolidation of their English as a Second Language classes to deciding to close numerous schools this past December, school funding is always top of mind for Decker.
Columbus City Schools receives about $70 million from the federal government per year, according to data from the U.S. Department of Education.
Statewide, OEA reports that the federal agency funds $1.5 billion through programs like Title 1 to help low-income families and the IDEA program to assist families with special needs.
'What would happen to your classroom if that funding went away?' we asked Decker.
'It's already happening; the boat is sinking,' he replied. 'We're bleeding our schools dry.'
President Donald Trump and his allies have proposed defunding the U.S. Department of Education with an executive order set to come soon, according to state lawmakers.
Some Ohio Republican leaders are encouraged by the administration's endorsement to disband the agency.
'We're going to have a better idea of what Ohio education needs are than they are in Washington D.C.,' said Ohio Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon.
McColley is one of the decision-makers who determines how much state money gets sent to Ohio schools. We asked him what benefits he sees, and he said flexibility.
'The Constitution originally envisioned the federal government would have no role in education and that it would be the states that control their own education,' he continued. 'The problem after the Department of Education was established is it's now basically legal bribery to the states to say 'You have to take this federal money, and you have to do everything that we're asking you to do.''
That so-called legal bribery, Decker responds, is just money for marginalized students. McColley argued back that the right amount of money would go into the best hands if state leaders got access to it.
'We're much more likely to figure out the education issues in this country by doing it that way than having a top down approach,' the Republican said.
But Trump can't do this himself. Constitutionally, Congress would need to decide how federal funds are distributed. This could mean that states would be put in charge of funding for low-income students and special needs resources. There are some safeguards to Title 1 and IDEA, and they can't just disappear without further congressional action.
'We would be better served to block grant that money to the state of Ohio and to all the other 49 states and basically say, 'Look, the beauty of this country is we have 50 laboratories of democracy,'' McColley continued. 'Some states are gonna get it right. Some states are gonna get it wrong. But we're going to be able to figure out the states that got it right and then hope to implement that on a wider basis.'
But if Ohio does get a lump sum, Decker doesn't trust elected leaders will do the right thing.
'I know lawmakers won't do what is right because I've watched what they've already done,' the teacher said. 'It's going to the private schools.'
For years, Ohio has been a champion of another Trump priority: private school vouchers.
Trump and his new education secretary Linda McMahon are focusing on shifting funding priorities to 'school choice,' or selecting alternative options to public schools. Federal funding will open up to private schools, and there will be grants that enable families to pursue faith-based education.
Ohio spent nearly a billion dollars on private school voucher scholarships in 2024
Just last year, the GOP leadership in Ohio sent roughly $1 billion in public dollars to private schools. Families in Ohio can get thousands of dollars to send their children to a nonpublic school. This year, the House Speaker Matt Huffman, R-Lima, is looking to slash at least $650 million in public education spending in this General Assembly's budget, arguing that private schools are better than public.
'What is the least expensive, acceptable educational product for the taxpayer?' Huffman asked rhetorically. 'If someone says they're willing to take a $7,000 scholarship voucher and go to a private school rather than going to the school that… on average in the state, it's about $15,000 — that's better for the taxpayers.'
Gov. Mike DeWine has said he would be fully funding public schools, but an analysis by the Legislative Service Commission shows a $103 million cut from traditional public schools over the two-year budget while costs for private charter schools and vouchers would go up another $500 million.
'We're proud to be offering students and families more choices than ever in terms of how they receive their education,' the governor said when announcing his budget in February. 'Ohio has a long history of supporting parents and supporting choices made by parents regarding the education of their children.'
At the time of the budget announcement, journalists and the public were unable to see what the funding breakdown was.
'Do you think the voucher system is a way to privatize education?' this reporter asked Decker.
'Most definitely,' he responded. 'Governor DeWine is giving our public school money to families out in New Albany, out in Pataskala, out in Dublin, so that they can hand over tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars to a private school. The people at that school are going to turn around and give the money back to Governor DeWine and other people who will just keep that circle going.'
Decker mentioned the wealthy suburbs of Columbus, and he isn't wrong about money going there.
The number of students receiving Ohio 'EdChoice Expansion' vouchers increased from 23,272 students during the 2022-2023 school year to 82,946 students during the 2023-2024 school year, according to data provided by the Ohio Department of Education & Workforce (ODEW).
But the number of students enrolled in private schools during the 2023-24 school year only increased by 3,719 students, according to ODEW.
DeWine and other legislative leaders argue that some public schools don't have what parents want.
