logo
Lack of victims' rights in new Bill ‘outrageous', says Barnaby Webber's mother

Lack of victims' rights in new Bill ‘outrageous', says Barnaby Webber's mother

The Victims and Courts Bill, which is currently passing through the Commons, will give victims no statutory right to be told about decisions affecting the detention, leave or discharge of their offenders with its current provisions, according to national charity Hundred Families.
Discretion of the information will be left to hospital managers and probation services instead, with victims having no legal right to be informed, carry out a consultation or appeal any decisions.
Valdo Calocane, who had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, killed 19-year-old students Barnaby and Grace O'Malley-Kumar and 65-year-old caretaker Ian Coates before attempting to kill three other people, in a spate of attacks in the city in June 2023.
He was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order in January last year after admitting manslaughter by diminished responsibility and attempted murder.
A judge-led public inquiry into the decisions made prior to the attacks was announced in February and is due to take place later this year.
Emma Webber said the Bill would be 'a betrayal of every victim who has already been failed by this system' if it was passed into law in its current form.
'This must not happen. It is utterly outrageous that the Government would even contemplate this,' she said.
'So egregious are the failings by every single agency involved in every aspect of our tragedy that a statutory public inquiry is under way.
'A significant part of the inquiry will focus on the failings of 'hospital managers' and 'clinicians' who failed to do their jobs properly. Resulting in the monster who killed my beautiful child be allowed to roam the streets and hide in plain sight.'
Ms Webber continued: 'Why has the Government chosen to include us as families in the proposals for the mental health bill, revision of our homicide laws and even the 10-year plan but conveniently chosen to ignore us on what is probably the one that will affect us the most?'
Campaigners have called on victims minister Alex Davies-Jones to amend the Bill by guaranteeing all victims have the right to be consulted, receive necessary information and be informed of key decisions, and to create a formal appeal process when information is denied.
Julian Hendy, founder of Hundred Families, said the Bill as it stands was 'not just a loophole, it's a kick in the teeth' for bereaved families and victims.
She said: 'We are talking about offenders who have been convicted of the most serious of crimes, which cause extreme concern amongst the public.
'This is not about punishment. It's about basic fairness, compassion, and transparency. Victims and their families should not be shut out of decisions that affect their personal safety and recovery.
'We have a lamentably long track record in our country of ignoring victims of serious crime. That has to stop. There is a balance to be struck.
'The Government has a clear opportunity to put this right and they must not waste it.'
The Victims and Courts Bill is currently at the report stage in the House of Commons after first being introduced to Parliament in May.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Port Talbot moves towards arc furnace future with groundbreaking ceremony
Port Talbot moves towards arc furnace future with groundbreaking ceremony

The Herald Scotland

time30 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Port Talbot moves towards arc furnace future with groundbreaking ceremony

Natarajan Chandrasekaran, chairman of Tata Steel and the Tata Group, described the moment as an 'important day for Tata Group, Tata Steel and for the UK'. He added: 'At Port Talbot, we are building the foundations of a cleaner, greener future, supporting jobs, driving innovation and demonstrating our commitment to responsible industry leadership.' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the Government was committed to a 'bright future for our steel industry' (Jordan Pettitt/PA) The Government has backed plans for the new £1.25 billion electric arc furnace at the Tata steelworks with a £500 million investment. The switch-on is due to take place in 2027 as part of the push towards greener production. Tata insists the move will cut Port Talbot's emissions by 90%, while ensuring the future of steel production in the town. The plant's last blast furnace was shut down in September 2024, with 2,500 workers to lose their jobs in the aftermath. The new electric arc furnace will be able to process scrap steel, but is not able to make virgin steel as a blast furnace can. Some MPs have said workers in South Wales have been let down in comparison with those retaining jobs in Scunthorpe, where ministers took control of the steelworks to prevent the closure of its blast furnaces. The Government has said the two steelworks were in different situations. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'This is our industrial strategy in action and is great news for Welsh steelmaking, backing this crucial Welsh industry, which will give certainty to local communities and thousands of local jobs for years to come. 'This Government is committed to a bright future for our steel industry, which is why we provided £500 million of funding to make this project possible.' Secretary of State for Wales Jo Stevens said the new furnace would help to realise 'the promise we made to the community, while the development of floating offshore wind, plans for a Celtic Freeport and millions more for local regeneration all mean that Port Talbot has a bright future'. First Minister of Wales Eluned Morgan said: 'This is a momentous day for heavy industry in Wales, as the electric arc furnace has secured the long-term future of steel making at Port Talbot. 'Seeing spades in the ground today provides a tangible sign of Tata's intention to continue producing steel in the area, an industry which has provided quality jobs to local people for generations.' Steelworkers' union Community described the groundbreaking ceremony as 'bittersweet'. Community assistant general secretary Alasdair McDiarmid said: 'This bittersweet day is a consequence of the devastating closure of the blast furnaces, but importantly a future for Port Talbot steelmaking is being secured. The workforce needs the electric arc furnace project to be both a success and a turning point, and we look forward to playing our part to get the new furnace up and running. 'Today should represent the first step towards rebuilding our steel industry and creating new high-quality jobs for our steel communities. Going forward we must see further investment to develop and grow the business, both here in Port Talbot and across all the crucial downstream sites. 'It was also good to see the Secretary of State in Port Talbot today, and we will continue to hold talks with Government on their plans to safeguard and co-invest in our steel industry. The UK needs a strong and resilient steel sector now more than ever, and steel should be the cornerstone of a national industrial strategy fit for the future.'

Can Glasgow and Edinburgh follow Greater Manchester's lead?
Can Glasgow and Edinburgh follow Greater Manchester's lead?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Can Glasgow and Edinburgh follow Greater Manchester's lead?