'There's no educational system where one size fits all works for everyone,' now-U.S. Senator Jon Husted said while he was still lieutenant governor during a press conference.
Another problem with vouchers, according to Decker, is the lack of accountability they have.
Private schools aren't fair because they get to pick and choose their students, Decker argued.
'Talking about political realities — it's de facto segregated,' he said.
Mifflin, he explained, has a student body population that is 70% Black students and 20% Hispanic, 5% Asian-American, and the remaining 5% white. All the kids who can't afford private schools, even with a voucher, or won't get in due to racial discrimination, will be stuck at the grossly underfunded public schools, he said.
'Taking away money from our public schools is demoralizing our public schools, it's demoralizing our students and just cutting them 1,000 times over and over,' he said, welling up with tears. 'It is heartbreaking to watch day after day.'
Now, at the Ohio Statehouse, lawmakers are still debating how much state money should be going to schools.
With the threat of cuts to both state and federal money, teachers believe the privatization of education is imminent — and the least privileged will suffer the most.
Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on X and Facebook.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis
The Democratic Party is bleeding registered voters, suffering a 4.5 million swing against it that could take years to recover from, according to a new report. Between the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections, Democrats lost about 2.1 million voters across the 30 states that track registration by political party, according to a New York Times analysis of data gathered by the L2 tracking firm. Over the same period, the Republican Party gained 2.4 million registered voters. Officially, there are still more registered Democrats than Republicans nationwide, but that number is incomplete because blue states like California and New York allow voters to register by party — as does the District of Columbia — while reliably red states like Texas, Missouri and Ohio do not. Most alarmingly for Democrats, the decline is nationwide, with the US seeing more new voters registering with the GOP in 2024 for the first time in six years. Democrats also saw their registered voter advantage dwindle in four 2024 battleground states — Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina and Pennsylvania — all of which President Trump carried this past Nov. 5. Democrats lost about 2.1 million registered voters in the 30 states that track registration by political party. AP Michael Pruser, who tracks voter registration closely as the director of data science for Decision Desk HQ, warned that the numbers not only help explain Trump's victory last year — in which he became the first Republican presidential candidate to win the popular vote in 20 years — but also forecast significant headwinds for Democrats in next year's midterm elections as well as the 2028 presidential vote. 'I don't want to say, 'The death cycle of the Democratic Party,'' Pruser told the Times, 'but there seems to be no end to this.' 'There is no silver lining or cavalry coming across the hill. This is month after month, year after year,' he added. In North Carolina, Democrats lost 115,523 voters between the 2020 and 2024 election, with Republicans gaining more than 140,000 members and erasing the Dems' registration advantage, according to the L2 data. More new voters registered to be Republican than Democrat last year, the first time since 2018. Michael Nagle Democrats suffered similar losses in Arizona and Pennsylvania, while in Nevada — a state whose politics were long dominated by the Las Vegas-based Culinary Workers Union — the share of registered Democrats suffered the second-steepest plunge of those states measured between 2020 and 2024. (Only deep-red West Virginia saw more precipitous losses.). Even Democratic bastions like New York and California were not safe from voter erosion, with Dems losing 305,922 registered voters in the Empire State in between the two elections. In California, Democrats lost 680,556 voters between 2020 and 2024. All in all, Democrats went from enjoying an advantage of nearly 11 percentage points over Republicans in registered voter numbers in 2020 to just over six percentage points across the 30 states and DC in 2024, the Times found. Experts believe that the fall of new Democratic registrations can be linked to the growing number of voters choosing to be independents or unaffiliated, a trend that is sapping both parties' rolls. In 2018, more than one-third (34%) of new voter registrations nationwide were Democrats, while registered Republicans made up just 20% of new voters. As of last year, however, Republicans had erased that gap, with party supporters making up 29% of new voters, while Democrats made up 26% of new voters.


Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom's Redistricting Ballot Measure Chances of Passing—New Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom's redistricting ballot measure has support from a majority of the state's voters, according to a new poll. Newsweek reached out to Newsom and the California GOP for comment via email. Why It Matters The redistricting arms race between California, Texas and other states could have key implications for the midterms. Texas, with the support of President Donald Trump, first announced plans to redraw its map to become more favorable to Republicans and thwart losses in the midterms, but Newsom has warned California could redraw its map to benefit Democrats in return. California Democrats' ability to do so may hinge on the outcome of a ballot measure Newsom announced last week that would allow a new map drafted by legislators to temporarily replace the boundaries drawn up by the state's independent redistricting committee following the 2020 census. If the ballot measure is successful, it could neutralize efforts from Texas Republicans. But if it fails, Republicans may be able to net several seats in not only Texas, but also other GOP states like Indiana and Missouri. What to Know A new poll from Newsom's pollster, reported by Axios, suggests a majority of voters are prepared to support the ballot measure. The poll, conducted by David Binder, showed that 57 percent of California voters are in support of the proposal. Only 35 percent were opposed to it, while 8 percent remained undecided. Among Democrats, the ballot measure had 84 percent support, while only 13 percent opposed it. Among Republicans, 79 percent were opposed, the poll found, according to Axios. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Los Angeles on August 14, 2025. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Los Angeles on August 14, poll surveyed 1,000 likely voters from August 10 to August 14, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. California remains a solidly blue state where Democrats handily outnumber Republicans. Former Vice President Kamala Harris carried it by 20 points last November, so Democrats are hopeful this ballot measure will fall on partisan lines. But the state has an independent redistricting community that was passed by voters and remains popular. A Politico poll released last week found that 64 percent of California voters support keeping the commission, while only 36 percent support returning redistricting authority to the state legislature. Newsom, who is viewed as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, has cast the ballot measure as a temporary measure, which would no longer be in effect after the 2030 census, which is only in response to Texas' redistricting efforts. It would not go into effect unless Texas or other Republican states first redraw their lines. Republicans, however, have described it as a power grab that violates the will of Californians. What People Are Saying David Binder wrote in the poll, per Axios: "Voter trends on this measure closely mirror the presidential election results of November 2024, in which Kamala Harris defeated Donald Trump in California by 58% to 38%. Poll results indicate that Proposition 50 will fall along similar partisan lines." Representative Kevin Kiley, a California Republican, wrote to X on Tuesday: "Newsom is overthrowing the Redistricting Commission in order to make California 'a whole lot bluer.' To accomplish this, his proposal expressly overrides the entire State Constitution. Partisan gerrymandering will become the supreme law of the land." Governor Newsom wrote to X on Tuesday: "Unlike Texas, we're not following @realDonaldTrump's orders to quietly try to redistrict our way out of losing the next election. In California, we're working transparently to respond if Texas enacts new maps — and we'll give the power to the people to make our final decision." What Happens Next Voters will make their decision about the redistricting plan in November. Both Democrats and Republicans will spend the coming months making their case to voters on whether the ballot measure should pass. Meanwhile, the redistricting war continues across the country, with Trump urging Texas Republicans to pass their plan "ASAP."

Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Beto O'Rourke PAC donated more than $1 million to Democrats during redistricting battle
Former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke announced on Saturday that his political group, Powered by People, donated more than $1 million to Texas Democrats during a special session in which they walked out to deny Republicans the quorum they needed to pass new congressional maps. In the announcement, O'Rourke said that 'more than 55,000 donations' poured in from people across the country since the start of the first special session called by Gov. Greg Abbott. The money from his political group benefited the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, the Texas House Democratic Caucus, and the Mexican American Legislative Caucus. Abbott's first special session, which ended Friday, didn't have a quorum for the past two weeks because most of the House's 62 Democrats left the state to prevent proposed redistricting aimed at securing more GOP seats in Congress. He immediately called a second special session. Last week, a Tarrant County District Judge Megan Fahey sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, temporarily blocking Powered by People from fundraising for Democrats or financially supporting the quorum break. Paxton on Tuesday argued in a motion that O'Rourke had violated the temporary injunction. He asked the judge to imprison O'Rourke for the duration of the lawsuit, and to fine the Democrat $500 for each alleged violation of the injunction. O'Rourke filed his own lawsuit against Paxton earlier this month after being sued by the attorney general. He's asking a judge to block Paxton's investigation into Powered by People and alleges that he engaged in a 'fishing expedition, constitutional rights be damned.' In 2021, when Democrats broke quorum and left the state to prevent a bill that sought to tighten voting rules, which eventually became law, Powered by People donated around $600,000 to help pay for their expenses, including lodging, travel, and meals. That was before the House passed new rules in 2023 imposing a $500-per-day fine on lawmakers who leave the state during sessions and said they aren't allowed to use campaign funds to pay the penalties. More all-star speakers confirmed for The Texas Tribune Festival, Nov. 13–15! This year's lineup just got even more exciting with the addition of State Rep. Caroline Fairly, R-Amarillo; former United States Attorney General Eric Holder; Abby Phillip, anchor of 'CNN NewsNight'; Aaron Reitz, 2026 Republican candidate for Texas Attorney General; and State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.