One issue concerning Scottish city-regions, however, is the governance arrangements needed to sustain them. South of the border, Greater Manchester is widely held up as the poster child for the localist turn in sub-national English governance, and the prominence and convening power of Andy Burnham, the directly elected mayor, is now widely cited. Read more: This has led to a recent flurry of media and advocacy concerning the need for directly elected mayors, and combined authority arrangements, here in Scotland. The argument seems to be that, if it works for Greater Manchester, then it will (hopefully) work for the Glasgow city-region too. This is supported by the UK Government position that accountable mayors in England give confidence for further devolution and provide the basis through which to develop new 'local growth plans'. One UK minister considers the mayoral model as a 'good idea', though for 'people in Scotland to decide'. Recent comparisons with Greater Manchester have been drawn by another minister, suggesting that Glasgow is missing out on an economic dividend. Adoption of directly elected mayors warrants a few reflections. First, we should consider that directly elected mayors for Scottish city-regions would be advocating in two directions – to both the UK and Scottish governments. Read more: If we consider innovation policy in the Glasgow city-region, for example, we can see direct UK Government investments (innovation accelerator), Scottish Government initiatives (tech scalars), and joint developments (investment zones). This makes the operating environment for a mayor somewhat more complex. Second, we may consider what evidence we have on the impacts of mayors driving economic change in other localities, and this does not appear to be clear cut. John Tomaney from UCL previously noted that the argument for mayors has rested on 'more or less persuasive anecdotes drawn principally from the US experience and the limited experience in London'. Greater Manchester has experienced radical change in many senses, however, relative to the Glasgow city-region, transformation is yet to clearly appear in the productivity data. Of course, we may need more time to see such productivity change, and it should be noted that the mayor still works within a very centralised arrangement there (despite the steps made). Read more: Third, we could perhaps start to consider the fundamental building blocks of effective urban governance. Arguably, this can be considered in terms of accountability, capacity and direction. Accountability relates to those who provide resource and those who experience the policy impacts. Capacity relates to the ability to manage at a city-region level a greater range of tools and policies. Direction relates to the fact that city-regions cannot do everything, so objectives need to be set that can be plausibly delivered against (localities in the UK have few powers compared with localities in other jurisdictions). Add to that trio the need to build city-region identities over the long run through bottom-up change; arguably, indeed, this is the key lesson from Greater Manchester. Read more: Together, this gives a set of principles by which to consider if a mayor, or strengthened city-region working in another form, would offer advantages in service of further city-region devolution. None of the above seeks to divert attention from other concerns, such as transitions to net zero, which have a particular regional imprint, or the prospects for our rural economies; simply, the governance futures for city-regions in Scotland warrants a concerted focus. There is a concern that our city-regions risk being somewhat stuck between differing UK Government and Scottish Government developments, with only piecemeal attempts at co-ordination between them. If the debates about Scottish city-regions fail to become anything more than a political football, the prospects for the Scottish economy will be diminished in turn. David Waite, School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow.

Jim Chalmers insists Labor can meet target of 1.2m new homes despite department warning
Jim Chalmers insists Labor can meet target of 1.2m new homes despite department warning

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Jim Chalmers insists Labor can meet target of 1.2m new homes despite department warning

Treasurer Jim Chalmers insists Labor is ambitious enough to meet its policy of building 1.2m new homes by 2030, despite his own department warning the federal government's goals will not be met. Calling housing shortages 'one of the defining challenges' facing the Australian economy, Chalmers downplayed advice from Treasury officials saying the current policy settings would not deliver the new homes and warning Labor would need to increase taxes to make the budget more sustainable. The comments were included in the incoming brief delivered to Chalmers after Labor's 3 May federal election victory, and accidentally made public in subheadings in a redacted version of the document released to the ABC under freedom of information rules. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Treasury officials asked the public broadcaster to delete the version released without full redactions. A less revealing version has been posted by the department online. Chalmers said the advice reflected what he and the housing minister, Clare O'Neil, had been saying since before the election. 'We will need more effort to reach that substantial, ambitious housing target,' he said. 'We're investing tens of billions of dollars. We're working well with the states and territories and local governments. We're engaging with the industry. We're trying to get the capital flowing. I've changed the tax arrangements for build to rent. 'But we'll need to do better, and we'll need to do more, and the advice just reflects that.' Economists and industry players have warned Labor will miss its goals. Deloitte Access Economics research released in October forecast Labor would deliver fewer than a million new homes by 2029 – at least 200,000 below its promised target. Separate Housing Industry Association research has found the target for 1.2m new homes within five years would require a 50% increase on 2024 construction levels. To meet its promise, Labor needs an average of 240,000 new homes need to be built each year. But Australia has only ever come close to that level twice, in 2016 and in 2021. In 2023, only 173,000 homes were completed. Before the election, Labor pledged $10bn to build 100,000 homes over eight years, set to be offered for sale to first home buyers, as well as an expansion of a scheme allowing first home buyers to purchase a home with just a 5% deposit. The government has changed tax settings in the build to rent sector and banned foreign buyers from purchasing homes in Australia for two years. Chalmers said he was 'relaxed' about the error that saw extra information from the brief publicly shared, but said he would not make the full unredacted document public. Incoming government briefs from across government departments are routinely released to journalists, but with sensitive advice from senior public servants kept secret. On tax, Chalmers said addressing the federal budget's structural deficit was a key priority for Labor and would be achieved through less spending, more savings from income derived from commodity prices and some higher taxes. 'We've already made it really clear that we will do more to make our economy more productive and more resilient, we have made it clear that we need to build on the progress we've made in repairing the budget so that we can make the budget even more sustainable.' He confirmed next month's productivity roundtable would be structured around the themes of resilience, productivity and sustainability.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store